Skip to content

L
libvirt

openeuler / libvirt

通知 3
Star 0
Fork 0
L
libvirt

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

提交 d3ad38e2 编写于 作者: D Daniel P. Berrangé
浏览文件
操作

docs: convert kbase/domainstatecapture.html.in to RST 

This is a semi-automated conversion. The first conversion is done using
"pandoc -f html -t rst". The result is then editted manually to apply
the desired heading markup, and fix a few things that pandoc gets wrong.
Reviewed-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
上级 fc721b08
隐藏空白更改
内联 并排
Showing with 255 addition and 303 deletion
docs/kbase/domainstatecapture.html.in 已删除 100644 → 0
浏览文件 @ fc721b08
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<!DOCTYPE html>
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<body>
<h1>Domain state capture using Libvirt</h1>
<ul id="toc"></ul>
<p>
In order to aid application developers to choose which
operations best suit their needs, this page compares the
different means for capturing state related to a domain managed
by libvirt.
</p>
<p>
The information here is primarily geared towards capturing the
state of an active domain. Capturing the state of an inactive
domain essentially amounts to copying the contents of guest
disks, followed by a fresh boot of the same domain configuration
with disks restored back to that saved state.
</p>
<h2><a id="definitions">State capture trade-offs</a></h2>
<p>One of the features made possible with virtual machines is live
migration -- transferring all state related to the guest from
one host to another with minimal interruption to the guest's
activity. In this case, state includes domain memory (including
register and device contents), and domain storage (whether the
guest's view of the disks are backed by local storage on the
host, or by the hypervisor accessing shared storage over a
network). A clever observer will then note that if all state is
available for live migration, then there is nothing stopping a
user from saving some or all of that state at a given point of
time in order to be able to later rewind guest execution back to
the state it previously had. The astute reader will also realize
that state capture at any level requires that the data must be
stored and managed by some mechanism. This processing might fit
in a single file, or more likely require a chain of related
files, and may require synchronization with third-party tools
built around managing the amount of data resulting from
capturing the state of multiple guests that each use multiple
disks.
</p>
<p>
There are several libvirt APIs associated with capturing the
state of a guest, which can later be used to rewind that guest
to the conditions it was in earlier. The following is a list of
trade-offs and differences between the various facets that
affect capturing domain state for active domains:
</p>
<dl>
<dt>Duration</dt>
<dd>Capturing state can be a lengthy process, so while the
captured state ideally represents an atomic point in time
corresponding to something the guest was actually executing,
capturing state tends to focus on minimizing guest downtime
while performing the rest of the state capture in parallel
with guest execution. Some interfaces require up-front
preparation (the state captured is not complete until the API
ends, which may be some time after the command was first
started), while other interfaces track the state when the
command was first issued, regardless of the time spent in
capturing the rest of the state. Also, time spent in state
capture may be longer than the time required for live
migration, when state must be duplicated rather than shared.
</dd>
<dt>Amount of state</dt>
<dd>For an online guest, there is a choice between capturing the
guest's memory (all that is needed during live migration when
the storage is already shared between source and destination),
the guest's disk state (all that is needed if there are no
pending guest I/O transactions that would be lost without the
corresponding memory state), or both together. Reverting to
partial state may still be viable, but typically, booting from
captured disk state without corresponding memory is comparable
to rebooting a machine that had power cut before I/O could be
flushed. Guests may need to use proper journaling methods to
avoid problems when booting from partial state.
</dd>
<dt>Quiescing of data</dt>
<dd>Even if a guest has no pending I/O, capturing disk state may
catch the guest at a time when the contents of the disk are
inconsistent. Cooperating with the guest to perform data
quiescing is an optional step to ensure that captured disk
state is fully consistent without requiring additional memory
state, rather than just crash-consistent. But guest
cooperation may also have time constraints, where the guest
can rightfully panic if there is too much downtime while I/O
is frozen.
</dd>
<dt>Quantity of files</dt>
<dd>When capturing state, some approaches store all state within
the same file (internal), while others expand a chain of
related files that must be used together (external), for more
files that a management application must track.
</dd>
<dt>Impact to guest definition</dt>
<dd>Capturing state may require temporary changes to the guest
definition, such as associating new files into the domain
definition. While state capture should never impact the
running guest, a change to the domain's active XML may have
impact on other host operations being performed on the domain.
