HACKING 25.7 KB
Newer Older
1
-*- buffer-read-only: t -*- vi: set ro:
2 3
DO NOT EDIT THIS FILE!  IT IS GENERATED AUTOMATICALLY
from docs/hacking.html.in!
4

5 6 7 8 9


                         Contributor guidelines
                         ======================

10 11


12 13
General tips for contributing patches
=====================================
14 15
(1) Discuss any large changes on the mailing list first. Post patches early and
listen to feedback.
16

E
Eric Blake 已提交
17 18 19 20 21 22
(2) Post patches in unified diff format, with git rename detection enabled. You
need a one-time setup of:

  git config diff.renames true

After that, a command similar to this should work:
23 24 25 26 27

  diff -urp libvirt.orig/ libvirt.modified/ > libvirt-myfeature.patch

or:

28
  git diff > libvirt-myfeature.patch
29

E
Eric Blake 已提交
30 31 32
Also, for code motion patches, you may find that "git diff --patience"
provides an easier-to-read patch. However, the usual workflow of libvirt
developer is:
33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42

  git checkout master
  git pull
  git checkout -t origin -b workbranch
  Hack, committing any changes along the way

Then, when you want to post your patches:

  git pull --rebase
  (fix any conflicts)
43 44
  git send-email --cover-letter --no-chain-reply-to --annotate \
                 --to=libvir-list@redhat.com master
45

46 47 48 49 50 51
(Note that the "git send-email" subcommand may not be in the main git package
and using it may require installion of a separate package, for example the
"git-email" package in Fedora.) For a single patch you can omit
"--cover-letter", but a series of two or more patches needs a cover letter. If
you get tired of typing "--to=libvir-list@redhat.com" designation you can set
it in git config:
52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67

  git config sendemail.to libvir-list@redhat.com

Please follow this as close as you can, especially the rebase and git
send-email part, as it makes life easier for other developers to review your
patch set. One should avoid sending patches as attachments, but rather send
them in email body along with commit message. If a developer is sending
another version of the patch (e.g. to address review comments), he is advised
to note differences to previous versions after the "---" line in the patch so
that it helps reviewers but doesn't become part of git history. Moreover, such
patch needs to be prefixed correctly with "--subject-prefix=PATCHv2" appended
to "git send-email" (substitute "v2" with the correct version if needed
though).



E
Eric Blake 已提交
68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80
(3) In your commit message, make the summary line reasonably short (60 characters
is typical), followed by a blank line, followed by any longer description of
why your patch makes sense. If the patch fixes a regression, and you know what
commit introduced the problem, mentioning that is useful. If the patch
resolves a bugzilla report, mentioning the URL of the bug number is useful;
but also summarize the issue rather than making all readers follow the link.
You can use 'git shortlog -30' to get an idea of typical summary lines.
Libvirt does not currently attach any meaning to Signed-off-by: lines, so it
is up to you if you want to include or omit them in the commit message.



(4) Split large changes into a series of smaller patches, self-contained if
81
possible, with an explanation of each patch and an explanation of how the
82
sequence of patches fits together. Moreover, please keep in mind that it's
83 84 85 86 87
required to be able to compile cleanly (*including* "make check" and "make
syntax-check") after each patch. A feature does not have to work until the end
of a series, but intermediate patches must compile and not cause test-suite
failures (this is to preserve the usefulness of "git bisect", among other
things).
88 89


90

E
Eric Blake 已提交
91
(5) Make sure your patches apply against libvirt GIT. Developers only follow GIT
92
and don't care much about released versions.
93

E
Eric Blake 已提交
94
(6) Run the automated tests on your code before submitting any changes. In
95 96
particular, configure with compile warnings set to -Werror. This is done
automatically for a git checkout; from a tarball, use:
97

98
  ./configure --enable-werror
99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107

and run the tests:

  make check
  make syntax-check
  make -C tests valgrind

The latter test checks for memory leaks.

