Now we can finally hook up everything so we can actually use free space
tree. The free space tree is enabled by passing the space_cache=v2 mount
option. On the first mount with the this option set, the free space tree
will be created and the FREE_SPACE_TREE read-only compat bit will be
set. Any time the filesystem is mounted from then on, we must use the
free space tree. The clear_cache option will also clear the free space
tree.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The free space cache has turned out to be a scalability bottleneck on
large, busy filesystems. When the cache for a lot of block groups needs
to be written out, we can get extremely long commit times; if this
happens in the critical section, things are especially bad because we
block new transactions from happening.

The main problem with the free space cache is that it has to be written
out in its entirety and is managed in an ad hoc fashion. Using a B-tree
to store free space fixes this: updates can be done as needed and we get
all of the benefits of using a B-tree: checksumming, RAID handling,
well-understood behavior.

With the free space tree, we get commit times that are about the same as
the no cache case with load times slower than the free space cache case
but still much faster than the no cache case. Free space is represented
with extents until it becomes more space-efficient to use bitmaps,
giving us similar space overhead to the free space cache.

The operations on the free space tree are: adding and removing free
space, handling the creation and deletion of block groups, and loading
the free space for a block group. We can also create the free space tree
by walking the extent tree and clear the free space tree.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The on-disk format for the free space tree is straightforward. Each
block group is represented in the free space tree by a free space info
item that stores accounting information: whether the free space for this
block group is stored as bitmaps or extents and how many extents of free
space exist for this block group (regardless of which format is being
used in the tree). Extents are (start, FREE_SPACE_EXTENT, length) keys
with no corresponding item, and bitmaps instead have the
FREE_SPACE_BITMAP type and have a bitmap item attached, which is just an
array of bytes.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We're also going to load the free space tree from caching_thread(), so
we should refactor some of the common code.
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We're finally going to add one of these for the free space tree, so
let's add the same nice helpers that we have for the incompat bits.
While we're add it, also add helpers to clear the bits.
Reviewed-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NOmar Sandoval <osandov@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Currently scrub can race with the cleaner kthread when the later attempts
to delete an unused block group, and the result is preventing the cleaner
kthread from ever deleting later the block group - unless the block group
becomes used and unused again. The following diagram illustrates that
race:

              CPU 1                                 CPU 2

 cleaner kthread
   btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()

     gets block group X from
     fs_info->unused_bgs and
     removes it from that list

                                             scrub_enumerate_chunks()

                                               searches device tree using
                                               its commit root

                                               finds device extent for
                                               block group X

                                               gets block group X from the tree
                                               fs_info->block_group_cache_tree
                                               (via btrfs_lookup_block_group())

                                               sets bg X to RO

     sees the block group is
     already RO and therefore
     doesn't delete it nor adds
     it back to unused list

So fix this by making scrub add the block group again to the list of
unused block groups if the block group is still unused when it finished
scrubbing it and it hasn't been removed already.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We were using only 1 transaction unit when attempting to delete an unused
block group but in reality we need 3 + N units, where N corresponds to the
number of stripes. We were accounting only for the addition of the orphan
item (for the block group's free space cache inode) but we were not
accounting that we need to delete one block group item from the extent
tree, one free space item from the tree of tree roots and N device extent
items from the device tree.

While one unit is not enough, it worked most of the time because for each
single unit we are too pessimistic and assume an entire tree path, with
the highest possible heigth (8), needs to be COWed with eventual node
splits at every possible level in the tree, so there was usually enough
reserved space for removing all the items and adding the orphan item.

However after adding the orphan item, writepages() can by called by the VM
subsystem against the btree inode when we are under memory pressure, which
causes writeback to start for the nodes we COWed before, this forces the
operation to remove the free space item to COW again some (or all of) the
same nodes (in the tree of tree roots). Even without writepages() being
called, we could fail with ENOSPC because these items are located in
multiple trees and one of them might have a higher heigth and require
node/leaf splits at many levels, exhausting all the reserved space before
removing all the items and adding the orphan.

