1. 06 8月, 2019 13 次提交
  2. 31 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  3. 30 7月, 2019 4 次提交
  4. 29 7月, 2019 13 次提交
  5. 28 7月, 2019 1 次提交
  6. 27 7月, 2019 8 次提交
    • S
      tpm: Run swtpm_setup with less parameters on incoming migration · 72299db6
      Stefan Berger 提交于
      In case of an incoming migration we do not need to run swtpm_setup
      with all the parameters but only want to get the benefit of it
      creating a TPM state file for us that we can then label with an
      SELinux label. The actual state will be overwritten by the in-
      coming state. So we have to pass an indicator for incomingMigration
      all the way to the command line parameter generation for swtpm_setup.
      Signed-off-by: NStefan Berger <stefanb@linux.ibm.com>
      Reviewed-by: NMarc-André Lureau <marcandre.lureau@redhat.com>
      72299db6
    • E
      backup: test: Implement metadata tracking for checkpoint APIs · a0efa678
      Eric Blake 提交于
      A lot of this work heavily copies from the existing snapshot APIs.
      The test driver doesn't really have to do anything more than just
      expose an interface into libvirt metadata, making it possible to test
      saving and restoring XML, and tracking relations between multiple
      checkpoints.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
      a0efa678
    • E
      backup: Implement checkpoint APIs for remote driver · cfe09209
      Eric Blake 提交于
      The remote code generator had to be taught about the new
      virDomainCheckpointPtr type, at which point the remote driver code for
      checkpoints can be generated.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
      cfe09209
    • E
      backup: Add new domain:checkpoint access control · 4f0438ef
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Creating a checkpoint does not modify guest-visible state,
      but does modify host resources.  Rather than reuse existing
      domain:write, domain:block_write, or domain:snapshot access
      controls, it seems better to introduce a new access control
      specific to tasks related to checkpoints and incremental
      backups of guest disk state.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
      4f0438ef
    • E
      backup: Add list of checkpoints to domain · b736619f
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Wire up the use of a checkpoint list into each domain, similar to the
      existing snapshot list.  This includes adding a function for checking
      that a redefine operation fits in with the existing list, as well as
      various filtering capabilities over the list contents.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
      b736619f
    • E
      backup: Allow for lists of checkpoint objects · 2795d856
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Create a new file for managing a list of checkpoint objects, borrowing
      heavily from existing virDomainSnapshotObjList paradigms.
      
      Note that while snapshots definitely have a use case for multiple
      children to a single parent (create a base snapshot, create a child
      snapshot, revert to the base, then create another child snapshot),
      it's harder to predict how checkpoints will play out with reverting to
      prior points in time. Thus, in initial use, given a list of
      checkpoints, you never have more than one child, and we can treat the
      most-recent leaf node as the parent of the next node creation, without
      having to expose a notion of a current node in XML or public API.
      However, as the snapshot machinery is already generic, it is easier to
      reuse the generic machinery that tracks relations between domain
      moments than it is to open-code a new list-management scheme just for
      checkpoints (hence, we still have internal functions related to a
      current checkpoint, even though that has no observable effect
      externally, as well as the addition of a function to easily find the
      lone leaf in the list to use as the current checkpoint).
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
      2795d856
    • E
      backup: Parse and output checkpoint XML · 1a4df34a
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Add a new file checkpoint_conf.c that performs the translation to and
      from new XML describing a checkpoint. The code shares a common base
      class with snapshots, since a checkpoint similarly represents the
      domain state at a moment in time. Add some basic testing of round trip
      XML handling through the new code.
      
      Of note - this code intentionally differs from snapshots in that XML
      schema validation is unconditional, rather than based on a public API
      flag.  We have many existing interfaces that still need to add a flag
      for opt-in schema validation, but those interfaces have existing
      clients that may not have been producing strictly-compliant XML, or we
      may still uncover bugs where our RNG grammar is inconsistent with our
      code (where omitting the opt-in flag allows existing apps to keep
      working while waiting for an RNG patch).  But since checkpoints are
      brand-new, it's easier to ensure the code matches the schema by always
      using the schema.  If needed, a later patch could extend the API and
      add a flag to turn on to request schema validation, rather than having
      it forced (possibly just the validation of the <domain> sub-element
      during REDEFINE) - but if a user encounters XML that looks like it
      should be good but fails to validate with our RNG schema, they would
      either have to upgrade to a new libvirt that adds the new flag, or
      upgrade to a new libvirt that fixes the RNG schema, which implies
      adding such a flag won't help much.
      
