- 30 10月, 2008 7 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
From: Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> [hch: split out from bigger patch and minor adaptions] SGI-PV: 985583 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32192a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NBill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
From: Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> [hch: split out from bigger patch and minor adaptions] SGI-PV: 985583 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32191a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NBill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
From: Dave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Because this is the first major generic btree routine this patch includes some infrastrucure, first a few routines to deal with a btree block that can be either in short or long form, second xfs_btree_read_buf_block, which is the new central routine to read a btree block given a cursor, and third the new xfs_btree_ptr_addr routine to calculate the address for a given btree pointer record. [hch: split out from bigger patch and minor adaptions] SGI-PV: 985583 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32190a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NBill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Add new helpers in xfs_btree.c to find the record, key and block pointer entries inside a btree block. To implement this genericly the ->get_maxrecs methods and two new xfs_btree_ops entries for the key and record sizes are used. Also add a big comment describing how the addressing inside a btree block works. Note that these helpers are unused until users are introduced in the next patches and this patch will thus cause some harmless compiler warnings. SGI-PV: 985583 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32189a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NBill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Factor xfs_btree_maxrecs into a per-btree operation. The get_maxrecs method is based on a patch from Dave Chinner. SGI-PV: 985583 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32188a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NBill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Make the existing bmap btree tracing generic so that it applies to all btree types. Some fragments lifted from a patch by Dave Chinner. SGI-PV: 985583 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32187a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NBill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
xfs_btree_init_cursor contains close to little shared code for the different btrees and will get even more non-common code in the future. Split it up into one routine per btree type. Because xfs_btree_dup_cursor needs to call the init routine for a generic btree cursor add a new btree operation vector that contains a dup_cursor method that initializes a new cursor based on an existing one. The btree operations vector is based on an idea and code from Dave Chinner and will grow more entries later during this series. SGI-PV: 985583 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:32176a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NLachlan McIlroy <lachlan@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NBill O'Donnell <billodo@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <david@fromorbit.com>
-
- 14 2月, 2008 1 次提交
-
-
由 Marcin Slusarz 提交于
remove beX_add functions and replace all uses with beX_add_cpu Signed-off-by: NMarcin Slusarz <marcin.slusarz@gmail.com> Cc: Mark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com> Reviewed-by: NDave Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Cc: Timothy Shimmin <tes@sgi.com> Cc: <linux-ext4@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 14 7月, 2007 1 次提交
-
-
由 David Chinner 提交于
When we have a couple of hundred transactions on the fly at once, they all typically modify the on disk superblock in some way. create/unclink/mkdir/rmdir modify inode counts, allocation/freeing modify free block counts. When these counts are modified in a transaction, they must eventually lock the superblock buffer and apply the mods. The buffer then remains locked until the transaction is committed into the incore log buffer. The result of this is that with enough transactions on the fly the incore superblock buffer becomes a bottleneck. The result of contention on the incore superblock buffer is that transaction rates fall - the more pressure that is put on the superblock buffer, the slower things go. The key to removing the contention is to not require the superblock fields in question to be locked. We do that by not marking the superblock dirty in the transaction. IOWs, we modify the incore superblock but do not modify the cached superblock buffer. In short, we do not log superblock modifications to critical fields in the superblock on every transaction. In fact we only do it just before we write the superblock to disk every sync period or just before unmount. This creates an interesting problem - if we don't log or write out the fields in every transaction, then how do the values get recovered after a crash? the answer is simple - we keep enough duplicate, logged information in other structures that we can reconstruct the correct count after log recovery has been performed. It is the AGF and AGI structures that contain the duplicate information; after recovery, we walk every AGI and AGF and sum their individual counters to get the correct value, and we do a transaction into the log to correct them. An optimisation of this is that if we have a clean unmount record, we know the value in the superblock is correct, so we can avoid the summation walk under normal conditions and so mount/recovery times do not change under normal operation. One wrinkle that was discovered during development was that the blocks used in the freespace btrees are never accounted for in the AGF counters. This was once a valid optimisation to make; when the filesystem is full, the free space btrees are empty and consume no space. Hence when it matters, the "accounting" is correct. But that means the when we do the AGF summations, we would not have a correct count and xfs_check would complain. Hence a new counter was added to track the number of blocks used by the free space btrees. This is an *on-disk format change*. As a result of this, lazy superblock counters are a mkfs option and at the moment on linux there is no way to convert an old filesystem. This is possible - xfs_db can be used to twiddle the right bits and then xfs_repair will do the format conversion for you. Similarly, you can convert backwards as well. At some point we'll add functionality to xfs_admin to do the bit twiddling easily.... SGI-PV: 964999 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:28652a Signed-off-by: NDavid Chinner <dgc@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
- 28 9月, 2006 3 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Sandeen 提交于
ialloc_btree. SGI-PV: 955302 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26910a Signed-off-by: NEric Sandeen <sandeen@sandeen.net> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
SGI-PV: 954580 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26562a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
handling with sparse now, no need for comments. SGI-PV: 954580 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26557a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NTim Shimmin <tes@sgi.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2006 1 次提交
-
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
pure bloat. SGI-PV: 952969 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux-melb:xfs-kern:26251a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 02 11月, 2005 4 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
SGI-PV: 943272 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:201006a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
information gcc could not find out (that a directory always has a .. entry), the others are outright gcc bugs. SGI-PV: 943511 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:200055a Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@sgi.com> Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
boilerplate. SGI-PV: 913862 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23903a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
由 Nathan Scott 提交于
SGI-PV: 943122 SGI-Modid: xfs-linux:xfs-kern:23901a Signed-off-by: NNathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
-
- 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
-
-
由 Linus Torvalds 提交于
Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history, even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about 3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good infrastructure for it. Let it rip!
-