It's always set to whatever CONFIG_SUNRPC_DEBUG is, so just use that.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Now that nfs_release_page() doesn't block indefinitely, other deadlock
avoidance mechanisms aren't needed.
 - it doesn't hurt for kswapd to block occasionally.  If it doesn't
   want to block it would clear __GFP_WAIT.  The current_is_kswapd()
   was only added to avoid deadlocks and we have a new approach for
   that.
 - memory allocation in the SUNRPC layer can very rarely try to
   ->releasepage() a page it is trying to handle.  The deadlock
   is removed as nfs_release_page() doesn't block indefinitely.

So we don't need to set PF_FSTRANS for sunrpc network operations any
more.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Acked-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@primarydata.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

It is currently not possible for various wait_on_bit functions
to implement a timeout.

While the "action" function that is called to do the waiting
could certainly use schedule_timeout(), there is no way to carry
forward the remaining timeout after a false wake-up.
As false-wakeups a clearly possible at least due to possible
hash collisions in bit_waitqueue(), this is a real problem.

The 'action' function is currently passed a pointer to the word
containing the bit being waited on.  No current action functions
use this pointer.  So changing it to something else will be a
little noisy but will have no immediate effect.

This patch changes the 'action' function to take a pointer to
the "struct wait_bit_key", which contains a pointer to the word
containing the bit so nothing is really lost.

It also adds a 'private' field to "struct wait_bit_key", which
is initialized to zero.

An action function can now implement a timeout with something
like

static int timed_out_waiter(struct wait_bit_key *key)
{
	unsigned long waited;
	if (key->private == 0) {
		key->private = jiffies;
		if (key->private == 0)
			key->private -= 1;
	}
	waited = jiffies - key->private;
	if (waited > 10 * HZ)
		return -EAGAIN;
	schedule_timeout(waited - 10 * HZ);
	return 0;
}

If any other need for context in a waiter were found it would be
easy to use ->private for some other purpose, or even extend
"struct wait_bit_key".

My particular need is to support timeouts in nfs_release_page()
to avoid deadlocks with loopback mounted NFS.

While wait_on_bit_timeout() would be a cleaner interface, it
will not meet my need.  I need the timeout to be sensitive to
the state of the connection with the server, which could change.
 So I need to use an 'action' interface.
Signed-off-by: NNeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>
Acked-by: NPeter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com>
Cc: Steve French <sfrench@samba.org>
Cc: David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
Cc: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20140707051604.28027.41257.stgit@notabene.brownSigned-off-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>

rpc_malloc() allocates with GFP_NOWAIT without making any attempt at
reclaim so it easily fails when low on memory.  This ends up spamming the
kernel log:

SLAB: Unable to allocate memory on node 0 (gfp=0x4000)
  cache: kmalloc-8192, object size: 8192, order: 1
  node 0: slabs: 207/207, objs: 207/207, free: 0
rekonq: page allocation failure: order:1, mode:0x204000
CPU: 2 PID: 14321 Comm: rekonq Tainted: G           O  3.15.0-rc3-12.gfc9498b-desktop+ #6
Hardware name: System manufacturer System Product Name/M4A785TD-V EVO, BIOS 2105    07/23/2010
 0000000000000000 ffff880010ff17d0 ffffffff815e693c 0000000000204000
 ffff880010ff1858 ffffffff81137bd2 0000000000000000 0000001000000000
 ffff88011ffebc38 0000000000000001 0000000000204000 ffff88011ffea000
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff815e693c>] dump_stack+0x4d/0x6f
 [<ffffffff81137bd2>] warn_alloc_failed+0xd2/0x140
 [<ffffffff8113be19>] __alloc_pages_nodemask+0x7e9/0xa30
 [<ffffffff811824a8>] kmem_getpages+0x58/0x140
 [<ffffffff81183de6>] fallback_alloc+0x1d6/0x210
 [<ffffffff81183be3>] ____cache_alloc_node+0x123/0x150
 [<ffffffff81185953>] __kmalloc+0x203/0x490
 [<ffffffffa06b0ee2>] rpc_malloc+0x32/0xa0 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa06a6999>] call_allocate+0xb9/0x170 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa06b19d8>] __rpc_execute+0x88/0x460 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa06b2da9>] rpc_execute+0x59/0xc0 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa06a932b>] rpc_run_task+0x6b/0x90 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa077b5c1>] nfs4_call_sync_sequence+0x51/0x80 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa077d45d>] _nfs4_do_setattr+0x1ed/0x280 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa0782a72>] nfs4_do_setattr+0x72/0x180 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa078334c>] nfs4_proc_setattr+0xbc/0x140 [nfsv4]
 [<ffffffffa074a7e8>] nfs_setattr+0xd8/0x240 [nfs]
 [<ffffffff811baa71>] notify_change+0x231/0x380
 [<ffffffff8119cf5c>] chmod_common+0xfc/0x120
 [<ffffffff8119df80>] SyS_chmod+0x40/0x90
 [<ffffffff815f4cfd>] system_call_fastpath+0x1a/0x1f
...

