Implemented in QEMU by commit 28b8e4d0bf93ba176b4b7be819d537383c5a9060.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

This was implemented in QEMU by commit 0bb0b2d2fe7f645dda.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

As a side effect this changes the order of CPU features in XMLs
generated by libvirt, but that's not a big deal since the order there is
insignificant.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

For two reasons:
- 0x00000001 is very similar to 0x80000001, but 0x01 is visually
  different
- 0x01 format is consistent with CPUID manual
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

This patch makes our CPUID handling code up-to-date with the current
specification found in

Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Developer's Manual: Vol. 2A
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/processors/architectures-software-developer-manuals.htmlSigned-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

CPUID instruction normally takes its parameter from EAX, but sometimes
ECX is used as an additional parameter. Let's rename 'function' to
'eax_in' in preparation for adding 'ecx_in'.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Corresponding QEMU commits:
    clflushopt f7fda280948a5e74aeb076ef346b991ecb173c56
    tsc_adjust 7b458bfd12a71b3da6b531daedc417492c9334e0
Signed-off-by: NAlexander Burluka <aburluka@virtuozzo.com>

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1254420Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

This is yet another variation of POWER8. The PVR information comes
from arch/powerpc/kernel/cputable.c in the Linux kernel tree.

Instead of relying on a hard-coded mask value, read it from the CPU
map XML and use it when looking up models by PVR.

Use multiple PVRs per CPU model to reduce the number of models we
need to keep track of.

Remove specific CPU models (eg. POWER7+_v2.1): the corresponding
generic CPU model (eg. POWER7) should be used instead to ensure
the guest can be booted on any compatible host.

Get rid of all the entries that did not match any of the CPU
models supported by QEMU, like power8 and power8e.

Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1250977

The information is not used anywhere in libvirt.

No functional changes.

Corresponding QEMU commits:
    MPX     79e9ebebbf2a00c46fcedb6dc7dd5e12bbd30216
    AVX512  9aecd6f8aef653cea58932f06a2740299dbe5fd3
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Inheritance among CPU model is cool but it makes reviewing CPU model
definitions and comparing them to CPU models from QEMU rather hard and
unpleasant. Let's define all CPU models from scratch.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Sorted feature list is easier to review or compare.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

QEMU 2.3 adds these new models to cover Haswell and Broadwell CPUs with
updated microcode. Luckily, they also reverted former the machine type
specific changes to existing models. And since these changes were never
released, we don't need to hack around them in libvirt.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

With this patch, Freescale ppc64 CPU modesl could be recognized.

virsh # cpu-models ppc64
POWERPC_e6500
POWERPC_e5500
power8
power8e
power7+
power7
power6
POWER8_v1.0
POWER7+_v2.1
POWER7_v2.3
POWER7_v2.1
POWER7

virsh # capabilities
<capabilities>
  <host>
    <uuid>5a54efa6-20dc-4da7-b271-0b7fb7062cb8</uuid>
    <cpu>
      <arch>ppc64</arch>
      <model>POWERPC_e6500</model>
      <vendor>Freescale</vendor>

IBM Power processors differ uniquely across generations (such as power6,
power7, power8). Each generation signifies a new PowerISA version
that exhibits features unique to that generation.
The higher 16 bits of PVR for IBM Power processors encode the CPU
generation, while the CPU chip (sub)version is encoded in lower 16 bits.

For all practical purposes of launching a VM, we care about the
generation which the vCPU will belong to, and not specifically the chip
version. This patch updates the libvirt PVR check to reflect this
relationship. It allows libvirt to select the right CPU generation
in case the exact match for a a specific CPU is not found.
Hence, there will no longer be a need to add each PowerPC CPU model to
cpu_map.xml; just adding entry for the matching ISA generation will
suffice.

It also contains changes to cpu_map.xml since processor generations
as understood by QEMU compat mode go as "power6", "power7" or "power8"
[Reference : QEMU commit 8dfa3a5e85 ]
Signed-off-by: NPrerna Saxena <prerna@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPradipta Kr. Banerjee <bpradip@in.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NAnton Blanchard <anton@samba.org>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>

Commit fba6bc47 introduced support for the 'invtsc' feature,
which blocks migration. We should not include it in the
host-model CPU by default, because it's intended to be used
with migration.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1138221

Add suport for invariant TSC flag (CPUID 0x80000007, bit 8 of EDX).
If this flag is enabled, the TSC ticks at a constant rate across
all ACPI P-, C- and T-states.

This can be enabled by adding:
<feature name='invtsc'/>
to the <cpu> element.

Migration and saving the domain does not work with this flag.

QEMU support: http://git.qemu.org/?p=qemu.git;a=commitdiff;h=303752a

The feature name "invtsc" differs from the name "" used by the linux kernel:
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/powerflags.c?id=30321c7b#n18