In the kernel 4.0 release, commit 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in
btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group"), we attempted to fix
a BUG_ON due to ENOSPC when trying to add the orphan item by making the
cleaner kthread reserve one transaction unit before attempting to remove
the block group, but this was not enough. We had a couple user reports
still hitting the same BUG_ON after 4.0, like Stefan Priebe's report on
a 4.2-rc6 kernel for example:

    http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-btrfs/msg46070.html

So fix this by reserving all the necessary units of metadata.
Reported-by: NStefan Priebe <s.priebe@profihost.ag>
Fixes: 3d84be79 ("Btrfs: fix BUG_ON in btrfs_orphan_add() when delete unused block group")
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

It's possible to reach a state where the cleaner kthread isn't able to
start a transaction to delete an unused block group due to lack of enough
free metadata space and due to lack of unallocated device space to allocate
a new metadata block group as well. If this happens try to use space from
the global block group reserve just like we do for unlink operations, so
that we don't reach a permanent state where starting a transaction for
filesystem operations (file creation, renames, etc) keeps failing with
-ENOSPC. Such an unfortunate state was observed on a machine where over
a dozen unused data block groups existed and the cleaner kthread was
failing to delete them due to ENOSPC error when attempting to start a
transaction, and even running balance with a -dusage=0 filter failed with
ENOSPC as well. Also unmounting and mounting again the filesystem didn't
help. Allowing the cleaner kthread to use the global block reserve to
delete the unused data block groups fixed the problem.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

There are many places which use mapping_gfp_mask to restrict a more
generic gfp mask which would be used for allocations which are not
directly related to the page cache but they are performed in the same
context.

Let's introduce a helper function which makes the restriction explicit and
easier to track.  This patch doesn't introduce any functional changes.

[akpm@linux-foundation.org: coding-style fixes]
Signed-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Suggested-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>

Between btrfs_allocerved_file_extent() and
btrfs_add_delayed_qgroup_reserve(), there is a window that delayed_refs
are run and delayed ref head maybe freed before
btrfs_add_delayed_qgroup_reserve().

This will cause btrfs_dad_delayed_qgroup_reserve() to return -ENOENT,
and cause transaction to be aborted.

This patch will record qgroup reserve space info into delayed_ref_head
at btrfs_add_delayed_ref(), to eliminate the race window.
Reported-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Similar to the 'limit' filter, we can enhance the 'usage' filter to
accept a range. The change is backward compatible, the range is applied
only in connection with the BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_USAGE_RANGE flag.

We don't have a usecase yet, the current syntax has been sufficient. The
enhancement should provide parity with other range-like filters.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Balance block groups which have the given number of stripes, defined by
a range min..max. This is useful to selectively rebalance only chunks
that do not span enough devices, applies to RAID0/10/5/6.
Signed-off-by: NGabríel Arthúr Pétursson <gabriel@system.is>
[ renamed bargs members, added to the UAPI, wrote the changelog ]
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The 'limit' filter is underdesigned, it should have been a range for
[min,max], with some relaxed semantics when one of the bounds is
missing. Besides that, using a full u64 for a single value is a waste of
bytes.

Let's fix both by extending the use of the u64 bytes for the [min,max]
range. This can be done in a backward compatible way, the range will be
interpreted only if the appropriate flag is set
(BTRFS_BALANCE_ARGS_LIMIT_RANGE).
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In the kernel 4.2 merge window we had a big changes to the implementation
of delayed references and qgroups which made the no_quota field of delayed
references not used anymore. More specifically the no_quota field is not
used anymore as of:

  commit 0ed4792a ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented qgroup mechanism.")

Leaving the no_quota field actually prevents delayed references from
getting merged, which in turn cause the following BUG_ON(), at
fs/btrfs/extent-tree.c, to be hit when qgroups are enabled:

  static int run_delayed_tree_ref(...)
  {
     (...)
     BUG_ON(node->ref_mod != 1);
     (...)
  }

This happens on a scenario like the following:

  1) Ref1 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added.

  2) Ref2 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added.
     It's not merged with Ref1 because Ref1->no_quota != Ref2->no_quota.

  3) Ref3 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 1, added.
     It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs
     for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref2 is incompatible
     due to Ref2->no_quota != Ref3->no_quota.

  4) Ref4 bytenr X, action = BTRFS_DROP_DELAYED_REF, no_quota = 0, added.
     It's not merged with the reference at the tail of the list of refs
     for bytenr X because the reference at the tail, Ref3 is incompatible
     due to Ref3->no_quota != Ref4->no_quota.

