Validate that the virNetServer(Client) RPC APIs are processing the
private data callbacks correctly by passing in non-NULL pointers.
Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>

Enable testing for 'auth_pending' in the virnetdaemon test case.
Signed-off-by: NMarc Hartmayer <mhartmay@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NBoris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>

Admin API needs a way of addressing specific clients. Unlike servers, which we
are happy to address by names both because its name reflects its purpose (to
some extent) and we only have two of them (so far), naming clients doesn't make
any sense, since a) each client is an anonymous, i.e. not recognized after a
disconnect followed by a reconnect, b) we can't predict what kind of requests
it's going to send to daemon, and c) the are loads of them comming and going,
so the only viable option is to use an ID which is of a reasonably wide data
type.
Signed-off-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>

Since the daemon can manage and add (at fresh start) multiple servers,
we also should be able to add them from a JSON state file in case of a
daemon restart, so post exec restart support for multiple servers is also
provided. Patch also updates virnetdaemontest accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>

Since its introduction in 2011 (particularly in commit f4324e32),
the option doesn't work.  It just effectively disables all incoming
connections.  That's because the client private data that contain the
'keepalive_supported' boolean, are initialized to zeroes so the bool is
false and the only other place where the bool is used is when checking
whether the client supports keepalive.  Thus, according to the server,
no client supports keepalive.

Removing this instead of fixing it is better because a) apparently
nobody ever tried it since 2011 (4 years without one month) and b) we
cannot know whether the client supports keepalive until we get a ping or
pong keepalive packet.  And that won't happen until after we dispatched
the ConnectOpen call.

Another two reasons would be c) the keepalive_required was tracked on
the server level, but keepalive_supported was in private data of the
client as well as the check that was made in the remote layer, thus
making all other instances of virNetServer miss this feature unless they
all implemented it for themselves and d) we can always add it back in
case there is a request and a use-case for it.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>

Rename the test to virnetdaemontest and use virNetDaemon objects instead
of virNetServer inside.
Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>