No backend was setting an error when ending the visit of a list or
implicit struct, or when moving to the next list node.  Make the
callers a bit easier to follow by making this a part of the contract,
and removing the errp argument - callers can then unconditionally end
an object as part of cleanup without having to think about whether a
second error is dominated by a first, because there is no second
error.

A later patch will then tackle the larger task of splitting
visit_end_struct(), which can indeed set an error.
Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
Message-Id: <1454075341-13658-24-git-send-email-eblake@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMarkus Armbruster <armbru@redhat.com>