  5) We run delayed references, trigger merging of delayed references,
     through __btrfs_run_delayed_refs() -> btrfs_merge_delayed_refs().

  6) Ref1 and Ref3 are merged as Ref1->no_quota = Ref3->no_quota and
     all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref1 gets a ref_mod
     value of 2.

  7) Ref2 and Ref4 are merged as Ref2->no_quota = Ref4->no_quota and
     all other conditions are satisfied too. So Ref2 gets a ref_mod
     value of 2.

  8) Ref1 and Ref2 aren't merged, because they have different values
     for their no_quota field.

  9) Delayed reference Ref1 is picked for running (select_delayed_ref()
     always prefers references with an action == BTRFS_ADD_DELAYED_REF).
     So run_delayed_tree_ref() is called for Ref1 which triggers the
     BUG_ON because Ref1->red_mod != 1 (equals 2).

So fix this by removing the no_quota field, as it's not used anymore as
of commit 0ed4792a ("btrfs: qgroup: Switch to new extent-oriented
qgroup mechanism.").

The use of no_quota was also buggy in at least two places:

1) At delayed-refs.c:btrfs_add_delayed_tree_ref() - we were setting
   no_quota to 0 instead of 1 when the following condition was true:
   is_fstree(ref_root) || !fs_info->quota_enabled

2) At extent-tree.c:__btrfs_inc_extent_ref() - we were attempting to
   reset a node's no_quota when the condition "!is_fstree(root_objectid)
   || !root->fs_info->quota_enabled" was true but we did it only in
   an unused local stack variable, that is, we never reset the no_quota
   value in the node itself.

This fixes the remainder of problems several people have been having when
running delayed references, mostly while a balance is running in parallel,
on a 4.2+ kernel.

Very special thanks to Stéphane Lesimple for helping debugging this issue
and testing this fix on his multi terabyte filesystem (which took more
than one day to balance alone, plus fsck, etc).

Also, this fixes deadlock issue when using the clone ioctl with qgroups
enabled, as reported by Elias Probst in the mailing list. The deadlock
happens because after calling btrfs_insert_empty_item we have our path
holding a write lock on a leaf of the fs/subvol tree and then before
releasing the path we called check_ref() which did backref walking, when
qgroups are enabled, and tried to read lock the same leaf. The trace for
this case is the following:

  INFO: task systemd-nspawn:6095 blocked for more than 120 seconds.
  (...)
  Call Trace:
    [<ffffffff86999201>] schedule+0x74/0x83
    [<ffffffff863ef64c>] btrfs_tree_read_lock+0xc0/0xea
    [<ffffffff86137ed7>] ? wait_woken+0x74/0x74
    [<ffffffff8639f0a7>] btrfs_search_old_slot+0x51a/0x810
    [<ffffffff863a129b>] btrfs_next_old_leaf+0xdf/0x3ce
    [<ffffffff86413a00>] ? ulist_add_merge+0x1b/0x127
    [<ffffffff86411688>] __resolve_indirect_refs+0x62a/0x667
    [<ffffffff863ef546>] ? btrfs_clear_lock_blocking_rw+0x78/0xbe
    [<ffffffff864122d3>] find_parent_nodes+0xaf3/0xfc6
    [<ffffffff86412838>] __btrfs_find_all_roots+0x92/0xf0
    [<ffffffff864128f2>] btrfs_find_all_roots+0x45/0x65
    [<ffffffff8639a75b>] ? btrfs_get_tree_mod_seq+0x2b/0x88
    [<ffffffff863e852e>] check_ref+0x64/0xc4
    [<ffffffff863e9e01>] btrfs_clone+0x66e/0xb5d
    [<ffffffff863ea77f>] btrfs_ioctl_clone+0x48f/0x5bb
    [<ffffffff86048a68>] ? native_sched_clock+0x28/0x77
    [<ffffffff863ed9b0>] btrfs_ioctl+0xabc/0x25cb
  (...)

