提交 08a655be 编写于 作者: G Gonglei 提交者: Michael Tokarev

dump: Fix dump-guest-memory termination and use-after-close

dump_iterate() dumps blocks in a loop.  Eventually, get_next_block()
returns "no more".  We then call dump_completed().  But we neglect to
break the loop!  Broken in commit 4c7e251a.

Because of that, we dump the last block again.  This attempts to write
to s->fd, which fails if we're lucky.  The error makes dump_iterate()
return failure.  It's the only way it can ever return.

Theoretical: if we're not so lucky, something else has opened something
for writing and got the same fd.  dump_iterate() then keeps looping,
messing up the something else's output, until a write fails, or the
process mercifully terminates.

The obvious fix is to restore the return lost in commit 4c7e251a.  But
the root cause of the bug is needlessly opaque loop control.  Replace it
by a clean do ... while loop.

This makes the badly chosen return values of get_next_block() more
visible.  Cleaning that up is outside the scope of this bug fix.
Signed-off-by: NGonglei <arei.gonglei@huawei.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMichael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru>
上级 7d5a8435
......@@ -604,10 +604,9 @@ static void dump_iterate(DumpState *s, Error **errp)
{
GuestPhysBlock *block;
int64_t size;
int ret;
Error *local_err = NULL;
while (1) {
do {
block = s->next_block;
size = block->target_end - block->target_start;
......@@ -623,11 +622,9 @@ static void dump_iterate(DumpState *s, Error **errp)
return;
}
ret = get_next_block(s, block);
if (ret == 1) {
dump_completed(s);
}
}
} while (!get_next_block(s, block));
dump_completed(s);
}
static void create_vmcore(DumpState *s, Error **errp)
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册