- 25 4月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 1a699476 "ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Hotplug notifications from acpi_bus_notify()" changed the root notify handler, acpi_bus_notify(), to block unknown type norifications, but it overlooked the fact that they might be propagated to drivers via the ->notify() callback. Fix the problem by allowing drivers to receive unknown type notifications via ->notify() as before. Fixes: 1a699476 (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Hotplug notifications from acpi_bus_notify()) Reported-and-tested-by: NMantas Mikulėnas <grawity@gmail.com> Reported-and-tested-by: NSitsofe Wheeler <sitsofe@yahoo.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 05 3月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since the only function executed by acpi_hotplug_execute() is acpi_device_hotplug() and it only is called by the ACPI core, simplify its definition so that it only takes two arguments, the ACPI device object pointer and event code, rename it to acpi_hotplug_schedule() and move its header from acpi_bus.h to the ACPI core's internal header file internal.h. Modify the definition of acpi_device_hotplug() so that its first argument is an ACPI device object pointer and modify the definition of struct acpi_hp_work accordingly. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 22 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Replace acpi_evaluate_hotplug_ost() with acpi_evaluate_ost() everywhere and drop the ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST symbol so that hotplug _OST is supported unconditionally. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com>
-
- 07 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_bus_notify() is executed on all notifications for all devices anyway, make it execute acpi_device_hotplug() for all hotplug events instead of installing notify handlers pointing to the same function for all hotplug devices. This change reduces both the size and complexity of ACPI-based device hotplug code. Moreover, since acpi_device_hotplug() only does significant things for devices that have either an ACPI scan handler, or a hotplug context with .eject() defined, and those devices had notify handlers pointing to acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() installed before anyway, this modification shouldn't change functionality. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 2月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There is a slight possibility for the ACPI device object pointed to by adev in acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() to become invalid between the acpi_bus_get_device() that it comes from and the subsequent dereference of that pointer under get_device(). Namely, if acpi_scan_drop_device() runs in parallel with acpi_hotplug_notify_cb(), acpi_device_del_work_fn() queued up by it may delete the device object in question right after a successful execution of acpi_bus_get_device() in acpi_bus_notify(). An analogous problem is present in acpi_bus_notify() where the device pointer coming from acpi_bus_get_device() may become invalid before it subsequent dereference in the "if" block. To prevent that from happening, introduce a new function, acpi_bus_get_acpi_device(), working analogously to acpi_bus_get_device() except that it will grab a reference to the ACPI device object returned by it and it will do that under the ACPICA's namespace mutex. Then, make both acpi_hotplug_notify_cb() and acpi_bus_notify() use acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() instead of acpi_bus_get_device() so as to ensure that the pointers used by them will not become stale at one point. In addition to that, introduce acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() as a wrapper around put_device() to be used along with acpi_bus_get_acpi_device() and make the (new) users of the latter use acpi_bus_put_acpi_device() too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
- 29 1月, 2014 1 次提交
-
-
由 Mark Brown 提交于
There is currently no facility in ACPI to express the hookup of voltage regulators, the expectation is that the regulators that exist in the system will be handled transparently by firmware if they need software control at all. This means that if for some reason the regulator API is enabled on such a system it should assume that any supplies that devices need are provided by the system at all relevant times without any software intervention. Tell the regulator core to make this assumption by calling regulator_has_full_constraints(). Do this as soon as we know we are using ACPI so that the information is available to the regulator core as early as possible. This will cause the regulator core to pretend that there is an always on regulator supplying any supply that is requested but that has not otherwise been mapped which is the behaviour expected on a system with ACPI. Should the ability to specify regulators be added in future revisions of ACPI then once we have support for ACPI mappings in the kernel the same assumptions will apply. It is also likely that systems will default to a mode of operation which does not require any interpretation of these mappings in order to be compatible with existing operating system releases so it should remain safe to make these assumptions even if the mappings exist but are not supported by the kernel. Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@linaro.org> Cc: All applicable <stable@vger.kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 31 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The changes in the ACPI-based PCI hotplug (ACPIPHP) subsystem made during the 3.12 development cycle uncovered a problem with VGA switcheroo that on some systems, when the device-specific method (ATPX in the radeon case, _DSM in the nouveau case) is used to turn off the discrete graphics, the BIOS generates ACPI hotplug events for that device and those events cause ACPIPHP to attempt to remove the device from the system (they are events for a device that was present previously and is not present any more, so that's what should be done according to the spec). Then, the system stops functioning correctly. Since the hotplug events in question were simply silently ignored previously, the least intrusive way to address that problem is to make ACPIPHP ignore them again. For this purpose, introduce a new ACPI device flag, no_hotplug, and modify ACPIPHP to ignore hotplug events for PCI devices whose ACPI companions have that flag set. Next, make the radeon and nouveau switcheroo detection code set the no_hotplug flag for the discrete graphics' ACPI companion. Fixes: bbd34fcd (ACPI / hotplug / PCI: Register all devices under the given bridge) References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=61891 References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=64891Reported-and-tested-by: NMike Lothian <mike@fireburn.co.uk> Reported-and-tested-by: <madcatx@atlas.cz> Reported-and-tested-by: NJoaquín Aramendía <samsagax@gmail.com> Cc: Alex Deucher <alexdeucher@gmail.com> Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@linux.ie> Cc: Takashi Iwai <tiwai@suse.de> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Cc: 3.12+ <stable@vger.kernel.org> # 3.12+
-
- 07 12月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
Replace direct inclusions of <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h>, which are incorrect, with <linux/acpi.h> inclusions and remove some inclusions of those files that aren't necessary. First of all, <acpi/acpi.h>, <acpi/acpi_bus.h> and <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> should not be included directly from any files that are built for CONFIG_ACPI unset, because that generally leads to build warnings about undefined symbols in !CONFIG_ACPI builds. For CONFIG_ACPI set, <linux/acpi.h> includes those files and for CONFIG_ACPI unset it provides stub ACPI symbols to be used in that case. Second, there are ordering dependencies between those files that always have to be met. Namely, it is required that <acpi/acpi_bus.h> be included prior to <acpi/acpi_drivers.h> so that the acpi_pci_root declarations the latter depends on are always there. And <acpi/acpi.h> which provides basic ACPICA type declarations should always be included prior to any other ACPI headers in CONFIG_ACPI builds. That also is taken care of including <linux/acpi.h> as appropriate. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org> Cc: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@srcf.ucam.org> Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com> Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com> Acked-by: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> (drivers/pci stuff) Acked-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@oracle.com> (Xen stuff) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 23 11月, 2013 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Introduce a static inline function for setting the status field of struct acpi_device on the basis of a supplied u32 number, acpi_set_device_status(), and use it instead of the horrible horrible STRUCT_TO_INT() macro wherever applicable. Having done that, drop STRUCT_TO_INT() (and pretend that it has never existed). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Tested-by: NMika Westerberg <mika.westerberg@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are two global hotplug notification handling routines in bus.c, acpi_bus_check_device() and acpi_bus_check_scope(), that have never been finished and don't do anything useful, so drop them. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 24 10月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chen, Gong 提交于
This H/W error log driver (a.k.a eMCA driver) is implemented based on http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/architecture-and-technology/enhanced-mca-logging-xeon-paper.html After errors are captured, more detailed platform specific information can be got via this new enhanced H/W error log driver. Most notably we can track memory errors back to the DIMM slot silk screen label. Signed-off-by: NChen, Gong <gong.chen@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NTony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
-
- 24 9月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
OSC_QUERY_TYPE isn't a "type"; it's an index into the _OSC Capabilities Buffer of DWORDs. Rename OSC_QUERY_TYPE, OSC_SUPPORT_TYPE, and OSC_CONTROL_TYPE to OSC_QUERY_DWORD, etc., to make this clear. No functional change. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Acked-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 8月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move acpi_bus_get_device() from bus.c to scan.c which allows acpi_bus_data_handler() to become static and clean up the latter. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 26 7月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
This patch cleans up the following sparse warning: # make C=2 drivers/acpi/osl.o ... drivers/acpi/osl.c:1775:20: warning: symbol 'acpi_os_initialize1' was not declared. Should it be static? ... CC drivers/acpi/osl.o Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 7月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Thomas Renninger 提交于
It is quite some time that this one has been deprecated. Get rid of it. Should some really important user be overseen, it may be reverted and the userspace program worked on first, but it is time to do something to get rid of this old stuff... Signed-off-by: NThomas Renninger <trenn@suse.de> Acked-by: NMatthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@nebula.com> Acked-by: NHenrique de Moraes Holschuh <hmh@hmh.eng.br> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are no users of the ACPI bus notifier call chain, acpi_bus_notify_list, any more, so drop it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Jiang Liu 提交于
Introduce helper function acpi_execute_simple_method() and use it in a number of places to simplify code. [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NJiang Liu <jiang.liu@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 6月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Bjorn Helgaas 提交于
These local variables are all initialized at their first use, so there's no point in initializing them earlier. Signed-off-by: NBjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 25 3月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Andrei Epure 提交于
