- 28 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJán Tomko <jtomko@redhat.com>
-
- 16 10月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The "preferred" parameter is not used by any caller of cpuDecode anymore. It's only used internally in cpu_x86 to implement cpuBaseline. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
All APIs which expect a list of CPU models supported by hypervisors were switched from char **models and int models to just accept a pointer to virDomainCapsCPUModels object stored in domain capabilities. This avoids the need to transform virDomainCapsCPUModelsPtr into a NULL-terminated list of model names and also allows the various cpu driver APIs to access additional details (such as its usability) about each CPU model. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com> Reviewed-by: NJohn Ferlan <jferlan@redhat.com>
-
- 18 9月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
This new API may be used to check whether all features used in a CPU definition are valid (e.g., libvirt knows their name, their policy is supported, etc.). Leaving this API unimplemented in an arch subdriver means libvirt does not restrict CPU features usable on the associated architectures. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The implementation of virConnectBaselineCPU may be different for each hypervisor. Thus it shouldn't really be implmented in the cpu code. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 19 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Sometimes we want to call virCPUGetHost only when it is implemented for a given architecture to avoid logging expected and possibly misleading errors. The new virCPUGetHostIsSupported API may be used to guard such calls to virCPUGetHost. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 07 4月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
This new internal API makes a copy of virCPUDef while removing all features which would block migration. It uses cpu_map.xml as a database of such features, which should only be used as a fallback when we cannot get the data from a hypervisor. The main goal of this API is to decouple this filtering from virCPUUpdate so that the hypervisor driver can filter the features according to the hypervisor. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 27 3月, 2017 5 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The public API flags are handled by the cpuBaselineXML wrapper. The internal cpuBaseline API only needs to know whether it is supposed to drop non-migratable features. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Having to use cpuBaseline with VIR_CONNECT_BASELINE_CPU_EXPAND_FEATURES flag to expand CPU features is strange. Not to mention that cpuBaseline can only expand host CPU definitions (i.e., it completely ignores feature policies). The new virCPUExpandFeatures API is designed to work with both host and guest CPU definitions. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Martin Kletzander 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
-
由 Martin Kletzander 提交于
Both QEMU and bhyve are using the same function for setting up the CPU in virCapabilities, so de-duplicate it, save code and time, and help other drivers adopt it. Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
-
- 23 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 John Ferlan 提交于
Since the code checks and handles a NULL 'cpus' anyway, so no need for the NONNULL.
-
- 17 3月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
When starting a domain with custom guest CPU specification QEMU may add or remove some CPU features. There are several reasons for this, e.g., QEMU/KVM does not support some requested features or the definition of the requested CPU model in libvirt's cpu_map.xml differs from the one QEMU is using. We can't really avoid this because CPU models are allowed to change with machine types and libvirt doesn't know (and probably doesn't even want to know) about such changes. Thus when we want to make sure guest ABI doesn't change when a domain gets migrated to another host, we need to update our live CPU definition according to the CPU QEMU created. Once updated, we will change CPU checking to VIR_CPU_CHECK_FULL to make sure the virtual CPU created after migration exactly matches the one on the source. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822148 https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=824989Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 14 3月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
When creating host CPU definition usable with a given emulator, the CPU should not be defined using an unsupported CPU model. The new @models and @nmodels parameters can be used to limit CPU models which can be used in the result. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The parameter can be used to request either VIR_CPU_TYPE_HOST (which has been assumed so far) or VIR_CPU_TYPE_GUEST definition. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
cpuNodeData has always been followed by cpuDecode as no hypervisor driver is really interested in raw CPUID data for a host CPU. Let's create a new CPU driver API which returns virCPUDefPtr directly. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 24 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The new API is called virCPUDataFree. Individual CPU drivers are no longer required to implement their own freeing function unless they need to free architecture specific data from virCPUData. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 22 2月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2016 7 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The API is not used anywhere in the code. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
PPC driver needs to convert POWERx_v* legacy CPU model names into POWERx to maintain backward compatibility with existing domains. This patch adds a new step into the guest CPU configuration work flow which CPU drivers can use to convert legacy CPU definitions. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The API doesn't change the array so let's make it constant. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The new name is virCPUDataFormat. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The new name is virCPUDataParse. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The new name is virCPUModelIsAllowed. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The new name is virCPUGetModels. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 22 9月, 2016 6 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Both cpuCompare* APIs are renamed to virCPUCompare*. And they should now work for any guest CPU definition, i.e., even for host-passthrough (trivial) and host-model CPUs. The implementation in x86 driver is enhanced to provide a hint about -noTSX Broadwell and Haswell models when appropriate. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The function is similar to virCPUDataCheckFeature, but it works directly on CPU definition rather than requiring it to be transformed into CPU data first. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The API is supposed to make sure the provided CPU definition does not use a CPU model which is not supported by the hypervisor (if at all possible, of course). Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
The reworked API is now called virCPUUpdate and it should change the provided CPU definition into a one which can be consumed by the QEMU command line builder: - host-passthrough remains unchanged - host-model is turned into custom CPU with a model and features copied from host - custom CPU with minimum match is converted similarly to host-model - optional features are updated according to host's CPU Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
Our internal APIs mostly use virArch rather than strings. Switching cpuGetModels to virArch will save us from unnecessary conversions in the future. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 09 6月, 2016 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
virCPUData and struct ppc64_model structures contained a pointer to virCPUppc64Data, which was not very nice since the real data were accessible by yet another level of pointers from virCPUppc64Data. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
virCPUData, virCPUx86Feature, and virCPUx86Model all contained a pointer to virCPUx86Data, which was not very nice since the real CPUID data were accessible by yet another pointer from virCPUx86Data. Moreover, using virCPUx86Data directly will make static definitions of internal CPU features a bit easier. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
由 Jiri Denemark 提交于
A CPU data XML file already contains the architecture, let the parser use it to detect which CPU driver should be used to parse the rest of the file. Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>
-
- 11 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Erik Skultety 提交于
Usage of this keyword in front of function declaration that is exported via a header file is unnecessary, since internally, this has been the default for most compilers for quite some time. Signed-off-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>
-
- 11 8月, 2015 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
Use a typedef instead of the plain struct and heap allocation. This will make it easier to extend the ppc64 specific CPU data later on.
-
- 05 8月, 2015 2 次提交
-
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
Only the symbols exported by the driver have been updated; the driver implementation itself still uses the old names internally. No functional changes.
-
由 Andrea Bolognani 提交于
The driver only supports VIR_ARCH_PPC64 and VIR_ARCH_PPC64LE. Just shuffling files around and updating the build system accordingly. No functional changes.
-
- 03 12月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Hansel 提交于
For Intel and PowerPC the implementation is calling a cpu driver function across driver layers (i.e. from qemu driver directly to cpu driver). The correct behavior is to use libvirt API functionality to perform such a inter-driver call. This patch introduces a new cpu driver API function getModels() to retrieve the cpu models. The currect implementation to process the cpu_map XML content is transferred to the INTEL and PowerPC cpu driver specific API functions. Additionally processing the cpu_map XML file is not safe due to the fact that the cpu map does not exist for all architectures. Therefore it is better to encapsulate the processing in the architecture specific cpu drivers. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Hansel <daniel.hansel@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NBoris Fiuczynski <fiuczy@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Reviewed-by: NViktor Mihajlovski <mihajlov@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
-