If the allocation fails, simply return NULL and avoid spamming the kernel
log.
Reported-by: NMarc Dietrich <marvin24@gmx.de>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Rientjes <rientjes@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

The RPC_TASK_RUNNING flag will always have been set in rpc_make_runnable()
once we get past the test for out_of_line_wait_on_bit() returning
ERESTARTSYS.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

If the rpc_task is asynchronous, it could theoretically finish executing
on the workqueue it was assigned by rpc_make_runnable() before we get
round to testing RPC_IS_ASYNC() in rpc_execute.

In practice, however, all the existing callers hold a reference to the
rpc_task, so this can't happen today...
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

The lockless RPC_IS_QUEUED() test in __rpc_execute means that we need to
be careful about ordering the calls to rpc_test_and_set_running(task) and
rpc_clear_queued(task). If we get the order wrong, then we may end up
testing the RPC_TASK_RUNNING flag after __rpc_execute() has looped
and changed the state of the rpc_task.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

NFS calls the freezable helpers with locks held, which is unsafe
and will cause lockdep warnings when 6aa97070 "lockdep: check
that no locks held at freeze time" is reapplied (it was reverted
in dbf520a9).  NFS shouldn't be doing this, but it has
long-running syscalls that must hold a lock but also shouldn't
block suspend.  Until NFS freeze handling is rewritten to use a
signal to exit out of the critical section, add new *_unsafe
versions of the helpers that will not run the lockdep test when
6aa97070 is reapplied, and call them from NFS.

In practice the likley result of holding the lock while freezing
is that a second task blocked on the lock will never freeze,
aborting suspend, but it is possible to manufacture a case using
the cgroup freezer, the lock, and the suspend freezer to create
a deadlock.  Silencing the lockdep warning here will allow
problems to be found in other drivers that may have a more
serious deadlock risk, and prevent new problems from being added.
Signed-off-by: NColin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Acked-by: NPavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
Acked-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>

We need to be careful when testing task->tk_waitqueue in
rpc_wake_up_task_queue_locked, because it can be changed while we
are holding the queue->lock.
By adding appropriate memory barriers, we can ensure that it is safe to
test task->tk_waitqueue for equality if the RPC_TASK_QUEUED bit is set.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

This fixes a livelock in the xprt->sending queue where we end up never
making progress on lower priority tasks because sleep_on_priority()
keeps adding new tasks with the same owner to the head of the queue,
and priority bumps mean that we keep resetting the queue->owner to
whatever task is at the head of the queue.

Regression introduced by commit c05eecf6
(SUNRPC: Don't allow low priority tasks to pre-empt higher priority ones).
Reported-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

If the rpc_task exits while holding the socket write lock before it has
allocated an rpc slot, then the usual mechanism for releasing the write
lock in xprt_release() is defeated.