Replace the combination of kmalloc() and memcpy() in acpi_run_osc() with a single call to kmemdup(). [rjw: Changelog] Signed-off-by: NAndrei Epure <epure.andrei@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 20 1月, 2013 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Move ACPI device power management functions from drivers/acpi/bus.c to drivers/acpi/device_pm.c. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 17 1月, 2013 3 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The function returning string representations of ACPI device power states, state_string((), is now static, because it is only used internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c. However, it will be used outside of that file going forward, so rename it to acpi_power_state_string(), add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its header to acpi_bus.h. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The function used for retrieving ACPI device power states, __acpi_bus_get_power(), is now static, because it is only used internally in drivers/acpi/bus.c. However, it will be used outside of that file going forward, so rename it to acpi_device_get_power(), in analogy with acpi_device_set_power(), add a kerneldoc comment to it and add its header to acpi_bus.h. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
During power transitions into D3cold from any shallower power states we are supposed to transition the device into D3hot and remove power from it afterward, but the current code in acpi_device_set_power() doesn't work this way. At the same time, though, we need to be careful enough to preserve backwards compatibility for systems that don't distinguish between D3hot and D3cold (e.g. designed before ACPI 4). Modify acpi_device_set_power() so that it works in accordance with the expectations in both cases. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 16 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lv Zheng 提交于
No power transitioning from D3 state up to a non-D0 state is allowed so make acpi_device_set_power() fail and complain if such a transition is attempted. Signed-off-by: NLv Zheng <lv.zheng@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If the caller of acpi_bus_set_power() already has a pointer to the struct acpi_device object corresponding to the device in question, it doesn't make sense for it to go through acpi_bus_get_device(), which may be costly, because it involves acquiring the global ACPI namespace mutex. For this reason, export the function operating on struct acpi_device objects used internally by acpi_bus_set_power(), so that it may be called instead of acpi_bus_set_power() in the above case, and change its name to acpi_device_set_power(). Additionally, introduce two inline wrappers for checking ACPI PM capabilities of devices represented by struct acpi_device objects. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 25 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
The _OSC method may exist in module level code, so it must be called after ACPI_FULL_INITIALIZATION On some new platforms with Zero-Power-Optical-Disk-Drive (ZPODD) support, this fix is necessary to save power. Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Tested-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
-
- 14 9月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
It turns out that there are ACPI BIOSes defining device objects with _PSx and without either _PSC or _PRx. For devices corresponding to those ACPI objetcs __acpi_bus_get_power() returns ACPI_STATE_UNKNOWN and their initial power states are regarded as unknown as a result. If such a device is a parent of another power-manageable device, the child cannot be put into a low-power state through ACPI, because __acpi_bus_set_power() refuses to change power states of devices whose parents' power states are unknown. To work around this problem, observe that the ACPI power state of a device cannot be higher-power (lower-number) than the power state of its parent. Thus, if the device's _PSC method or the configuration of its power resources indicates that the device is in D0, the device's parent has to be in D0 as well. Consequently, if the parent's power state is unknown when we've just learned that its child's power state is D0, we can safely set the parent's power.state field to ACPI_STATE_D0. Tested-by: NAaron Lu <aaron.lu@intel.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 04 6月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Toshi Kani 提交于
When ACPI_HOTPLUG_OST is defined, set hotplug _OST support bit OSC_SB_HOTPLUG_OST_SUPPORT to indicate that the OS supports hotplug _OST by calling the platform-wide ACPI Operating System Capabilities (_OSC). Signed-off-by: NToshi Kani <toshi.kani@hp.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 30 5月, 2012 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After recent changes of the ACPI device power states definitions, if power resources are not used for the device's power management, the state returned by __acpi_bus_get_power() cannot exceed D3hot, because the return values of _PSC are 0 through 3. However, if the _PR3 method is not present for the device and _PS3 returns 3, we have to assume that the device is in D3cold, so the value returned by __acpi_bus_get_power() in that case should be 4. Similarly, acpi_power_get_inferred_state() should take the power resources for the D3hot state into account in general, so that it can return 3 if those resources are "on" or 4 (D3cold) otherwise. Fix the the above two issues and make sure that if both _PSC and _PR3 are present for the device, the power resources listed by _PR3 will be used to determine if the number 3 returned by _PSC is meant to represent D3cold or D3hot. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After recent changes of the ACPI device low-power states definitions kernel messages in drivers/acpi/bus.c need to be updated so that they include the correct names of the states in question (currently is "D3" for D3hot and "D4" for D3cold, which is incorrect). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl>
-
