- 01 9月, 2011 10 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
If open fails with any error other than nfserr_replay_me, then the main nfsd4_proc_compound() loop continues unconditionally to nfsd4_encode_operation(), which will always call encode_seqid_op_tail. Thus the condition we check for here does not occur. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There are currently a couple races in the seqid replay code: a retransmission could come while we're still encoding the original reply, or a new seqid-mutating call could come as we're encoding a replay. So, extend the state lock over the encoding (both encoding of a replayed reply and caching of the original encoded reply). I really hate doing this, and previously added the stateowner reference-counting code to avoid it (which was insufficient)--but I don't see a less complicated alternative at the moment. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Now that the replay owner is in the cstate we can remove it from a lot of other individual operations and further simplify nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op(). Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Set the stateowner associated with a replay in one spot in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() and keep it in cstate. This allows removing a few lines of boilerplate from all the nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op() callers. Also turn ENCODE_SEQID_OP_TAIL into a function while we're here. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Thanks to Casey for reminding me that 5661 gives a special meaning to a value of 0 in the stateid's seqid field, so all stateid's should start out with si_generation 1. We were doing that in the open and lock cases for minorversion 1, but not for the delegation stateid, and not for openstateid's with v4.0. It doesn't *really* matter much for v4.0 or for delegation stateid's (which never get the seqid field incremented), but we may as well do the same for all of them. Reported-by: NCasey Bodley <cbodley@citi.umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Follow the recommendation from rfc3530bis for stateid generation number wraparound, simplify some code, and fix or remove incorrect comments. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There's no reason to have two separate hash tables for open and lock stateid's. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The trick free_stateid is using is a little cheesy, and we'll have more uses for this field later. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Wow, I wonder how long that typo's been there. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The values here represent highest slotid numbers. Since slotid's are numbered starting from zero, the highest should be one less than the number of slots. Reported-by: NRick Macklem <rmacklem@uoguelph.ca> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We don't need this any more. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 28 8月, 2011 13 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
When called with OPEN_STATE, preprocess_seqid_op only returns an open stateid, hence only an open owner. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We've got some lock-specific code here in nfs4_preprocess_seqid_op which is only used by nfsd4_lock(). Move it to the caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Note that the special handling for the lock stateid case is already done by nfs4_check_openmode() (as of 02921914 "nfsd4: fix openmode checking on IO using lock stateid") so we no longer need these two cases in the caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
This flag doesn't really buy us anything. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Share some common code, stop doing silly things like initializing a list head immediately before adding it to a list, etc. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
These appear to be generic (for both open and lock owners), but they're actually just for open owners. This has confused me more than once. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
For all the usual reasons. (Type safety, readability.) Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The server is returning nfserr_resource for both permanent errors and for errors (like allocation failures) that might be resolved by retrying later. Save nfserr_resource for the former and use delay/jukebox for the latter. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 Boaz Harrosh 提交于
Even if we fail to write a recovery record, we should still mark the client as having acquired its first state. Otherwise we leave 4.1 clients with indefinite ERR_GRACE returns. However, an inability to write stable storage records may cause failures of reboot recovery, and the problem should still be brought to the server administrator's attention. So, make sure the error is logged. These errors shouldn't normally be triggered on a corectly functioning server--this isn't a case where a misconfigured client could spam the logs. Signed-off-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Move around some of this code, simplify a bit. Reviewed-by: NBoaz Harrosh <bharrosh@panasas.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Acked-by: NJim Rees <rees@umich.edu> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
A client that wants to execute a file must be able to read it. Read opens over nfs are therefore implicitly allowed for executable files even when those files are not readable. NFSv2/v3 get this right by using a passed-in NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE on read requests, but NFSv4 has gotten this wrong ever since dc730e17 "nfsd4: fix owner-override on open", when we realized that the file owner shouldn't override permissions on non-reclaim NFSv4 opens. So we can't use NFSD_MAY_OWNER_OVERRIDE to tell nfsd_permission to allow reads of executable files. So, do the same thing we do whenever we encounter another weird NFS permission nit: define yet another NFSD_MAY_* flag. The industry's future standardization on 128-bit processors will be motivated primarily by the need for integers with enough bits for all the NFSD_MAY_* flags. Reported-by: NLeonardo Borda <leonardoborda@gmail.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 27 8月, 2011 6 次提交