The problem goes away by eleminating check_ref(), which no longer is
needed as its purpose was to get a value for the no_quota field of
a delayed reference (this patch removes the no_quota field as mentioned
earlier).
Reported-by: NStéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr>
Tested-by: NStéphane Lesimple <stephane_btrfs@lesimple.fr>
Reported-by: NElias Probst <mail@eliasprobst.eu>
Reported-by: NPeter Becker <floyd.net@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NMalte Schröder <malte@tnxip.de>
Reported-by: NDerek Dongray <derek@valedon.co.uk>
Reported-by: NErkki Seppala <flux-btrfs@inside.org>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org  # 4.2+
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>

If we are extremely fragmented then we won't be able to create a free_cluster.
So if this happens set last_ptr->fragmented so that all future allcations will
give up trying to create a cluster.  When we unpin extents we will unset
->fragmented if we free up a sufficient amount of space in a block group.
Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we are heavily fragmented we can induce a lot of latency trying to make an
allocation happen that is simply not going to happen.  Thankfully we keep track
of our max_extent_size when going through the allocator, so if we get to the
point where we are exiting find_free_extent with ENOSPC then set our
space_info->max_extent_size so we can keep future allocations from having to pay
this cost.  We reset the max_extent_size whenever we release pinned bytes back
into this space info so we can redo all the work.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In tracking down these weird bitmap problems it was helpful to artificially
create an extremely fragmented file system.  These mount options let us either
fragment data or metadata or both.  With these options I could reproduce all
sorts of weird latencies and hangs that occur under extreme fragmentation and
get them fixed.  Thanks,
Signed-off-by: NJosef Bacik <jbacik@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

In clear_bit_hook, qgroup reserved data is already handled quite well,
either released by finish_ordered_io or invalidatepage.

So calling btrfs_qgroup_free_data() here is completely meaningless, and
since btrfs_qgroup_free_data() will lock io_tree, so it can't be called
with io_tree lock hold.

This patch will add a new function
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space_noquota() for clear_bit_hook() to cease
the lockdep warning.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Cleanup the old facilities which use old btrfs_qgroup_reserve() function
call, replace them with the newer version, and remove the "__" prefix in
them.

Also, make btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free() functions private, as they are
now only used inside qgroup codes.

Now, the whole btrfs qgroup is swithed to use the new reserve facilities.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Add new version of btrfs_delalloc_reserve_space() and
btrfs_delalloc_release_space() functions, which supports accurate qgroup
reserve.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

btrfs: extent-tree: Add new version of btrfs_check_data_free_space and btrfs_free_reserved_data_space.

Add new functions __btrfs_check_data_free_space() and
__btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() to work with new accurate qgroup
reserved space framework.

The new function will replace old btrfs_check_data_free_space() and
btrfs_free_reserved_data_space() respectively, but until all the change
is done, let's just use the new name.

Also, export internal use function btrfs_alloc_data_chunk_ondemand(), as
now qgroup reserve requires precious bytes, some operation can't get the
accurate number in advance(like fallocate).
But data space info check and data chunk allocate doesn't need to be
that accurate, and can be called at the beginning.

So export it for later operations.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Introduce new functions btrfs_qgroup_reserve/free_meta() to reserve/free
metadata reserved space.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Due to the missing variants there are messages that lack the information
printed by btrfs_info etc helpers.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

btrfs_error() and btrfs_std_error() does the same thing
and calls _btrfs_std_error(), so consolidate them together.
And the main motivation is that btrfs_error() is closely
named with btrfs_err(), one handles error action the other
is to log the error, so don't closely name them.
Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Suggested-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

Signed-off-by: NAnand Jain <anand.jain@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>

The code using 'ordered_extent_flush_mutex' mutex has removed by below
commit.
 - 8d875f95
   btrfs: disable strict file flushes for renames and truncates
But the mutex still lives in struct 'btrfs_fs_info'.

So, this patch removes the mutex from struct 'btrfs_fs_info' and its
initialization code.
Signed-off-by: NByongho Lee <bhlee.kernel@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

These arguments are not used in functions, remove them for cleanup
and make kernel stack happy.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

More than one code call set_block_group_ro() and restore rw in fail.

Old code use bool bit to save blockgroup's ro state, it can not
support parallel case(it is confirmd exist in my debug log).

This patch use ref count to store ro state, and rename
set_block_group_ro/set_block_group_rw
to
inc_block_group_ro/dec_block_group_ro.
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When we clear the dirty bits in btrfs_delete_unused_bgs for extents
in the empty block group, it results in btrfs_finish_extent_commit being
unable to discard the freed extents.

