Signed-off-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>

Since commit 44e7f029
    util: rewrite auto cleanup macros to use glib's equivalent

VIR_AUTOFREE is just an alias for g_autofree. Use the GLib macros
directly instead of our custom aliases.
Signed-off-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>

Missing semicolon at the end of macros can confuse some analyzers
(like cppcheck <filename>). VIR_ONCE_GLOBAL_INIT is almost
exclusively called without an ending semicolon, but let's
standardize on using one like the other macros.

Add a dummy struct definition at the end of the macro, so
the compiler will require callers to add a semicolon.
Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NCole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>

Missing semicolon at the end of macros can confuse some analyzers
(like cppcheck <filename>), and we have a mix of semicolon and
non-semicolon usage through the code. Let's standardize on using
a semicolon for VIR_LOG_INIT calls.

Drop the semicolon from the final statement of the macro, so
the compiler will require callers to add a semicolon.
Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NCole Robinson <crobinso@redhat.com>

There seems to be no need to add the ignore_value wrapper or
caste with (void) to the unlink() calls, so let's just remove
them. I assume at one point in time Coverity complained. So,
let's just be consistent - those that care to check the return
status can and those that don't can just have the naked unlink.
Signed-off-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>

By making use of GNU C's cleanup attribute handled by the
VIR_AUTOFREE macro for declaring scalar variables, majority
of the VIR_FREE calls can be dropped, which in turn leads to
getting rid of most of our cleanup sections.
Signed-off-by: NSukrit Bhatnagar <skrtbhtngr@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NRamy Elkest <ramyelkest@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>

So far we are repeating the following lines over and over:

  if (!(virSomeObjectClass = virClassNew(virClassForObject(),
                             "virSomeObject",
                             sizeof(virSomeObject),
                             virSomeObjectDispose)))
      return -1;

While this works, it is impossible to do some checking. Firstly,
the class name (the 2nd argument) doesn't match the name in the
code in all cases (the 3rd argument). Secondly, the current style
is needlessly verbose. This commit turns example into following:

  if (!(VIR_CLASS_NEW(virSomeObject,
                      virClassForObject)))
      return -1;
Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>

Whenever we declare a new object the first member of the struct
has to be virObject (or any other member of that family). Now, up
until now we did not care about the name of the struct member.
But lets unify it so that we can do some checks at compile time
later.

The unified name is 'parent'.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>

The new virFileCache will nicely handle the caching logic for any data
that we would like to cache.  For each type of data we will just need
to implement few handlers that will take care of creating, validating,
loading and saving the cached data.

The cached data must be an instance of virObject.

Currently we cache QEMU capabilities which will start using
virFileCache.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>