-
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Userspace shouldn't have a use for these constants. Nothing here is used outside fs/nfsd. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The nfsd4 code has a bunch of special exceptions for error returns which map nfserr_symlink to other errors. In fact, the spec makes it clear that nfserr_symlink is to be preferred over less specific errors where possible. The patch that introduced it back in 2.6.4 is "kNFSd: correct symlink related error returns.", which claims that these special exceptions are represent an NFSv4 break from v2/v3 tradition--when in fact the symlink error was introduced with v4. I suspect what happened was pynfs tests were written that were overly faithful to the (known-incomplete) rfc3530 error return lists, and then code was fixed up mindlessly to make the tests pass. Delete these unnecessary exceptions. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Zero means "I don't care what kind of file this is". And that's probably what we want--acls are also settable at least on directories, and if the filesystem doesn't want them on other objects, leave it to it to complain. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Add some more comments, simplify logic, do & S_IFMT just once, name "type" more helpfully. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We allow the fh_verify caller to specify that any object *except* those of a given type is allowed, by passing a negative type. But only one caller actually uses it. Open-code that check in the one caller. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
A slightly unconventional approach to make the code more compact I could live with, but let's give the poor reader *some* chance. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 20 8月, 2011 7 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
Use NUMA aware allocations to reduce latencies and increase throughput. sunrpc kthreads can use kthread_create_on_node() if pool_mode is "percpu" or "pernode", and svc_prepare_thread()/svc_init_buffer() can also take into account NUMA node affinity for memory allocations. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com> CC: "J. Bruce Fields" <bfields@fieldses.org> CC: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de> CC: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Reviewed-by: NGreg Banks <gnb@fastmail.fm> [bfields@redhat.com: fix up caller nfs41_callback_up] Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
There's an incorrect comment here. Also clean up the logic: the "rdlease" and "wrlease" locals are confusingly named, and don't really add anything since we can make a decision as soon as we hit one of these cases. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
We currently use a bit in fl_flags to record whether a lease is being broken, and set fl_type to the type (RDLCK or UNLCK) that it will eventually have. This means that once the lease break starts, we forget what the lease's type *used* to be. Breaking a read lease will then result in blocking read opens, even though there's no conflict--because the lease type is now F_UNLCK and we can no longer tell whether it was previously a read or write lease. So, instead keep fl_type as the original type (the type which we enforce), and keep track of whether we're unlocking or merely downgrading by replacing the single FL_INPROGRESS flag by FL_UNLOCK_PENDING and FL_DOWNGRADE_PENDING flags. To get this right we also need to track separate downgrade and break times, to handle the case where a write-leased file gets conflicting opens first for read, then later for write. (I first considered just eliminating the downgrade behavior completely--nfsv4 doesn't need it, and nobody as far as I can tell actually uses it currently--but Jeremy Allison tells me that Windows oplocks do behave this way, so Samba will probably use this some day.) Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
F_INPROGRESS isn't exposed to userspace. To me it makes more sense in fl_flags.... Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Use a helper function, to simplify upcoming changes. Reviewed-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
Without this, an attempt to open a device special file without first stat'ing it will fail. Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
由 J. Bruce Fields 提交于
The set of errors here does *not* agree with the set of errors specified in the rfc! While we're there, turn this macros into a function, for the usual reasons, and move it to the one place where it's actually used. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 17 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bernd Schubert 提交于
Fan Yong <yong.fan@whamcloud.com> noticed setting FMODE_32bithash wouldn't work with nfsd v4, as nfsd4_readdir() checks for 32 bit cookies. However, according to RFC 3530 cookies have a 64 bit type and cookies are also defined as u64 in 'struct nfsd4_readdir'. So remove the test for >32-bit values. Cc: stable@kernel.org Signed-off-by: NBernd Schubert <bernd.schubert@itwm.fraunhofer.de> Signed-off-by: NJ. Bruce Fields <bfields@redhat.com>
-
- 08 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Al points out that the do_follow_link() helper function really is misnamed - it's about whether we should try to follow a symlink or not, not about actually doing the following. Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 07 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ari Savolainen 提交于
After commit 3567866b: "RCUify freeing acls, let check_acl() go ahead in RCU mode if acl is cached" posix_acl_permission is being called with an unsupported flag and the permission check fails. This patch fixes the issue. Signed-off-by: NAri Savolainen <ari.m.savolainen@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-