- 18 7月, 2013 5 次提交
-
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The odds of this happening are *extremely* unlikely. Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Shamelessly manipulated out of Daniel :-) "When moving the lists around explain that the active/inactive stuff is used by eviction when we run out of address space, so needs to be per-vma and per-address space. Bound/unbound otoh is used by the shrinker which only cares about the amount of memory used and not one bit about in which address space this memory is all used in. Of course to actual kick out an object we need to unbind it from every address space, but for that we have the per-object list of vmas." v2: Leave the bound list as a global one. (Chris, indirectly) v3: Rebased with no i915_gtt_vm. In most places I added a new *vm local, since it will eventually be replaces by a vm argument. Put comment back inline, since it no longer makes sense to do otherwise. v4: Rebased on hangcheck/error state movement Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
After we plumb our code to support multiple address spaces (VMs), there are a few situations where we want to be able to traverse the list of all address spaces in the system. Cases like eviction, or error state collection are obvious example. v2: Delete the global link instead of the list head. While this in and of itself shouldn't be really be a problem, doing this allows us to WARN on an non-empty list, which is a problem. (Daniel) Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
Every address space should support object allocation. It therefore makes sense to have the allocator be part of the "superclass" which GGTT and PPGTT will derive. Since our maximum address space size is only 2GB we're not yet able to avoid doing allocation/eviction; but we'd hope one day this becomes almost irrelvant. v2: Rebased Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The GTT and PPGTT can be thought of more generally as GPU address spaces. Many of their actions (insert entries), state (LRU lists), and many of their characteristics (size) can be shared. Do that. The change itself doesn't actually impact most of the VMA/VM rework coming up, it just fits in with the grand scheme of abstracting the GPU VM operations. GGTT will usually be a special case where we either know an object must be in the GGTT (dislay engine, workarounds, etc.). The scratch page is left as part of the VM (even though it's currently shared with the ppgtt code) because in the future when we have Full PPGTT, I intend to create a separate scratch page for each. v2: Drop usage of i915_gtt_vm (Daniel) Make cleanup also part of the parent class (Ben) Modified commit msg Rebased v3: Properly share scratch page (Imre) Finish commit message (Daniel, Imre) Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 16 7月, 2013 17 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
To run hangcheck in near future. Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The intent of the check is made more clear if we use the proper name for 0 here. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
The default context is always supported (as it contains the global hangcheck stats) and the contexts for hangcheck are not limited to any ring. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=65845Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
intel_enable_rc6() is used to check if we can compute the RC6 residency in the sysfs code. Disable this for platforms older than Ironlake. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
v2: Put the comment a bit closer to the actual write (Paulo Zanoni) Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> [danvet: Fix space before tab.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
We also wait for that blank on other platforms but the w/a doesn't apply there. Not an issue at all. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
At the moment we have the following interrupt enabling sequence: 1. irq preinstall hook 2. enabling the interrupt handler and calling irq postinstall hook 3. enable rps interrupts from the async work And the folliwing disable sequence: 1. disabling the interrupt handler and calling the uninstall hook 2. disabling the rps interrupt Since the postinstall hook now always sets up PMIIR, PMIER and PMIMR to known-good states there no way for an interrupt to sneak in in the enable sequence, so we can reinstate the WARN lost in commit eda63ffb Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Date: Tue May 28 19:22:26 2013 -0700 drm/i915: Add PM regs to pre/post install Note that there's some room for future cleanups since most of the interrupt register clearing in the disable function is rather redundant. But that's better done in follow-up patches, if at all. Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The VECS enabling required some changes to how rps interrupts are enabled/disabled since VECS interrupts are handling with the PM interrupt registers. But now that the pre/postinstall sequences is identical for all platforms with rps support (snb, ivb, hsw, vlv) we can also use the exact same sequence to actually enable the rps interrupts. Strictly speaking using spinlocks is overkill on snb/ivb & vlv since they have no VECS ring, but imo that's more than made up by the common code. Hence this just unifies the vlv code with the snb-hsw code which matched exactly before the VECS enabling. See commit eda63ffb Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Date: Tue May 28 19:22:26 2013 -0700 drm/i915: Add PM regs to pre/post install and commit 4848405c Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Date: Tue May 28 19:22:27 2013 -0700 drm/i915: make PM interrupt writes non-destructive for why the gen6 code (shared between snb, ivb and hsw) needed to be changed originally. v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want to unify the code and what exactly changes. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Again extract a common helper. For the postinstall hook things are a bit more complicated since we have more cases on ilk-hsw/vlv here. But since vlv was clearly broken by failing to initialize dev_priv->gt_irq_mask correctly the shared code is clearly justified. Also kill the PMIER setting in the async rps enable work. I should have been save, but also clearly looked rather fragile. PMIER setup is now all down in the irq pre/postinstall hooks. With this we now have the usual interrupt register sequence for GT/PM irq registers: - IER is setup once with all the interrupts we ever need in the postinstall hook and never touched again. Exceptions are SDEIER, which is touched in the preinstall hook (when the irq handler isn't enabled) and then only from the irq handler. And DEIER/VLV_IER with is used in the irq handler but also written to once in the postinstall hook. But since that write is essentially what enables the interrupt and we should always have MSI interrupts we should be save. In case we ever have non-MSI interrupts we'd be screwed. - IIR is cleared in the postinstall hook before we enable/unmask the respective interrupt sources. Hence we can't steal an interrupt event an accidentally trigger the spurious interrupt logic in the core kernel. Note that after some discussion with Ben Widawsky we think that we actually should clear the IIR registers in the preinstall hook. But doing that is a much larger patch series. - IMR regs are (usually) all masked off. Those are the only regs changed at runtime, which is all protected by dev_priv->irq_lock. This unification also kills the cargo-culted read-modify-write PM register setup for VECS. Interrupt setup is done without userspace being able to interfere, so we better know what values we want to put into those registers. RMW cycles otoh are really good at papering over races, until stuff magically blows up and no one has a clue why. v2: Touch the gen6+ PM interrupt registers only on gen6+. v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want to unify the code and what exactly changes. Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: Add a comment to explain why the l3 parity interrupt is special.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Since the addition of VECS we have a slightly different enable sequence for PM interrupts on ivb/hsw vs snb and vlv. Usually that will end up in hard to track down surprises. Hence unifiy things and since we have copies of this code in 3 places now, extract it into its own little helper. Note that this changes the irq preinstall sequence a bit for snb and vlv: We now also clear the PM registers in the preinstall hook, in addition to the PM register clearing/setup already done when actually enabling rps. So this doesn't fix a bug but simply unifies the code across all platforms. After the postinstall hook is similarly unified we can rip out the then redundant PM interrupt setup from the rps code. v3: Rebase on top of the retained double-GTIIR clearing. Also resurrect the masking/disabling of the gen6+ PM interrupts as spotted by Ben Widaswky. v4: Move the DE interrupt reset code out of gen5_gt_irq_preinstall back to ironlake_irq_preinstall where it really belongs. Spotted by Paulo. v3: Improve the commit message to more clearly spell out why we want to unify the code and what exactly changes. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: s/GT/PM/ to fix up a comment which Ben spotted while reviewing.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
To make users life a little easier figuring out what they have on their system. Ideally, I'd really like to report LLC size, but it turned out to be a bit of a pain. Maybe I'll revisit it in the future. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
DRI clients really should be using MOCS to get fine grained streaming cache controls. With that note, I *hope* that this patch doesn't improve performance overwhelmingly, because if it does - it means there is a problem elsewhere. In any case, the kernel, and old userspace should get some benefit from this, so let's do it. eLLC is always a good default, and really not using it is the special case for MOCS. References: http://www.intel.com/newsroom/kits/restricted/ha$well!/pdfs/4th_Gen_Intel_Core_PressBriefing_5-29.pdf (page 57) Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The eLLC cannot be determined by PCIID because as far as we know, even machines supporting eLLC may not have it enabled, or fused off or whatever. It's possible this isn't actually true, and at that point we can switch to a DEV_INFO flag instead. I've defined everything where the docs are clear, and left the rest as magic. But we need it before we set the pte_encode function pointers, which happens really early, in gtt_init. The problem with just doing the normal sequence earlier is we don't have the ability to use forcewake until after the pte functions have been set up. Since all solutions are somewhat ugly (barring rewriting all the init ordering), I've opted to do the detection really early, and the enabling later - since the register to detect doesn't require forcewake. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> [danvet: Move dev_priv->ellc_size away from the dri1 dungeon to a nice place right next to the l3 parity stuff. Also squash in the follow-up commit to read out the eLLC size a bit earlier.] Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The EDRAM present register isn't really defined in the docs. It just says check to see if it's set to 1. So I haven't defined the 1 value not knowing what it actually means. Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Ben Widawsky 提交于