The problem occurs if the call to xprt_lock_write() initially fails, so
that the rpc_task is put on the xprt->sending wait queue. If the task
exits after being assigned the lock by __xprt_lock_write_func, but
before it has retried the call to xprt_lock_and_alloc_slot(), then
it calls xprt_release() while holding the write lock, but will
immediately exit due to the test for task->tk_rqstp != NULL.
Reported-by: NChris Perl <chris.perl@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org [>= 3.1]

This patch ensures that we free the rpc_task after the cleanup callbacks
are done in order to avoid a deadlock problem that can be triggered if
the callback needs to wait for another workqueue item to complete.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Weston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Cc: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: Bruce Fields <bfields@fieldses.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

Currently, the priority queues attempt to be 'fair' to lower priority
tasks by scheduling them after a certain number of higher priority tasks
have run. The problem is that both the transport send queue and
the NFSv4.1 session slot queue have strong ordering requirements.

This patch therefore removes the fairness code in favour of strong
ordering of task priorities.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We want to preserve the rpc_task priority for things like writebacks,
that may have differing levels of urgency.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Replace two BUG_ON() calls with WARN_ON_ONCE() and early returns.
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE().
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Replace BUG_ON() with WARN_ON_ONCE() and clean up after inactive task.
Signed-off-by: NWeston Andros Adamson <dros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We shouldn't need more than 1 worker thread per cpu, since rpciod
is designed to run without sleeping in most cases.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Implement the new swapfile a_ops for NFS and hook up ->direct_IO.  This
will set the NFS socket to SOCK_MEMALLOC and run socket reconnect under
PF_MEMALLOC as well as reset SOCK_MEMALLOC before engaging the protocol
->connect() method.

PF_MEMALLOC should allow the allocation of struct socket and related
objects and the early (re)setting of SOCK_MEMALLOC should allow us to
receive the packets required for the TCP connection buildup.

[jlayton@redhat.com: Restore PF_MEMALLOC task flags in all cases]
[dfeng@redhat.com: Fix handling of multiple swap files]
[a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl: Original patch]
Signed-off-by: NMel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Acked-by: NRik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>
Cc: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric B Munson <emunson@mgebm.net>
Cc: Eric Paris <eparis@redhat.com>
Cc: James Morris <jmorris@namei.org>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Mike Christie <michaelc@cs.wisc.edu>
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>
Cc: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <sebastian@breakpoint.cc>
Cc: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: Xiaotian Feng <dfeng@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

We've had some reports of a deadlock where rpciod ends up with a stack
trace like this:

    PID: 2507   TASK: ffff88103691ab40  CPU: 14  COMMAND: "rpciod/14"
     #0 [ffff8810343bf2f0] schedule at ffffffff814dabd9
     #1 [ffff8810343bf3b8] nfs_wait_bit_killable at ffffffffa038fc04 [nfs]
     #2 [ffff8810343bf3c8] __wait_on_bit at ffffffff814dbc2f
     #3 [ffff8810343bf418] out_of_line_wait_on_bit at ffffffff814dbcd8
     #4 [ffff8810343bf488] nfs_commit_inode at ffffffffa039e0c1 [nfs]
     #5 [ffff8810343bf4f8] nfs_release_page at ffffffffa038bef6 [nfs]
     #6 [ffff8810343bf528] try_to_release_page at ffffffff8110c670
     #7 [ffff8810343bf538] shrink_page_list.clone.0 at ffffffff81126271
     #8 [ffff8810343bf668] shrink_inactive_list at ffffffff81126638
     #9 [ffff8810343bf818] shrink_zone at ffffffff8112788f
    #10 [ffff8810343bf8c8] do_try_to_free_pages at ffffffff81127b1e
    #11 [ffff8810343bf958] try_to_free_pages at ffffffff8112812f
    #12 [ffff8810343bfa08] __alloc_pages_nodemask at ffffffff8111fdad
    #13 [ffff8810343bfb28] kmem_getpages at ffffffff81159942
    #14 [ffff8810343bfb58] fallback_alloc at ffffffff8115a55a
    #15 [ffff8810343bfbd8] ____cache_alloc_node at ffffffff8115a2d9
    #16 [ffff8810343bfc38] kmem_cache_alloc at ffffffff8115b09b
    #17 [ffff8810343bfc78] sk_prot_alloc at ffffffff81411808
    #18 [ffff8810343bfcb8] sk_alloc at ffffffff8141197c
    #19 [ffff8810343bfce8] inet_create at ffffffff81483ba6
    #20 [ffff8810343bfd38] __sock_create at ffffffff8140b4a7
    #21 [ffff8810343bfd98] xs_create_sock at ffffffffa01f649b [sunrpc]
    #22 [ffff8810343bfdd8] xs_tcp_setup_socket at ffffffffa01f6965 [sunrpc]
    #23 [ffff8810343bfe38] worker_thread at ffffffff810887d0
    #24 [ffff8810343bfee8] kthread at ffffffff8108dd96
    #25 [ffff8810343bff48] kernel_thread at ffffffff8100c1ca

