- 10 7月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
In order to provide PMU name strings compatible with the OProfile user ABI, an enumeration of all PMUs is currently used by perf to identify each PMU uniquely. Unfortunately, this does not scale well in the presence of multiple PMUs and creates a single, global namespace across all PMUs in the system. This patch removes the enumeration and instead uses the name string for the PMU to map onto the OProfile variant. perf_pmu_name is implemented for CPU PMUs, which is all that OProfile cares about anyway. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 07 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
On ARM, the PMU does not stop counting after an overflow and therefore IRQ latency affects the new counter value read by the kernel. This is significant for non-sampling runs where it is possible for the new value to overtake the previous one, causing the delta to be out by up to max_period events. Commit a737823d ("ARM: 6835/1: perf: ensure overflows aren't missed due to IRQ latency") attempted to fix this problem by allowing interrupt handlers to pass an overflow flag to the event update function, causing the overflow calculation to assume that the counter passed through zero when going from prev to new. Unfortunately, this doesn't work when overflow occurs on the perf_task_tick path because we have the flag cleared and end up computing a large negative delta. This patch removes the overflow flag from armpmu_event_update and instead limits the sample_period to half of the max_period for non-sampling profiling runs. Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 02 12月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Ming Lei 提交于
This patch introduces .enable_irq and .disable_irq into struct arm_pmu_platdata, so platform specific irq enablement can be handled after request_irq, and platform specific irq disablement can be handled before free_irq. This patch is for support of pmu irq routed from CTI on omap4. Acked-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 16 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
pmu_init no longer exists, so don't declare it in asm/pmu.h. Reported-by: NPawel Moll <Pawel.Moll@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 31 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Currently, struct arm_pmu and related functions are only visible to {,arch/arm/}/kernel/perf_event.c. This prevents new drivers from using the framework. This patch moves declarations to asm/pmu.h, allowing new PMU drivers to use the framework. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Reviewed-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: NAshwin Chaugule <ashwinc@codeaurora.org> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
Once upon a time, OProfile and Perf fought hard over who could play with the PMU. To stop all hell from breaking loose, pmu.c offered an internal reserve/release API and took care of parsing PMU platform data passed in from board support code. Now that Perf has ingested OProfile, let's move the platform device handling into the Perf driver and out of the PMU locking code. Unfortunately, the lock has to remain to prevent Perf being bitten by out-of-tree modules such as LTTng, which still claim a right to the PMU when Perf isn't looking. Acked-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Reviewed-by: NJean Pihet <j-pihet@ti.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 12 8月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Commit f12482c9 ("ARM: 6974/1: pmu: refactor reservation") changed {release,reserve}_pmu to take an enum arm_pmu_type as a parameter, but inconsistently named the parameter `type' or `device'. It would be nice if these were consistent. This patch makes use of enum arm_pmu_type consistent, always using `type'. Related printks are updated, explicitly mentioning `type' also. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Commit f12482c9 ("ARM: 6974/1: pmu: refactor reservation") changed the prototype of release_pmu, but missed the stub for when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU is not selected by the platform. This patch changes the prototype of the stub, preventing possible build failures when CONFIG_CPU_HAS_PMU is not selected. Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com>
-
- 29 6月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Rutland 提交于
Currently, PMU platform_device reservation relies on some minor abuse of the platform_device::id field for determining the type of PMU. This is problematic for device tree based probing, where the ID cannot be controlled. This patch removes reliance on the id field, and depends on each PMU's platform driver to figure out which type it is. As all PMUs handled by the current platform_driver name "arm-pmu" are CPU PMUs, this convention is hardcoded. New PMU types can be supported through the use of {of,platform}_device_id tables Signed-off-by: NMark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com> Acked-by: NJamie Iles <jamie@jamieiles.com> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Cc: Rob Herring <rob.herring@calxeda.com> Cc: Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 17 2月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rabin Vincent 提交于
Allow a platform-specific IRQ handler to be specified via platform data. This will be used to implement the single-irq workaround for the DB8500. Signed-off-by: NRabin Vincent <rabin.vincent@stericsson.com> Acked-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org> Acked-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NLinus Walleij <linus.walleij@linaro.org>
-
- 17 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
The current PMU infrastructure for ARM requires that the IRQs for the PMU device are fixed at compile time and are selected based on the ARCH_ or MACH_ flags. This has the disadvantage of tying the Kernel down to a particular board as far as profiling is concerned. This patch replaces the compile-time IRQ registration with a runtime mechanism which allows the IRQs to be registered with the framework as a platform_device. A further advantage of this change is that there is scope for registering different types of performance counters in the future by changing the id of the platform_device and attaching different resources to it. Acked-by: NJamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com> Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 30 4月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Will Deacon 提交于
This patch adds an enum describing the potential PMU device types in preparation for PMU device registration via platform devices. Signed-off-by: NWill Deacon <will.deacon@arm.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-
- 13 2月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jamie Iles 提交于
To add support for perf events and to allow the hardware counters to be shared with oprofile, we need a way to reserve access to the pmu (performance monitor unit). Platforms with PMU interrupts should register the interrupts in arch/arm/kernel/pmu.c Signed-off-by: NJamie Iles <jamie.iles@picochip.com> Signed-off-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
-