- 18 5月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Commit 1cc0c998 ("ACPI: Fix D3hot v D3cold confusion") introduced a bug in __acpi_bus_set_power() and changed the behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state() in such a way that it generally doesn't work as expected if PCI_D3hot is passed to it as the second argument. First off, if ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) is passed to __acpi_bus_set_power() and the explicit_set flag is set for the D3cold state, the function will try to execute AML method called "_PS4", which doesn't exist. Fix this by adding a check to ensure that the name of the AML method to execute for transitions to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD is correct in __acpi_bus_set_power(). Also make sure that the explicit_set flag for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD will be set if _PS3 is present and modify acpi_power_transition() to avoid accessing power resources for ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD, because they don't exist. Second, if PCI_D3hot is passed to acpi_pci_set_power_state() as the target state, the function will request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT instead of ACPI_STATE_D3. However, ACPI_STATE_D3_HOT is now only marked as supported if the _PR3 AML method is defined for the given device, which is rare. This causes problems to happen on systems where devices were successfully put into ACPI D3 by pci_set_power_state(PCI_D3hot) which doesn't work now. In particular, some unused graphics adapters are not turned off as a result. To fix this issue restore the old behavior of acpi_pci_set_power_state(), which is to request a transition to ACPI_STATE_D3 (equal to ACPI_STATE_D3_COLD) if either PCI_D3hot or PCI_D3cold is passed to it as the argument. This approach is not ideal, because generally power should not be removed from devices if PCI_D3hot is the target power state, but since this behavior is relied on, we have no choice but to restore it at the moment and spend more time on designing a better solution in the future. References: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43228Reported-by: Nrocko <rockorequin@hotmail.com> Reported-by: NCristian Rodríguez <crrodriguez@opensuse.org> Reported-and-tested-by: NPeter <lekensteyn@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 30 3月, 2012 1 次提交
-
-
由 Matthew Garrett 提交于
Drivers may wish to add entries to /sys/firmware/acpi, so export acpi_kobj in order to let them do that. Signed-off-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 07 11月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
ACPI_NO_HARDWARE_INIT is only used by acpi_early_init() and acpi_bus_init() when calling acpi_enable_subsystem(), but acpi_enable_subsystem() doesn't check that flag, so it can be dropped. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 03 8月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Len Brown 提交于
as GHES is optional... When # CONFIG_ACPI_APEI_GHES is not set: (.init.text+0x4c22): undefined reference to `ghes_disable' Reported-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Acked-by: NRandy Dunlap <rdunlap@xenotime.net> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 14 7月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Huang Ying 提交于
In APEI firmware first mode, hardware error is reported by hardware to firmware firstly, then firmware reports the error to Linux in a GHES error record via POLL/SCI/IRQ/NMI etc. This may result in some issues if OS has no full APEI support. So some firmware implementation will work in a back-compatible mode by default. Where firmware will only notify OS in old-fashion, without GHES record. For example, for a fatal hardware error, only NMI is signaled, no GHES record. To gain full APEI power on these machines, APEI bit in generic _OSC call can be specified to tell firmware that Linux has full APEI support. This patch adds the APEI bit support in generic _OSC call. Signed-off-by: NHuang Ying <ying.huang@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NAndi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMatthew Garrett <mjg@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 29 5月, 2011 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lin Ming 提交于
_SxW returns an Integer containing the lowest D-state supported in state Sx. If OSPM has not indicated that it supports _PR3, then the value “3” corresponds to D3. If it has indicated _PR3 support, the value “3” represents D3hot and the value “4” represents D3cold. Linux does set _OSC._PR3, so we should fix it to expect that _SxW can return 4. Signed-off-by: NLin Ming <ming.m.lin@intel.com> Acked-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 15 3月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The variable pm_flags is used to prevent APM from being enabled along with ACPI, which would lead to problems. However, acpi_init() is always called before apm_init() and after acpi_init() has returned, it is known whether or not ACPI will be used. Namely, if acpi_disabled is not set after acpi_init() has returned, this means that ACPI is enabled. Thus, it is sufficient to check acpi_disabled in apm_init() to prevent APM from being enabled in parallel with ACPI. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
If direct references to pm_flags are removed from drivers/acpi/bus.c, CONFIG_ACPI will not need to depend on CONFIG_PM any more. Make that happen. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Acked-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
- 12 1月, 2011 2 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Since acpi_bus_set_power() should not use __acpi_bus_get_power() to update the device's device->power.state field before changing its power state (this may cause device->power.state to be inconsistent with the device power resources' reference counters), remove this call from it. In consequence, the acpi_power_nocheck variable is not necessary any more, so it can be dropped along with the DMI table used for setting that variable for HP Pavilion 05. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
There are no more users of acpi_bus_get_power(), so it can be dropped. Moreover, it should be dropped, because it modifies the device->power.state field of an ACPI device without updating the reference counters of the device's power resources, which is wrong. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rjw@sisk.pl> Signed-off-by: NLen Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
-