1. 19 10月, 2020 2 次提交
  2. 15 10月, 2020 3 次提交
  3. 13 10月, 2020 4 次提交
    • D
      blk-mq: Add blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues() API call · 9f7b6ce9
      Douglas Anderson 提交于
      mainline inclusion
      from mainline-5.8-rc1
      commit b9151e7b
      category: bugfix
      bugzilla: 42781
      CVE: NA
      
      ---------------------------
      
      We have:
      * blk_mq_run_hw_queue()
      * blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queue()
      * blk_mq_run_hw_queues()
      
      ...but not blk_mq_delay_run_hw_queues(), presumably because nobody
      needed it before now.  Since we need it for a later patch in this
      series, add it.
      Signed-off-by: NDouglas Anderson <dianders@chromium.org>
      Reviewed-by: NMing Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      Signed-off-by: NYu Kuai <yukuai3@huawei.com>
      Reviewed-by: NYufen Yu <yuyufen@huawei.com>
      Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      9f7b6ce9
    • L
      mm: don't rely on system state to detect hot-plug operations · 29b493b4
      Laurent Dufour 提交于
      commit f85086f9 upstream.
      
      In register_mem_sect_under_node() the system_state's value is checked to
      detect whether the call is made during boot time or during an hot-plug
      operation.  Unfortunately, that check against SYSTEM_BOOTING is wrong
      because regular memory is registered at SYSTEM_SCHEDULING state.  In
      addition, memory hot-plug operation can be triggered at this system
      state by the ACPI [1].  So checking against the system state is not
      enough.
      
      The consequence is that on system with interleaved node's ranges like this:
      
       Early memory node ranges
         node   1: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000011fffffff]
         node   2: [mem 0x0000000120000000-0x000000014fffffff]
         node   1: [mem 0x0000000150000000-0x00000001ffffffff]
         node   0: [mem 0x0000000200000000-0x000000048fffffff]
         node   2: [mem 0x0000000490000000-0x00000007ffffffff]
      
      This can be seen on PowerPC LPAR after multiple memory hot-plug and
      hot-unplug operations are done.  At the next reboot the node's memory
      ranges can be interleaved and since the call to link_mem_sections() is
      made in topology_init() while the system is in the SYSTEM_SCHEDULING
      state, the node's id is not checked, and the sections registered to
      multiple nodes:
      
        $ ls -l /sys/devices/system/memory/memory21/node*
        total 0
        lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     0 Aug 24 05:27 node1 -> ../../node/node1
        lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     0 Aug 24 05:27 node2 -> ../../node/node2
      
      In that case, the system is able to boot but if later one of theses
      memory blocks is hot-unplugged and then hot-plugged, the sysfs
      inconsistency is detected and this is triggering a BUG_ON():
      
        kernel BUG at /Users/laurent/src/linux-ppc/mm/memory_hotplug.c:1084!
        Oops: Exception in kernel mode, sig: 5 [#1]
        LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
        Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp pseries_rng rng_core vmx_crypto gf128mul binfmt_misc ip_tables x_tables xfs libcrc32c crc32c_vpmsum autofs4
        CPU: 8 PID: 10256 Comm: drmgr Not tainted 5.9.0-rc1+ #25
        Call Trace:
          add_memory_resource+0x23c/0x340 (unreliable)
          __add_memory+0x5c/0xf0
          dlpar_add_lmb+0x1b4/0x500
          dlpar_memory+0x1f8/0xb80
          handle_dlpar_errorlog+0xc0/0x190
          dlpar_store+0x198/0x4a0
          kobj_attr_store+0x30/0x50
          sysfs_kf_write+0x64/0x90
          kernfs_fop_write+0x1b0/0x290
          vfs_write+0xe8/0x290
          ksys_write+0xdc/0x130
          system_call_exception+0x160/0x270
          system_call_common+0xf0/0x27c
      
      This patch addresses the root cause by not relying on the system_state
      value to detect whether the call is due to a hot-plug operation.  An
      extra parameter is added to link_mem_sections() detailing whether the
      operation is due to a hot-plug operation.
      
      [1] According to Oscar Salvador, using this qemu command line, ACPI
      memory hotplug operations are raised at SYSTEM_SCHEDULING state:
      
        $QEMU -enable-kvm -machine pc -smp 4,sockets=4,cores=1,threads=1 -cpu host -monitor pty \
              -m size=$MEM,slots=255,maxmem=4294967296k  \
              -numa node,nodeid=0,cpus=0-3,mem=512 -numa node,nodeid=1,mem=512 \
              -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm0,size=134217728 -device pc-dimm,node=0,memdev=memdimm0,id=dimm0,slot=0 \
              -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm1,size=134217728 -device pc-dimm,node=0,memdev=memdimm1,id=dimm1,slot=1 \
              -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm2,size=134217728 -device pc-dimm,node=0,memdev=memdimm2,id=dimm2,slot=2 \
              -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm3,size=134217728 -device pc-dimm,node=0,memdev=memdimm3,id=dimm3,slot=3 \
              -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm4,size=134217728 -device pc-dimm,node=1,memdev=memdimm4,id=dimm4,slot=4 \
              -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm5,size=134217728 -device pc-dimm,node=1,memdev=memdimm5,id=dimm5,slot=5 \
              -object memory-backend-ram,id=memdimm6,size=134217728 -device pc-dimm,node=1,memdev=memdimm6,id=dimm6,slot=6 \
      
      Fixes: 4fbce633 ("mm/memory_hotplug.c: make register_mem_sect_under_node() a callback of walk_memory_range()")
      Signed-off-by: NLaurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
      Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915094143.79181-3-ldufour@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      29b493b4
    • L
      mm: replace memmap_context by meminit_context · bf133f4f
      Laurent Dufour 提交于
      commit c1d0da83 upstream.
      