</dd>
<dt>Third-party integration</dt>
<dd>When capturing state, there are tradeoffs to how much of the
process must be done directly by the hypervisor, and how much
can be off-loaded to third-party software. Since capturing
state is not instantaneous, it is essential that any
third-party integration see consistent data even if the
running guest continues to modify that data after the point in
time of the capture.</dd>
<dt>Full vs. incremental</dt>
<dd>When periodically repeating the action of state capture, it
is useful to minimize the amount of state that must be
captured by exploiting the relation to a previous capture,
such as focusing only on the portions of the disk that the
guest has modified in the meantime. Some approaches are able
to take advantage of checkpoints to provide an incremental
backup, while others are only capable of a full backup even if
that means re-capturing unchanged portions of the disk.</dd>
<dt>Local vs. remote</dt>
<dd>Domains that completely use remote storage may only need
some mechanism to keep track of guest memory state while using
external means to manage storage. Still, hypervisor and guest
cooperation to ensure points in time when no I/O is in flight
across the network can be important for properly capturing
disk state.</dd>
<dt>Network latency</dt>
<dd>Whether it's domain storage or saving domain state into
remote storage, network latency has an impact on snapshot
data. Having dedicated network capacity, bandwidth, or quality
of service levels may play a role, as well as planning for how
much of the backup process needs to be local.</dd>
</dl>
<p>
An example of the various facets in action is migration of a
running guest. In order for the guest to be able to resume on
the destination at the same place it left off at the source, the
hypervisor has to get to a point where execution on the source
is stopped, the last remaining changes occurring since the
migration started are then transferred, and the guest is started
on the target. The management software thus must keep track of
the starting point and any changes since the starting
point. These last changes are often referred to as dirty page
tracking or dirty disk block bitmaps. At some point in time
during the migration, the management software must freeze the
source guest, transfer the dirty data, and then start the guest
on the target. This period of time must be minimal. To minimize
overall migration time, one is advised to use a dedicated
network connection with a high quality of service. Alternatively
saving the current state of the running guest can just be a
point in time type operation which doesn't require updating the
"last vestiges" of state prior to writing out the saved state
file. The state file is the point in time of whatever is current
and may contain incomplete data which if used to restart the
guest could cause confusion or problems because some operation
wasn't completed depending upon where in time the operation was
commenced.
</p>
<h2><a id="apis">State capture APIs</a></h2>
<p>With those definitions, the following libvirt APIs related to
state capture have these properties:</p>
<dl>
<dt><a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainManagedSave"><code>virDomainManagedSave</code></a></dt>
<dd>This API saves guest memory, with libvirt managing all of
the saved state, then stops the guest. While stopped, the
disks can be copied by a third party. However, since any
subsequent restart of the guest by libvirt API will restore
the memory state (which typically only works if the disk state
is unchanged in the meantime), and since it is not possible to
get at the memory state that libvirt is managing, this is not
viable as a means for rolling back to earlier saved states,
but is rather more suited to situations such as suspending a
guest prior to rebooting the host in order to resume the guest
when the host is back up. This API also has a drawback of
potentially long guest downtime, and therefore does not lend
itself well to live backups.</dd>
<dt><a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainSave"><code>virDomainSave</code></a></dt>
<dd>This API is similar to virDomainManagedSave(), but moves the
burden on managing the stored memory state to the user. As
such, the user can now couple saved state with copies of the
disks to perform a revert to an arbitrary earlier saved state.
However, changing who manages the memory state does not change
the drawback of potentially long guest downtime when capturing
state.</dd>
<dt><a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain-snapshot.html#virDomainSnapshotCreateXML"><code>virDomainSnapshotCreateXML</code></a></dt>
<dd>This API wraps several approaches for capturing guest state,
with a general premise of creating a snapshot (where the
current guest resources are frozen in time and a new wrapper
layer is opened for tracking subsequent guest changes). It
can operate on both offline and running guests, can choose
whether to capture the state of memory, disk, or both when
used on a running guest, and can choose between internal and
external storage for captured state. However, it is geared
towards post-event captures (when capturing both memory and
disk state, the disk state is not captured until all memory
state has been collected first). Using QEMU as the
hypervisor, internal snapshots currently have lengthy downtime
that is incompatible with freezing guest I/O, but external
snapshots are quick when memory contents are not also saved.
