If user or management application wants to create a guest,
it may be useful to know the cost of internode latencies
before the guest resources are pinned. For example:

<capabilities>

  <host>
    ...
    <topology>
      <cells num='2'>
        <cell id='0'>
          <memory unit='KiB'>4004132</memory>
          <distances>
            <sibling id='0' value='10'/>
            <sibling id='1' value='20'/>
          </distances>
          <cpus num='2'>
            <cpu id='0' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='0'/>
            <cpu id='2' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='2'/>
          </cpus>
        </cell>
        <cell id='1'>
          <memory unit='KiB'>4030064</memory>
          <distances>
            <sibling id='0' value='20'/>
            <sibling id='1' value='10'/>
          </distances>
          <cpus num='2'>
            <cpu id='1' socket_id='0' core_id='0' siblings='1'/>
            <cpu id='3' socket_id='0' core_id='2' siblings='3'/>
          </cpus>
        </cell>
      </cells>
    </topology>
    ...
  </host>
  ...
</capabilities>

We can see the distance from node1 to node0 is 20 and within nodes 10.
Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>

Coverity complains about cell_cpus being leaked on error
and valgrind shows 'caps' is leaked on success.

Introduced in eb64e875.

This test creates a Fake NUMA topology with non-sequential cell ids
to check if libvirt properly handles the same
Signed-off-by: NShivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NPradipta Kr. Banerjee <bpradip@in.ibm.com>