1. 18 7月, 2013 5 次提交
  2. 16 7月, 2013 17 次提交
  3. 13 7月, 2013 4 次提交
  4. 12 7月, 2013 2 次提交
  5. 11 7月, 2013 10 次提交
    • D
      drm/i915: don't enable PM_VEBOX_CS_ERROR_INTERRUPT · c0d6a3dd
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The code to handle it is broken - there's simply no code to clear CS
      parser errors on gen5+. And behold, for all the other rings we also
      don't enable it!
      
      Leave the handling code itself in place just to be consistent with the
      existing mess though. And in case someone feels like fixing it all up.
      
      This has been errornously enabled in
      
      commit 12638c57
      Author: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Date:   Tue May 28 19:22:31 2013 -0700
      
          drm/i915: Enable vebox interrupts
      
      Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
      Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c0d6a3dd
    • D
      drm/i915: unify ring irq refcounts (again) · c7113cc3
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      With the simplified locking there's no reason any more to keep the
      refcounts seperate.
      
      v2: Readd the lost comment that ring->irq_refcount is protected by
      dev_priv->irq_lock.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      c7113cc3
    • D
      drm/i915: kill dev_priv->rps.lock · 59cdb63d
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Now that the rps interrupt locking isn't clearly separated (at elast
      conceptually) from all the other interrupt locking having a different
      lock stopped making sense: It protects much more than just the rps
      workqueue it started out with. But with the addition of VECS the
      separation started to blurr and resulted in some more complex locking
      for the ring interrupt refcount.
      
      With this we can (again) unifiy the ringbuffer irq refcounts without
      causing a massive confusion, but that's for the next patch.
      
      v2: Explain better why the rps.lock once made sense and why no longer,
      requested by Ben.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      59cdb63d
    • D
      drm/i915: queue work outside spinlock in hsw_pm_irq_handler · 2adbee62
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      And kill the comment about it. Queueing work is a barrier type event,
      no amount of locking will help in ordering things (as long as we queue
      the work after having updated all relevant data structures). Also, the
      queue_work works itself as a sufficient memory barrier.
      
      Again on the surface this is just a tiny micro-optimization to reduce
      the hold-time of dev_priv->irq_lock. But the better reason is that it
      reduces superficial locking and so makes it clearer what we actually
      need for correctness.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      2adbee62
    • D
      drm/i915: streamline hsw_pm_irq_handler · 41a05a3a
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The if (pm_iir & ~GEN6_PM_RPS_EVENTS) check was redunandant. Otoh
      adding a check for rps events allows us to avoid the spinlock grabbing
      for VECS interrupts.
      
      v2: Drop misplaced hunk which now moved to the right patch.
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      41a05a3a
    • D
      drm/i915: irq handlers don't need interrupt-safe spinlocks · d0ecd7e2
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Since we only have one interrupt handler and interrupt handlers are
      non-reentrant.
      
      To drive the point really home give them all an _irq_handler suffix.
      
      This is a tiny micro-optimization but even more important it makes it
      clearer what locking we actually need. And in case someone screws this
      up: lockdep will catch hardirq vs. other context deadlocks.
      
      v2: Fix up compile fail.
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Reviewed-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      d0ecd7e2
    • D
      drm/i915: kill lpt pch transcoder->crtc mapping code for fifo underruns · de28075d
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      It's racy: There's no guarantee that we won't walk this code (due to a
      pch fifo underrun interrupt) while someone is changing the pointers
      around.
      
      The only reason we do this is to use the righ crtc for the pch fifo
      underrun accounting. But we never expose this to userspace, so
      essentially no one really cares if we use the "wrong" crtc.
      
      So let's just rip it out.
      