108 109 110 111 112 113 114
If you encounter any failing tests, the VIR_TEST_DEBUG environment variable
may provide extra information to debug the failures. Larger values of
VIR_TEST_DEBUG may provide larger amounts of information:

  VIR_TEST_DEBUG=1 make check    (or)
  VIR_TEST_DEBUG=2 make check

115
Also, individual tests can be run from inside the "tests/" directory, like:
116 117 118

  ./qemuxml2xmltest

E
Eric Blake 已提交
119 120 121 122 123 124 125
There is also a "./run" script at the top level, to make it easier to run
programs that have not yet been installed, as well as to wrap invocations of
various tests under gdb or valgrind.



(7) Update tests and/or documentation, particularly if you are adding a new
126
feature or changing the output of a program.
127 128


129

130 131
There is more on this subject, including lots of links to background reading
on the subject, on
132

133 134
  Richard Jones' guide to working with open source projects
  http://et.redhat.com/~rjones/how-to-supply-code-to-open-source-projects/
135

136

137 138 139
Code indentation
================
Libvirt's C source code generally adheres to some basic code-formatting
140 141 142 143
conventions. The existing code base is not totally consistent on this front,
but we do prefer that contributed code be formatted similarly. In short, use
spaces-not-TABs for indentation, use 4 spaces for each indentation level, and
other than that, follow the K&R style.
144 145 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 153 154 155 156

If you use Emacs, add the following to one of one of your start-up files
(e.g., ~/.emacs), to help ensure that you get indentation right:

  ;;; When editing C sources in libvirt, use this style.
  (defun libvirt-c-mode ()
    "C mode with adjusted defaults for use with libvirt."
    (interactive)
    (c-set-style "K&R")
    (setq indent-tabs-mode nil) ; indent using spaces, not TABs
    (setq c-indent-level 4)
    (setq c-basic-offset 4))
  (add-hook 'c-mode-hook
157 158 159
            '(lambda () (if (string-match "/libvirt" (buffer-file-name))
                            (libvirt-c-mode))))

160 161 162 163 164 165 166 167 168 169 170 171 172 173 174 175 176 177 178 179 180 181
If you use vim, append the following to your ~/.vimrc file:

  set nocompatible
  filetype on
  set autoindent
  set smartindent
  set cindent
  set tabstop=8
  set shiftwidth=4
  set expandtab
  set cinoptions=(0,:0,l1,t0
  filetype plugin indent on
  au FileType make setlocal noexpandtab
  au BufRead,BufNewFile *.am setlocal noexpandtab
  match ErrorMsg /\s\+$\| \+\ze\t/

Or if you don't want to mess your ~/.vimrc up, you can save the above into a
file called .lvimrc (not .vimrc) located at the root of libvirt source, then
install a vim script from
http://www.vim.org/scripts/script.php?script_id=1408, which will load the
.lvimrc only when you edit libvirt code.

182 183 184

Code formatting (especially for new code)
=========================================
185 186 187
With new code, we can be even more strict. Please apply the following function
(using GNU indent) to any new code. Note that this also gives you an idea of
the type of spacing we prefer around operators and keywords:
188 189 190 191 192 193 194 195

  indent-libvirt()
  {
    indent -bad -bap -bbb -bli4 -br -ce -brs -cs -i4 -l75 -lc75 \
      -sbi4 -psl -saf -sai -saw -sbi4 -ss -sc -cdw -cli4 -npcs -nbc \
      --no-tabs "$@"
  }

196 197 198
Note that sometimes you'll have to post-process that output further, by piping
it through "expand -i", since some leading TABs can get through. Usually
they're in macro definitions or strings, and should be converted anyhow.
199

200 201 202 203 204 205
Libvirt requires a C99 compiler for various reasons. However, most of the code
base prefers to stick to C89 syntax unless there is a compelling reason
otherwise. For example, it is preferable to use "/* */" comments rather than
"//". Also, when declaring local variables, the prevailing style has been to
declare them at the beginning of a scope, rather than immediately before use.

