提交 41a45994 编写于 作者: E Erik Skultety

util: Introduce virTypedParameterRemote datatype

Both admin and remote protocols define their own types
(remote_typed_param vs admin_typed_param). Because of the naming convention,
admin typed params wouldn't be able to reuse the serialization/deserialization
methods, which are tailored for use by remote protocol, even if those method
were exported properly. In that case, introduce a new internal data type
structurally copying both admin and remote protocols which, eventually, would
allow serializer and deserializer to be used in a more generic way.
上级 1e93470d
......@@ -36,6 +36,30 @@
verify(!(VIR_TYPED_PARAM_LAST & VIR_TYPED_PARAM_MULTIPLE));
typedef struct _virTypedParameterRemoteValue virTypedParameterRemoteValue;
typedef struct virTypedParameterRemoteValue *virTypedParameterRemoteValuePtr;
struct _virTypedParameterRemoteValue {
int type;
union {
int i; /* exempt from syntax-check */
unsigned int ui;
long long int l;
unsigned long long int ul;
double d;
char b;
char *s;
} remote_typed_param_value;
};
typedef struct _virTypedParameterRemote *virTypedParameterRemotePtr;
struct _virTypedParameterRemote {
char *field;
virTypedParameterRemoteValue value;
};
int virTypedParamsValidate(virTypedParameterPtr params, int nparams,
/* const char *name, int type ... */ ...)
ATTRIBUTE_SENTINEL ATTRIBUTE_RETURN_CHECK;
......
Markdown is supported
0% .
You are about to add 0 people to the discussion. Proceed with caution.
先完成此消息的编辑!
想要评论请 注册