The block group removal patch added an alternate path to forget extents
other than btrfs_finish_extent_commit.  As a result, any extents that
would be freed when the block group is removed aren't discarded.  In my
test run, with a large copy of mixed sized files followed by removal, it
left nearly 2/3 of extents undiscarded.

To clean up the block groups, we add the removed block group onto a list
that will be discarded after transaction commit.
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Tested-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

We have a race between deleting an unused block group and balancing the
same block group that leads to an assertion failure/BUG(), producing the
following trace:

[181631.208236] BTRFS: assertion failed: 0, file: fs/btrfs/volumes.c, line: 2622
[181631.220591] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[181631.222959] kernel BUG at fs/btrfs/ctree.h:4062!
[181631.223932] invalid opcode: 0000 [#1] PREEMPT SMP DEBUG_PAGEALLOC
[181631.224566] Modules linked in: btrfs dm_flakey dm_mod crc32c_generic xor raid6_pq nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd grace fscache sunrpc loop fuse acpi_cpufreq parpor$
[181631.224566] CPU: 8 PID: 17451 Comm: btrfs Tainted: G        W       4.1.0-rc5-btrfs-next-10+ #1
[181631.224566] Hardware name: QEMU Standard PC (i440FX + PIIX, 1996), BIOS rel-1.8.1-0-g4adadbd-20150316_085822-nilsson.home.kraxel.org 04/01/2014
[181631.224566] task: ffff880127e09590 ti: ffff8800b5824000 task.ti: ffff8800b5824000
[181631.224566] RIP: 0010:[<ffffffffa03f19f6>]  [<ffffffffa03f19f6>] assfail.constprop.50+0x1e/0x20 [btrfs]
[181631.224566] RSP: 0018:ffff8800b5827ae8  EFLAGS: 00010246
[181631.224566] RAX: 0000000000000040 RBX: ffff8800109fc218 RCX: ffffffff81095dce
[181631.224566] RDX: 0000000000005124 RSI: ffffffff81464819 RDI: 00000000ffffffff
[181631.224566] RBP: ffff8800b5827ae8 R08: 0000000000000001 R09: 0000000000000000
[181631.224566] R10: 0000000000000000 R11: 0000000000000000 R12: ffff8800109fc200
[181631.224566] R13: ffff880020095000 R14: ffff8800b1a13f38 R15: ffff880020095000
[181631.224566] FS:  00007f70ca0b0c80(0000) GS:ffff88013ec00000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
[181631.224566] CS:  0010 DS: 0000 ES: 0000 CR0: 000000008005003b
[181631.224566] CR2: 00007f2872ab6e68 CR3: 00000000a717c000 CR4: 00000000000006e0
[181631.224566] Stack:
[181631.224566]  ffff8800b5827ba8 ffffffffa03f3916 ffff8800b5827b38 ffffffffa03d080e
[181631.224566]  ffffffffa03d1423 ffff880020095000 ffff88001233c000 0000000000000001
[181631.224566]  ffff880020095000 ffff8800b1a13f38 0000000a69c00000 0000000000000000
[181631.224566] Call Trace:
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03f3916>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0xa4/0x6bb [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03d080e>] ? join_transaction.isra.8+0xb9/0x3ba [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03d1423>] ? wait_current_trans.isra.13+0x22/0xfc [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03f3fbc>] btrfs_relocate_chunk.isra.29+0x8f/0xa7 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03f54df>] btrfs_balance+0xaa4/0xc52 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa03fd388>] btrfs_ioctl_balance+0x23f/0x2b0 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff810872f9>] ? trace_hardirqs_on+0xd/0xf
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffffa04019a3>] btrfs_ioctl+0xfe2/0x2220 [btrfs]
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff812603ed>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff81084669>] ? arch_local_irq_save+0x9/0xc
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff81138def>] ? handle_mm_fault+0x834/0xcd2
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff8103e48c>] ? __do_page_fault+0x211/0x424
[181631.224566]  [<ffffffff811755e6>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x3c6/0x479
(...)

