Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 18 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • K
      pstore: pass allocated memory region back to caller · f6f82851
      由 Kees Cook 提交于 
      The buf_lock cannot be held while populating the inodes, so make the backend
pass forward an allocated and filled buffer instead. This solves the following
backtrace. The effect is that "buf" is only ever used to notify the backends
that something was written to it, and shouldn't be used in the read path.

To replace the buf_lock during the read path, isolate the open/read/close
loop with a separate mutex to maintain serialized access to the backend.

Note that is is up to the pstore backend to cope if the (*write)() path is
called in the middle of the read path.

[   59.691019] BUG: sleeping function called from invalid context at .../mm/slub.c:847
[   59.691019] in_atomic(): 0, irqs_disabled(): 1, pid: 1819, name: mount
[   59.691019] Pid: 1819, comm: mount Not tainted 3.0.8 #1
[   59.691019] Call Trace:
[   59.691019]  [<810252d5>] __might_sleep+0xc3/0xca
[   59.691019]  [<810a26e6>] kmem_cache_alloc+0x32/0xf3
[   59.691019]  [<810b53ac>] ? __d_lookup_rcu+0x6f/0xf4
[   59.691019]  [<810b68b1>] alloc_inode+0x2a/0x64
[   59.691019]  [<810b6903>] new_inode+0x18/0x43
[   59.691019]  [<81142447>] pstore_get_inode.isra.1+0x11/0x98
[   59.691019]  [<81142623>] pstore_mkfile+0xae/0x26f
[   59.691019]  [<810a2a66>] ? kmem_cache_free+0x19/0xb1
[   59.691019]  [<8116c821>] ? ida_get_new_above+0x140/0x158
[   59.691019]  [<811708ea>] ? __init_rwsem+0x1e/0x2c
[   59.691019]  [<810b67e8>] ? inode_init_always+0x111/0x1b0
[   59.691019]  [<8102127e>] ? should_resched+0xd/0x27
[   59.691019]  [<8137977f>] ? _cond_resched+0xd/0x21
[   59.691019]  [<81142abf>] pstore_get_records+0x52/0xa7
[   59.691019]  [<8114254b>] pstore_fill_super+0x7d/0x91
[   59.691019]  [<810a7ff5>] mount_single+0x46/0x82
[   59.691019]  [<8114231a>] pstore_mount+0x15/0x17
[   59.691019]  [<811424ce>] ? pstore_get_inode.isra.1+0x98/0x98
[   59.691019]  [<810a8199>] mount_fs+0x5a/0x12d
[   59.691019]  [<810b9174>] ? alloc_vfsmnt+0xa4/0x14a
[   59.691019]  [<810b9474>] vfs_kern_mount+0x4f/0x7d
[   59.691019]  [<810b9d7e>] do_kern_mount+0x34/0xb2
[   59.691019]  [<810bb15f>] do_mount+0x5fc/0x64a
[   59.691019]  [<810912fb>] ? strndup_user+0x2e/0x3f
[   59.691019]  [<810bb3cb>] sys_mount+0x66/0x99
[   59.691019]  [<8137b537>] sysenter_do_call+0x12/0x26
Signed-off-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
      f6f82851
  3. 16 11月, 2011 7 次提交
  5. 15 11月, 2011 1 次提交
    • L
      fsl-rio: fix compile error · e0ce42e1
      由 Liu Gang 提交于 
      The "#include <linux/module.h>" was replaced by "#include <linux/export.h>"
in the patch "powerpc: various straight conversions from module.h --> export.h".
This will cause the following compile problem:
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c: In function 'fsl_rio_mcheck_exception':
arch/powerpc/sysdev/fsl_rio.c:296: error: implicit declaration of function 'search_exception_tables'.

The file fsl_rio.c needs the declaration of function "search_exception_tables"
in the header file "linux/module.h".
Signed-off-by: NLiu Gang <Gang.Liu@freescale.com>
Signed-off-by: NPaul Gortmaker <paul.gortmaker@windriver.com>
      e0ce42e1
  7. 14 11月, 2011 7 次提交
  9. 13 11月, 2011 2 次提交
  11. 12 11月, 2011 17 次提交
  13. 11 11月, 2011 5 次提交