- 13 12月, 2018 4 次提交
-
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
SFC (Scaler & Format Converter) units are shared between VD and VEBoxes. They also happen to have separate reset bits. So, whenever we want to reset one or more of the media engines, we have to make sure the SFCs do not change owner in the process and, if this owner happens to be one of the engines being reset, we need to reset the SFC as well. This happens in 4 steps: 1) Tell the engine that a software reset is going to happen. The engine will then try to force lock the SFC (if currently locked, it will remain so; if currently unlocked, it will ignore this and all new lock requests). 2) Poll the ack bit to make sure the hardware has received the forced lock from the driver. Once this bit is set, it indicates SFC status (lock or unlock) will not change anymore (until we tell the engine it is safe to unlock again). 3) Check the usage bit to see if the SFC has ended up being locked to the engine we want to reset. If this is the case, we have to reset the SFC as well. 4) Unlock all the SFCs once the reset sequence is completed. Obviously, if we are resetting the whole GPU, we don't have to worry about all of this. BSpec: 10989 BSpec: 10990 BSpec: 10954 BSpec: 10955 BSpec: 10956 BSpec: 19212 Signed-off-by: NTomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181213091522.2926-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Instead of using IS_GEN() for consecutive gen checks, let's pass the range to IS_GEN_RANGE(). By code inspection these were the ranges deemed necessary for spatch: @@ expression e; @@ ( - IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 2) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 2, 3) | - IS_GEN(e, 3) || IS_GEN(e, 4) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 3, 4) | - IS_GEN(e, 5) || IS_GEN(e, 6) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 5, 6) | - IS_GEN(e, 6) || IS_GEN(e, 7) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 6, 7) | - IS_GEN(e, 7) || IS_GEN(e, 8) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 7, 8) | - IS_GEN(e, 8) || IS_GEN(e, 9) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 8, 9) | - IS_GEN(e, 10) || IS_GEN(e, 9) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 9, 10) | - IS_GEN(e, 9) || IS_GEN(e, 10) + IS_GEN_RANGE(e, 9, 10) ) After conversion, checking we don't have any missing IS_GEN_RANGE() || IS_GEN() was also done. Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-3-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
Define IS_GEN() similarly to our IS_GEN_RANGE(). but use gen instead of gen_mask to do the comparison. Now callers can pass then gen as a parameter, so we don't require one macro for each gen. The following spatch was used to convert the users of these macros: @@ expression e; @@ ( - IS_GEN2(e) + IS_GEN(e, 2) | - IS_GEN3(e) + IS_GEN(e, 3) | - IS_GEN4(e) + IS_GEN(e, 4) | - IS_GEN5(e) + IS_GEN(e, 5) | - IS_GEN6(e) + IS_GEN(e, 6) | - IS_GEN7(e) + IS_GEN(e, 7) | - IS_GEN8(e) + IS_GEN(e, 8) | - IS_GEN9(e) + IS_GEN(e, 9) | - IS_GEN10(e) + IS_GEN(e, 10) | - IS_GEN11(e) + IS_GEN(e, 11) ) v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN and compare to info.gen rather than using the bitmask Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-2-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
-
由 Lucas De Marchi 提交于
RANGE makes it longer, but clearer. We are also going to add a macro to check an individual gen, so add the _RANGE prefix here. Diff generated with: sed 's/IS_GEN(/IS_GEN_RANGE(/g' drivers/gpu/drm/i915/{*/,}*.{c,h} -i v2: use IS_GEN rather than GT_GEN Signed-off-by: NLucas De Marchi <lucas.demarchi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181212181044.15886-1-lucas.demarchi@intel.com
-
- 23 10月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rodrigo Vivi 提交于
No functional change. Just sorting this "if" statement from newer to older platform. Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20181022171526.15641-5-rodrigo.vivi@intel.com
-
- 04 9月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Elsewhere we manipulate uncore.unclaimed_mmio_check and i915_param.mmio_debug under the irq lock (e.g. preserving the current value across a user forcewake grab), but do not protect the manipulation inside intel_uncore_arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection() from concurrent access, even from itself. This is an issue as we do call arm_unclaimed_mmio_detection from multiple threads without coordination. Suggested-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intelcom> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180904131207.17563-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Currently, if the user has enabled mmio-debug around each register access, we presume that we have then checked them all. However, it is still possible through omission (raw register access) or external interaction that the unclaimed access was not highlighted. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180904111732.24266-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 16 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
