There is really no reason why we could not keep journald's fd within the
journald output object the same way as we do for regular file-based outputs.
By doing this we later won't have to special case the journald-based output
(due to the fd being globally shared) when replacing the existing set of outputs
with a new one. Additionally, by making this change, we don't need the
virLogCloseJournald routine anymore, plain virLogCloseFd will suffice.
Signed-off-by: NErik Skultety <eskultet@redhat.com>