1. 02 9月, 2013 2 次提交
  2. 19 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  3. 13 6月, 2013 1 次提交
  4. 06 4月, 2013 1 次提交
  5. 29 11月, 2012 2 次提交
  6. 16 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • M
      mfd: core: Push irqdomain mapping out into devices · 0848c94f
      Mark Brown 提交于
      Currently the MFD core supports remapping MFD cell interrupts using an
      irqdomain but only if the MFD is being instantiated using device tree
      and only if the device tree bindings use the pattern of registering IPs
      in the device tree with compatible properties.  This will be actively
      harmful for drivers which support non-DT platforms and use this pattern
      for their DT bindings as it will mean that the core will silently change
      remapping behaviour and it is also limiting for drivers which don't do
      DT with this particular pattern.  There is also a potential fragility if
      there are interrupts not associated with MFD cells and all the cells are
      omitted from the device tree for some reason.
      
      Instead change the code to take an IRQ domain as an optional argument,
      allowing drivers to take the decision about the parent domain for their
      interrupts.  The one current user of this feature is ab8500-core, it has
      the domain lookup pushed out into the driver.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
      0848c94f
  7. 14 9月, 2012 1 次提交
    • M
      mfd: core: Push irqdomain mapping out into devices · 55692af5
      Mark Brown 提交于
      Currently the MFD core supports remapping MFD cell interrupts using an
      irqdomain but only if the MFD is being instantiated using device tree
      and only if the device tree bindings use the pattern of registering IPs
      in the device tree with compatible properties.  This will be actively
      harmful for drivers which support non-DT platforms and use this pattern
      for their DT bindings as it will mean that the core will silently change
      remapping behaviour and it is also limiting for drivers which don't do
      DT with this particular pattern.  There is also a potential fragility if
      there are interrupts not associated with MFD cells and all the cells are
      omitted from the device tree for some reason.
      
      Instead change the code to take an IRQ domain as an optional argument,
      allowing drivers to take the decision about the parent domain for their
      interrupts.  The one current user of this feature is ab8500-core, it has
      the domain lookup pushed out into the driver.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
      55692af5
  8. 27 5月, 2011 1 次提交
    • S
      mfd: Use mfd cell platform_data for davinci cells platform bits · cb5811cf
      Samuel Ortiz 提交于
      With the addition of a platform device mfd_cell pointer, MFD drivers
      can go back to passing platform back to their sub drivers.
      This allows for an mfd_cell->mfd_data removal and thus keep the
      sub drivers MFD agnostic. This is mostly needed for non MFD aware
      sub drivers.
      
      Cc: Miguel Aguilar <miguel.aguilar@ridgerun.com>
      Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
      Cc: Liam Girdwood <lrg@slimlogic.co.uk>
      Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
      cb5811cf
  9. 23 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  10. 02 3月, 2011 1 次提交
  11. 12 8月, 2010 1 次提交
    • J
      mfd: Fix davinci memory leak · e2bde787
      Julia Lawall 提交于
      Error handling code following a kmalloc should free the allocated data.
      
      The semantic match that finds the problem is as follows:
      (http://www.emn.fr/x-info/coccinelle/)
      
      // <smpl>
      @r exists@
      local idexpression x;
      statement S;
      expression E;
      identifier f,f1,l;
      position p1,p2;
      expression *ptr != NULL;
      @@
      
      x@p1 = \(kmalloc\|kzalloc\|kcalloc\)(...);
      ...
      if (x == NULL) S
      <... when != x
           when != if (...) { <+...x...+> }
      (
      x->f1 = E
      |
       (x->f1 == NULL || ...)
      |
       f(...,x->f1,...)
      )
      ...>
      (
       return \(0\|<+...x...+>\|ptr\);
      |
       return@p2 ...;
      )
      
      @script:python@
      p1 << r.p1;
      p2 << r.p2;
      @@
      
      print "* file: %s kmalloc %s return %s" % (p1[0].file,p1[0].line,p2[0].line)
      // </smpl>
      Signed-off-by: NJulia Lawall <julia@diku.dk>
      Signed-off-by: NSamuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
      e2bde787
  12. 03 4月, 2010 1 次提交
  13. 12 3月, 2010 1 次提交