This is required for virCPUBaseline to accept a list of guest CPU
definitions since they do not have arch set.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NCollin Walling <walling@linux.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>

The "preferred" parameter is not used by any caller of cpuDecode
anymore. It's only used internally in cpu_x86 to implement cpuBaseline.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>

All APIs which expect a list of CPU models supported by hypervisors were
switched from char **models and int models to just accept a pointer to
virDomainCapsCPUModels object stored in domain capabilities. This avoids
the need to transform virDomainCapsCPUModelsPtr into a NULL-terminated
list of model names and also allows the various cpu driver APIs to
access additional details (such as its usability) about each CPU model.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>

This new API may be used to check whether all features used in a CPU
definition are valid (e.g., libvirt knows their name, their policy is
supported, etc.). Leaving this API unimplemented in an arch subdriver
means libvirt does not restrict CPU features usable on the associated
architectures.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The implementation of virConnectBaselineCPU may be different for each
hypervisor. Thus it shouldn't really be implmented in the cpu code.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Sometimes we want to call virCPUGetHost only when it is implemented for
a given architecture to avoid logging expected and possibly misleading
errors. The new virCPUGetHostIsSupported API may be used to guard such
calls to virCPUGetHost.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

This new internal API makes a copy of virCPUDef while removing all
features which would block migration. It uses cpu_map.xml as a database
of such features, which should only be used as a fallback when we cannot
get the data from a hypervisor. The main goal of this API is to decouple
this filtering from virCPUUpdate so that the hypervisor driver can
filter the features according to the hypervisor.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The public API flags are handled by the cpuBaselineXML wrapper. The
internal cpuBaseline API only needs to know whether it is supposed to
drop non-migratable features.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Having to use cpuBaseline with VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_EXPAND_FEATURES
flag to expand CPU features is strange. Not to mention that cpuBaseline
can only expand host CPU definitions (i.e., it completely ignores
feature policies). The new virCPUExpandFeatures API is designed to work
with both host and guest CPU definitions.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>

Both QEMU and bhyve are using the same function for setting up the CPU
in virCapabilities, so de-duplicate it, save code and time, and help
other drivers adopt it.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>

Since the code checks and handles a NULL 'cpus' anyway, so no need
for the NONNULL.

When starting a domain with custom guest CPU specification QEMU may add
or remove some CPU features. There are several reasons for this, e.g.,
QEMU/KVM does not support some requested features or the definition of
the requested CPU model in libvirt's cpu_map.xml differs from the one
QEMU is using. We can't really avoid this because CPU models are allowed
to change with machine types and libvirt doesn't know (and probably
doesn't even want to know) about such changes.

Thus when we want to make sure guest ABI doesn't change when a domain
gets migrated to another host, we need to update our live CPU definition
according to the CPU QEMU created. Once updated, we will change CPU
checking to VIR_CPU_CHECK_FULL to make sure the virtual CPU created
after migration exactly matches the one on the source.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822148
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824989Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

When creating host CPU definition usable with a given emulator, the CPU
should not be defined using an unsupported CPU model. The new @models
and @nmodels parameters can be used to limit CPU models which can be
used in the result.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The parameter can be used to request either VIR_CPU_TYPE_HOST (which has
been assumed so far) or VIR_CPU_TYPE_GUEST definition.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

cpuNodeData has always been followed by cpuDecode as no hypervisor
driver is really interested in raw CPUID data for a host CPU. Let's
create a new CPU driver API which returns virCPUDefPtr directly.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The new API is called virCPUDataFree. Individual CPU drivers are no
longer required to implement their own freeing function unless they need
to free architecture specific data from virCPUData.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The API is not used anywhere in the code.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

PPC driver needs to convert POWERx_v* legacy CPU model names into POWERx
to maintain backward compatibility with existing domains. This patch
adds a new step into the guest CPU configuration work flow which CPU
drivers can use to convert legacy CPU definitions.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The API doesn't change the array so let's make it constant.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The new name is virCPUDataFormat.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The new name is virCPUDataParse.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The new name is virCPUModelIsAllowed.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The new name is virCPUGetModels.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Both cpuCompare* APIs are renamed to virCPUCompare*. And they should now
work for any guest CPU definition, i.e., even for host-passthrough
(trivial) and host-model CPUs. The implementation in x86 driver is
enhanced to provide a hint about -noTSX Broadwell and Haswell models
when appropriate.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The function is similar to virCPUDataCheckFeature, but it works directly
on CPU definition rather than requiring it to be transformed into CPU
data first.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The API is supposed to make sure the provided CPU definition does not
use a CPU model which is not supported by the hypervisor (if at all
possible, of course).
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The reworked API is now called virCPUUpdate and it should change the
provided CPU definition into a one which can be consumed by the QEMU
command line builder:

    - host-passthrough remains unchanged
    - host-model is turned into custom CPU with a model and features
      copied from host
    - custom CPU with minimum match is converted similarly to host-model
    - optional features are updated according to host's CPU
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Our internal APIs mostly use virArch rather than strings. Switching
cpuGetModels to virArch will save us from unnecessary conversions in the
future.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

virCPUData and struct ppc64_model structures contained a pointer to
virCPUppc64Data, which was not very nice since the real data were
accessible by yet another level of pointers from virCPUppc64Data.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

virCPUData, virCPUx86Feature, and virCPUx86Model all contained a pointer
to virCPUx86Data, which was not very nice since the real CPUID data were
accessible by yet another pointer from virCPUx86Data. Moreover, using
virCPUx86Data directly will make static definitions of internal CPU
features a bit easier.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

A CPU data XML file already contains the architecture, let the parser
use it to detect which CPU driver should be used to parse the rest of
the file.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Usage of this keyword in front of function declaration that is exported via a
header file is unnecessary, since internally, this has been the default for most
compilers for quite some time.
Signed-off-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>

Use a typedef instead of the plain struct and heap allocation. This
will make it easier to extend the ppc64 specific CPU data later on.

Only the symbols exported by the driver have been updated;
the driver implementation itself still uses the old names
internally.

No functional changes.

The driver only supports VIR_ARCH_PPC64 and VIR_ARCH_PPC64LE.

Just shuffling files around and updating the build system
accordingly. No functional changes.