206

207 208 209
Bracket spacing
===============
The keywords "if", "for", "while", and "switch" must have a single space
M
Martin Kletzander 已提交
210
following them before the opening bracket. E.g.
211 212 213 214

      if(foo)   // Bad
      if (foo)  // Good

M
Martin Kletzander 已提交
215
Function implementations mustnothave any whitespace between the function name and the opening bracket. E.g.
216 217 218 219

      int foo (int wizz)  // Bad
      int foo(int wizz)   // Good

M
Martin Kletzander 已提交
220
Function calls mustnothave any whitespace between the function name and the opening bracket. E.g.
221 222 223 224 225

      bar = foo (wizz);  // Bad
      bar = foo(wizz);   // Good

Function typedefs mustnothave any whitespace between the closing bracket of the function name and
M
Martin Kletzander 已提交
226
opening bracket of the arg list. E.g.
227 228 229 230 231

      typedef int (*foo) (int wizz);  // Bad
      typedef int (*foo)(int wizz);   // Good

There must not be any whitespace immediately following any opening bracket, or
M
Martin Kletzander 已提交
232
immediately prior to any closing bracket. E.g.
233 234 235 236 237

      int foo( int wizz );  // Bad
      int foo(int wizz);    // Good


238 239 240 241
Curly braces
============
Omit the curly braces around an "if", "while", "for" etc. body only when that
body occupies a single line. In every other case we require the braces. This
242 243
ensures that it is trivially easy to identify a single-'statement' loop: each
has only one 'line' in its body.
244 245 246

Omitting braces with a single-line body is fine:

247 248
  while (expr) // one-line body -> omitting curly braces is ok
      single_line_stmt();
249 250 251 252

However, the moment your loop/if/else body extends onto a second line, for
whatever reason (even if it's just an added comment), then you should add
braces. Otherwise, it would be too easy to insert a statement just before that
253
comment (without adding braces), thinking it is already a multi-statement loop:
254

255 256 257
  while (true) // BAD! multi-line body with no braces
      /* comment... */
      single_line_stmt();
258 259 260

Do this instead:

261 262 263 264
  while (true) { // Always put braces around a multi-line body.
      /* comment... */
      single_line_stmt();
  }
265 266 267 268

There is one exception: when the second body line is not at the same
indentation level as the first body line:

269 270 271
  if (expr)
      die("a diagnostic that would make this line"
          " extend past the 80-column limit"));
272 273 274 275 276 277

It is safe to omit the braces in the code above, since the further-indented
second body line makes it obvious that this is still a single-statement body.

To reiterate, don't do this:

278 279 280 281
  if (expr)            // BAD: no braces around...
      while (expr_2) { // ... a multi-line body
          ...
      }
282 283 284

Do this, instead:

285 286 287 288 289
  if (expr) {
      while (expr_2) {
          ...
      }
  }
290 291 292

However, there is one exception in the other direction, when even a one-line
block should have braces. That occurs when that one-line, brace-less block is
293 294 295 296 297
an "if" or "else" block, and the counterpart block *does* use braces. In that
case, put braces around both blocks. Also, if the "else" block is much shorter
than the "if" block, consider negating the "if"-condition and swapping the
bodies, putting the short block first and making the longer, multi-line block
be the "else" block.
298

299 300 301 302 303
  if (expr) {
      ...
      ...
  }
  else
304 305
      x = y;    // BAD: braceless "else" with braced "then",
                // and short block last
306

307 308 309 310 311 312
  if (expr)
      x = y;    // BAD: braceless "if" with braced "else"
  else {
      ...
      ...
  }
313

314 315 316 317 318 319
Keeping braces consistent and putting the short block first is preferred,
especially when the multi-line body is more than a few lines long, because it
is easier to read and grasp the semantics of an if-then-else block when the
simpler block occurs first, rather than after the more involved block:

  if (!expr) {
320
    x = y; // putting the smaller block first is more readable
321
  } else {
322 323 324
      ...
      ...
  }
325

326
But if negating a complex condition is too ugly, then at least add braces:
327

328
  if (complex expr not worth negating) {
329 330 331 332 333
      ...
      ...
  } else {
      x = y;
  }
334 335


336 337 338 339
Preprocessor
============
For variadic macros, stick with C99 syntax:

340
  #define vshPrint(_ctl, ...) fprintf(stdout, __VA_ARGS__)
341

342 343
Use parenthesis when checking if a macro is defined, and use indentation to
track nesting:
344

345 346 347
  #if defined(HAVE_POSIX_FALLOCATE) && !defined(HAVE_FALLOCATE)
  # define fallocate(a,ignored,b,c) posix_fallocate(a,b,c)
  #endif
348 349


350 351 352 353 354 355
C types
=======
Use the right type.

