- 11 1月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
Since we don't actually reserve an entire slot at a time anymore, the name of this function is just confusing, and it's almost identical in operation to virDomainPCIAddressReserveNextAddr() anyway, so remove the *Slot() function and replace calls to it with calls to *Addr(..., -1).
-
- 29 8月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roman Bogorodskiy 提交于
As bhyve currently doesn't use controller addressing and simply uses 1 implicit controller for 1 disk device, the scheme looks the following: pci addrees -> (implicit controller) -> disk device So in fact we identify disk devices by pci address of implicit controller and just pass it this way to bhyve in a form: -s pci_addr,ahci-(cd|hd),/path/to/disk Therefore, we cannot use virDeviceInfoPCIAddressWanted() because it does not expect that disk devices might need PCI address assignment. As a result, if a disk was specified without address, it will not be generated and domain will to start. Until proper controller addressing is implemented in the bhyve driver, force each disk to have PCI address generated if it was not specified by user.
-
- 21 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
Rather than only assigning a PCI address when no address is given at all, also do it when the config says that the address type is 'pci', but it gives no address.
-
- 02 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin Kletzander 提交于
We had both and the only difference was that the latter also included information about multifunction setting. The problem with that was that we couldn't use functions made for only one of the structs (e.g. parsing). To consolidate those two structs, use the one in virpci.h, include that in domain_conf.h and add the multifunction member in it. Signed-off-by: NMartin Kletzander <mkletzan@redhat.com>
-
- 15 4月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Laine Stump 提交于
The flags used to determine which devices could be plugged into which controllers were quite confusing, as they tried to create classes of connections, then put particular devices into possibly multiple classes, while sometimes setting multiple flags for the controllers themselves. The attempt to have a single flag indicate, e.g. that a root-port or a switch-downstream-port could connect was not only confusing, it was leading to a situation where it would be impossible to specify exactly the right combinations for a new controller. The solution is for the VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_* flags to have a 1:1 correspondence with each type of PCI controller, plus a flag for a PCI endpoint device and another for a PCIe endpoint device (the only exception to this is that pci-bridge and pcie-expander-bus controllers have their upstream connection classified as VIR_PCI_CONNECT_TYPE_PCI_DEVICE since they can be plugged into *exactly* the same ports as any endpoint device). Each device then has a single flag for connect type (plus the HOTPLUG flag if that device can e hotplugged), and each controller sets the CONNECT bits for all controllers that can be plugged into it, as well as for either type of endpoint device that can be plugged in (and the HOTPLUG flag if it can accept hotplugged devices). With this change, it is *slightly* easier to understand the matching of connections (as long as you remember that the flag for a device/upstream-facing connection of a controller is the same as that device's type, while the flags for a controller's downstream connections is the OR of all device types that can be plugged into that controller). More importantly, it will be possible to correctly specify what can be plugged into a pcie-switch-expander-bus, when support for it is added.
-
- 13 11月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Conrad Meyer 提交于
-
- 13 6月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Roman Bogorodskiy 提交于
Automatically allocate PCI addresses for devices instead of hardcoding them in the driver code. The current allocation schema is to dedicate an entire slot for each devices. Also, allow having arbitrary number of devices.
-