We skip index 0 that holds CSS section which isn't relevant for paged
memory.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.ad2df68fccbc.I381f931c6e7606c21935ec6667619b209224e408@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The code is not directly related to PCIe transport, and it will help
moving sync/async commands logic out of PCIe in the next patches.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.271f59887fd1.I8ff41236f4e11a25df83d76c982a2a30ba2b9903@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Instead of pretending to have NAPI and then relying entirely on
interrupts anyway, properly implement NAPI and schedule the poll
when we get an interrupt, re-enabling the interrupt only after
the poll completed.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.a5951ac4fc06.I9c84a147288fcfb1b019572c6758f2d92949f5d7@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

In the new api all the flush in the FW is done before we
get the response and in the response we only get the updated
read pointer and all queued packets don't get anymore rx_tx
per packet to free the queued packet, so driver needs to free
all queued packets on flushed queue at once after flush response.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4bd0eca8c0ef.I1601aad2eb2cc83f6f73b8ca52be57bb9fd626ab@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If there are frequent CCA delays due to the extension channel
as detected by the firmware, and we're on 2.4 GHz, then handle
this by disconnecting (with a reconnect hint).

When we disconnect, we'll also update our capabilities to use
only 20 MHz on the next connection (if it's on 2.4 GHz) as to
avoid the use of the extension channel that has too much noise.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4de9c363b0b5.I709b7e6f73a7537c53f22d7418927691259de8a8@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When restarting firmware with an ongoing scheduled scan, we
don't (and shouldn't) mark it as aborted as mac80211 will be
restarting it, and so no event should go out to userspace.
The appropriate comment regarding this wasn't moved to this
place, so add it.

However, we _do_ need to clean up our internal state, since
mac80211 will restart the scan, and we'll otherwise get to
the WARN_ON() a few lines below for no reason whatsoever.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.4ddc9b017268.Ie869b628ae56a5d776eba0e7b7f05f42fc566f2e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

For testing features where the firmware may send some
notifications it can often be a lot easier to do that
from a test script. Remove most injection limitations
from debugfs to be able to do this.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.9aff3c6b4607.I03b0ae7df094734451445ffcb7f9f0274969f1c0@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Some notifications aren't handled by the general RX handler
code, due to multi-queue. Add size checks for them explicitly.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.1370c776cb31.Ic536bd1aee5368969fbf65db85b9b9b5dc9c6034@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We shouldn't trust the firmware with the sizes (or contents)
of notifications, accessing too much data could cause page
faults if the data doesn't fit into the allocated space. This
applies more on older NICs where multiple notifications can
be in a single RX buffer.

Add a general framework for checking a minimum size of any
notification in the RX handlers and use it for most. Some RX
handlers were already checking and I've moved the checks,
some more complex checks I left and made them _NO_SIZE for
the RX handlers.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20210117130510.3e155d5e5f90.I2121fa4ac7cd7eb98970d84b793796646afa3eed@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We have already WARN_ON(!qc) for non-QOS frame on txq->sched_retry path,
but we continue to process, what makes no sense since tid is not
initialized. Non QOS frame should never happen when aggregation
is enabled on queue, so do not process that.

Patch should fix smatch warning:
drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlegacy/4965-mac.c:2822 il4965_hdl_tx() error: uninitialized symbol 'tid'.
Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Reported-by: NDan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NStanislaw Gruszka <stf_xl@wp.pl>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210119100621.439134-1-stf_xl@wp.pl

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:123: warning: Function parameter or member 'args' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_object'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'dev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'rev' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/acpi.c:142: warning: Function parameter or member 'func' not described in 'iwl_acpi_get_dsm_u8'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-17-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Function parameter or member 'reg_data' not described in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/fw/dbg.c:1932: warning: Excess function parameter 'reg' description in 'iwl_dump_ini_mem'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: Shahar S Matityahu <shahar.s.matityahu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-15-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-phy-db.c:97: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_phy_db'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-14-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-parse.c:340: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'struct iwl_eeprom_enhanced_txpwr '

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-9-lee.jones@linaro.org

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'trans' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/iwl-eeprom-read.c:347: warning: Function parameter or member 'eeprom_size' not described in 'iwl_read_eeprom'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-8-lee.jones@linaro.org

Also add documentation for 'mvm'.