The sequence of steps leading to this are:

           CPU 0                                         CPU 1

  btrfs_balance()
    btrfs_relocate_chunk()

      btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X)
        btrfs_lookup_block_group(bg X)

                                               cleaner_kthread
                                                  locks fs_info->cleaner_mutex

                                                  btrfs_delete_unused_bgs()
                                                    finds bg X, which became
                                                    unused in the previous
                                                    transaction

                                                    checks bg X ->ro == 0,
                                                    so it proceeds
        sets bg X ->ro to 1
        (btrfs_set_block_group_ro(bg X))

        blocks on fs_info->cleaner_mutex
                                                    btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
                                                  unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex

        acquires fs_info->cleaner_mutex
        relocate_block_group()
          --> does nothing, no extents found in
              the extent tree from bg X
        unlocks fs_info->cleaner_mutex

      btrfs_relocate_block_group(bg X) returns

    btrfs_remove_chunk(bg X)
       extent map not found
          --> ASSERT(0)

Fix this by using a new mutex to make sure these 2 operations, block
group relocation and removal, are serialized.

This issue is reproducible by running fstests generic/038 (which stresses
chunk allocation and automatic removal of unused block groups) together
with the following balance loop:

    while true; do btrfs balance start -dusage=0 <mountpoint> ; done
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Goodbye, the old mechanisim.
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

lockdep report following warning in test:
 [25176.843958] =================================
 [25176.844519] [ INFO: inconsistent lock state ]
 [25176.845047] 4.1.0-rc3 #22 Tainted: G        W
 [25176.845591] ---------------------------------
 [25176.846153] inconsistent {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} -> {IN-SOFTIRQ-W} usage.
 [25176.846713] fsstress/26661 [HC0[0]:SC1[1]:HE1:SE0] takes:
 [25176.847246]  (&wr_ctx->wr_lock){+.?...}, at: [<ffffffffa04cdc6d>] scrub_free_ctx+0x2d/0xf0 [btrfs]
 [25176.847838] {SOFTIRQ-ON-W} state was registered at:
 [25176.848396]   [<ffffffff810bf460>] __lock_acquire+0x6a0/0xe10
 [25176.848955]   [<ffffffff810bfd1e>] lock_acquire+0xce/0x2c0
 [25176.849491]   [<ffffffff816489af>] mutex_lock_nested+0x7f/0x410
 [25176.850029]   [<ffffffffa04d04ff>] scrub_stripe+0x4df/0x1080 [btrfs]
 [25176.850575]   [<ffffffffa04d11b1>] scrub_chunk.isra.19+0x111/0x130 [btrfs]
 [25176.851110]   [<ffffffffa04d144c>] scrub_enumerate_chunks+0x27c/0x510 [btrfs]
 [25176.851660]   [<ffffffffa04d3b87>] btrfs_scrub_dev+0x1c7/0x6c0 [btrfs]
 [25176.852189]   [<ffffffffa04e918e>] btrfs_dev_replace_start+0x36e/0x450 [btrfs]
 [25176.852771]   [<ffffffffa04a98e0>] btrfs_ioctl+0x1e10/0x2d20 [btrfs]
 [25176.853315]   [<ffffffff8121c5b8>] do_vfs_ioctl+0x318/0x570
 [25176.853868]   [<ffffffff8121c851>] SyS_ioctl+0x41/0x80
 [25176.854406]   [<ffffffff8164da17>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x6f
 [25176.854935] irq event stamp: 51506
 [25176.855511] hardirqs last  enabled at (51506): [<ffffffff810d4ce5>] vprintk_emit+0x225/0x5e0
 [25176.856059] hardirqs last disabled at (51505): [<ffffffff810d4b77>] vprintk_emit+0xb7/0x5e0
 [25176.856642] softirqs last  enabled at (50886): [<ffffffff81067a23>] __do_softirq+0x363/0x640
 [25176.857184] softirqs last disabled at (50949): [<ffffffff8106804d>] irq_exit+0x10d/0x120
 [25176.857746]
 other info that might help us debug this:
 [25176.858845]  Possible unsafe locking scenario:
 [25176.859981]        CPU0
 [25176.860537]        ----
 [25176.861059]   lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
 [25176.861705]   <Interrupt>
 [25176.862272]     lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);
 [25176.862881]
  *** DEADLOCK ***

Reason:
 Above warning is caused by:
 Interrupt
 -> bio_endio()
 -> ...
 -> scrub_put_ctx()
 -> scrub_free_ctx() *1
 -> ...
 -> mutex_lock(&wr_ctx->wr_lock);

 scrub_put_ctx() is allowed to be called in end_bio interrupt, but
 in code design, it will never call scrub_free_ctx(sctx) in interrupe
 context(above *1), because btrfs_scrub_dev() get one additional
 reference of sctx->refs, which makes scrub_free_ctx() only called
 withine btrfs_scrub_dev().