      Patch series "mm: fix memory to node bad links in sysfs", v3.
      
      Sometimes, firmware may expose interleaved memory layout like this:
      
       Early memory node ranges
         node   1: [mem 0x0000000000000000-0x000000011fffffff]
         node   2: [mem 0x0000000120000000-0x000000014fffffff]
         node   1: [mem 0x0000000150000000-0x00000001ffffffff]
         node   0: [mem 0x0000000200000000-0x000000048fffffff]
         node   2: [mem 0x0000000490000000-0x00000007ffffffff]
      
      In that case, we can see memory blocks assigned to multiple nodes in
      sysfs:
      
        $ ls -l /sys/devices/system/memory/memory21
        total 0
        lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     0 Aug 24 05:27 node1 -> ../../node/node1
        lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     0 Aug 24 05:27 node2 -> ../../node/node2
        -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65536 Aug 24 05:27 online
        -r--r--r-- 1 root root 65536 Aug 24 05:27 phys_device
        -r--r--r-- 1 root root 65536 Aug 24 05:27 phys_index
        drwxr-xr-x 2 root root     0 Aug 24 05:27 power
        -r--r--r-- 1 root root 65536 Aug 24 05:27 removable
        -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65536 Aug 24 05:27 state
        lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root     0 Aug 24 05:25 subsystem -> ../../../../bus/memory
        -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 65536 Aug 24 05:25 uevent
        -r--r--r-- 1 root root 65536 Aug 24 05:27 valid_zones
      
      The same applies in the node's directory with a memory21 link in both
      the node1 and node2's directory.
      
      This is wrong but doesn't prevent the system to run.  However when
      later, one of these memory blocks is hot-unplugged and then hot-plugged,
      the system is detecting an inconsistency in the sysfs layout and a
      BUG_ON() is raised:
      
        kernel BUG at /Users/laurent/src/linux-ppc/mm/memory_hotplug.c:1084!
        LE PAGE_SIZE=64K MMU=Hash SMP NR_CPUS=2048 NUMA pSeries
        Modules linked in: rpadlpar_io rpaphp pseries_rng rng_core vmx_crypto gf128mul binfmt_misc ip_tables x_tables xfs libcrc32c crc32c_vpmsum autofs4
        CPU: 8 PID: 10256 Comm: drmgr Not tainted 5.9.0-rc1+ #25
        Call Trace:
          add_memory_resource+0x23c/0x340 (unreliable)
          __add_memory+0x5c/0xf0
          dlpar_add_lmb+0x1b4/0x500
          dlpar_memory+0x1f8/0xb80
          handle_dlpar_errorlog+0xc0/0x190
          dlpar_store+0x198/0x4a0
          kobj_attr_store+0x30/0x50
          sysfs_kf_write+0x64/0x90
          kernfs_fop_write+0x1b0/0x290
          vfs_write+0xe8/0x290
          ksys_write+0xdc/0x130
          system_call_exception+0x160/0x270
          system_call_common+0xf0/0x27c
      
      This has been seen on PowerPC LPAR.
      
      The root cause of this issue is that when node's memory is registered,
      the range used can overlap another node's range, thus the memory block
      is registered to multiple nodes in sysfs.
      
      There are two issues here:
      
       (a) The sysfs memory and node's layouts are broken due to these
           multiple links
      
       (b) The link errors in link_mem_sections() should not lead to a system
           panic.
      
      To address (a) register_mem_sect_under_node should not rely on the
      system state to detect whether the link operation is triggered by a hot
      plug operation or not.  This is addressed by the patches 1 and 2 of this
      series.
      
      Issue (b) will be addressed separately.
      
      This patch (of 2):
      
      The memmap_context enum is used to detect whether a memory operation is
      due to a hot-add operation or happening at boot time.
      
      Make it general to the hotplug operation and rename it as
      meminit_context.
      
      There is no functional change introduced by this patch
      Suggested-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NLaurent Dufour <ldufour@linux.ibm.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Reviewed-by: NDavid Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
      Reviewed-by: NOscar Salvador <osalvador@suse.de>
      Acked-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
      Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
      Cc: Nathan Lynch <nathanl@linux.ibm.com>
      Cc: Scott Cheloha <cheloha@linux.ibm.com>
      Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      Cc: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@intel.com>
      Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915094143.79181-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.com
      Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200915132624.9723-1-ldufour@linux.ibm.comSigned-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NGreg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      bf133f4f
    • S
      vsock/virtio: add transport parameter to the virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() · 2c2331d4
      Stefano Garzarella 提交于
      [ Upstream commit 4c7246dc ]
      
      We are going to add 'struct vsock_sock *' parameter to
      virtio_transport_get_ops().
      
      In some cases, like in the virtio_transport_reset_no_sock(),
      we don't have any socket assigned to the packet received,
      so we can't use the virtio_transport_get_ops().
      
      In order to allow virtio_transport_reset_no_sock() to use the
      '.send_pkt' callback from the 'vhost_transport' or 'virtio_transport',
      we add the 'struct virtio_transport *' to it and to its caller:
      virtio_transport_recv_pkt().
      
      We moved the 'vhost_transport' and 'virtio_transport' definition,
      to pass their address to the virtio_transport_recv_pkt().
      Reviewed-by: NStefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NStefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      Signed-off-by: NSasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
      Signed-off-by: NYang Yingliang <yangyingliang@huawei.com>
      2c2331d4
  4. 10 10月, 2020 31 次提交