      Also, the redefine flag requires the <domain> sub-element to be
      present, rather than catering to historical back-compat to older
      versions.
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      1a4df34a
    • E
      backup: Introduce virDomainCheckpoint APIs · 0d44788f
      Eric Blake 提交于
      Introduce a bunch of new public APIs related to backup checkpoints.
      Checkpoints are modeled heavily after virDomainSnapshotPtr (both
      represent a point in time of the guest), although a snapshot exists
      with the intent of rolling back to that state, while a checkpoint
      exists to make it possible to create an incremental backup at a later
      time.  We may have a future hypervisor that can completely manage
      checkpoints without libvirt metadata, but the first two planned
      hypervisors (qemu and test) both always use libvirt for tracking
      metadata relations between checkpoints, so for now, I've deferred
      the counterpart of virDomainSnapshotHasMetadata for a separate
      API addition at a later date if there is ever a need for it.
      
      Note that until we allow snapshots and checkpoints to exist
      simultaneously on the same domain (although the actual prevention of
      this will be in a separate patch for the sake of an easier revert down
      the road), that it is not possible to branch out to create more than
      one checkpoint child to a given parent, although it may become
      possible later when we revert to a snapshot that coincides with a
      checkpoint.  This also means that for now, the decision of which
      checkpoint becomes the parent of a newly created one is the only
      checkpoint with no child (so while there are APIs for dealing with a
      current snapshot, we do not need those for checkpoints).  We may end
      up exposing a notion of a current checkpoint later, but it's easier to
      add stuff when proven needed than to blindly support it now and wish
      we hadn't exposed it.
      
      The following map shows the API relations to snapshots, with new APIs
      on the right:
      
      Operate on a domain object to create/redefine a child:
      virDomainSnapshotCreateXML          virDomainCheckpointCreateXML
      
      Operate on a child object for lifetime management:
      virDomainSnapshotDelete             virDomainCheckpointDelete
      virDomainSnapshotFree               virDomainCheckpointFree
      virDomainSnapshotRef                virDomainCheckpointRef
      
      Operate on a child object to learn more about it:
      virDomainSnapshotGetXMLDesc         virDomainCheckpointGetXMLDesc
      virDomainSnapshotGetConnect         virDomainCheckpointGetConnect
      virDomainSnapshotGetDomain          virDomainCheckpointGetDomain
      virDomainSnapshotGetName            virDomainCheckpiontGetName
      virDomainSnapshotGetParent          virDomainCheckpiontGetParent
      virDomainSnapshotHasMetadata        (deferred for later)
      virDomainSnapshotIsCurrent          (no counterpart, see note above)
      
      Operate on a domain object to list all children:
      virDomainSnapshotNum                (no counterparts, these are the old
      virDomainSnapshotListNames           racy interfaces)
      virDomainSnapshotListAllSnapshots   virDomainListAllCheckpoints
      
      Operate on a child object to list descendents:
      virDomainSnapshotNumChildren        (no counterparts, these are the old
      virDomainSnapshotListChildrenNames   racy interfaces)
      virDomainSnapshotListAllChildren    virDomainCheckpointListAllChildren
      
      Operate on a domain to locate a particular child:
      virDomainSnapshotLookupByName       virDomainCheckpointLookupByName
      virDomainSnapshotCurrent            (no counterpart, see note above)
      virDomainHasCurrentSnapshot         (no counterpart, old racy interface)
      
      Operate on a snapshot to roll back to earlier state:
      virDomainSnapshotRevert             (no counterpart, instead checkpoints
                                           are used in incremental backups via
      				     XML to virDomainBackupBegin)
      Signed-off-by: NEric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
      0d44788f