The cacheability controls have changed, and the bits have been rearranged in general. Note that age 0 is the oldest (most likely to get evicted) and age 3 is the youngest (most likely to stick around for a bit). We've picked 0 for no reason, but atm it shouldn't matter anyway (since we don't yet try to differentiate between different objects). v2: Remove comments for snb/ivb cache leves, that's a separate change. v3: Resolve conflicts due to patch series reordering. v4: Rebased on top of Kenneth Graunke's ->pte_encode refactoring. v5: Removed eLLC bits for separate patch. In the internal repository this was: Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NKenneth Graunke <kenneth@whitecape.org> Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> [danvet: Add comment about cache ages as requested by Ben provoked due to a question from Damien.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 13 7月, 2013 4 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Toghether with the hw state readout this should catch cases where we don't properly updated the pll state (either in sw or hw). At least for the shared dpll code the equivalent tricke helped a lot in catching bugs. Also rename the function prefix, it's not a generic piece of infrastructure. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Bspec for the "DPLL HDMI multiplier" field says: "Restriction : The DPLL must be enabled and stable before setting these bits. These bits must be programmed after DPLL_SEL is programmed." There is apparently no restriction on programming the DPLL_SEL register wrt the DPLL. So let's just move that up before we enable the pch dpll. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
No need to call the ->pre_pll_enable hook twice if we don't enable the dpll too early. This should make Jani a bit less grumpy. v2: Rebase on top of the newly-colored BUG_ONs. v3: Reinstate the lost write of the DPLL_MD register, spotted by Imre. Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
Move error state generation and stringification to it's own compilation unit. Sysfs also uses this so it can't be under CONFIG_DEBUG_FS This fixes a regression introduced in commit ef86ddce Author: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Date: Thu Jun 6 17:38:54 2013 +0300 drm/i915: add error_state sysfs entry Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66814Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reported-by: Nkbuild test robot <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 12 7月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
If intel_sdvo_get_value() fails here, val is unitialized and the cross check will compare the pipe config multiplier with a bogus value. Instead, only set encoder_pixel_multiplier when the sdvo command has been successful. The cross check will compare the pipe config value with 0 otherwise. v2: Do the cross check with the initial value of encoder_pixel_multiplier (0) if the sdvo command fails (and thus keep the warning) (Daniel Vetter) Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Damien Lespiau 提交于
Came accross two open coding of for_each_pipe(), might as well use the macro. Signed-off-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 11 7月, 2013 10 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The code to handle it is broken - there's simply no code to clear CS parser errors on gen5+. And behold, for all the other rings we also don't enable it! Leave the handling code itself in place just to be consistent with the existing mess though. And in case someone feels like fixing it all up. This has been errornously enabled in commit 12638c57 Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Date: Tue May 28 19:22:31 2013 -0700 drm/i915: Enable vebox interrupts Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com> Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
With the simplified locking there's no reason any more to keep the refcounts seperate. v2: Readd the lost comment that ring->irq_refcount is protected by dev_priv->irq_lock. Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Now that the rps interrupt locking isn't clearly separated (at elast conceptually) from all the other interrupt locking having a different lock stopped making sense: It protects much more than just the rps workqueue it started out with. But with the addition of VECS the separation started to blurr and resulted in some more complex locking for the ring interrupt refcount. With this we can (again) unifiy the ringbuffer irq refcounts without causing a massive confusion, but that's for the next patch. v2: Explain better why the rps.lock once made sense and why no longer, requested by Ben. Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