Fixes the following W=1 kernel build warning(s):

 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:400: warning: cannot understand function prototype: 'const u16 expected_tpt_legacy[IWL_RATE_COUNT] = '
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'tbl' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'scale_index' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'attempts' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'successes' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:684: warning: Function parameter or member 'window' not described in '_rs_collect_tx_data'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2677: warning: duplicate section name 'NOTE'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:2682: warning: Function parameter or member 'band' not described in 'rs_initialize_lq'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:3761: warning: Function parameter or member 'lq_sta' not described in 'rs_program_fix_rate'
 drivers/net/wireless/intel/iwlwifi/mvm/rs.c:4213: warning: Function parameter or member 'mvm' not described in 'iwl_mvm_tx_protection'

Cc: Johannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Cc: Emmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Cc: Luca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Cc: Intel Linux Wireless <linuxwifi@intel.com>
Cc: Kalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-wireless@vger.kernel.org
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: NLee Jones <lee.jones@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201126133152.3211309-3-lee.jones@linaro.org

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix a
warning by replacing a /* fall through */ comment with the new
pseudo-keyword macro fallthrough; instead of letting the code fall
through to the next case.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize /* fall through */ comments as
implicit fall-through markings.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/edd98d194bfc98b4be93a9bdc303630b719c0e66.1605896060.git.gustavoars@kernel.org

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117155904.GA14551@embeddedor

In preparation to enable -Wimplicit-fallthrough for Clang, fix multiple
warnings by explicitly using the fallthrough pseudo-keyword as a
replacement for a number of "fall through" markings.

Notice that Clang doesn't recognize "fall through" comments as
implicit fall-through.

Link: https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/115Signed-off-by: NGustavo A. R. Silva <gustavoars@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NKalle Valo <kvalo@codeaurora.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201117135053.GA13248@embeddedor

When waiting for a notification and then processing it,
we also need to check the size of the data before we use
it. Most places do that already, but fix the remaining
ones to do it as well.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b29573bcba39.I4b7e72824d06dc0719a40021d933e29edfc14713@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When the firmware is loaded, its internal timer (GP2) is
reset and all the time_sync in the BSS table is now
unusable. Ask cfg80211 to purge the BSS table.
Signed-off-by: NEmmanuel Grumbach <emmanuel.grumbach@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.1b703b6f4c05.I0b5c51aa87e86c964e2eae6d959a96e232840ef5@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

FW now puts in the struct version, the TLV version so we also check
it to make sure it matches.
Signed-off-by: NMordechay Goodstein <mordechay.goodstein@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.bc1dfb56ffbd.I99d8085cccc8687805781ccc43e189dbcef0e63b@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The range response notification has several versions. Check the
notification size according to the expected notification version.
Notifications with incorrect size will be ignored.
Signed-off-by: NAvraham Stern <avraham.stern@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.ee57c3214d05.I810d7de33fb08001ef1a2e24714d5b68932e088e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

The RX handlers for probe response data and channel switch weren't
hooked up properly, fix that.

Fixes: 86e177d8 ("iwlwifi: mvm: add NOA and CSA to a probe response")
Fixes: d3a108a4 ("iwlwifi: mvm: Support CSA countdown offloading")
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.2d07dcee0d35.I07a61b5d734478db57d9434ff303e4c90bf6c32b@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Previously, we added checks that the contained MPDU size is long
enough, but really we should also check that the notification
itself fits into the data. Add some checks for that.

Also add unlikely() annotations on the previously added checks.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.51cc04cf1e3e.I7bfd6809f8f5feb75f79397646e6656e95688a0e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Add a PCI ID for snj with mr in AX family.
Signed-off-by: NMatti Gottlieb <matti.gottlieb@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.101ac3058c04.Idd28706b122cdc8103956f8e72bb062fe4adb54e@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If the channel switch delay that we would incur after the channel
switch actually happens is longer than the quiet time we're willing
to tolerate, disconnect as well.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.3bc3449922da.Ib0255deb67b2fc21317e274adcacb545bb1dc669@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

There are some races in the hardware that can possibly lead to
a bus lockup later during a restart when we manage to kill the
firmware at a bad time (while it's accessing the bus).