Scalars
-------
356 357 358 359 360 361 362 363 364 365 366 367 368 369 370 371 372 373 374 375 376 377 378 379 380 381 382 383 384 385 386 387 388 389 390 391 392 393 394 395 396 397 398 399 400 401 402 403 404
- If you're using "int" or "long", odds are good that there's a better type.

- If a variable is counting something, be sure to declare it with an unsigned
type.

- If it's memory-size-related, use "size_t" (use "ssize_t" only if required).

- If it's file-size related, use uintmax_t, or maybe "off_t".

- If it's file-offset related (i.e., signed), use "off_t".

- If it's just counting small numbers use "unsigned int"; (on all but oddball
embedded systems, you can assume that that type is at least four bytes wide).

- If a variable has boolean semantics, give it the "bool" type and use the
corresponding "true" and "false" macros. It's ok to include <stdbool.h>, since
libvirt's use of gnulib ensures that it exists and is usable.

- In the unusual event that you require a specific width, use a standard type
like "int32_t", "uint32_t", "uint64_t", etc.

- While using "bool" is good for readability, it comes with minor caveats:

-- Don't use "bool" in places where the type size must be constant across all
systems, like public interfaces and on-the-wire protocols. Note that it would
be possible (albeit wasteful) to use "bool" in libvirt's logical wire
protocol, since XDR maps that to its lower-level "bool_t" type, which *is*
fixed-size.

-- Don't compare a bool variable against the literal, "true", since a value with
a logical non-false value need not be "1". I.e., don't write "if (seen ==
true) ...". Rather, write "if (seen)...".





Of course, take all of the above with a grain of salt. If you're about to use
some system interface that requires a type like "size_t", "pid_t" or "off_t",
use matching types for any corresponding variables.

Also, if you try to use e.g., "unsigned int" as a type, and that conflicts
with the signedness of a related variable, sometimes it's best just to use the
*wrong* type, if 'pulling the thread' and fixing all related variables would
be too invasive.

Finally, while using descriptive types is important, be careful not to go
overboard. If whatever you're doing causes warnings, or requires casts, then
reconsider or ask for help.
405 406 407

Pointers
--------
408 409 410 411 412 413
Ensure that all of your pointers are 'const-correct'. Unless a pointer is used
to modify the pointed-to storage, give it the "const" attribute. That way, the
reader knows up-front that this is a read-only pointer. Perhaps more
importantly, if we're diligent about this, when you see a non-const pointer,
you're guaranteed that it is used to modify the storage it points to, or it is
aliased to another pointer that is.
414 415


416 417 418
Low level memory management
===========================
Use of the malloc/free/realloc/calloc APIs is deprecated in the libvirt
419 420
codebase, because they encourage a number of serious coding bugs and do not
enable compile time verification of checks for NULL. Instead of these
421
routines, use the macros from memory.h.
422

423
- To allocate a single object:
424

425 426 427 428 429 430
  virDomainPtr domain;

  if (VIR_ALLOC(domain) < 0) {
      virReportOOMError();
      return NULL;
  }
431 432 433



434
- To allocate an array of objects:
435

436
  virDomainPtr domains;
437
  size_t ndomains = 10;
438 439 440 441 442

  if (VIR_ALLOC_N(domains, ndomains) < 0) {
      virReportOOMError();
      return NULL;
  }
443 444 445



