提交 · fa485d21a7ae712fef8e943d1dd3ca7b27cb392e · openeuler / Kernel

10 12月, 2020 40 次提交

btrfs: scrub: reduce width of extent_len/stripe_len from 64 to 32 bits · fa485d21

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

Btrfs on-disk format chose to use u64 for almost everything, but there
are a other restrictions that won't let us use more than u32 for things
like extent length (the maximum length is 128MiB for non-hole extents),
or stripe length (we have device number limit).

This means if we don't have extra handling to convert u64 to u32, we
will always have some questionable operations like
"u32 = u64 >> sectorsize_bits" in the code.

This patch will try to address the problem by reducing the width for the
following members/parameters:

- scrub_parity::stripe_len
- @len of scrub_pages()
- @extent_len of scrub_remap_extent()
- @len of scrub_parity_mark_sectors_error()
- @len of scrub_parity_mark_sectors_data()
- @len of scrub_extent()
- @len of scrub_pages_for_parity()
- @len of scrub_extent_for_parity()

For members extracted from on-disk structure, like map->stripe_len, they
will be kept as is. Since that modification would require on-disk format
change.

There will be cases like "u32 = u64 - u64" or "u32 = u64", for such call
sites, extra ASSERT() is added to be extra safe for debug builds.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

fa485d21

btrfs: refactor btrfs_lookup_bio_sums to handle out-of-order bvecs · 6275193e

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

Refactor btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() by:

- Remove the @file_offset parameter
  There are two factors making the @file_offset parameter useless:

  * For csum lookup in csum tree, file offset makes no sense
    We only need disk_bytenr, which is unrelated to file_offset

  * page_offset (file offset) of each bvec is not contiguous.
    Pages can be added to the same bio as long as their on-disk bytenr
    is contiguous, meaning we could have pages at different file offsets
    in the same bio.

  Thus passing file_offset makes no sense any more.
  The only user of file_offset is for data reloc inode, we will use
  a new function, search_file_offset_in_bio(), to handle it.

- Extract the csum tree lookup into search_csum_tree()
  The new function will handle the csum search in csum tree.
  The return value is the same as btrfs_find_ordered_sum(), returning
  the number of found sectors which have checksum.

- Change how we do the main loop
  The only needed info from bio is:
  * the on-disk bytenr
  * the length

  After extracting the above info, we can do the search without bio
  at all, which makes the main loop much simpler:

	for (cur_disk_bytenr = orig_disk_bytenr;
	     cur_disk_bytenr < orig_disk_bytenr + orig_len;
	     cur_disk_bytenr += count * sectorsize) {

		/* Lookup csum tree */
		count = search_csum_tree(fs_info, path, cur_disk_bytenr,
					 search_len, csum_dst);
		if (!count) {
			/* Csum hole handling */
		}
	}

- Use single variable as the source to calculate all other offsets
  Instead of all different type of variables, we use only one main
  variable, cur_disk_bytenr, which represents the current disk bytenr.

  All involved values can be calculated from that variable, and
  all those variable will only be visible in the inner loop.

The above refactoring makes btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() way more robust than
it used to be, especially related to the file offset lookup.  Now
file_offset lookup is only related to data reloc inode, otherwise we
don't need to bother file_offset at all.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

6275193e

btrfs: remove btrfs_find_ordered_sum call from btrfs_lookup_bio_sums · 9e46458a

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

The function btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() is only called for read bios.
While btrfs_find_ordered_sum() is to search ordered extent sums, which
is only for write path.

This means to read a page we either:

- Submit read bio if it's not uptodate
  This means we only need to search csum tree for checksums.

- The page is already uptodate
  It can be marked uptodate for previous read, or being marked dirty.
  As we always mark page uptodate for dirty page.
  In that case, we don't need to submit read bio at all, thus no need
  to search any checksums.

Remove the btrfs_find_ordered_sum() call in btrfs_lookup_bio_sums().
And since btrfs_lookup_bio_sums() is the only caller for
btrfs_find_ordered_sum(), also remove the implementation.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

9e46458a

btrfs: handle sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE case for extent buffer accessors · 884b07d0

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

To support sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE case, we need to take extra care of
extent buffer accessors.

Since sectorsize is smaller than PAGE_SIZE, one page can contain
multiple tree blocks, we must use eb->start to determine the real offset
to read/write for extent buffer accessors.

This patch introduces two helpers to do this:

- get_eb_page_index()
  This is to calculate the index to access extent_buffer::pages.
  It's just a simple wrapper around "start >> PAGE_SHIFT".

  For sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, nothing is changed.
  For sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE case, we always get index as 0, and
  the existing page shift also works.

- get_eb_offset_in_page()
  This is to calculate the offset to access extent_buffer::pages.
  This needs to take extent_buffer::start into consideration.

  For sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, extent_buffer::start is always
  aligned to PAGE_SIZE, thus adding extent_buffer::start to
  offset_in_page() won't change the result.
  For sectorsize < PAGE_SIZE case, adding extent_buffer::start gives
  us the correct offset to access.

This patch will touch the following parts to cover all extent buffer
accessors:

- BTRFS_SETGET_HEADER_FUNCS()
- read_extent_buffer()
- read_extent_buffer_to_user()
- memcmp_extent_buffer()
- write_extent_buffer_chunk_tree_uuid()
- write_extent_buffer_fsid()
- write_extent_buffer()
- memzero_extent_buffer()
- copy_extent_buffer_full()
- copy_extent_buffer()
- memcpy_extent_buffer()
- memmove_extent_buffer()
- btrfs_get_token_##bits()
- btrfs_get_##bits()
- btrfs_set_token_##bits()
- btrfs_set_##bits()
- generic_bin_search()
Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

884b07d0

btrfs: update num_extent_pages to support subpage sized extent buffer · 4a3dc938

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

For subpage sized extent buffer, we have ensured no extent buffer will
cross page boundary, thus we would only need one page for any extent
buffer.

Update function num_extent_pages to handle such case.  Now
num_extent_pages() returns 1 for subpage sized extent buffer.
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

4a3dc938

btrfs: don't allow tree block to cross page boundary for subpage support · 1aaac38c

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

As a preparation for subpage sector size support (allowing filesystem
with sector size smaller than page size to be mounted) if the sector
size is smaller than page size, we don't allow tree block to be read if
it crosses 64K(*) boundary.

The 64K is selected because:

- we are only going to support 64K page size for subpage for now
- 64K is also the maximum supported node size

This ensures that tree blocks are always contained in one page for a
system with 64K page size, which can greatly simplify the handling.

Otherwise we would have to do complex multi-page handling of tree
blocks.  Currently there is no way to create such tree blocks.

In kernel we have avoided such tree blocks allocation even on 4K page
size, as it can lead to RAID56 stripe scrubbing.

While btrfs-progs have fixed its chunk allocator since 2016 for convert,
and has extra checks to do the same behavior as the kernel.

Just add such graceful checks in case of an ancient filesystem.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1aaac38c

btrfs: calculate inline extent buffer page size based on page size · deb67895

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

Btrfs only support 64K as maximum node size, thus for 4K page system, we
would have at most 16 pages for one extent buffer.

For a system using 64K page size, we would really have just one page.

While we always use 16 pages for extent_buffer::pages, this means for
systems using 64K pages, we are wasting memory for 15 page pointers
which will never be used.

Calculate the array size based on page size and the node size maximum.

- for systems using 4K page size, it will stay 16 pages
- for systems using 64K page size, it will be 1 page

Move the definition of BTRFS_MAX_METADATA_BLOCKSIZE to btrfs_tree.h, to
avoid circular inclusion of ctree.h.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

deb67895

btrfs: factor out btree page submission code to a helper · f91e0d0c

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

In btree_write_cache_pages() we have a btree page submission routine
buried deeply in a nested loop.

This patch will extract that part of code into a helper function,
submit_eb_page(), to do the same work.

Since submit_eb_page() now can return >0 for successful extent
buffer submission, remove the "ASSERT(ret <= 0);" line.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

f91e0d0c

btrfs: make btrfs_verify_data_csum follow sector size · f44cf410

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

Currently btrfs_verify_data_csum() just passes the whole page to
check_data_csum(), which is fine since we only support sectorsize ==
PAGE_SIZE.

To support subpage, we need to properly honor per-sector
checksum verification, just like what we did in dio read path.

This patch will do the csum verification in a for loop, starts with
pg_off == start - page_offset(page), with sectorsize increase for
each loop.

For sectorsize == PAGE_SIZE case, the pg_off will always be 0, and we
will only loop once.

For subpage case, we do the iterate over each sector and if we found any
error, we return error.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NGoldwyn Rodrigues <rgoldwyn@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

f44cf410

btrfs: pass bio_offset to check_data_csum() directly · 7ffd27e3

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

Parameter icsum for check_data_csum() is a little hard to understand.
So is the phy_offset for btrfs_verify_data_csum().

Both parameters are calculated values for csum lookup.

Instead of some calculated value, just pass bio_offset and let the
final and only user, check_data_csum(), calculate whatever it needs.

Since we are here, also make the bio_offset parameter and some related
variables to be u32 (unsigned int).
As bio size is limited by its bi_size, which is unsigned int, and has
extra size limit check during various bio operations.
Thus we are ensured that bio_offset won't overflow u32.

Thus for all involved functions, not only rename the parameter from
@phy_offset to @bio_offset, but also reduce its width to u32, so we
won't have suspicious "u32 = u64 >> sector_bits;" lines anymore.
Reviewed-by: NJohannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Reviewed-by: NNikolay Borisov <nborisov@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <josef@toxicpanda.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

7ffd27e3

btrfs: rename bio_offset of extent_submit_bio_start_t to dio_file_offset · 1941b64b

由 Qu Wenruo 提交于 12月 02, 2020

The parameter bio_offset of extent_submit_bio_start_t is very confusing.
If it's really bio_offset (offset to bio), then it should be u32.  But
in fact, it's only utilized by dio read, and that member is used as file
offset, which must be u64.

Rename it to dio_file_offset since the only user uses it as file offset,
and add comment for who is using it.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

1941b64b

btrfs: fix lockdep warning when creating free space tree · 8a6a87cd