As we only cancel the timers asynchronously, they may
still be running on another CPU as we shutdown, raising one last
softirq. So be safe and make sure the tasklet is flushed before
destroying the engine's memory.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191129172542.1222810-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Wait on only the last request on the kernel_context after emitting a
barrier so that we do not wait for everything in general and by doing so
cause an accidental emission of the barrier!

Bugzilla; https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112405Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191129103455.744389-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Implement Wa_1604555607 (set the DS pairing timer to 128 cycles).
FF_MODE2 is part of the register state context, that's why it is
implemented here.

At TGL A0 stepping, FF_MODE2 register read back is broken, hence
disabling the WA verification.

v2: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring (Oscar)
v3: Correctly add to ctx_workarounds_init (Michel)
v4:
  uncore read is used [Tvrtko]
  Macros as used for MASK definition [Chris]
v5:
  Skip the Wa_1604555607 verification [Ram]
  i915 ptr retrieved from engine. [Tvrtko]
v6:
  Added wa_add as a wrapper for __wa_add [Chris]
  wa_add is directly called instead of new wrapper [tvrtko]

BSpec: 19363
HSDES: 1604555607
Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NRamalingam C <ramlingam.c@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> [v5]
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128021005.3350-1-ramalingam.c@intel.com

We have a case of a mysteriously absent pulse, so dump the engine
details to see if we can find out what happened to it.

References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112405Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191128102546.3857140-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The design of our interrupt handlers is that we ack the receipt of the
interrupt first, inside the critical section where the master interrupt
control is off and other cpus cannot start processing the next
interrupt; and then process the interrupt events afterwards. However,
Icelake introduced a whole new set of banked GT_IIR that are inherently
serialised and slow to retrieve the IIR and must be processed within the
critical section. We can still push our breadcrumbs out of this critical
section by using our irq_worker. On bdw+, this should not make too much
of a difference as we only slightly defer the breadcrumbs, but on icl+
this should make a big difference to our throughput of interrupts from
concurrently executing engines.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127115813.3345823-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The expected downside to commit 58b4c1a0 ("drm/i915: Reduce nested
prepare_remote_context() to a trylock") was that it would need to return
-EAGAIN to userspace in order to resolve potential mutex inversion. Such
an unsightly round trip is unnecessary if we could atomically insert a
barrier into the i915_active_fence, so make it happen.

Currently, we use the timeline->mutex (or some other named outer lock)
to order insertion into the i915_active_fence (and so individual nodes
of i915_active). Inside __i915_active_fence_set, we only need then
serialise with the interrupt handler in order to claim the timeline for
ourselves.

However, if we remove the outer lock, we need to ensure the order is
intact between not only multiple threads trying to insert themselves
into the timeline, but also with the interrupt handler completing the
previous occupant. We use xchg() on insert so that we have an ordered
sequence of insertions (and each caller knows the previous fence on
which to wait, preserving the chain of all fences in the timeline), but
we then have to cmpxchg() in the interrupt handler to avoid overwriting
the new occupant. The only nasty side-effect is having to temporarily
strip off the RCU-annotations to apply the atomic operations, otherwise
the rules are much more conventional!

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112402
Fixes: 58b4c1a0 ("drm/i915: Reduce nested prepare_remote_context() to a trylock")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127134527.3438410-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we rapidly park the GT when the GPU idles, we often find
ourselves idling faster than the RC6 promotion timer. Thus if we tell
the GPU to enter RC6 manually as we park, we can do so quicker (by
around 50ms, half an EI on average) and marginally increase our
powersaving across all execlists platforms.

v2: Now with a selftest to check we can enter RC6 manually
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Acked-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191127095657.3209854-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

On context retiring, we may invoke the kernel_context to unpin this
context. Elsewhere, we may use the kernel_context to modify this
context. This currently leads to an AB-BA lock inversion, so we need to
back-off from the contended lock, and repeat.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111732Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: a9877da2 ("drm/i915/oa: Reconfigure contexts on the fly")
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191126065521.2331017-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The major drawback of commit 7e34f4e4 ("drm/i915/gen8+: Add RC6 CTX
corruption WA") is that it disables RC6 while Skylake (and friends) is
active, and we do not consider the GPU idle until all outstanding
requests have been retired and the engine switched over to the kernel
context. If userspace is idle, this task falls onto our background idle
worker, which only runs roughly once a second, meaning that userspace has
to have been idle for a couple of seconds before we enable RC6 again.
Naturally, this causes us to consume considerably more energy than
before as powersaving is effectively disabled while a display server
(here's looking at you Xorg) is running.