446
- To allocate an array of object pointers:
447

448
  virDomainPtr *domains;
449
  size_t ndomains = 10;
450

451 452 453 454 455 456 457
  if (VIR_ALLOC_N(domains, ndomains) < 0) {
      virReportOOMError();
      return NULL;
  }



458 459 460 461 462 463
- To re-allocate the array of domains to be 1 element longer (however, note that
repeatedly expanding an array by 1 scales quadratically, so this is
recommended only for smaller arrays):

  virDomainPtr domains;
  size_t ndomains = 0;
464

465
  if (VIR_EXPAND_N(domains, ndomains, 1) < 0) {
466 467 468
      virReportOOMError();
      return NULL;
  }
469 470 471 472 473 474 475 476 477 478 479 480 481 482 483 484
  domains[ndomains - 1] = domain;



- To ensure an array has room to hold at least one more element (this approach
scales better, but requires tracking allocation separately from usage)

  virDomainPtr domains;
  size_t ndomains = 0;
  size_t ndomains_max = 0;

  if (VIR_RESIZE_N(domains, ndomains_max, ndomains, 1) < 0) {
      virReportOOMError();
      return NULL;
  }
  domains[ndomains++] = domain;
485 486 487



488 489
- To trim an array of domains from its allocated size down to the actual used
size:
490

491 492 493 494
  virDomainPtr domains;
  size_t ndomains = x;
  size_t ndomains_max = y;

495
  VIR_SHRINK_N(domains, ndomains_max, ndomains_max - ndomains);
496 497 498



499
- To free an array of domains:
500

501 502 503 504 505 506 507 508 509
  virDomainPtr domains;
  size_t ndomains = x;
  size_t ndomains_max = y;
  size_t i;

  for (i = 0; i < ndomains; i++)
      VIR_FREE(domains[i]);
  VIR_FREE(domains);
  ndomains_max = ndomains = 0;
510 511 512 513 514 515






516 517
File handling
=============
518 519
Usage of the "fdopen()", "close()", "fclose()" APIs is deprecated in libvirt
code base to help avoiding double-closing of files or file descriptors, which
J
Ján Tomko 已提交
520
is particularly dangerous in a multi-threaded application. Instead of these
E
Eric Blake 已提交
521
APIs, use the macros from virfile.h
522

523
- Open a file from a file descriptor:
524 525 526 527 528 529 530 531 532

  if ((file = VIR_FDOPEN(fd, "r")) == NULL) {
      virReportSystemError(errno, "%s",
                           _("failed to open file from file descriptor"));
      return -1;
  }
  /* fd is now invalid; only access the file using file variable */


533

534
- Close a file descriptor:
535 536

  if (VIR_CLOSE(fd) < 0) {
537 538 539 540 541
      virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", _("failed to close file"));
  }



542
- Close a file:
543 544 545

  if (VIR_FCLOSE(file) < 0) {
      virReportSystemError(errno, "%s", _("failed to close file"));
546 547 548 549
  }



550 551
- Close a file or file descriptor in an error path, without losing the previous
"errno" value:
552 553

  VIR_FORCE_CLOSE(fd);
554
  VIR_FORCE_FCLOSE(file);
555 556


557 558 559



560 561 562

String comparisons
==================
563 564 565 566 567 568 569 570 571 572 573 574 575 576 577 578
Do not use the strcmp, strncmp, etc functions directly. Instead use one of the
following semantically named macros

- For strict equality:

  STREQ(a,b)
  STRNEQ(a,b)



- For case insensitive equality:

  STRCASEEQ(a,b)
  STRCASENEQ(a,b)


579

580
- For strict equality of a substring:
581

582 583
  STREQLEN(a,b,n)
  STRNEQLEN(a,b,n)
584 585 586



587
- For case insensitive equality of a substring:
588

589 590
  STRCASEEQLEN(a,b,n)
  STRCASENEQLEN(a,b,n)
591 592 593



594 595 596 597 598
- For strict equality of a prefix:

  STRPREFIX(a,b)


599

600 601 602 603 604 605 606
- To avoid having to check if a or b are NULL:

  STREQ_NULLABLE(a, b)
  STRNEQ_NULLABLE(a, b)



