1. 01 8月, 2010 1 次提交
  2. 09 6月, 2010 1 次提交
  3. 17 5月, 2010 1 次提交
    • L
      KVM: use the correct RCU API for PROVE_RCU=y · 90d83dc3
      Lai Jiangshan 提交于
      The RCU/SRCU API have already changed for proving RCU usage.
      
      I got the following dmesg when PROVE_RCU=y because we used incorrect API.
      This patch coverts rcu_deference() to srcu_dereference() or family API.
      
      ===================================================
      [ INFO: suspicious rcu_dereference_check() usage. ]
      ---------------------------------------------------
      arch/x86/kvm/mmu.c:3020 invoked rcu_dereference_check() without protection!
      
      other info that might help us debug this:
      
      rcu_scheduler_active = 1, debug_locks = 0
      2 locks held by qemu-system-x86/8550:
       #0:  (&kvm->slots_lock){+.+.+.}, at: [<ffffffffa011a6ac>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x29/0x50 [kvm]
       #1:  (&(&kvm->mmu_lock)->rlock){+.+...}, at: [<ffffffffa012262d>] kvm_arch_commit_memory_region+0xa6/0xe2 [kvm]
      
      stack backtrace:
      Pid: 8550, comm: qemu-system-x86 Not tainted 2.6.34-rc4-tip-01028-g939eab1 #27
      Call Trace:
       [<ffffffff8106c59e>] lockdep_rcu_dereference+0xaa/0xb3
       [<ffffffffa012f6c1>] kvm_mmu_calculate_mmu_pages+0x44/0x7d [kvm]
       [<ffffffffa012263e>] kvm_arch_commit_memory_region+0xb7/0xe2 [kvm]
       [<ffffffffa011a5d7>] __kvm_set_memory_region+0x636/0x6e2 [kvm]
       [<ffffffffa011a6ba>] kvm_set_memory_region+0x37/0x50 [kvm]
       [<ffffffffa015e956>] vmx_set_tss_addr+0x46/0x5a [kvm_intel]
       [<ffffffffa0126592>] kvm_arch_vm_ioctl+0x17a/0xcf8 [kvm]
       [<ffffffff810a8692>] ? unlock_page+0x27/0x2c
       [<ffffffff810bf879>] ? __do_fault+0x3a9/0x3e1
       [<ffffffffa011b12f>] kvm_vm_ioctl+0x364/0x38d [kvm]
       [<ffffffff81060cfa>] ? up_read+0x23/0x3d
       [<ffffffff810f3587>] vfs_ioctl+0x32/0xa6
       [<ffffffff810f3b19>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x495/0x4db
       [<ffffffff810e6b2f>] ? fget_light+0xc2/0x241
       [<ffffffff810e416c>] ? do_sys_open+0x104/0x116
       [<ffffffff81382d6d>] ? retint_swapgs+0xe/0x13
       [<ffffffff810f3ba6>] sys_ioctl+0x47/0x6a
       [<ffffffff810021db>] system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b
      Signed-off-by: NLai Jiangshan <laijs@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      90d83dc3
  4. 08 3月, 2010 1 次提交
  5. 01 3月, 2010 4 次提交
  6. 10 6月, 2009 1 次提交
    • S
      KVM: Enable snooping control for supported hardware · 522c68c4
      Sheng Yang 提交于
      Memory aliases with different memory type is a problem for guest. For the guest
      without assigned device, the memory type of guest memory would always been the
      same as host(WB); but for the assigned device, some part of memory may be used
      as DMA and then set to uncacheable memory type(UC/WC), which would be a conflict of
      host memory type then be a potential issue.
      
      Snooping control can guarantee the cache correctness of memory go through the
      DMA engine of VT-d.
      
      [avi: fix build on ia64]
      Signed-off-by: NSheng Yang <sheng@linux.intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAvi Kivity <avi@redhat.com>
      522c68c4
  7. 15 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  8. 03 1月, 2009 6 次提交
  9. 15 10月, 2008 3 次提交