As execlists will get a completion event as each context is completed,
we can use this interrupt to queue a retire worker bound to this engine
to cleanup idle timelines. We will then immediately notice the idle
engine (without userspace intervention or the aid of the background
retire worker) and start parking the GPU. Thus during light workloads,
we will do much more work to idle the GPU faster...  Hopefully with
commensurate power saving!

v2: Watch context completions and only look at those local to the engine
when retiring to reduce the amount of excess work we perform.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112315
References: 7e34f4e4 ("drm/i915/gen8+: Add RC6 CTX corruption WA")
References: 2248a283 ("drm/i915/gen8+: Add RC6 CTX corruption WA")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-3-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In the next patch, we will introduce a new asynchronous retirement
worker, fed by execlists CS events. Here we may queue a retirement as
soon as a request is submitted to HW (and completes instantly), and we
also want to process that retirement as early as possible and cannot
afford to postpone (as there may not be another opportunity to retire it
for a few seconds). To allow the new async retirer to run in parallel
with our submission, pull the __i915_request_queue (that passes the
request to HW) inside the timelines spinlock so that the retirement
cannot release the timeline before we have completed the submission.

v2: Actually to play nicely with engine_retire, we have to raise the
timeline.active_lock before releasing the HW. intel_gt_retire_requsts()
is still serialised by the outer lock so they cannot see this
intermediate state, and engine_retire is serialised by HW submission.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As the engine->kernel_context is used within the engine-pm barrier, we
have to be careful when emitting requests outside of the barrier, as the
strict timeline locking rules do not apply. Instead, we must ensure the
engine_park() cannot be entered as we build the request, which is
simplest by taking an explicit engine-pm wakeref around the request
construction.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125105858.1718307-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

I rushed a last minute correction to cancel_port_requests() to prevent
the snooping of *execlists->active as the inflight array was being
updated, without noticing we iterated the inflight array starting from
active! Oops.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112387
Fixes: 331bf905 ("drm/i915/gt: Mark the execlists->active as the primary volatile access")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125112520.1760492-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we want to do a lockless read of the current active request, and
that request is written to by process_csb also without serialisation, we
need to instruct gcc to take care in reading the pointer itself.

Otherwise, we have observed execlists_active() to report 0x40.

[ 2400.760381] igt/para-4098    1..s. 2376479300us : process_csb: rcs0 cs-irq head=3, tail=4
[ 2400.760826] igt/para-4098    1..s. 2376479303us : process_csb: rcs0 csb[4]: status=0x00000001:0x00000000
[ 2400.761271] igt/para-4098    1..s. 2376479306us : trace_ports: rcs0: promote { b9c59:2622, b9c55:2624 }
[ 2400.761726] igt/para-4097    0d... 2376479311us : __i915_schedule: rcs0: -2147483648->3, inflight:0000000000000040, rq:ffff888208c1e940

which is impossible!

The answer is that as we keep the existing execlists->active pointing
into the array as we copy over that array, the unserialised read may see
a partial pointer value.

Fixes: df403069 ("drm/i915/execlists: Lift process_csb() out of the irq-off spinlock")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191125094318.1630806-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Before checking the current i915_active state for the asynchronous work
we submitted, flush any ongoing callback. This ensures that our sampling
is robust and does not sporadically fail due to bad timing as the work
is running on another cpu.

v2: Drop the fence callback sync, retiring under the lock should be good
enough to synchronize with engine_retire() and the
intel_gt_retire_requests() background worker.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191122132404.690440-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Bonded request submission is designed to allow requests to execute in
parallel as laid out by the user. If the master request is already
finished before its bonded pair is submitted, the pair were not destined
to run in parallel and we lose the information about the master engine
to dictate selection of the secondary. If the second request was
required to be run on a particular engine in a virtual set, that should
have been specified, rather than left to the whims of a random
unconnected requests!

In the selftest, I made the mistake of not ensuring the master would
overlap with its bonded pairs, meaning that it could indeed complete
before we submitted the bonds. Those bonds were then free to select any
available engine in their virtual set, and not the one expected by the
test.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191122112152.660743-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Whenever we wait on a request, make sure we actually hold a reference to
it and that it cannot be retired/freed on another CPU!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121071044.97798-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Assume that intel_wakeref_get() may take the mutex, and perform other
sleeping actions in the course of its callbacks and so use might_sleep()
to ensure that all callers abide. Anything that cannot sleep has to use
e.g. intel_wakeref_get_if_active() to guarantee its avoidance of the
non-atomic paths.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121130528.309474-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since the request is already on the HW as we perform its validation, it
and even its subsequent barrier may be concurrently retired before we
process the assertions. If it is retired already and so off the HW, our
assertions become void and we need to ignore them.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=112363Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121103546.146487-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we wait upon a request, we must be holding a reference to it, and be
wary that i915_request_add() consumes the passed in reference.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121093326.134774-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