607 608 609



C
Chris Lalancette 已提交
610 611
String copying
==============
612 613 614
Do not use the strncpy function. According to the man page, it does *not*
guarantee a NULL-terminated buffer, which makes it extremely dangerous to use.
Instead, use one of the functionally equivalent functions:
C
Chris Lalancette 已提交
615

616
  virStrncpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t n, size_t destbytes)
C
Chris Lalancette 已提交
617

618 619 620 621 622 623
The first three arguments have the same meaning as for strncpy; namely the
destination, source, and number of bytes to copy, respectively. The last
argument is the number of bytes available in the destination string; if a copy
of the source string (including a \0) will not fit into the destination, no
bytes are copied and the routine returns NULL. Otherwise, n bytes from the
source are copied into the destination and a trailing \0 is appended.
C
Chris Lalancette 已提交
624

625
  virStrcpy(char *dest, const char *src, size_t destbytes)
C
Chris Lalancette 已提交
626

627 628 629
Use this variant if you know you want to copy the entire src string into dest.
Note that this is a macro, so arguments could be evaluated more than once.
This is equivalent to virStrncpy(dest, src, strlen(src), destbytes)
C
Chris Lalancette 已提交
630

631 632 633 634 635 636 637
  virStrcpyStatic(char *dest, const char *src)

Use this variant if you know you want to copy the entire src string into dest
*and* you know that your destination string is a static string (i.e. that
sizeof(dest) returns something meaningful). Note that this is a macro, so
arguments could be evaluated more than once. This is equivalent to
virStrncpy(dest, src, strlen(src), sizeof(dest)).
C
Chris Lalancette 已提交
638 639


640 641
Variable length string buffer
=============================
642 643 644
If there is a need for complex string concatenations, avoid using the usual
sequence of malloc/strcpy/strcat/snprintf functions and make use of the
virBuffer API described in buf.h
645

646
Typical usage is as follows:
647 648

  char *
649 650
  somefunction(...)
  {
651 652 653 654 655
     virBuffer buf = VIR_BUFFER_INITIALIZER;

     ...

     virBufferAddLit(&buf, "<domain>\n");
656
     virBufferAsprintf(&buf, "  <memory>%d</memory>\n", memory);
657 658 659
     ...
     virBufferAddLit(&buf, "</domain>\n");

660
     ...
661 662

     if (virBufferError(&buf)) {
663
         virBufferFreeAndReset(&buf);
664
         virReportOOMError();
665 666 667 668 669
         return NULL;
     }

     return virBufferContentAndReset(&buf);
  }
670 671 672 673


Include files
=============
674 675 676
There are now quite a large number of include files, both libvirt internal and
external, and system includes. To manage all this complexity it's best to
stick to the following general plan for all *.c source files:
677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691

  /*
   * Copyright notice
   * ....
   * ....
   * ....
   *
   */

  #include <config.h>             Must come first in every file.

  #include <stdio.h>              Any system includes you need.
  #include <string.h>
  #include <limits.h>

692
  #if WITH_NUMACTL                Some system includes aren't supported
J
Jim Meyering 已提交
693
  # include <numa.h>              everywhere so need these #if guards.
694 695 696 697 698 699 700
  #endif

  #include "internal.h"           Include this first, after system includes.

  #include "util.h"               Any libvirt internal header files.
  #include "buf.h"

701 702
  static int
  myInternalFunc()                The actual code.
703
  {
704
      ...
705

706 707 708
Of particular note: *Do not* include libvirt/libvirt.h or libvirt/virterror.h.
It is included by "internal.h" already and there are some special reasons why
you cannot include these files explicitly.
709 710


711 712
Printf-style functions
======================
713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723
Whenever you add a new printf-style function, i.e., one with a format string
argument and following "..." in its prototype, be sure to use gcc's printf
attribute directive in the prototype. For example, here's the one for
virAsprintf, in util.h:

  int virAsprintf(char **strp, const char *fmt, ...)
      ATTRIBUTE_FORMAT(printf, 2, 3);

This makes it so gcc's -Wformat and -Wformat-security options can do their
jobs and cross-check format strings with the number and types of arguments.