rpciod is trying to allocate memory for a new socket to talk to the
server. The VM ends up calling ->releasepage to get more memory, and it
tries to do a blocking commit. That commit can't succeed however without
a connected socket, so we deadlock.

Fix this by setting PF_FSTRANS on the workqueue task prior to doing the
socket allocation, and having nfs_release_page check for that flag when
deciding whether to do a commit call. Also, set PF_FSTRANS
unconditionally in rpc_async_schedule since that function can also do
allocations sometimes.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

rpc_make_runnable is not generally called with the queue lock held, unless
it's waking up a task that has been sitting on a waitqueue. This is safe
when the task has not entered the FSM yet, but the comments don't really
spell this out.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

The problem is that for the case of priority queues, we
have to assume that __rpc_remove_wait_queue_priority will move new
elements from the tk_wait.links lists into the queue->tasks[] list.
We therefore cannot use list_for_each_entry_safe() on queue->tasks[],
since that will skip these new tasks that __rpc_remove_wait_queue_priority
is adding.

Without this fix, rpc_wake_up and rpc_wake_up_status will both fail
to wake up all functions on priority wait queues, which can result
in some nasty hangs.
Reported-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org

The tracepoint code relies on the queue->name being defined in order to
be able to display the name of the waitqueue on which an RPC task is
sleeping.
Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>
Reported-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Acked-by: NSteven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net>

Add declarations to allow tracing of RPC call creation, running, sleeping,
and destruction.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

We have to ensure that the wake up from the waitqueue and the assignment
of xprt->snd_task are atomic. We can do this by assigning the snd_task
while under the waitqueue spinlock.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Allow the freezer to skip wait_on_bit_killable sleeps in the sunrpc
layer. This should allow suspend and hibernate events to proceed, even
when there are RPC's pending on the wire.

Also, wrap the TASK_KILLABLE sleeps in NFS layer in freezer_do_not_count
and freezer_count calls. This allows the freezer to skip tasks that are
sleeping while looping on EJUKEBOX or NFS4ERR_DELAY sorts of errors.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>

If the rpc_task gets restarted, then we want to ensure that we don't
double-count the execution time statistics, timeout data, etc.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Currently, the caller has to change the value of task->tk_priority if
it wants to select on which priority level the task will sleep.

This patch allows the caller to select a priority level at sleep time
rather than always using task->tk_priority.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Since rpc_killall_tasks may modify the rpc_task's tk_action field
without any locking, we need to be careful when dereferencing it.
Reported-by: NBen Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Tested-by: NBen Greear <greearb@candelatech.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

If the NLM daemon is killed on the NFS server, we can currently end up
hanging forever on an 'unlock' request, instead of aborting. Basically,
if the rpcbind request fails, or the server keeps returning garbage, we
really want to quit instead of retrying.
Tested-by: NVasily Averin <vvs@sw.ru>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

