- 01 12月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Kletzander 提交于
virAdmConnect was named after virConnect, but after some discussions, most of the APIs called will be working with remote daemon and starting them virAdmDaemon will make more sense. Only possibly controversal name is CloseCallback (de)registration, and connecting to the daemon (which will still be Open/Close), but even this makes sense if one thinks about the daemon being opened and closed, e.g. as file, etc. This way all the APIs working with the daemon will start with virAdmDaemon prefix, they will accept virAdmDaemonPtr as first parameter and that will better suit with other namings as well (virDomain*, virAdmServer*, etc.). Because in virt-admin, the connection name does not refer to a struct that would have a connect in its name, also adjust 'connname' in clients. And because it is not used anywhere in the vsh code, move it from there into each client. Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
-
- 30 11月, 2015 3 次提交
-
-
由 Erik Skultety 提交于
As we need a client disconnect handler, we also need a mechanism to register such handlers for a client. This patch introduced both the close callbacks and also the client vshAdmCatchDisconnect handler to be registered with it. By registering the handler we still need to make sure the client can react to daemon's events like disconnect or keepalive, so asynchronous I/O event polling is necessary to be enabled too.
-
由 Erik Skultety 提交于
As we plan to add more and more logic to remote connecting methods, these cannot be generated from admin_protocol.x anymore. Instead, this patch implements these to methods explicitly.
-
由 Erik Skultety 提交于
By moving the remote version into a separate module, we gain a slightly better maintainability in the long run than just by leaving it in one place with the existing libvirt-admin library which can start getting pretty messy later on.
-