E
Eric Blake 已提交
724 725 726 727 728 729
When printing to a string, consider using virBuffer for incremental
allocations, virAsprintf for a one-shot allocation, and snprintf for
fixed-width buffers. Do not use sprintf, even if you can prove the buffer
won't overflow, since gnulib does not provide the same portability guarantees
for sprintf as it does for snprintf.

730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738

Use of goto
===========
The use of goto is not forbidden, and goto is widely used throughout libvirt.
While the uncontrolled use of goto will quickly lead to unmaintainable code,
there is a place for it in well structured code where its use increases
readability and maintainability. In general, if goto is used for error
recovery, it's likely to be ok, otherwise, be cautious or avoid it all
together.
739

740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748
The typical use of goto is to jump to cleanup code in the case of a long list
of actions, any of which may fail and cause the entire operation to fail. In
this case, a function will have a single label at the end of the function.
It's almost always ok to use this style. In particular, if the cleanup code
only involves free'ing memory, then having multiple labels is overkill.
VIR_FREE() and every function named XXXFree() in libvirt is required to handle
NULL as its arg. Thus you can safely call free on all the variables even if
they were not yet allocated (yes they have to have been initialized to NULL).
This is much simpler and clearer than having multiple labels.
749

750
There are a couple of signs that a particular use of goto is not ok:
751

752 753 754
- You're using multiple labels. If you find yourself using multiple labels,
you're strongly encouraged to rework your code to eliminate all but one of
them.
755

756 757 758 759 760
- The goto jumps back up to a point above the current line of code being
executed. Please use some combination of looping constructs to re-execute code
instead; it's almost certainly going to be more understandable by others. One
well-known exception to this rule is restarting an i/o operation following
EINTR.
761

762 763 764 765
- The goto jumps down to an arbitrary place in the middle of a function followed
by further potentially failing calls. You should almost certainly be using a
conditional and a block instead of a goto. Perhaps some of your function's
logic would be better pulled out into a helper function.
766 767


768 769 770 771 772 773 774 775 776 777 778 779

Although libvirt does not encourage the Linux kernel wind/unwind style of
multiple labels, there's a good general discussion of the issue archived at

  KernelTrap
  http://kerneltrap.org/node/553/2131

When using goto, please use one of these standard labels if it makes sense:

      error: A path only taken upon return with an error code
    cleanup: A path taken upon return with success code + optional error
  no_memory: A path only taken upon return with an OOM error code
780
      retry: If needing to jump upwards (e.g., retry on EINTR)
781 782 783 784 785 786


Libvirt committer guidelines
============================
The AUTHORS files indicates the list of people with commit access right who
can actually merge the patches.
787

J
Jim Meyering 已提交
788
The general rule for committing a patch is to make sure it has been reviewed
789 790 791 792 793 794 795 796 797 798 799
properly in the mailing-list first, usually if a couple of people gave an ACK
or +1 to a patch and nobody raised an objection on the list it should be good
to go. If the patch touches a part of the code where you're not the main
maintainer, or where you do not have a very clear idea of how things work,
it's better to wait for a more authoritative feedback though. Before
committing, please also rebuild locally, run 'make check syntax-check', and
make sure you don't raise errors. Try to look for warnings too; for example,
configure with

  --enable-compile-warnings=error

800 801
which adds -Werror to compile flags, so no warnings get missed

802 803 804 805 806 807 808 809 810 811 812 813 814 815
An exception to 'review and approval on the list first' is fixing failures to
build:

- if a recently committed patch breaks compilation on a platform or for a given
driver, then it's fine to commit a minimal fix directly without getting the
review feedback first

- if make check or make syntax-check breaks, if there is an obvious fix, it's
fine to commit immediately. The patch should still be sent to the list (or
tell what the fix was if trivial), and 'make check syntax-check' should pass
too, before committing anything

- fixes for documentation and code comments can be managed in the same way, but
still make sure they get reviewed if non-trivial.