Since creating an external snapshot changes which disk image
resource is in use by the guest, this API can be coupled
with <a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainBlockCommit"><code>virDomainBlockCommit()</code></a>
to restore things back to the guest using its original disk
image, where a third-party tool can read the backing file
prior to the live commit. See also
the <a href="formatsnapshot.html">XML details</a> used with
this command.</dd>
<dt><a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainFSFreeze"><code>virDomainFSFreeze</code></a>, <a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainFSThaw"><code>virDomainFSThaw</code></a></dt>
<dd>This pair of APIs does not directly capture guest state, but
can be used to coordinate with a trusted live guest that state
capture is about to happen, and therefore guest I/O should be
quiesced so that the state capture is fully consistent, rather
than merely crash consistent. Some APIs are able to
automatically perform a freeze and thaw via a flags parameter,
rather than having to make separate calls to these
functions. Also, note that freezing guest I/O is only possible
with trusted guests running a guest agent, and that some
guests place maximum time limits on how long I/O can be
frozen.</dd>
<dt><a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain-checkpoint.html#virDomainCheckpointCreateXML"><code>virDomainCheckpointCreateXML</code></a></dt>
<dd>This API does not actually capture guest state, rather it
makes it possible to track which portions of guest disks have
changed between a checkpoint and the current live execution of
the guest. However, while it is possible use this API to
create checkpoints in isolation, it is more typical to create
a checkpoint as a side-effect of starting a new incremental
backup with <code>virDomainBackupBegin()</code> or at the
creation of an external snapshot
with <code>virDomainSnapshotCreateXML2()</code>, since a
second incremental backup is most useful when using the
checkpoint created during the first. See also
the <a href="formatcheckpoint.html">XML details</a> used with
this command.</dd>
<dt><a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainBackupBegin"><code>virDomainBackupBegin</code></a>, <a href="html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainBackupEnd"><code>virDomainBackupEnd</code></a></dt>
<dd>This API wraps approaches for capturing the state of disks
of a running guest, but does not track accompanying guest
memory state. The capture is consistent to the start of the
operation, where the captured state is stored independently
from the disk image in use with the guest and where it can be
easily integrated with a third-party for capturing the disk
state. Since the backup operation is stored externally from
the guest resources, there is no need to commit data back in
at the completion of the operation. When coupled with
checkpoints, this can be used to capture incremental backups
instead of full.</dd>
</dl>
<h2><a id="examples">Examples</a></h2>
<p>The following two sequences both accomplish the task of
capturing the disk state of a running guest, then wrapping
things up so that the guest is still running with the same file
as its disk image as before the sequence of operations began.
The difference between the two sequences boils down to the
impact of an unexpected interruption made at any point in the
middle of the sequence: with such an interruption, the first
example leaves the guest tied to a temporary wrapper file rather
than the original disk, and requires manual clean up of the
domain definition; while the second example has no impact to the
domain definition.</p>
<p>1. Backup via temporary snapshot
<pre>
virDomainFSFreeze()
virDomainSnapshotCreateXML(VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_CREATE_DISK_ONLY)
virDomainFSThaw()
third-party copy the backing file to backup storage # most time spent here
virDomainBlockCommit(VIR_DOMAIN_BLOCK_COMMIT_ACTIVE) per disk
wait for commit ready event per disk
virDomainBlockJobAbort() per disk
</pre></p>
<p>2. Direct backup
<pre>
virDomainFSFreeze()
virDomainBackupBegin()
virDomainFSThaw()
wait for push mode event, or pull data over NBD # most time spent here
virDomainBackupEnd()
</pre></p>
</body>
</html>
docs/kbase/domainstatecapture.rst 0 → 100644
浏览文件 @ d3ad38e2
==================================
Domain state capture using Libvirt
==================================
.. contents::
In order to aid application developers to choose which operations best
suit their needs, this page compares the different means for capturing
state related to a domain managed by libvirt.
The information here is primarily geared towards capturing the state of
an active domain. Capturing the state of an inactive domain essentially
amounts to copying the contents of guest disks, followed by a fresh boot
of the same domain configuration with disks restored back to that saved
state.
State capture trade-offs
========================
One of the features made possible with virtual machines is live
migration -- transferring all state related to the guest from one host
to another with minimal interruption to the guest's activity. In this
case, state includes domain memory (including register and device
contents), and domain storage (whether the guest's view of the disks are
backed by local storage on the host, or by the hypervisor accessing
shared storage over a network). A clever observer will then note that if
all state is available for live migration, then there is nothing
stopping a user from saving some or all of that state at a given point
of time in order to be able to later rewind guest execution back to the
state it previously had. The astute reader will also realize that state
capture at any level requires that the data must be stored and managed
by some mechanism. This processing might fit in a single file, or more
likely require a chain of related files, and may require synchronization
with third-party tools built around managing the amount of data
resulting from capturing the state of multiple guests that each use
multiple disks.
