1. 07 9月, 2018 7 次提交
  2. 06 9月, 2018 4 次提交
    • A
      bpf/verifier: fix verifier instability · a9c676bc
      Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
      Edward Cree says:
      In check_mem_access(), for the PTR_TO_CTX case, after check_ctx_access()
      has supplied a reg_type, the other members of the register state are set
      appropriately.  Previously reg.range was set to 0, but as it is in a
      union with reg.map_ptr, which is larger, upper bytes of the latter were
      left in place.  This then caused the memcmp() in regsafe() to fail,
      preventing some branches from being pruned (and occasionally causing the
      same program to take a varying number of processed insns on repeated
      verifier runs).
      
      Fix the instability by clearing bpf_reg_state in __mark_reg_[un]known()
      
      Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking")
      Debugged-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
      Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      a9c676bc
    • T
      libbpf: Remove the duplicate checking of function storage · 69495d2a
      Taeung Song 提交于
      After the commit eac7d845 ("tools: libbpf: don't return '.text'
      as a program for multi-function programs"), bpf_program__next()
      in bpf_object__for_each_program skips the function storage such as .text,
      so eliminate the duplicate checking.
      
      Cc: Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Signed-off-by: NTaeung Song <treeze.taeung@gmail.com>
      Acked-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
      69495d2a
    • D
      netlink: Make groups check less stupid in netlink_bind() · 428f944b
      Dmitry Safonov 提交于
      As Linus noted, the test for 0 is needless, groups type can follow the
      usual kernel style and 8*sizeof(unsigned long) is BITS_PER_LONG:
      
      > The code [..] isn't technically incorrect...
      > But it is stupid.
      > Why stupid? Because the test for 0 is pointless.
      >
      > Just doing
      >        if (nlk->ngroups < 8*sizeof(groups))
      >                groups &= (1UL << nlk->ngroups) - 1;
      >
      > would have been fine and more understandable, since the "mask by shift
      > count" already does the right thing for a ngroups value of 0. Now that
      > test for zero makes me go "what's special about zero?". It turns out
      > that the answer to that is "nothing".
      [..]
      > The type of "groups" is kind of silly too.
      >
      > Yeah, "long unsigned int" isn't _technically_ wrong. But we normally
      > call that type "unsigned long".
      
      Cleanup my piece of pointlessness.
      
      Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
      Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
      Cc: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@secunet.com>
      Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
      Fairly-blamed-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NDmitry Safonov <dima@arista.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      428f944b
    • V
      packet: add sockopt to ignore outgoing packets · fa788d98
      Vincent Whitchurch 提交于
      Currently, the only way to ignore outgoing packets on a packet socket is
      via the BPF filter.  With MSG_ZEROCOPY, packets that are looped into
      AF_PACKET are copied in dev_queue_xmit_nit(), and this copy happens even
      if the filter run from packet_rcv() would reject them.  So the presence
      of a packet socket on the interface takes away the benefits of
      MSG_ZEROCOPY, even if the packet socket is not interested in outgoing
      packets.  (Even when MSG_ZEROCOPY is not used, the skb is unnecessarily
      cloned, but the cost for that is much lower.)
      
      Add a socket option to allow AF_PACKET sockets to ignore outgoing
      packets to solve this.  Note that the *BSDs already have something
      similar: BIOCSSEESENT/BIOCSDIRECTION and BIOCSDIRFILT.
      
      The first intended user is lldpd.
      Signed-off-by: NVincent Whitchurch <vincent.whitchurch@axis.com>
      Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      fa788d98
  3. 05 9月, 2018 29 次提交