network: set firewalld zone of bridges to "libvirt" zone when appropriate
This patch restores broken guest network connectivity after a host firewalld is switched to using an nftables backend. It does this by adding libvirt networks' bridge interfaces to the new "libvirt" zone in firewalld. After this patch, the bridge interface of any network created by libvirt (when firewalld is active) will be added to the firewalld zone called "libvirt" if it exists (regardless of the firewalld backend setting). This behavior does *not* depend on whether or not libvirt has installed the libvirt zone file (set with "--with[out]-firewalld-zone" during the configure phase of the package build). If the libvirt zone doesn't exist (either because the package was configured to not install it, or possibly it was installed, but firewalld doesn't support rule priorities, resulting in a parse error), the bridge will remain in firewalld's default zone, which could be innocuous (in the case that the firewalld backend is iptables, guest networking will still function properly with the bridge in the default zone), or it could be disastrous (if the firewalld backend is nftables, we can be assured that guest networking will fail). In order to be unobtrusive in the former case, and informative in the latter, when the libvirt zone doesn't exist we then check the firewalld version to see if it's new enough to support the nftables backend, and then if the backend is actually set to nftables, before logging an error (and failing the net-start operation, since the network couldn't possibly work anyway). When the libvirt zone is used, network behavior is *slightly* different from behavior of previous libvirt. In the past, libvirt network behavior would be affected by the configuration of firewalld's default zone (usually "public"), but now it is affected only by the "libvirt" zone), and thus almost surely warrants a release note for any distro upgrading to libvirt 5.1 or above. Although it's unfortunate that we have to deal with a mandatory behavior change, the architecture of multiple hooks makes it impossible to *not* change behavior in some way, and the new behavior is arguably better (since it will now be possible to manage access to the host from virtual machines vs from public interfaces separately). Creates-and-Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1650320 Resolves: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/1638342Signed-off-by: NLaine Stump <laine@laine.org> Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>
Showing
想要评论请 注册 或 登录