There are several libvirt APIs associated with capturing the state of a
guest, which can later be used to rewind that guest to the conditions it
was in earlier. The following is a list of trade-offs and differences
between the various facets that affect capturing domain state for active
domains:
Duration
Capturing state can be a lengthy process, so while the captured state
ideally represents an atomic point in time corresponding to something
the guest was actually executing, capturing state tends to focus on
minimizing guest downtime while performing the rest of the state
capture in parallel with guest execution. Some interfaces require
up-front preparation (the state captured is not complete until the
API ends, which may be some time after the command was first
started), while other interfaces track the state when the command was
first issued, regardless of the time spent in capturing the rest of
the state. Also, time spent in state capture may be longer than the
time required for live migration, when state must be duplicated
rather than shared.
Amount of state
For an online guest, there is a choice between capturing the guest's
memory (all that is needed during live migration when the storage is
already shared between source and destination), the guest's disk
state (all that is needed if there are no pending guest I/O
transactions that would be lost without the corresponding memory
state), or both together. Reverting to partial state may still be
viable, but typically, booting from captured disk state without
corresponding memory is comparable to rebooting a machine that had
power cut before I/O could be flushed. Guests may need to use proper
journaling methods to avoid problems when booting from partial state.
Quiescing of data
Even if a guest has no pending I/O, capturing disk state may catch
the guest at a time when the contents of the disk are inconsistent.
Cooperating with the guest to perform data quiescing is an optional
step to ensure that captured disk state is fully consistent without
requiring additional memory state, rather than just crash-consistent.
But guest cooperation may also have time constraints, where the guest
can rightfully panic if there is too much downtime while I/O is
frozen.
Quantity of files
When capturing state, some approaches store all state within the same
file (internal), while others expand a chain of related files that
must be used together (external), for more files that a management
application must track.
Impact to guest definition
Capturing state may require temporary changes to the guest
definition, such as associating new files into the domain definition.
While state capture should never impact the running guest, a change
to the domain's active XML may have impact on other host operations
being performed on the domain.
Third-party integration
When capturing state, there are tradeoffs to how much of the process
must be done directly by the hypervisor, and how much can be
off-loaded to third-party software. Since capturing state is not
instantaneous, it is essential that any third-party integration see
consistent data even if the running guest continues to modify that
data after the point in time of the capture.
Full vs. incremental
When periodically repeating the action of state capture, it is useful
to minimize the amount of state that must be captured by exploiting
the relation to a previous capture, such as focusing only on the
portions of the disk that the guest has modified in the meantime.
Some approaches are able to take advantage of checkpoints to provide
an incremental backup, while others are only capable of a full backup
even if that means re-capturing unchanged portions of the disk.
Local vs. remote
Domains that completely use remote storage may only need some
mechanism to keep track of guest memory state while using external
means to manage storage. Still, hypervisor and guest cooperation to
ensure points in time when no I/O is in flight across the network can
be important for properly capturing disk state.
Network latency
Whether it's domain storage or saving domain state into remote
storage, network latency has an impact on snapshot data. Having
dedicated network capacity, bandwidth, or quality of service levels
may play a role, as well as planning for how much of the backup
process needs to be local.
An example of the various facets in action is migration of a running
guest. In order for the guest to be able to resume on the destination at
the same place it left off at the source, the hypervisor has to get to a
point where execution on the source is stopped, the last remaining
changes occurring since the migration started are then transferred, and
the guest is started on the target. The management software thus must
keep track of the starting point and any changes since the starting
point. These last changes are often referred to as dirty page tracking
or dirty disk block bitmaps. At some point in time during the migration,
the management software must freeze the source guest, transfer the dirty
data, and then start the guest on the target. This period of time must
be minimal. To minimize overall migration time, one is advised to use a
dedicated network connection with a high quality of service.
Alternatively saving the current state of the running guest can just be
a point in time type operation which doesn't require updating the "last
vestiges" of state prior to writing out the saved state file. The state
file is the point in time of whatever is current and may contain
incomplete data which if used to restart the guest could cause confusion
or problems because some operation wasn't completed depending upon where
in time the operation was commenced.
State capture APIs
==================
With those definitions, the following libvirt APIs related to state
capture have these properties:
`virDomainManagedSave <../html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainManagedSave>`__
This API saves guest memory, with libvirt managing all of the saved
state, then stops the guest. While stopped, the disks can be copied
by a third party. However, since any subsequent restart of the guest
by libvirt API will restore the memory state (which typically only
works if the disk state is unchanged in the meantime), and since it
is not possible to get at the memory state that libvirt is managing,
this is not viable as a means for rolling back to earlier saved
states, but is rather more suited to situations such as suspending a
guest prior to rebooting the host in order to resume the guest when
the host is back up. This API also has a drawback of potentially long
guest downtime, and therefore does not lend itself well to live
backups.