 Now the code runs out of our wish, because free sequence in
 scrub_pending_bio_dec() have a gap.

 Current code:
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 scrub_pending_bio_dec()            |  btrfs_scrub_dev
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
 wake_up(&sctx->list_wait);         |
                                    | scrub_put_ctx()
                                    | -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
 scrub_put_ctx(sctx);               |
 -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
 -> scrub_free_ctx()                |
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------

 We expected:
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 scrub_pending_bio_dec()            |  btrfs_scrub_dev
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------
 atomic_dec(&sctx->bios_in_flight); |
 wake_up(&sctx->list_wait);         |
 scrub_put_ctx(sctx);               |
 -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)|
                                    | scrub_put_ctx()
                                    | -> atomic_dec_and_test(&sctx->refs)
                                    | -> scrub_free_ctx()
 -----------------------------------+-----------------------------------

Fix:
 Move scrub_pending_bio_dec() to a workqueue, to avoid this function run
 in interrupt context.
 Tested by check tracelog in debug.

Changelog v1->v2:
 Use workqueue instead of adjust function call sequence in v1,
 because v1 will introduce a bug pointed out by:
 Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@gmail.com>
Reported-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: NZhao Lei <zhaolei@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

When allocating a new chunk or removing one we need to update num_devs
device items and insert or remove a chunk item in the chunk tree, so
in the worst case the space needed in the chunk space_info is:

  btrfs_calc_trunc_metadata_size(chunk_root, num_devs) +
     btrfs_calc_trans_metadata_size(chunk_root, 1)

That is, in the worst case we need to cow num_devs paths and cow 1 other
path that can result in splitting every node and leaf, and each path
consisting of BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL - 1 nodes and 1 leaf. We were requiring
some additional chunk_root->nodesize * BTRFS_MAX_LEVEL * num_devs bytes,
which were unnecessary since updating the existing device items does
not result in splitting the nodes and leaf since after updating them
they remain with the same size.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Unlike when attempting to allocate a new block group, where we check
that we have enough space in the system space_info to update the device
items and insert a new chunk item in the chunk tree, we were not checking
if the system space_info had enough space for updating the device items
and deleting the chunk item in the chunk tree. This often lead to -ENOSPC
error when attempting to allocate blocks for the chunk tree (during btree
node/leaf COW operations) while updating the device items or deleting the
chunk item, which resulted in the current transaction being aborted and
turning the filesystem into read-only mode.

While running fstests generic/038, which stresses allocation of block
groups and removal of unused block groups, with a large scratch device
(750Gb) this happened often, despite more than enough unallocated space,
and resulted in the following trace:

[68663.586604] WARNING: CPU: 3 PID: 1521 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]()
[68663.600407] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[68663.730829] Call Trace:
[68663.732585]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[68663.734334]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[68663.739980]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[68663.757153]  [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.760925]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[68663.762854]  [<ffffffffa03b159d>] ? btrfs_update_device+0x15a/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.764073]  [<ffffffffa036ca6d>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x114 [btrfs]
[68663.765130]  [<ffffffffa03b3638>] btrfs_remove_chunk+0x597/0x5ee [btrfs]
[68663.765998]  [<ffffffffa0384663>] ? btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x245/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.767068]  [<ffffffffa0384676>] btrfs_delete_unused_bgs+0x258/0x296 [btrfs]
[68663.768227]  [<ffffffff8143527f>] ? _raw_spin_unlock_irq+0x2d/0x4c
[68663.769081]  [<ffffffffa038b109>] cleaner_kthread+0x13d/0x16c [btrfs]
[68663.799485]  [<ffffffffa038afcc>] ? btrfs_alloc_root+0x28/0x28 [btrfs]
[68663.809208]  [<ffffffff8105f367>] kthread+0xef/0xf7
[68663.828795]  [<ffffffff810e603f>] ? time_hardirqs_on+0x15/0x28
[68663.844942]  [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.846486]  [<ffffffff81435a88>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90
[68663.847760]  [<ffffffff8105f278>] ? __kthread_parkme+0xad/0xad
[68663.849503] ---[ end trace 798477c6d6dbaad6 ]---
[68663.850525] BTRFS: error (device sdc) in btrfs_remove_chunk:2652: errno=-28 No space left