And kill the comment about it. Queueing work is a barrier type event, no amount of locking will help in ordering things (as long as we queue the work after having updated all relevant data structures). Also, the queue_work works itself as a sufficient memory barrier. Again on the surface this is just a tiny micro-optimization to reduce the hold-time of dev_priv->irq_lock. But the better reason is that it reduces superficial locking and so makes it clearer what we actually need for correctness. Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The if (pm_iir & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS) check was redunandant. Otoh adding a check for rps events allows us to avoid the spinlock grabbing for VECS interrupts. v2: Drop misplaced hunk which now moved to the right patch. Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Since we only have one interrupt handler and interrupt handlers are non-reentrant. To drive the point really home give them all an _irq_handler suffix. This is a tiny micro-optimization but even more important it makes it clearer what locking we actually need. And in case someone screws this up: lockdep will catch hardirq vs. other context deadlocks. v2: Fix up compile fail. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
It's racy: There's no guarantee that we won't walk this code (due to a pch fifo underrun interrupt) while someone is changing the pointers around. The only reason we do this is to use the righ crtc for the pch fifo underrun accounting. But we never expose this to userspace, so essentially no one really cares if we use the "wrong" crtc. So let's just rip it out. With this patch fifo underrun code will always use crtc A for tracking underruns on the (only) pch transcoder on LPT. v2: Add a big comment explaining what's going on. Requested by Paulo. v3: Fixup spelling in comment as spotted by Paulo. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
Same treatment as for SERR_INT: If we clear only the bit for the pipe we're enabling (but unconditionally) then we can always check for possible underruns after having disabled the interrupt. That way pipe underruns won't be lost, but at worst only get reported in a delayed fashion. v2: The same logic bug as in the SERR handling change also existed here. The same bugfix of only reporting missed underruns when the error interrupt was masked applies, too. v3: Do the same fixes as for the SERR handling that Paulo suggested in his review: - s/%i/%c/ fix in the debug output - move the DE_ERR_INT_IVB read into the respective if block Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> [danvet: Fix up the checkpatch bikeshed Paulo noticed.] Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
The current code won't report any fifo underruns on cpt if just one pipe has fifo underrun reporting disabled. We can't enable the interrupts, but we can still check the per-transcoder bits and so report the underrun delayed if: - We always clear the transcoder's bit (and none of the other bits) when enabling. - We check the transcoder's bit after disabling (to avoid racing with the interrupt handler). v2: I've forgotten to actually remove the old SERR_INT clearing. v3: Use transcoder_name as suggested by Paulo Zanoni. Paulo also noticed a logic bug: When an underrun interrupt fires we report it both in the interrupt handler and when checking for underruns when disabling it in cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But that second check is only required if the interrupt is disabled and we're switching of underrun reporting (e.g. because we're disabling the crtc). Hence check for that condition. At first I wanted to rework the code to pass that bit of information from the uppper functions down to cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But that turned out too messy. Hence the quick&dirty check whether the south error interrupt source is masked off or not. v4: Streamline the control flow a bit. v5: s/pipe/pch transcoder/ in the dmesg output, suggested by Paulo. v6: Review from Paulo: - Reorder the was_enabled assignment to only read the register when we need it. Also add a comment that we need to do that before updating the register. - s/%i/%c/ fix for the debug output. - Fix the checkpath complaint in the SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN #define. v7: Hopefully put that elusive SERR hunk back into this patch, spotted by Paulo. Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
This way all changes to SDEIMR all go through the same function, with the exception of the (single-threaded) setup/teardown code. For paranoia again add an assert_spin_locked. v2: For even more paranoia also sprinkle a spinlock assert over cpt_can_enable_serr_int since we need to have that one there, too. v3: Fix the logic of interrupt enabling, add enable/disable macros for the simple cases in the fifo code and add a comment. All requested by Paulo. Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
- 10 7月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Maarten Lankhorst 提交于
Signed-off-by: NMaarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@canonical.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-
由 Daniel Vetter 提交于
In kernel modeset driver mode we're in full control of the chip, always. So there's no need at all to set mm.suspended in i915_gem_idle. Hence move that out into the leavevt ioctl. Since i915_gem_idle doesn't suspend gem any more we can also drop the re-enabling for KMS in the thaw function. Also clean up the handling of mm.suspend at driver load by coalescing all the assignments. Stumbled over while reading through our resume code for unrelated reasons. v2: Shovel mm.suspended into the (newly created) ums dungeon as suggested by Chris Wilson. The plan is that once we've completely stopped relying on the register save/restore code we could shovel even that in there. v3: Improve the locking for the entervt/leavevt ioctls a bit by moving the dev->struct_mutex locking outside of i915_gem_idle. Also don't clear dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended for the kms case, we allocate it with kzalloc. Both suggested by Chris Wilson. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2) Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
-