`virDomainSave <../html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainSave>`__
This API is similar to virDomainManagedSave(), but moves the burden
on managing the stored memory state to the user. As such, the user
can now couple saved state with copies of the disks to perform a
revert to an arbitrary earlier saved state. However, changing who
manages the memory state does not change the drawback of potentially
long guest downtime when capturing state.
`virDomainSnapshotCreateXML <../html/libvirt-libvirt-domain-snapshot.html#virDomainSnapshotCreateXML>`__
This API wraps several approaches for capturing guest state, with a
general premise of creating a snapshot (where the current guest
resources are frozen in time and a new wrapper layer is opened for
tracking subsequent guest changes). It can operate on both offline
and running guests, can choose whether to capture the state of
memory, disk, or both when used on a running guest, and can choose
between internal and external storage for captured state. However, it
is geared towards post-event captures (when capturing both memory and
disk state, the disk state is not captured until all memory state has
been collected first). Using QEMU as the hypervisor, internal
snapshots currently have lengthy downtime that is incompatible with
freezing guest I/O, but external snapshots are quick when memory
contents are not also saved. Since creating an external snapshot
changes which disk image resource is in use by the guest, this API
can be coupled with
`virDomainBlockCommit() <html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainBlockCommit>`__
to restore things back to the guest using its original disk image,
where a third-party tool can read the backing file prior to the live
commit. See also the `XML details <formatsnapshot.html>`__ used with
this command.
`virDomainFSFreeze <html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainFSFreeze>`__, `virDomainFSThaw <html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainFSThaw>`__
This pair of APIs does not directly capture guest state, but can be
used to coordinate with a trusted live guest that state capture is
about to happen, and therefore guest I/O should be quiesced so that
the state capture is fully consistent, rather than merely crash
consistent. Some APIs are able to automatically perform a freeze and
thaw via a flags parameter, rather than having to make separate calls
to these functions. Also, note that freezing guest I/O is only
possible with trusted guests running a guest agent, and that some
guests place maximum time limits on how long I/O can be frozen.
`virDomainCheckpointCreateXML <html/libvirt-libvirt-domain-checkpoint.html#virDomainCheckpointCreateXML>`__
This API does not actually capture guest state, rather it makes it
possible to track which portions of guest disks have changed between
a checkpoint and the current live execution of the guest. However,
while it is possible use this API to create checkpoints in isolation,
it is more typical to create a checkpoint as a side-effect of
starting a new incremental backup with ``virDomainBackupBegin()`` or
at the creation of an external snapshot with
``virDomainSnapshotCreateXML2()``, since a second incremental backup
is most useful when using the checkpoint created during the first.
See also the `XML details <formatcheckpoint.html>`__ used with this
command.
`virDomainBackupBegin <html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainBackupBegin>`__, `virDomainBackupEnd <html/libvirt-libvirt-domain.html#virDomainBackupEnd>`__
This API wraps approaches for capturing the state of disks of a
running guest, but does not track accompanying guest memory state.
The capture is consistent to the start of the operation, where the
captured state is stored independently from the disk image in use
with the guest and where it can be easily integrated with a
third-party for capturing the disk state. Since the backup operation
is stored externally from the guest resources, there is no need to
commit data back in at the completion of the operation. When coupled
with checkpoints, this can be used to capture incremental backups
instead of full.
Examples
========
The following two sequences both accomplish the task of capturing the
disk state of a running guest, then wrapping things up so that the guest
is still running with the same file as its disk image as before the
sequence of operations began. The difference between the two sequences
boils down to the impact of an unexpected interruption made at any point
in the middle of the sequence: with such an interruption, the first
example leaves the guest tied to a temporary wrapper file rather than
the original disk, and requires manual clean up of the domain
definition; while the second example has no impact to the domain
definition.
Backup via temporary snapshot
-----------------------------
::
virDomainFSFreeze()
virDomainSnapshotCreateXML(VIR_DOMAIN_SNAPSHOT_CREATE_DISK_ONLY)
virDomainFSThaw()
third-party copy the backing file to backup storage # most time spent here
virDomainBlockCommit(VIR_DOMAIN_BLOCK_COMMIT_ACTIVE) per disk
wait for commit ready event per disk
virDomainBlockJobAbort() per disk
Direct backup
-------------
::
virDomainFSFreeze()
virDomainBackupBegin()
virDomainFSThaw()
wait for push mode event, or pull data over NBD # most time spent here
virDomainBackupEnd()
Markdown is supported
0% 或 .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑！
想要评论请 注册 或