On suspend, we cancel the automatic forcewake and clear all other sources of forcewake so the machine can sleep before we do suspend. However, we expose the forcewake to userspace (only via debugfs, but nevertheless we do) and want to restore that upon resume or else our accounting will be off and we may not acquire the forcewake before we use it. So record which domains we cleared on suspend and reacquire them early on resume. v2: Hold the spinlock to appease our sanitychecks v3: s/fw_domains_user/fw_domains_saved/ to convey intent more clearly Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com> Fixes: b8473050 ("drm/i915: Fix forcewake active domain tracking") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180808210842.3555-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk (cherry picked from commit d60996ab) Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
-
- 13 8月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
If engine reports that it is not ready for reset, we give up. Evidence shows that forcing a per engine reset on an engine which is not reporting to be ready for reset, can bring it back into a working order. There is risk that we corrupt the context image currently executing on that engine. But that is a risk worth taking as if we unblock the engine, we prevent a whole device wedging in a case of full gpu reset. Reset individual engine even if it reports that it is not prepared for reset, but only if we aim for full gpu reset and not on first reset attempt. v2: force reset only on later attempts, readability (Chris) v3: simplify with adequate caffeine levels (Chris) v4: comment about risks and migitations (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180813130116.7250-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
There is a possibility for per gen reset logic to be more nasty if the softer approach on resetting does not bear fruit. Expose retry count to per gen reset logic if it wants to take such tough measures. Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180810140036.24240-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
- 09 8月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
On suspend, we cancel the automatic forcewake and clear all other sources of forcewake so the machine can sleep before we do suspend. However, we expose the forcewake to userspace (only via debugfs, but nevertheless we do) and want to restore that upon resume or else our accounting will be off and we may not acquire the forcewake before we use it. So record which domains we cleared on suspend and reacquire them early on resume. v2: Hold the spinlock to appease our sanitychecks v3: s/fw_domains_user/fw_domains_saved/ to convey intent more clearly Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com> Fixes: b8473050 ("drm/i915: Fix forcewake active domain tracking") Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180808210842.3555-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 24 7月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
On Sandybridge, we need a workaround to wait for the CPU thread to wake up before we are sure that we have enabled the GT power well. However, we do see the errors being reported and failed reads returning spurious results. To try and capture more details as it fails, promote the error into a WARN so we grab the stacktrace, and to try and reduce the frequency of error increase the timeout from 500us to 5ms. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180720111102.11549-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 08 6月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
There is a problem with kbl up to rev E0 where a heavy memory/fabric traffic from adjacent engine(s) can cause an engine reset to fail. This traffic can be from normal memory accesses or it can be from heavy polling on a semaphore wait. For engine hogging causing a fail, we already fallback to full reset. Which effectively stops all engines and thus we only add a workaround documentation. For the semaphore wait loop poll case, we add one microsecond poll interval to semaphore wait to guarantee bandwidth for the reset preration. The side effect is that we make semaphore completion latencies also 1us longer. v2: Let full reset handle the adjacent engine idling (Chris) v3: Skip render engine (Joonas), please checkpatch on define (Mika) References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106684 References: VTHSD#2227190, HSDES#1604216706, BSID#0917 Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180607172444.17080-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
Our reset handling has a retry layer further up in the chain. As we have told the engine to prepare for reset, and failed it, make sure to remove that preparation so that the next attempted reset has a clean slate by triggering another full prepare cycle for the engines. v2: ret as int, simplified cleanup (Chris) Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180605160357.32591-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
- 17 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
We cannot call kthread_park() from softirq context, so let's avoid it entirely during the reset. We wanted to suspend the signaler so that it would not mark a request as complete at the same time as we marked it as being in error. Instead of parking the signaling, stop the engine from advancing so that the GPU doesn't emit the breadcrumb for our chosen "guilty" request. v2: Refactor setting STOP_RING so that we don't have the same code thrice Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michałt Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180516183355.10553-8-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 11 5月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
Inherit workarounds from previous platforms that are still valid for Icelake. v2: GEN7_ROW_CHICKEN2 is masked v3: - Since it has been fixed already in upstream, removed the TODO comment about WA_SET_BIT for WaInPlaceDecompressionHang. - Squashed with this patch: drm/i915/icl: add icelake_init_clock_gating() from Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> - Squashed with this patch: drm/i915/icl: WaForceEnableNonCoherent from Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> - WaPushConstantDereferenceHoldDisable is now Wa_1604370585 and applies to B0 as well. - WaPipeControlBefore3DStateSamplePattern WABB was being applied to ICL incorrectly. v4: - Wrap the commit message - s/dev_priv/p to please checkpatch v5: Rebased on top of the WA refactoring v6: Rebased on top of further whitelist registers refactoring (Michel) v7: Added WaRsForcewakeAddDelayForAck v8: s/ICL_HDC_CHICKEN0/ICL_HDC_MODE (Mika) v9: - C, not lisp (Chris) - WaIncreaseDefaultTLBEntries is the same for GEN > 9_LP (Tvrtko) Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Tomasz Lis <tomasz.lis@intel.com> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1525814984-20039-2-git-send-email-oscar.mateo@intel.com
-
- 06 4月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
The bits used to reset the different engines/domains have changed in GEN11, this patch maps the reset engine mask bits with the new bits in the reset control register. v2: Use shift-left instead of BIT macro to match the file style (Paulo). v3: Reuse gen8_reset_engines (Daniele). v4: Do not call intel_uncore_forcewake_reset after reset, we may be using the forcewake to read protected registers elsewhere and those results may be clobbered by the concurrent dropping of forcewake. bspec: 19212 Cc: Oscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Cc: Antonio Argenziano <antonio.argenziano@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Acked-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180405140052.10682-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
- 30 3月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
As intel_wait_for_register_fw() may use, and if successful only use, a busy-wait loop, the might_sleep() warning is a little over-zealous. Restrict it to a might_sleep_if() a slow timeout is specified (and so the caller authorises use of a usleep). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180329224519.13598-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Only sleep and repeat when asked for a full device reset (ALL_ENGINES) and avoid using sleeping waits when asked for a per-engine reset. The goal is to be able to use a per-engine reset from hardirq/softirq/timer context. A consequence is that our individual wait timeouts are a thousand times shorter, on the order of a hundred microseconds rather than hundreds of millisecond. This may make hitting the timeouts more common, but hopefully the fallover to the full-device reset will be sufficient to pick up the pieces. Note, that the sleeps inside older gen (pre-gen8) have been left as they are only used in full device reset mode. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> CC: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180329224519.13598-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 23 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
After resetting the GPU (or subset of engines), call synchronize_irq() to flush any pending irq before proceeding with the cleanup. For a device level reset, we disable the interupts around the reset, but when resetting just one engine, we have to avoid such global disabling. This leaves us open to an interrupt arriving for the engine as we try to reset it. We already do try to flush the IIR following the reset, but we have to ensure that the in-flight interrupt does not land after we start cleaning up after the reset; enter synchronize_irq(). As it current stands, we very rarely, but fatally, see sequences such as: 2.... 57964564us : execlists_reset_prepare: rcs0 2.... 57964613us : execlists_reset: rcs0 seqno=424 0d.h1 57964615us : gen8_cs_irq_handler: rcs0 CS active=1 2d..1 57964617us : __i915_request_unsubmit: rcs0 fence 29:1056 <- global_seqno 1060 2.... 57964703us : execlists_reset_finish: rcs0 0..s. 57964705us : execlists_submission_tasklet: rcs0 awake?=1, active=0, irq-posted?=1 v2: Move the sync into the execlists reset handler so that we coordinate the flush with disabling the interrupt handling and canceling the pending interrupt. v3: Just use synchronize_hardirq() to avoid the might_sleep(), we do not yet have threaded-irq to worry about. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Michel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Michał Winiarski <michal.winiarski@intel.com> Cc: Jeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180322073533.5313-4-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com>
-
- 20 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Oscar Mateo 提交于
In Gen11, the Video Decode engines (aka VDBOX, aka VCS, aka BSD) and the Video Enhancement engines (aka VEBOX, aka VECS) could be fused off. Also, each VDBOX and VEBOX has its own power well, which only exist if the related engine exists in the HW. Unfortunately, we have a Catch-22 situation going on: we need the blitter forcewake to read the register with the fuse info, but we cannot initialize the forcewake domains without knowin about the engines present in the HW. We workaround this problem by allowing the initialization of all forcewake domains and then pruning the fused off ones, as per the fuse information. Bspec: 20680 v2: We were shifting incorrectly for vebox disable (Vinay) v3: Assert mmio is ready and warn if we have attempted to initialize forcewake for fused-off engines (Paulo) v4: - Use INTEL_GEN in new code (Tvrtko) - Shorter local variable (Tvrtko, Michal) - Keep "if (!...) continue" style (Tvrtko) - No unnecessary BUG_ON (Tvrtko) - WARN_ON and cleanup if wrong mask (Tvrtko, Michal) - Use I915_READ_FW (Michal) - Use I915_MAX_VCS/VECS macros (Michal) v5: Rebased by Rodrigo fixing conflicts on top of: "drm/i915: Simplify intel_engines_init" v6: Fix v5. Remove info->num_rings. (by Oscar) v7: Rebase (Rodrigo). v8: - s/intel_device_info_fused_off_engines/ intel_device_info_init_mmio (Chris) - Make vdbox_disable & vebox_disable local variables (Chris) v9: - Move function declaration to intel_device_info.h (Michal) - Missing indent in bit fields definitions (Michal) - When RC6 is enabled by BIOS, the fuse register cannot be read until the blitter powerwell is awake. Shuffle where the fuse is read, prune the forcewake domains after the fact and change the commit message accordingly (Vinay, Sagar, Chris). v10: - Improved commit message (Sagar) - New line in header file (Sagar) - Specify the message in fw_domain_reset applies to ICL+ (Sagar) Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Cc: Vinay Belgaumkar <vinay.belgaumkar@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Daniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180316121456.11577-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com [Mika: soothe checkpatch on commit msg] Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
- 07 3月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniele Ceraolo Spurio 提交于
The main difference with previous GENs is that starting from Gen11 each VCS and VECS engine has its own power well, which only exist if the related engine exists in the HW. The fallback forcewake request workaround is only needed on gen9 according to the HSDES WA entry (1604254524), so we can go back to using the simpler fw_domains_get/put functions. BSpec: 18331 v2: fix fwtable, use array to test shadow tables, create new accessors to avoid check on every access (Tvrtko) v3 (from Paulo): Rebase. v4: - Range 09400-097FF should be FORCEWAKE_ALL (Daniele) - Use the BIT macro for forcewake domains (Daniele) - Add a comment about the range ordering (Oscar) - Updated commit message (Oscar) v5: Rebased v6: Use I915_MAX_VCS/VECS (Michal) v7: translate FORCEWAKE_ALL to available domains v8: rebase, add clarification on fallback ack in commit message. v9: fix rebase issue, change check in fw_domains_init from IS_GEN11 to GEN >= 11 v10: Generate is_genX_shadowed with a macro (Daniele) Include gen11_fw_ranges in the selftest (Michel) v11: Simplify FORCEWAKE_ALL, new line between NEEDS_FORCEWAKEs (Tvrtko) Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Acked-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniele Ceraolo Spurio <daniele.ceraolospurio@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NOscar Mateo <oscar.mateo@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180302161501.28594-6-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
- 10 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Tvrtko Ursulin 提交于
Coccinelle patch: @@ identifier p; @@ -INTEL_INFO(p)->gen +INTEL_GEN(p) Signed-off-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208130606.15556-12-tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180209215847.6660-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 08 2月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
After we assert the reset request (and wait for 20us), when the device has been fully reset it asserts the reset-status bit. Before we stop requesting the reset and allow the device to return to normal, we should wait for the reset to be completed. (Similar to how we wait for the device to return to normal after deasserting the reset request.) v2: Rename i915_reset_completed() probe to not cause as much confusion. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180207222824.29864-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Although the mmio are uncached and so should be flushed on every write, be paranoid and do a mmio read after setting the ring head/tail to be sure they have taken effect before moving on. v2: post tail to be pleasing to the eye Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180208072800.595-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com>
-
- 01 2月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Paulo Zanoni 提交于
This enables the Mesa driver to advertise support for ARB_timer_query, and thus an OpenGL version higher than 3.2. Based on the CNL patch by Nanley Chery. v2: Rebase. Cc: Anuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@intel.com> Cc: Nanley Chery <nanley.g.chery@intel.com> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Requested-by: NAnuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@intel.com> Tested-by: NAnuj Phogat <anuj.phogat@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180130134918.32283-10-paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com
-
- 09 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sean Paul 提交于
This patch adds a little more control to a couple wait_for routines such that we can avoid open-coding read/wait/timeout patterns which: - need the value of the register after the wait_for - run arbitrary operation for the read portion This patch also chooses the correct sleep function (based on timers-howto.txt) for the polling interval the caller specifies. Changes in v2: - Added to the series Changes in v3: - Rebased on drm-intel-next-queued and the new Wmin/max _wait_for - Removed msleep option Changes in v4: - Removed ; for OP in _wait_for (Chris) - Moved reg_value definition above ret (Chris) Changes in v4: - checkpatch whitespace fix Changes in v5: - None Changes in v6: - None Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NSean Paul <seanpaul@chromium.org> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20180108195545.218615-3-seanpaul@chromium.org
-
- 03 1月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Sujaritha Sundaresan 提交于
Instead of returning -EINVAL, GEM_BUG_ON when GuC reset is invoked for platforms not supporting as we don't expect to invoke it. v2: re-wording commit message and subject (Sagar) Signed-off-by: NSujaritha Sundaresan <sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Michal Wajdeczko <michal.wajdeczko@intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1514928025-29659-2-git-send-email-sujaritha.sundaresan@intel.com
-
- 01 12月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
It has been many years since the last confirmed sighting (and fix) of an RC6 related bug (usually a system hang). Remove the parameter to stop users from setting dangerous values, as they often set it during triage and end up disabling the entire runtime pm instead (the option is not a fine scalpel!). Furthermore, it allows users to set known dangerous values which were intended for testing and not for production use. For testing, we can always patch in the required setting without having to expose ourselves to random abuse. v2: Fixup NEEDS_WaRsDisableCoarsePowerGating fumble, and document the lack of ilk support better. v3: Clear intel_info->rc6p if we don't support rc6 itself. Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com> Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Acked-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch> Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171201113030.18360-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 21 11月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Hans de Goede 提交于
intel_uncore_suspend() unregisters the uncore code's PMIC bus access notifier and gets called on both normal and runtime suspend. intel_uncore_resume_early() re-registers the notifier, but only on normal resume. Add a new intel_uncore_runtime_resume() function which only re-registers the notifier and call that on runtime resume. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114135518.15981-2-hdegoede@redhat.com (cherry picked from commit bedf4d79) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
由 Hans de Goede 提交于
assert_rpm_wakelock_held is triggered from i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier even though it gets unregistered on (runtime) suspend, this is caused by a race happening under the following circumstances: intel_runtime_pm_put does: atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count); pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev); pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(kdev); And pm_runtime_put_autosuspend calls intel_runtime_suspend from a workqueue, so there is ample of time between the atomic_dec() and intel_runtime_suspend() unregistering the notifier. If the notifier gets called in this windowd assert_rpm_wakelock_held falsely triggers (at this point we're not runtime-suspended yet). This commit adds disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts and enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts calls around the intel_uncore_forcewake_get(FORCEWAKE_ALL) call in i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier fixing the false-positive WARN_ON. Changes in v2: -Reword comment explaining why disabling the wakeref asserts is ok and necessary Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NFKr <bugs-freedesktop@ubermail.me> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171110150301.9601-2-hdegoede@redhat.com (cherry picked from commit ce30560c) Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
-
- 15 11月, 2017 2 次提交
-
-
由 Hans de Goede 提交于
intel_uncore_suspend() unregisters the uncore code's PMIC bus access notifier and gets called on both normal and runtime suspend. intel_uncore_resume_early() re-registers the notifier, but only on normal resume. Add a new intel_uncore_runtime_resume() function which only re-registers the notifier and call that on runtime resume. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171114135518.15981-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
-
由 Hans de Goede 提交于
assert_rpm_wakelock_held is triggered from i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier even though it gets unregistered on (runtime) suspend, this is caused by a race happening under the following circumstances: intel_runtime_pm_put does: atomic_dec(&dev_priv->pm.wakeref_count); pm_runtime_mark_last_busy(kdev); pm_runtime_put_autosuspend(kdev); And pm_runtime_put_autosuspend calls intel_runtime_suspend from a workqueue, so there is ample of time between the atomic_dec() and intel_runtime_suspend() unregistering the notifier. If the notifier gets called in this windowd assert_rpm_wakelock_held falsely triggers (at this point we're not runtime-suspended yet). This commit adds disable_rpm_wakeref_asserts and enable_rpm_wakeref_asserts calls around the intel_uncore_forcewake_get(FORCEWAKE_ALL) call in i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier fixing the false-positive WARN_ON. Changes in v2: -Reword comment explaining why disabling the wakeref asserts is ok and necessary Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Reported-by: NFKr <bugs-freedesktop@ubermail.me> Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171110150301.9601-2-hdegoede@redhat.com
-
- 14 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
From gen6, the hardware tracks address lookup failures and we should clear those registers upon startup to prevent false positives. However, this was happening before we have the engines defined (intel_uncore_init()) and the for_each_engine loop was just a nop. The earliest we can call this is inside intel_engines_init_mmio(). Suggested-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171111004448.12360-1-michel.thierry@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 10 11月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Hans de Goede 提交于
intel_uncore_forcewake_reset() does forcewake puts and gets as such we need to make sure that no-one tries to access the PUNIT->PMIC bus (on systems where this bus is shared) while it runs, otherwise bad things happen. Normally this is taken care of by the i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier() which does an intel_uncore_forcewake_get(FORCEWAKE_ALL) when some other driver tries to access the PMIC bus, so that later forcewake gets are no-ops (for the duration of the bus access). But intel_uncore_forcewake_reset gets called in 3 cases: 1) Before registering the pmic_bus_access_notifier 2) After unregistering the pmic_bus_access_notifier 3) To reset forcewake state on a GPU reset In all 3 cases the i915_pmic_bus_access_notifier() protection is insufficient. This commit fixes this race by calling iosf_mbi_punit_acquire() before calling intel_uncore_forcewake_reset(). In the case where it is called directly after unregistering the pmic_bus_access_notifier, we need to hold the punit-lock over both calls to avoid a race where intel_uncore_fw_release_timer() may execute between the 2 calls. Reviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com> Acked-by: NIngo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NHans de Goede <hdegoede@redhat.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171019111620.26761-3-hdegoede@redhat.com
-
- 02 11月, 2017 3 次提交
-
-
由 Mika Kuoppala 提交于
There is a possibility on gen9 hardware to miss the forcewake ack message. The recommended workaround is to use another free bit and toggle it until original bit is successfully acknowledged. Some future gen9 revs might or might not fix the underlying issue but using fallback forcewake bit dance can be considered as harmless: without the ack timeout we never reach the fallback bit forcewake. Thus as of now we adopt a blanket approach for all gen9 and leave the bypassing the fallback bit approach for future patches if corresponding hw revisions do appear. Commit 83e33372 ("drm/i915: Increase maximum polling time to 50ms for forcewake request/clear ack") did increase the forcewake timeout. If the issue was a delayed ack, future work could include finding a suitable timeout value both for primary ack and reserve toggle to reduce the worst case latency. v2: use bit 15, naming, comment (Chris), only wait fallback ack v3: fix return on fallback, backoff after fallback write (Chris) v4: udelay on first pass, grammar (Chris) v4: s/reserve/fallback References: HSDES #1604254524 References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102051 Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com> Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com> Cc: Sagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171102094836.2506-1-mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
This patch adds per engine reset and recovery (TDR) support when GuC is used to submit workloads to GPU. In the case of i915 directly submission to ELSP, driver manages hang detection, recovery and resubmission. With GuC submission these tasks are shared between driver and GuC. i915 is still responsible for detecting a hang, and when it does it only requests GuC to reset that Engine. GuC internally manages acquiring forcewake and idling the engine before resetting it. Once the reset is successful, i915 takes over again and handles the resubmission. The scheduler in i915 knows which requests are pending so after resetting a engine, pending workloads/requests are resubmitted again. v2: s/i915_guc_request_engine_reset/i915_guc_reset_engine/ to match the non-guc function names. v3: Removed debug message about engine restarting from which request, since the new baseline do it regardless of submission mode. (Chris) v4: Rebase. v5: Do not pass unnecessary reporting flags to the fw (Jeff); tasklet_schedule(&execlists->irq_tasklet) handles the resubmit; rebase. v6: Rename the existing reset engine function and share a similar interface between guc and non-guc paths (Chris). Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171031225309.10888-1-michel.thierry@intel.comReviewed-by: NJeff McGee <jeff.mcgee@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
由 Michel Thierry 提交于
intel_guc_reset sounds more like the microcontroller is the one performing a reset, while in this case is the opposite. intel_reset_guc not only makes it clearer, it follows the other intel_reset functions available. v2: Print error message in English (Tvrtko). Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NMichel Thierry <michel.thierry@intel.com> Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171030185616.32836-2-michel.thierry@intel.comReviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
-
- 27 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
An interesting snippet from Sandybridge's prm: "Although a Ring Buffer can be enabled in the non-empty state, it must not be disabled unless it is empty. Attempting to disable a Ring Buffer in the non-empty state is UNDEFINED." Let's avoid the undefined behaviour as we disable the rings prior to reset and resume. v2: Tell HEAD to catch up to TAIL (empty ring) first, then reset both to 0 (supposedly while stopped). Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@linux.intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171027094311.30380-1-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
-
- 14 10月, 2017 1 次提交
-
-
由 Chris Wilson 提交于
Always try to stop the rings, even if the GPU reset itself has been disabled (via modparam i915.reset). This should at least stop the hw from spinning in the background consuming resources (e.g. power and memory bandwidth) letting the system rest-in-peace. References: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103260Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Cc: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com> Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171013131218.18013-2-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
-