From inside an active timeline in the execbuf ioctl, we may try to
reclaim some space in the GGTT. We need GGTT space for all objects on
!full-ppgtt platforms, and for context images everywhere. However, to
free up space in the GGTT we may need to remove some pinned objects
(e.g. context images) that require flushing the idle barriers to remove.
For this we use the big hammer of intel_gt_wait_for_idle()

However, commit 7936a22d ("drm/i915/gt: Wait for new requests in
intel_gt_retire_requests()") will continue spinning on the wait if a
timeline is active but lacks requests, as is the case during execbuf
reservation. Spinning forever is quite time consuming, so revert that
commit and start again.

In practice, the effect commit 7936a22d was trying to achieve is
accomplished by commit 1683d24c ("drm/i915/gt: Move new timelines
to the end of active_list"), so there is no immediate rush to replace
the looping.

Testcase: igt/gem_exec_reloc/basic-range
Fixes: 7936a22d ("drm/i915/gt: Wait for new requests in intel_gt_retire_requests()")
References: 1683d24c ("drm/i915/gt: Move new timelines to the end of active_list")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191121071044.97798-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

GuC submission path can be called from an interrupt context
and so should use a worker to avoid holding a mutex.

References: 07779a76 ("drm/i915: Mark up the calling context for intel_wakeref_put()")
Signed-off-by: NStuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120211321.88021-1-stuart.summers@intel.com

pm_suspend_target_state is declared under CONFIG_PM_SLEEP but only
defined under CONFIG_SUSPEND. Play safe and only use the symbol if it is
both declared and defined.

Reported-by: kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: a70a9e99 ("drm/i915: Defer rc6 shutdown to suspend_late")
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120182209.3967833-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we never allow the intel_wakeref callbacks to be invoked from
interrupt context, we do not need the irqsafe spinlock for the timeline.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120170858.3965380-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In commit a79ca656 ("drm/i915: Push the wakeref->count deferral to
the backend"), I erroneously concluded that we last modify the engine
inside __i915_request_commit() meaning that we could enable concurrent
submission for userspace as we enqueued this request. However, this
falls into a trap with other users of the engine->kernel_context waking
up and submitting their request before the idle-switch is queued, with
the result that the kernel_context is executed out-of-sequence most
likely upsetting the GPU and certainly ourselves when we try to retire
the out-of-sequence requests.

As such we need to hold onto the effective engine->kernel_context mutex
lock (via the engine pm mutex proxy) until we have finish queuing the
request to the engine.

v2: Serialise against concurrent intel_gt_retire_requests()
v3: Describe the hairy locking scheme with intel_gt_retire_requests()
for future reference.
v4: Combine timeline->lock and engine pm release; it's hairy.

Fixes: a79ca656 ("drm/i915: Push the wakeref->count deferral to the backend")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120165514.3955081-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The general concept was that intel_timeline.active_count was locked by
the intel_timeline.mutex. The exception was for power management, where
the engine->kernel_context->timeline could be manipulated under the
global wakeref.mutex.

This was quite solid, as we always manipulated the timeline only while
we held an engine wakeref.

And then we started retiring requests outside of struct_mutex, only
using the timelines.active_list and the timeline->mutex. There we
started manipulating intel_timeline.active_count outside of an engine
wakeref, and so introduced a race between __engine_park() and
intel_gt_retire_requests(), a race that could result in the
engine->kernel_context not being added to the active timelines and so
losing requests, which caused us to keep the system permanently powered
up [and unloadable].

The race would be easy to close if we could take the engine wakeref for
the timeline before we retire -- except timelines are not bound to any
engine and so we would need to keep all active engines awake. The
alternative is to guard intel_timeline_enter/intel_timeline_exit for use
outside of the timeline->mutex.

Fixes: e5dadff4 ("drm/i915: Protect request retirement with timeline->mutex")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120165514.3955081-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Previously, we assumed we could use mutex_trylock() within an atomic
context, falling back to a worker if contended. However, such trickery
is illegal inside interrupt context, and so we need to always use a
worker under such circumstances. As we normally are in process context,
we can typically use a plain mutex, and only defer to a work when we
know we are being called from an interrupt path.

Fixes: 51fbd8de ("drm/i915/pmu: Atomically acquire the gt_pm wakeref")
References: a0855d24 ("locking/mutex: Complain upon mutex API misuse in IRQ contexts")
References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111626Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191120125433.3767149-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Reading from CTX_INFO upsets rc6, requiring us to detect and prevent
possible rc6 context corruption. Poke at the bear!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Tested-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191119154723.3311814-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Retire all requests if we resort to wedged the driver on suspend. They
will now be idle, so we might as we free them before shutting down.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191118230254.2615942-16-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we may park the gt during request retirement, we may cancel the
retirement worker only to then program the delayed worker once more.

