提交 041088c7 编写于 作者: M Markus Armbruster 提交者: Andreas Färber

tests: Use proper functions types instead of void (*fn)

We have several function parameters declared as void (*fn).  This is
just a stupid way to write void *, and the only purpose writing it
like that could serve is obscuring the sin of bypassing the type
system without need.

The original sin is commit 49ee3590: its qtest_add_func() is a wrapper
for g_test_add_func().  Fix the parameter type to match
g_test_add_func()'s.  This uncovers type errors in ide-test.c; fix
them.

Commit 7949c0e3 faithfully repeated the sin for qtest_add_data_func().
Fix it the same way, along with a harmless type error uncovered in
vhost-user-test.c.

Commit 063c23d9 repeated it for qtest_add_abrt_handler().  The screwy
parameter gets assigned to GHook member func, so change its type to
match.  Requires wrapping kill_qemu() to keep the type checker happy.
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
[AF/armbru: Inline GTestFunc/GTestDataFunc typedef for old GLib]
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndreas Färber <afaerber@suse.de>
上级 70ae0b6d
......@@ -593,12 +593,12 @@ static void test_flush_nodev(void)
ide_test_quit();
}
static void test_pci_retry_flush(const char *machine)
static void test_pci_retry_flush(void)
{
test_retry_flush("pc");
}
static void test_isa_retry_flush(const char *machine)
static void test_isa_retry_flush(void)
{
test_retry_flush("isapc");
}
......
......@@ -110,6 +110,11 @@ static void kill_qemu(QTestState *s)
}
}
static void kill_qemu_hook_func(void *s)
{
kill_qemu(s);
}
static void sigabrt_handler(int signo)
{
g_hook_list_invoke(&abrt_hooks, FALSE);
......@@ -133,7 +138,7 @@ static void cleanup_sigabrt_handler(void)
sigaction(SIGABRT, &sigact_old, NULL);
}
void qtest_add_abrt_handler(void (*fn), const void *data)
void qtest_add_abrt_handler(GHookFunc fn, const void *data)
{
GHook *hook;
......@@ -170,7 +175,7 @@ QTestState *qtest_init(const char *extra_args)
sock = init_socket(socket_path);
qmpsock = init_socket(qmp_socket_path);
qtest_add_abrt_handler(kill_qemu, s);
qtest_add_abrt_handler(kill_qemu_hook_func, s);
s->qemu_pid = fork();
if (s->qemu_pid == 0) {
......@@ -755,14 +760,15 @@ void qtest_memread(QTestState *s, uint64_t addr, void *data, size_t size)
g_strfreev(args);
}
void qtest_add_func(const char *str, void (*fn))
void qtest_add_func(const char *str, void (*fn)(void))
{
gchar *path = g_strdup_printf("/%s/%s", qtest_get_arch(), str);
g_test_add_func(path, fn);
g_free(path);
}
void qtest_add_data_func(const char *str, const void *data, void (*fn))
void qtest_add_data_func(const char *str, const void *data,
void (*fn)(const void *))
{
gchar *path = g_strdup_printf("/%s/%s", qtest_get_arch(), str);
g_test_add_data_func(path, data, fn);
......
......@@ -416,7 +416,7 @@ const char *qtest_get_arch(void);
* The path is prefixed with the architecture under test, as
* returned by qtest_get_arch().
*/
void qtest_add_func(const char *str, void (*fn));
void qtest_add_func(const char *str, void (*fn)(void));
/**
* qtest_add_data_func:
......@@ -428,7 +428,8 @@ void qtest_add_func(const char *str, void (*fn));
* The path is prefixed with the architecture under test, as
* returned by qtest_get_arch().
*/
void qtest_add_data_func(const char *str, const void *data, void (*fn));
void qtest_add_data_func(const char *str, const void *data,
void (*fn)(const void *));
/**
* qtest_add:
......@@ -450,7 +451,7 @@ void qtest_add_data_func(const char *str, const void *data, void (*fn));
g_free(path); \
} while (0)
void qtest_add_abrt_handler(void (*fn), const void *data);
void qtest_add_abrt_handler(GHookFunc fn, const void *data);
/**
* qtest_start:
......
......@@ -173,8 +173,9 @@ static void wait_for_fds(TestServer *s)
g_mutex_unlock(&s->data_mutex);
}
static void read_guest_mem(TestServer *s)
static void read_guest_mem(const void *data)
{
TestServer *s = (void *)data;
uint32_t *guest_mem;
int i, j;
size_t size;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册