- 15 4月, 2019 6 次提交
-
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
We have occasionally failed to document certain categories of changes in the release notes, yet still left the corresponding sections in the file even though they were completely empty. Signed-off-by: NAndrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
In e17d1038 these functions were mistakenly moved into an #ifdef block, but remained used outside of it leaving the build broken for platforms where #ifdef evaluated to false. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
Model specific registers are a thing only on x86. Also, the /dev/cpu/0/msr path exists only on Linux and the fallback mechanism (asking KVM) exists on Linux and FreeBSD only. Therefore, move the function within #ifdef that checks all aforementioned constraints and provide a dummy stub for all other cases. This fixes the build on my arm box, mingw-* builds, etc. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Daniel Henrique Barboza 提交于
The NVIDIA V100 GPU has an onboard RAM that is mapped into the host memory and accessible as normal RAM via an NVLink2 bridge. When passed through in a guest, QEMU puts the NVIDIA RAM window in a non-contiguous area, above the PCI MMIO area that starts at 32TiB. This means that the NVIDIA RAM window starts at 64TiB and go all the way to 128TiB. This means that the guest might request a 64-bit window, for each PCI Host Bridge, that goes all the way to 128TiB. However, the NVIDIA RAM window isn't counted as regular RAM, thus this window is considered only for the allocation of the Translation and Control Entry (TCE). For more information about how NVLink2 support works in QEMU, refer to the accepted implementation [1]. This memory layout differs from the existing VFIO case, requiring its own formula. This patch changes the PPC64 code of @qemuDomainGetMemLockLimitBytes to: - detect if we have a NVLink2 bridge being passed through to the guest. This is done by using the @ppc64VFIODeviceIsNV2Bridge function added in the previous patch. The existence of the NVLink2 bridge in the guest means that we are dealing with the NVLink2 memory layout; - if an IBM NVLink2 bridge exists, passthroughLimit is calculated in a different way to account for the extra memory the TCE table can alloc. The 64TiB..128TiB window is more than enough to fit all possible GPUs, thus the memLimit is the same regardless of passing through 1 or multiple V100 GPUs. Further reading explaining the background [1] https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2019-03/msg03700.html [2] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-March/msg00660.html [3] https://www.redhat.com/archives/libvir-list/2019-April/msg00527.htmlSigned-off-by: NDaniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
-
由 Daniel Henrique Barboza 提交于
The NVLink2 support in QEMU implements the detection of NVLink2 capable devices by verifying the attributes of the VFIO mem region QEMU allocates for the NVIDIA GPUs. To properly allocate an adequate amount of memLock, Libvirt needs this information before a QEMU instance is even created, thus querying QEMU is not possible and opening a VFIO window is too much. An alternative is presented in this patch. Making the following assumptions: - if we want GPU RAM to be available in the guest, an NVLink2 bridge must be passed through; - an unknown PCI device can be classified as a NVLink2 bridge if its device tree node has 'ibm,gpu', 'ibm,nvlink', 'ibm,nvlink-speed' and 'memory-region'. This patch introduces a helper called @ppc64VFIODeviceIsNV2Bridge that checks the device tree node of a given PCI device and check if it meets the criteria to be a NVLink2 bridge. This new function will be used in a follow-up patch that, using the first assumption, will set up the rlimits of the guest accordingly. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Henrique Barboza <danielhb413@gmail.com>
-
- 14 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michal Privoznik 提交于
In 2878278c we've added new cpu model but we've forgot to distribute the XML file it comes in. Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
-
- 13 4月, 2019 32 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Kletzander 提交于
This does not cause a problem in usual scenarios thanks to us allowing CAP_DAC_OVERRIDE for the qemu process, however in some scenarios this might be an issue because the directory is created with mkdtemp(3) which explicitly creates that with 0700 permissions and qemu running as non-root cannot access that. The scenarios include: - Builds without CAPNG - Running libvirtd in certain container configurations [1] - and possibly others. [1] https://github.com/kubevirt/kubevirt/pull/2181#issuecomment-481840304Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The new virHostCPUGetMSR internal API will try to read the MSR from /dev/cpu/0/msr and if it is not possible (the device does not exist or libvirt is running unprivileged), it will fallback to asking KVM for the MSR using KVM_GET_MSRS ioctl. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The script just parses whatever cpu-gather.sh printed out. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
This patch adds an inline python code for reading MSR features. Since reading MSRs is a privileged operation, we have to read them from /dev/cpu/*/msr if it is readable (i.e., the script runs as root) or fallback to using KVM ioctl which can be done by any user that can start virtual machines. The python code is inlined rather than provided in a separate script because whenever there's an issue with proper detection of CPU features, we ask the reporter to run cpu-gather.sh script to give us all data we need to know about the host CPU. Asking them to run several scripts would likely result in one of them being ignored or forgotten. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The parseMapFeature for parsing features from CPU map XML can be easily generalized to support more feature types. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Let's make sure the current CPUID specific code is only applied to CPUID features. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
This will let us simplify the code since the dictionary keys will match attribute names in various XMLs. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
leaf["eax"] & eax > 0 check works correctly only if there's at most 1 bit set in eax. Luckily that's been always the case, but fixing this could save us from future surprises. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The function will have to deal with both CPUID and MSR features. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
We don't really need to parse CPU data from QEMU older than 2.9 (i.e., before query-cpu-model-expansion) at this point. But even if there's a need to do so, we can always use an older version of this script to do the conversion. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
They are static and we will need to call them a little bit closer to the beginning of the file. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The structure can only be used for CPUID data now. Adding a type indicator and moving the data into a union will let us store alternative data types. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The function now works on virCPUx86DataItem and it's called virCPUx86DataItemMatch. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The function is renamed as virCPUx86DataItemMatchMasked to reflect the change in parameter types. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The function now works on virCPUx86DataItem and it's renamed as virCPUx86DataItemAndBits. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The parameters changed from virCPUx86CPUID to virCPUx86DataItem and the function is now called virCPUx86DataItemClearBits. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The function is renamed as virCPUx86DataItemSetBits and it works on virCPUx86DataItem now. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
virCPUx86DataSorter already compares two virCPUx86DataItem structs. Let's add a tiny wrapper around it called virCPUx86DataCmp and use it instead of open coded comparisons. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The while loop just copied half of virCPUx86DataAddItem. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Renamed as virCPUx86VendorToData. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
It's called virCPUx86DataAdd now. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The new name is virCPUx86DataAddItem. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
It is called virCPUx86DataSorter since the function will work on any CPU data type. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
It is now called virCPUx86DataGet. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The function is now called virCPUx86DataNext to reflect its purpose: it is an iterator over CPU data (both CPUID and MSR in the near future). Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Although vendor string is always reported by CPUID, the container struct is used for consistency and thus "cpuid" name is not a good fit anymore. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The following patches introduce CPU features read from MSR in addition to those queried via CPUID instruction. Let's introduce a container struct which will be able to describe either feature type. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Introduced in QEMU 3.1.0 by commit c7a88b52f62b30c04158eeb07f73e3f72221b6a8 Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
- 12 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
Vim has trouble figuring out the filetype automatically because the name doesn't follow existing conventions; annotations like the ones we already have in Makefile.ci help it out. Signed-off-by: NAndrea Bolognani <abologna@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
-