      With this patch fifo underrun code will always use crtc A for tracking
      underruns on the (only) pch transcoder on LPT.
      
      v2: Add a big comment explaining what's going on. Requested by Paulo.
      
      v3: Fixup spelling in comment as spotted by Paulo.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      de28075d
    • D
      drm/i915: improve GEN7_ERR_INT clearing for fifo underrun reporting · 7336df65
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      Same treatment as for SERR_INT: If we clear only the bit for the pipe
      we're enabling (but unconditionally) then we can always check for
      possible underruns after having disabled the interrupt. That way pipe
      underruns won't be lost, but at worst only get reported in a delayed
      fashion.
      
      v2: The same logic bug as in the SERR handling change also existed
      here. The same bugfix of only reporting missed underruns when the
      error interrupt was masked applies, too.
      
      v3: Do the same fixes as for the SERR handling that Paulo suggested in
      his review:
      - s/%i/%c/ fix in the debug output
      - move the DE_ERR_INT_IVB read into the respective if block
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      [danvet: Fix up the checkpatch bikeshed Paulo noticed.]
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      7336df65
    • D
      drm/i915: improve SERR_INT clearing for fifo underrun reporting · 1dd246fb
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      The current code won't report any fifo underruns on cpt if just one
      pipe has fifo underrun reporting disabled. We can't enable the
      interrupts, but we can still check the per-transcoder bits and so
      report the underrun delayed if:
      - We always clear the transcoder's bit (and none of the other bits)
        when enabling.
      - We check the transcoder's bit after disabling (to avoid racing with
        the interrupt handler).
      
      v2: I've forgotten to actually remove the old SERR_INT clearing.
      
      v3: Use transcoder_name as suggested by Paulo Zanoni. Paulo also
      noticed a logic bug: When an underrun interrupt fires we report it
      both in the interrupt handler and when checking for underruns when
      disabling it in cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But that second check
      is only required if the interrupt is disabled and we're switching of
      underrun reporting (e.g. because we're disabling the crtc). Hence
      check for that condition.
      
      At first I wanted to rework the code to pass that bit of information
      from the uppper functions down to cpt_set_fifo_underrun_reporting. But
      that turned out too messy. Hence the quick&dirty check whether the
      south error interrupt source is masked off or not.
      
      v4: Streamline the control flow a bit.
      
      v5: s/pipe/pch transcoder/ in the dmesg output, suggested by Paulo.
      
      v6: Review from Paulo:
      - Reorder the was_enabled assignment to only read the register when we
        need it. Also add a comment that we need to do that before updating
        the register.
      - s/%i/%c/ fix for the debug output.
      - Fix the checkpath complaint in the SERR_INT_TRANS_FIFO_UNDERRUN
        #define.
      
      v7: Hopefully put that elusive SERR hunk back into this patch, spotted
      by Paulo.
      
      Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      1dd246fb
    • D
      drm/i915: extract ibx_display_interrupt_update · fee884ed
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      This way all changes to SDEIMR all go through the same function, with
      the exception of the (single-threaded) setup/teardown code.
      
      For paranoia again add an assert_spin_locked.
      
      v2: For even more paranoia also sprinkle a spinlock assert over
      cpt_can_enable_serr_int since we need to have that one there, too.
      
      v3: Fix the logic of interrupt enabling, add enable/disable macros for
      the simple cases in the fifo code and add a comment. All requested by
      Paulo.
      Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      fee884ed
  6. 10 7月, 2013 2 次提交
    • M
    • D
      drm/i915: don't frob mm.suspended when not using ums · db1b76ca
      Daniel Vetter 提交于
      In kernel modeset driver mode we're in full control of the chip,
      always. So there's no need at all to set mm.suspended in
      i915_gem_idle. Hence move that out into the leavevt ioctl. Since
      i915_gem_idle doesn't suspend gem any more we can also drop the
      re-enabling for KMS in the thaw function.
      
      Also clean up the handling of mm.suspend at driver load by coalescing
      all the assignments.
      
      Stumbled over while reading through our resume code for unrelated
      reasons.
      
      v2: Shovel mm.suspended into the (newly created) ums dungeon as
      suggested by Chris Wilson. The plan is that once we've completely
      stopped relying on the register save/restore code we could shovel even
      that in there.
      
      v3: Improve the locking for the entervt/leavevt ioctls a bit by moving
      the dev->struct_mutex locking outside of i915_gem_idle. Also don't
      clear dev_priv->ums.mm_suspended for the kms case, we allocate it with
      kzalloc. Both suggested by Chris Wilson.
      
      Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
      Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> (v2)
      Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
      db1b76ca