So fix this by verifying that enough space exists in system space_info,
and reserving the space in the chunk block reserve, before attempting to
delete the block group and allocate a new system chunk if we don't have
enough space to perform the necessary updates and delete in the chunk
tree. Like for the block group creation case, we don't error our if we
fail to allocate a new system chunk, since we might end up not needing
it (no node/leaf splits happen during the COW operations and/or we end
up not needing to COW any btree nodes or leafs because they were already
COWed in the current transaction and their writeback didn't start yet).
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

While creating a block group, we often end up getting ENOSPC while updating
the chunk tree, which leads to a transaction abortion that produces a trace
like the following:

[30670.116368] WARNING: CPU: 4 PID: 20735 at fs/btrfs/super.c:260 __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]()
[30670.117777] BTRFS: Transaction aborted (error -28)
(...)
[30670.163567] Call Trace:
[30670.163906]  [<ffffffff8142fa46>] dump_stack+0x4f/0x7b
[30670.164522]  [<ffffffff8108b6a2>] ? console_unlock+0x361/0x3ad
[30670.165171]  [<ffffffff81045ea5>] warn_slowpath_common+0xa1/0xbb
[30670.166323]  [<ffffffffa035daa7>] ? __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.167213]  [<ffffffff81045f05>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x46/0x48
[30670.167862]  [<ffffffffa035daa7>] __btrfs_abort_transaction+0x52/0x106 [btrfs]
[30670.169116]  [<ffffffffa03743d7>] btrfs_create_pending_block_groups+0x101/0x130 [btrfs]
[30670.170593]  [<ffffffffa038426a>] __btrfs_end_transaction+0x84/0x366 [btrfs]
[30670.171960]  [<ffffffffa038455c>] btrfs_end_transaction+0x10/0x12 [btrfs]
[30670.174649]  [<ffffffffa036eb6b>] btrfs_check_data_free_space+0x11f/0x27c [btrfs]
[30670.176092]  [<ffffffffa039450d>] btrfs_fallocate+0x7c8/0xb96 [btrfs]
[30670.177218]  [<ffffffff812459f2>] ? __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x13/0x15
[30670.178622]  [<ffffffff81152447>] vfs_fallocate+0x14c/0x1de
[30670.179642]  [<ffffffff8116b915>] ? __fget_light+0x2d/0x4f
[30670.180692]  [<ffffffff81152863>] SyS_fallocate+0x47/0x62
[30670.186737]  [<ffffffff81435b32>] system_call_fastpath+0x12/0x17
[30670.187792] ---[ end trace 0373e6b491c4a8cc ]---

This is because we don't do proper space reservation for the chunk block
reserve when we have multiple tasks allocating chunks in parallel.

So block group creation has 2 phases, and the first phase essentially
checks if there is enough space in the system space_info, allocating a
new system chunk if there isn't, while the second phase updates the
device, extent and chunk trees. However, because the updates to the
chunk tree happen in the second phase, if we have N tasks, each with
its own transaction handle, allocating new chunks in parallel and if
there is only enough space in the system space_info to allocate M chunks,
where M < N, none of the tasks ends up allocating a new system chunk in
the first phase and N - M tasks will get -ENOSPC when attempting to
update the chunk tree in phase 2 if they need to COW any nodes/leafs
from the chunk tree.

Fix this by doing proper reservation in the chunk block reserve.

The issue could be reproduced by running fstests generic/038 in a loop,
which eventually triggered the problem.
Signed-off-by: NFilipe Manana <fdmanana@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

Old csum type check is wrong and can't catch csum_type 1(not supported).

Fix it to avoid hostile 0 division.
Reported-by: NLukas Lueg <lukas.lueg@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NQu Wenruo <quwenruo@cn.fujitsu.com>
Reviewed-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>

The annotated functios will be placed into .text.unlikely section. The
annotation also hints compiler to move the code out of the hot paths,
and may implicitly mark if-statement leading to that block as unlikely.

This is a heuristic, the impact on the generated code is not
significant.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
Signed-off-by: NChris Mason <clm@fb.com>