1. 28 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  2. 14 6月, 2014 1 次提交
  3. 30 5月, 2014 1 次提交
  4. 03 5月, 2014 3 次提交
  5. 30 4月, 2014 2 次提交
  6. 26 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  7. 19 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • T
      Documentation/vm/numa_memory_policy.txt: fix wrong document in numa_memory_policy.txt · 8f28ed92
      Tang Chen 提交于
      In document numa_memory_policy.txt, the following examples for flag
      MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES are incorrect.
      
      	For example, consider a task that is attached to a cpuset with
      	mems 2-5 that sets an Interleave policy over the same set with
      	MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES.  If the cpuset's mems change to 3-7, the
      	interleave now occurs over nodes 3,5-6.  If the cpuset's mems
      	then change to 0,2-3,5, then the interleave occurs over nodes
      	0,3,5.
      
      According to the comment of the patch adding flag MPOL_F_RELATIVE_NODES,
      the nodemasks the user specifies should be considered relative to the
      current task's mems_allowed.
      
       (https://lkml.org/lkml/2008/2/29/428)
      
      And according to numa_memory_policy.txt, if the user's nodemask includes
      nodes that are outside the range of the new set of allowed nodes, then
      the remap wraps around to the beginning of the nodemask and, if not
      already set, sets the node in the mempolicy nodemask.
      
      So in the example, if the user specifies 2-5, for a task whose
      mems_allowed is 3-7, the nodemasks should be remapped the third, fourth,
      fifth, sixth node in mems_allowed.  like the following:
      
      	mems_allowed:       3  4  5  6  7
      
      	relative index:     0  1  2  3  4
      	                    5
      
      So the nodemasks should be remapped to 3,5-7, but not 3,5-6.
      
      And for a task whose mems_allowed is 0,2-3,5, the nodemasks should be
      remapped to 0,2-3,5, but not 0,3,5.
      
      	mems_allowed:       0  2  3  5
      
              relative index:     0  1  2  3
                                  4  5
      Signed-off-by: NTang Chen <tangchen@cn.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
      Acked-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      8f28ed92
  8. 18 4月, 2014 1 次提交
    • D
      drm: Split out drm_probe_helper.c from drm_crtc_helper.c · 8d754544
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This is leftover stuff from my previous doc round which I kinda wanted
      to do but didn't yet due to rebase hell.
      
      The modeset helpers and the probing helpers a independent and e.g.
      i915 uses the probing stuff but has its own modeset infrastructure. It
      hence makes to split this up. While at it add a DOC: comment for the
      probing libraray.
      
      It would be rather neat to pull some of the DocBook documenting these
      two helpers into in-line DOC: comments. But unfortunately kerneldoc
      doesn't support markdown or something similar to make nice-looking
      documentation, so the current state is better.
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      Signed-off-by: NDave Airlie <airlied@redhat.com>
      8d754544
  9. 17 4月, 2014 8 次提交
  10. 15 4月, 2014 8 次提交
  11. 14 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  12. 10 4月, 2014 1 次提交
  13. 08 4月, 2014 11 次提交