So far we are repeating the following lines over and over:

  if (!(virSomeObjectClass = virClassNew(virClassForObject(),
                             "virSomeObject",
                             sizeof(virSomeObject),
                             virSomeObjectDispose)))
      return -1;

While this works, it is impossible to do some checking. Firstly,
the class name (the 2nd argument) doesn't match the name in the
code in all cases (the 3rd argument). Secondly, the current style
is needlessly verbose. This commit turns example into following:

  if (!(VIR_CLASS_NEW(virSomeObject,
                      virClassForObject)))
      return -1;
Signed-off-by: NMichal Privoznik <mprivozn@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: NDaniel P. Berrangé <berrange@redhat.com>