Untangling me-too reports that actually aren't is really messy. And we
need to make sure the blame is put where it should be right from the
start ;-)

v2: Improve the wording from Ben's suggestions.

Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Acked-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Frob the message as suggested by Paulo on irc.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Enabling rps (turbo setup) was put in a work queue because it may
take quite awhile.  This change flushes the work queue to initialize
rps values before use by sysfs or debugfs.  Specifically,
rps.delayed_resume_work is flushed before using rps.hw_max,
rps.max_delay, rps.min_delay, or rps.cur_delay.

This change fixes a problem in sysfs where show functions using
uninitialized values show incorrect values and store functions
using uninitialized values in range checks incorrectly fail to
store valid input values.  This change also addresses similar use
before initialized problems in debugfs.
Signed-off-by: NTom O'Rourke <Tom.O'Rourke@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We lost the ability to capture the first error for a stuck ring in the
recent hangcheck robustification. Whilst both error states are
interesting (why does the GPU not recover is also essential to debug),
our primary goal is to fix the initial hang and so we need to capture
the first error state upon taking hangcheck action.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Let's try to avoid these confusing negated booleans.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Make sure our primary_disabled matches our expectations after driver
init.

Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70270Tested-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Tested-by: Nshui yangwei <yangweix.shui@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Regression introduced by:
    commit 311a2094
    Author: Paulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
        drm/i915: don't init DP or HDMI when not supported by DDI port

Since the commit above it is possible to have a DDI encoder that has
the HDMI connector but not the DP connector (in case the port doesn't
support DP). In this case, we must properly free the DP connector.

We just leak this once, so it's not a big deal.

Reported by kmemleak.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The DP spec allows this, and requires it when full link training is
started with non-minimum voltage swing and/or non-zero pre-emphasis.
Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For future platforms we'll need to initialize our MMIO function pointers
even earlier. Specifically, we'll need to be able to have register
reads/writes at GTT initialization (in i915_gem_gtt_init). Similarly,
these platforms also have MMIO differences based on the PCH id, so
while moving stuff around, also move the PCH initialization.

CC: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
[danvet: Mention the function where we need register access.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

At the end of haswell_crtc_enable we have an intel_wait_for_vblank
with a big comment, and the message suggests it's a workaround for
something we don't really understand. So I removed that wait and
started getting HW state readout error messages saying that the IPS
state is not what we expected.

I investigated and concluded that after you write IPS_ENABLE to
IPS_CTL, the bit will only actually become 1 on the next vblank. So
add code to wait for the IPS_ENABLE bit. We don't really need this
wait right now due to the wait I already mentioned, but at least this
one has a reason to be there, while the other one is just to
workaround some problem: we may remove it in the future.

The wait also acts as a POSTING_READ which we missed.
Signed-off-by: NPaulo Zanoni <paulo.r.zanoni@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Something already got misplaced (although it's from a patch from
before Paulo's cleanup). Move it to the right spot.

v2: Remove the line to keep a neat block, requested by Paulo.
Reported-by: NPaulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Cc: Paulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NPaulo Zanoni <przanoni@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Now that MMIO has been split up into gen specific functions it is
obvious when HAS_FPGA_DBG_UNCLAIMED, HAS_FORCE_WAKE are needed. As such,
we can remove this extraneous condition.

As a result of this, as well as previously existing function pointers
for forcewake, we no longer need the has_force_wake member in the device
specific data structure.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Similar to the previous patch which implemented GEN specific reads; this
patch does the same for writes. Writes have a bit of adding complexity
due to the FPGA_DBG feature of HSW plus:

gen[2-4]: nothing special
gen5: ILK dummy write
gen[6-7]: forcewake shenanigans
gen[HSW}: forcewake shenanigans + FPGA_DBG

I was a bit torn about whether or not to combine 6-HSW as one function,
since the FPGA_DBG is cleanly separated, and it wouldn't make the 6-7
MMIO too messy. In the end, I chose the clearest possible solution which
splits out HSW.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Extracting the MMIO read functionality makes per gen handling a bit
simpler, and the overall function a lot easier to read. The increasing
complexity of reads doesn't get too bad as the generation number
increases:

gen[2-4]: Nothing special
gen5: ILK dummy write workaround
gen6+: forcewake shenanigans
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Just to make the churn and code duplication in upcoming patches a bit
less, turn code which is common to all GEN MMIO functions into a macro.

v2: Fix typo in subject
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In preparation for having per GEN MMIO functions, create, and start
using MMIO functions in our uncore data structure. This simply makes the
transition easier by allowing us to just plug in the per GEN stuff
later.

For simplicity, I moved the intel_uncore_init() function down since
those rely on static functions defined lower in the file. This is most
of the churn in this patch.

I made one unrelated change here by using off_t datatype for the offset
of the register to write. I like the clarity that this brings to the
code. If I did it as a separate patch, I am pretty certain it would get
bikeshedded to oblivion.
Requested-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In order to be able to have virtual functions for the MMIO, we need to
use the raw access function. To keep things simple, just move this to
our early_sanitize code in uncore.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

For upcoming patches which will have GEN specific MMIO functions, we'll
need to initialize the uncore data structure earlier than we do today.

If we do not do this, the following will be problematic:

intel_uncore_sanitize
	intel_disable_gt_powersave
		gen6_disable_rps
			I915_WRITE(GEN6_RC_CONTROL, 0); <--- MMIO
intel_uncore_init // initializes MMIO

By initializing the function pointers first, we should be safe.
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

At least on my i830M here it reliably results in hard system hangs
nowadays. This is much worse than falling back to software rendering,
so I think we should simply rip this out.

After all we don't have any gpu reset for gen3 either, and there are a
lot more of those still around.

Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

In truly crazy circumstances shmem might give us the wrong type of
page. So be a bit paranoid and double check this.

Reviewer: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Cc: Rob Clark <robdclark@gmail.com>
References: http://lkml.org/lkml/2011/7/11/238Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: NDamien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The PIPEA quirk is specifically for the issue with the PIPEB PLL on
830gm being slaved to the PIPEA PLL, and so to use PIPEB requires PIPEA
running. i845 doesn't even have the second PLL or pipe, and enabling
the quirk results in a blank DVO LVDS.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The policy's max frequency is not equal to the CPU's max frequency. The
ring frequency is derived from the CPU frequency, and not the policy
frequency.

One example of how this may differ through sysfs. If the sysfs max
frequency is modified, that will be used for the max ring frequency
calculation.
(/sys/devices/system/cpu/cpu0/cpufreq/scaling_max_freq). As far as I
know, no current governor uses anything but max as the default, but in
theory, they could. Similarly distributions might set policy as part of
their init process.

It's ideal to use the real frequency because when we're currently scaled
up on the GPU. In this case we likely want to race to idle, and using a
less than max ring frequency is non-optimal for this situation.

AFAIK, this patch should have no impact on a majority of people.

This behavior hasn't been changed since it was first introduced:
commit 23b2f8bb
Author: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Date:   Tue Jun 28 13:04:16 2011 -0700

    drm/i915: load a ring frequency scaling table v3

CC: Jesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NBen Widawsky <ben@bwidawsk.net>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NRodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Flush the primary plane changes when enabling/disabling the primary
plane in response to sprite visibility.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The new names make it clearer which plane we're talking about.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
[danvet: Resolve small conflict with the haswell_crtc_disable_planes
extraction.]
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The intel_flush_primary_plane name actually tells us which plane
we're talking about.

Also reorganize the internals a bit and add a missing POSTING_READ()
to make sure the hardware has seen the changes by the time we
return from the function.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

IPS should be OK as long as one plane is enabled on the pipe, but
it does seem to cause problems when going between primary only and
sprite only.

This needs more investigations, but for now just disable IPS whenever
the primary plane is disabled.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Acked-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Disable fbc before disabling the primary plane, and enable fbc after
the primary plane has been enabled again.

Also use intel_disable_fbc() to disable FBC to avoid the pointless
overhead of intel_update_fbc(), and especially avoid having to clean
up and set up the stolen mem compressed buffer again.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If the setplane operation fails, we shouldn't save the user's requested
plane coordinates. Since we adjust the coordinates during the clipping
process, make a copy of the originals, and once the operation has
succeeded save them for later reuse when the plane gets re-enabled.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Move the variable initialization to where the variables are declared,
and kill a pointless to_intel_crtc() cast when we already have the
casted pointer.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Let's not use goto when a simple if suffices. This is not error handling
code or anything, so the goto looks out of place.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We used to call the entire intel specific update_plane hook while
holding struct_mutex. Actually we only need to hold struct_mutex while
pinning/unpinning the obj. The plane state itself is protected by the
kms locks, and as the object is pinned we can dig out the offset and
tiling information from it without fearing that it would change
underneath us.

So now we don't need to drop and reacquire the lock around the
wait_for_vblank. Also we will need another wait_for_vblank in the IVB
specific update_plane hook, and this way we don't need to worry about
struct_mutex there either.

Also move the intel_plane->obj=NULL assignment outside strut_mutex in
disable_plane to make it clear that it's not protected by struct_mutex.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We allow cursors to be set up when the pipe is disabled. Do the same for
sprites as well.

We need to be somewhat careful with the primary disable logic as we
don't want to accidentally enable the primary plane on a disabled pipe.

v2: Skip primary enable/disable and plane registers
    writes on disabled pipe
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If the primary gets marked as disabled while the pipe is off for
instance, we should still re-enable it when the pipe is turned on,
unless the sprite covers it fully also in that configuration.
Unfortunately we do the plane visibility checks only in the sprite code,
which is executed after the primary enabling when turning the pipe off.

Ideally we should compute the plane visibility before touching the
hardware at all, but for now just set the primary_disabld flag
in intel_{enable,disable}_plane.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If channel equalization succeeds, there's no indication something went
wrong in clock recovery (unless debug is enabled). We should shout about
the failures and fix them instead of hiding them under the carpet.

This has allowed bugs like [1] stay dormant for a long time.

[1] https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70117Signed-off-by: NJani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

The VGACNTRL register contains a bunch of other stuff besides
the VGA_DISP_DISABLE bit. When we write the register we always set those
other bits to zero, so normally the current check would work.

However on HSW disabling and re-enabling the power well will reset the
VGACNTRL register to its default value, which has several of the other
bits set as well.

So only look at the VGA_DISP_DISABLE bit when checking whether the VGA
plane needs re-disabling.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJesse Barnes <jbarnes@virtuousgeek.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

Everyone else uses intel_PLL_is_valid(), so make VLV use it as well.

We don't have any special p and m limits on VLV, so skip those tests,
and we also need to skip the m1<=m2 test line PNV.

Reorganize the function a bit to move the n check alongside the rest of
the test for the non-derived dividers, and check the derived values
afterwards.

Note that this changes vlv_find_best_dpll() in two ways:
- The .vco comparison is now >max instead of >=max, and since we round
  down when calculating that stuff, we may now allow frequencies slightly
  above the max as we do on other platforms. The previous method
  disallowed exactly max and anything above it.
- We now check the .dot frequency against the data rate limits, which we
  didn't do before.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

If vlv_find_best_dpll() couldn't find suitable PLL settings,
just say so instead of lying to caller.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

After aligning the p1 divider limits, and removing the unused p and m
limits, intel_limits_vlv_dac and intel_limits_vlv_hdmi are identical.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We don't use .dot_limit for anything on VLV, so don't populate it.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>

We never check the p and m limits (which according to comments are
based on someone's guesswork), so just remove them.

VLV2_DPLL_mphy_hsdpll_frequency_table_ww6_rev1p1.xlsm has no p and m
limits listed.
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NMika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>