BUG: atomic_dec_and_test(): -1: atomic counter underflow at:
Pid: 2827, comm: mount.nfs Not tainted 2.6.38 #1
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffffa02223a0>] ? put_rpccred+0x44/0x14e [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa021bbe9>] ? rpc_ping+0x4e/0x58 [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa021c4a5>] ? rpc_create+0x481/0x4fc [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa022298a>] ? rpcauth_lookup_credcache+0xab/0x22d [sunrpc]
 [<ffffffffa028be8c>] ? nfs_create_rpc_client+0xa6/0xeb [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa028c660>] ? nfs4_set_client+0xc2/0x1f9 [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa028cd3c>] ? nfs4_create_server+0xf2/0x2a6 [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa0295d07>] ? nfs4_remote_mount+0x4e/0x14a [nfs]
 [<ffffffff810dd570>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x6e/0x133
 [<ffffffffa029605a>] ? nfs_do_root_mount+0x76/0x95 [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa029643d>] ? nfs4_try_mount+0x56/0xaf [nfs]
 [<ffffffffa0297434>] ? nfs_get_sb+0x435/0x73c [nfs]
 [<ffffffff810dd59b>] ? vfs_kern_mount+0x99/0x133
 [<ffffffff810dd693>] ? do_kern_mount+0x48/0xd8
 [<ffffffff810f5b75>] ? do_mount+0x6da/0x741
 [<ffffffff810f5c5f>] ? sys_mount+0x83/0xc0
 [<ffffffff8100293b>] ? system_call_fastpath+0x16/0x1b

Well, so, I think this is real bug of nfs codes somewhere. With some
review, the code

rpc_call_sync()
    rpc_run_task
        rpc_execute()
            __rpc_execute()
                rpc_release_task()
                    rpc_release_resources_task()
                        put_rpccred()                <= release cred
    rpc_put_task
        rpc_do_put_task()
            rpc_release_resources_task()
                put_rpccred()                        <= release cred again

seems to be release cred unintendedly.
Signed-off-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

This fixes a race in which the task->tk_callback() puts the rpc_task
to sleep, setting a new callback. Under certain circumstances, the current
code may end up executing the task->tk_action before it gets round to the
callback.
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
Cc: stable@kernel.org

rpc_run_task can only fail if it is not passed in a preallocated task.
However, that is not at all clear with the current code.  So
remove several impossible to occur failure checks.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

queue_work() only returns 0 or 1, never a negative value.
Signed-off-by: NFred Isaman <iisaman@netapp.com>
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

Although they run as rpciod background tasks, under normal operation
(i.e. no SIGKILL), functions like nfs_sillyrename(), nfs4_proc_unlck()
and nfs4_do_close() want to be fully synchronous. This means that when we
exit, we want all references to the rpc_task to be gone, and we want
any dentry references etc. held by that task to be released.

For this reason these functions call __rpc_wait_for_completion_task(),
followed by rpc_put_task() in the expectation that the latter will be
releasing the last reference to the rpc_task, and thus ensuring that the
callback_ops->rpc_release() has been called synchronously.

This patch fixes a race which exists due to the fact that
rpciod calls rpc_complete_task() (in order to wake up the callers of
__rpc_wait_for_completion_task()) and then subsequently calls
rpc_put_task() without ensuring that these two steps are done atomically.

In order to avoid adding new spin locks, the patch uses the existing
waitqueue spin lock to order the rpc_task reference count releases between
the waiting process and rpciod.
The common case where nobody is waiting for completion is optimised for by
checking if the RPC_TASK_ASYNC flag is cleared and/or if the rpc_task
reference count is 1: in those cases we drop trying to grab the spin lock,
and immediately free up the rpc_task.

Those few processes that need to put the rpc_task from inside an
asynchronous context and that do not care about ordering are given a new
helper: rpc_put_task_async().
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>

WQ_RESCUER is now an internal flag and should only be used in the
workqueue implementation proper.  Use WQ_MEM_RECLAIM instead.

This doesn't introduce any functional difference.
Signed-off-by: NTejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Cc: dm-devel@redhat.com
Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@suse.de>