If we schedule the next delayed retirement worker first, if we then park
the gt, the work will remain cancelled.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191119162559.3313003-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When adding a new active timeline, place it at the end of the list. This
allows for intel_gt_retire_requests() to pick up the newcomer more
quickly and hopefully complete the retirement sooner. A miniscule
optimisation.

References: 7936a22d ("drm/i915/gt: Wait for new requests in intel_gt_retire_requests()")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191119162559.3313003-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

For our current users we don't expect pool objects to be writable from
the gpu.
Signed-off-by: NMatthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Fixes: 4f7af194 ("drm/i915: Support ro ppgtt mapped cmdparser shadow buffers")
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191119150154.18249-1-matthew.auld@intel.com

In order to avoid some nasty mutex inversions, commit 09c5ab38
("drm/i915: Keep rings pinned while the context is active") allowed the
intel_ring unpinning to be run concurrently with the next context
pinning it. Thus each step in intel_ring_unpin() needed to be atomic and
ordered in a nice onion with intel_ring_pin() so that the lifetimes
overlapped and were always safe.

Sadly, a few steps in intel_ring_unpin() were overlooked, such as
closing the read/write pointers of the ring and discarding the
intel_ring.vaddr, as these steps were not serialised with
intel_ring_pin() and so could leave the ring in disarray.

Fixes: 09c5ab38 ("drm/i915: Keep rings pinned while the context is active")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191118230254.2615942-6-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Only serialise with the chipset using an mmio if the chipset is
currently active. We expect that any writes into the chipset range will
simply be forgotten until it wakes up.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191118184943.2593048-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

On some platforms (e.g. KBL) that do not support GuC submission, but
the user enabled the GuC communication (e.g for HuC authentication)
calling the GuC EXIT_S_STATE action results in lose of ability to
enter RC6. We can remove the GuC suspend/resume entirely as we do
not need to save the GuC submission status.

Add intel_guc_submission_is_enabled() function to determine if
GuC submission is active.

v2: Do not suspend/resume the GuC on platforms that do not support
    Guc Submission.
v3: Fix typo, move suspend logic to remove goto.
v4: Use intel_guc_submission_is_enabled() to check GuC submission
    status.
v5: No need to look at engine to determine if submission is enabled.
    Squash fix + intel_guc_submission_is_enabled() patch into one.
v6: Move resume check into intel_guc_resume() for symmetry.
    Fix commit Fixes tag.
Reported-by: NKiteStramuort <kitestramuort@autistici.org>
Reported-by: NS. Zharkoff <s.zharkoff@gmail.com>
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111594
Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111623
Fixes: ffd5ce22 ("drm/i915/guc: Updates for GuC 32.0.3 firmware")
Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com>
Cc: Daniele Ceralo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com>
Cc: Stuart Summers <stuart.summers@intel.com>
Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Tested-by: NTomas Janousek <tomi@nomi.cz>
Signed-off-by: NDon Hiatt <don.hiatt@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191115231538.1249-1-don.hiatt@intel.com

When telling the user that device power management is disabled, it is
helpful to say which device that was.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191115122343.821331-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As the heartbeat has the effect of flushing context barriers, this
interferes with the context barrier tests that are trying to observe
them directly. Disable the heartbeat so that the barriers are as
predictable as the test demands.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191115150841.880349-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Verify that we can execute a long chain of dependent requests from
userspace, each one slightly more important than the last.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191114225736.616885-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

We need to wait until the timer object is marked as deactivated before
unloading, so follow up our gentle cancel_delayed_work() with the
synchronous variant to ensure it is flushed off a remote cpu before we
mark the memory as freed.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=111994Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191115150841.880349-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

RC6 is tracked underneath the intel_gt, so use our local pointers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Andi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Acked-by: NAndi Shyti <andi.shyti@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191115114800.725061-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Our callers fall into two categories, those passing timeout=0 who just
want to flush request retirements and those passing a timeout that need
to wait for submission completion (e.g. intel_gt_wait_for_idle()).
Currently, we only wait for a snapshot of timelines at the start of the
wait (but there was an expectation that new requests would cause timelines
to appear at the end). However, our callers, such as
intel_gt_wait_for_idle() before suspend, do require us to wait for the
power management requests emitted by retirement as well. If we don't,
then it takes an extra second or two for the background worker to flush
the queue and mark the GT as idle.

Fixes: 7e805762 ("drm/i915: Drop struct_mutex from around i915_retire_requests()")
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20191114225736.616885-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk