Found by running valgrind for these tests.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>
(cherry picked from commit 9005a64b)

 * Extract filling bhyve capabilities from virBhyveDomainCapsBuild()
   into a new function virBhyveDomainCapsFill() to make testing
   easier by not having to mock firmware directory listing and
   hypervisor capabilities probing
 * Also, just presence of the firmware files is not sufficient
   to enable os.loader.supported, hypervisor should support UEFI
   boot too
 * Add tests to domaincapstest for the main caps possible flows:
    - when UEFI bootrom is supported
    - when video (fbus) is supported
    - neither of above is supported

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

One of the main reasons for introducing host-model CPU definition in a
domain capabilities XML was the inability to express disabled features
in a host capabilities XML. That is, when a host CPU is, e.g., Haswell
without x2apic support, host capabilities XML will have to report it as
Westmere + a bunch of additional features., but we really want to use
Haswell - x2apic when creating a host-model CPU.

Unfortunately, I somehow forgot to do the last step and the code would
just copy the CPU definition found in the host capabilities XML. This
changed recently for new QEMU versions which allow us to query host CPU,
but any slightly older QEMU will not benefit from any change I did. This
patch makes sure the right CPU model is filled in the domain
capabilities even with old QEMU.

The issue was reported in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1426456Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Tests domain capabilities on s390x using the Qemu 2.8 capabilities data.
Signed-off-by: NCollin L. Walling <walling@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: NJason J. Herne <jjherne@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

CPU models (and especially some additional details which we will start
probing for later) differ depending on the accelerator. Thus we need to
call query-cpu-definitions in both KVM and TCG mode to get all data we
want.

Tests in tests/domaincapstest.c are temporarily switched to TCG to avoid
having to squash even more stuff into this single patch. They will all
be switched back later in separate commits.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The domain capabilities XML is capable of showing whether each guest CPU
mode is supported or not with a possibility to provide additional
details. This patch enhances host-model capability to advertise the
exact CPU model which will be used as a host-model:

    <cpu>
        ...
        <mode name='host-model' supported='yes'>
            <model fallback='allow'>Broadwell</model>
            <vendor>Intel</vendor>
            <feature policy='disable' name='aes'/>
            <feature policy='require' name='vmx'/>
        </mode>
        ...
    </cpu>
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Host capabilities provide libvirt's view of the host CPU, but for a
useful support for host-model CPUs we really need a hypervisor's view of
the CPU. And since the view can be differ with emulator, qemu
capabilities is the best place to store the host CPU model.

This patch just copies the CPU model from host capabilities, but this
will change in the future.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

In case a hypervisor is able to tell us a list of supported CPU models
and whether each CPU models can be used on the current host, we can
propagate this to domain capabilities. This is a better alternative
to calling virConnectCompareCPU for each supported CPU model.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The patch adds <cpu> element to domain capabilities XML:

    <cpu>
        <mode name='host-passthrough' supported='yes'/>
        <mode name='host-model' supported='yes'/>
        <mode name='custom' supported='yes'>
            <model>Broadwell</model>
            <model>Broadwell-noTSX</model>
            ...
        </mode>
    </cpu>

Applications can use it to inspect what CPU configuration modes are
supported for a specific combination of domain type, emulator binary,
guest architecture and machine type.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

virttype is already included in domCaps, no need to pass it separately.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

virQEMUCapsFillDomainCaps would use virHostCPUGetKVMMaxVCPUs for KVM
domains.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The qemu limit and host limit both should be considered for
the domain vcpu max limits.
Signed-off-by: NShivaprasad G Bhat <sbhat@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Commit 2a58ed0b added support for creating guests with USB
hostdevs. Commit fc21d106 later added support for hotplut of
USB hostdevs. Advertise support for USB hostdevs in the
domcapabilities.

In addition add the appropriate caps for USB support on
domaincapstest when libvirt is built on a Xen with
LIBXL_HAVE_PVUSB. Otherwise domaincapstest would fail i.e.
testing the wrong domain capabilities.
Signed-off-by: NJim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJoao Martins <joao.m.martins@oracle.com>

Add domain capabilities for PV and HVM domains.
Signed-off-by: NJim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>

The virQEMUDriverConfig object contains lists of
loader:nvram pairs to advertise firmwares supported by
by the driver, and qemu_conf.c contains code to populate
the lists, all of which is useful for other drivers too.

To avoid code duplication, introduce a virFirmware object
to encapsulate firmware details and switch the qemu driver
to use it.
Signed-off-by: NJim Fehlig <jfehlig@suse.com>

This function doesn't follow our convention of naming functions.

This function doesn't follow our convention of naming functions.

The qemu-1.6.50 is a beta before the new minor version, let's replace it with
the release qemu-1.7.0.
Signed-off-by: NPavel Hrdina <phrdina@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

They are shorter and most of the code requires the strings anyway.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Requires adding the plumbing for <device><video>
The value is <enum name='modelType'> to match the associated domain
XML of <video><model type='XXX'/>

Wire it up for qemu too

Requires adding the plumbing for <device><graphics>
Wire it up for qemu too

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The test was just a big mess passing callbacks and their data through
data for another callback.
Signed-off-by: NJiri Denemark <jdenemar@redhat.com>

The struct contains a single boolean field, 'supported':
the meaning of this field is too generic to be limited to
devices only, and in fact it's already being used for
other things like loaders and OSs.

Instead of trying to come up with a more generic name just
get rid of the struct altogether.

Signed-off-by: NZhang Bo <oscar.zhangbo@huawei.com>

Replaces a common pattern used in many test files