1. 04 3月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 21 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 09 1月, 2009 1 次提交
  4. 26 11月, 2008 1 次提交
  5. 14 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  6. 09 10月, 2008 2 次提交
  7. 08 10月, 2008 4 次提交
  8. 01 10月, 2008 1 次提交
  9. 28 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      missing bits of net-namespace / sysctl · eeb61f71
      Al Viro 提交于
      Piss-poor sysctl registration API strikes again, film at 11...
      
      What we really need is _pathname_ required to be present in already
      registered table, so that kernel could warn about bad order.  That's the
      next target for sysctl stuff (and generally saner and more explicit
      order of initialization of ipv[46] internals wouldn't hurt either).
      
      For the time being, here are full fixups required by ..._rotable()
      stuff; we make per-net sysctl sets descendents of "ro" one and make sure
      that sufficient skeleton is there before we start registering per-net
      sysctls.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      eeb61f71
  10. 27 7月, 2008 1 次提交
    • A
      net: missing bits of net-namespace / sysctl · 6f9f489a
      Al Viro 提交于
      Piss-poor sysctl registration API strikes again, film at 11...
      What we really need is _pathname_ required to be present in
      already registered table, so that kernel could warn about bad
      order.  That's the next target for sysctl stuff (and generally
      saner and more explicit order of initialization of ipv[46]
      internals wouldn't hurt either).
      
      For the time being, here are full fixups required by ..._rotable()
      stuff; we make per-net sysctl sets descendents of "ro" one and
      make sure that sufficient skeleton is there before we start registering
      per-net sysctls.
      Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      6f9f489a
  11. 26 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  12. 03 7月, 2008 2 次提交
  13. 15 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  14. 12 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  15. 10 6月, 2008 1 次提交
  16. 05 4月, 2008 1 次提交
  17. 27 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  18. 26 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  19. 21 3月, 2008 2 次提交
  20. 07 3月, 2008 1 次提交
    • D
      [UDP]: Revert udplite and code split. · db8dac20
      David S. Miller 提交于
      This reverts commit db1ed684 ("[IPV6]
      UDP: Rename IPv6 UDP files."), commit
      8be8af8f ("[IPV4] UDP: Move
      IPv4-specific bits to other file.") and commit
      e898d4db ("[UDP]: Allow users to
      configure UDP-Lite.").
      
      First, udplite is of such small cost, and it is a core protocol just
      like TCP and normal UDP are.
      
      We spent enormous amounts of effort to make udplite share as much code
      with core UDP as possible.  All of that work is less valuable if we're
      just going to slap a config option on udplite support.
      
      It is also causing build failures, as reported on linux-next, showing
      that the changeset was not tested very well.  In fact, this is the
      second build failure resulting from the udplite change.
      
      Finally, the config options provided was a bool, instead of a modular
      option.  Meaning the udplite code does not even get build tested
      by allmodconfig builds, and furthermore the user is not presented
      with a reasonable modular build option which is particularly needed
      by distribution vendors.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      db8dac20
  21. 06 3月, 2008 3 次提交
  22. 05 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  23. 04 3月, 2008 2 次提交
  24. 01 3月, 2008 1 次提交
  25. 18 2月, 2008 1 次提交
  26. 29 1月, 2008 5 次提交