To work around this, add support for a new handshake between
firmware and driver to ensure that the firmware is in a well-
known state before we kill it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.7756fcc9865c.I13de65e0ffcb4186dd4c1a465f66df2e98c9a947@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Start tracking not just if the firmware is dead or alive,
but also if it's starting.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.33e50d40b688.I8bbd41af7aa5e769273a6fc1c06fbf548dd2eb26@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

When we get a channel switch with a very long quiet period, we schedule
a work to disconnect after a while. This work runs in background. In the
meanwhile, we keep getting beacons and sending FW modify command for each.
This has a potential race, where we modify the CSA after we aborted it.

Protect the flow by setting csa_failed to true in case we abort, and check
it before sending the modify command.

This required a modification to the way we treat csa_failed in
iwl_mvm_post_channel_switch:
1. The variable isn't being reset anymore, so we can still look at it in
iwl_mvm_channel_switch_rx_beacon. This is fine, since we reset it when
starting a new CSA.
2. There is no more early return in case of csa_failed. This is fine,
since before this patch csa_failed was set only for GO, and for GO the
function is only resetting the power settings, which we want to restore
even in case of failure.
Signed-off-by: NSara Sharon <sara.sharon@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.b023856bdf39.I4ed0149e0018fe5e1ae3c2a1cbc614954016063f@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We send some data to the firmware and expect to get it back,
but we shouldn't really trust the firmware on this. Check the
size of all the data we send down to avoid using bad or just
uninitialized data when the firmware doesn't respond right.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.a5a8173f16c7.I4fa68bb2b1c7dcc52ddd381c4042722d27c4a34d@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We don't need the sequence/index/cmd_index unless we're doing
reclaim, they're not even valid in the other cases. Move the
variables and their assignments into the right if statement
and combine the two if statements into a single one as well.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6207fdcc91a9.Ia71e766ead7560262f4bc6ad3da6f1117c498cd6@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

Use SPDX tags instead of the long copyright notices.  Also cleanup
some duplicate copyright notices and combine the years where possible.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201210000603.481bcb512a6f.I8146abe5a637079e7336209f23cb26af98b12b31@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

There's a bug in the lengths - the 'old length' needs to be calculated
using the 'old' pointer, of course, likely a copy/paste mistake. Fix
this.
Reported-by: NDaniel Gabay <daniel.gabay@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Fixes: cf29c5b6 ("iwlwifi: dbg_ini: implement time point handling")
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.c0105ddffa74.I1ddb243053ff763c91b663748b6a593ecc3b5634@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

If we get an error, no longer consider the firmware to be
in IWL_TRANS_FW_ALIVE state.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.a9d01e79c1c7.Ib2deb076b392fb516a7230bac91d7ab8a9586d86@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We set this here, but don't really use it until we've
enabled interrupts. But when enabling interrupts we
always overwrite this value anyway, so remove setting
it here, mostly in order not to have some additional
code duplicated later.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.135d96297aca.Id2d26fff60b6c31202bb0a36e46948bda6a39d33@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

This was mistakenly tagged with CAPA instead of API, fix it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.6a9203094c1e.I658e63066b05257e78fc20bfcbcf151ba8fd7754@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

This is actually wrong, the bit used here by the image loader
is BIT(1), not BIT(2). The latter will be reused by the new
reset flow soon.

However, as we never had any complaints about not printing
the IML status or not handling the IML error interrupt (and
I suspect the code handling it was incorrectly anyway) just
remove the code for it.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.9a323f4a3493.Ic7aee4dbbf4be42287c338c2fa1b111473724116@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We keep the scan status per UID in scan_uid_status field when the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function is called. If we error out after
this, e.g. due to FW restart being in progress, we're not cleaning
up properly, and can run into warnings later.

Clean up internal variables when starting fails after calling the
iwl_mvm_build_scan_cmd() function.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.970421a2f753.Id62b2da8a0ccccbb114407db82ca485d07749d39@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>

We're currently doing accounting on the queue sync with an
atomic variable that counts down the number of remaining
notifications that we still need.

As we've been hitting issues in this area, modify this to
track a bitmap of queues, not just the number of queues,
and print out the remaining bitmap in the warning.
Signed-off-by: NJohannes Berg <johannes.berg@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/iwlwifi.20201209231352.0a3fa177cd6b.I7c69ff999419368266279ec27dd618eb450908b3@changeidSigned-off-by: NLuca Coelho <luciano.coelho@intel.com>