- 25 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiong Wang 提交于
- bpf_fill_ld_abs_vlan_push_pop: Prevent zext happens inside PUSH_CNT loop. This could happen because of BPF_LD_ABS (32-bit def) + BPF_JMP (64-bit use), or BPF_LD_ABS + EXIT (64-bit use of R0). So, change BPF_JMP to BPF_JMP32 and redefine R0 at exit path to cut off the data-flow from inside the loop. - bpf_fill_jump_around_ld_abs: Jump range is limited to 16 bit. every ld_abs is replaced by 6 insns, but on arches like arm, ppc etc, there will be one BPF_ZEXT inserted to extend the error value of the inlined ld_abs sequence which then contains 7 insns. so, set the dividend to 7 so the testcase could work on all arches. - bpf_fill_scale1/bpf_fill_scale2: Both contains ~1M BPF_ALU32_IMM which will trigger ~1M insn patcher call because of hi32 randomization later when BPF_F_TEST_RND_HI32 is set for bpf selftests. Insn patcher is not efficient that 1M call to it will hang computer. So , change to BPF_ALU64_IMM to avoid hi32 randomization. Signed-off-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 23 5月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Adjust scale tests to check for new jmp sequence limit. BPF_JGT had to be changed to BPF_JEQ because the verifier was too smart. It tracked the known safe range of R0 values and pruned the search earlier before hitting exact 8192 limit. bpf_semi_rand_get() was too (un)?lucky. k = 0; was missing in bpf_fill_scale2. It was testing a bit shorter sequence of jumps than intended. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NAndrii Nakryiko <andriin@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 28 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin KaFai Lau 提交于
This patch adds verifier tests for the bpf_sk_storage: 1. ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL 2. Map and helper compatibility (e.g. disallow bpf_map_loookup_elem) It also takes this chance to remove the unused struct btf_raw_data and uses the BTF encoding macros from "test_btf.h". Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 19 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Martin KaFai Lau 提交于
map_fds[16] is the last one index-ed by fixup_map_array_small. Hence, the MAX_NR_MAPS should be 17 instead. Fixes: fb2abb73 ("bpf, selftest: test {rd, wr}only flags and direct value access") Signed-off-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 16 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Add two tests to check that sequence of 1024 jumps is verifiable. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 10 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Extend test_verifier with various test cases around the two kernel extensions, that is, {rd,wr}only map support as well as direct map value access. All passing, one skipped due to xskmap not present on test machine: # ./test_verifier [...] #948/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 1 OK #949/p XDP pkt read, pkt_meta' <= pkt_data, bad access 2 OK #950/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', good access OK #951/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 1 OK #952/p XDP pkt read, pkt_data <= pkt_meta', bad access 2 OK Summary: 1410 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 0 FAILED Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 04 4月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Add a test to generate 1m ld_imm64 insns to stress the verifier. Bump the size of fill_ld_abs_vlan_push_pop test from 4k to 29k and jump_around_ld_abs from 4k to 5.5k. Larger sizes are not possible due to 16-bit offset encoding in jump instructions. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 22 3月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Lorenz Bauer 提交于
Make the BPF_SK_LOOKUP macro take a helper function, to ease writing tests for new helpers. Signed-off-by: NLorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 02 2月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
add bpf_spin_lock tests to test_verifier.c that don't require latest llvm with BTF support Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 31 1月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Stanislav Fomichev 提交于
Use recently introduced bpf_probe_map_type() to skip tests in the test_verifier if map creation (create_map) fails. It's handled explicitly for each fixup, i.e. if bpf_create_map returns negative fd, we probe the kernel for the appropriate map support and skip the test is map type is not supported. Signed-off-by: NStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Stanislav Fomichev 提交于
Use recently introduced bpf_probe_prog_type() to skip tests in the test_verifier() if bpf_verify_program() fails. The skipped test is indicated in the output. Example: ... 679/p bpf_get_stack return R0 within range SKIP (unsupported program type 5) 680/p ld_abs: invalid op 1 OK ... Summary: 863 PASSED, 165 SKIPPED, 3 FAILED Signed-off-by: NStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 28 1月, 2019 3 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
Break up the rest of test_verifier tests into separate files. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
Break up the first 10 kLoC of test verifier test cases out into smaller files. Looks like git line counting gets a little flismy above 16 bit integers, so we need two commits to break up test_verifier. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
test_verifier.c has grown to be very long (almost 16 kLoC), and it is very conflict prone since we always add tests at the end. Try to break it apart a little bit. Allow test snippets to be defined in separate files and include them automatically into the huge test array. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 27 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiong Wang 提交于
This patch adds unit tests for new JMP32 instructions. This patch also added the new BPF_JMP32_REG and BPF_JMP32_IMM macros to samples/bpf/bpf_insn.h so that JMP32 insn builders are available to tests under 'samples' directory. Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 24 1月, 2019 2 次提交
-
-
由 Eric Dumazet 提交于
This adds the ability to read gso_segs from a BPF program. v3: Use BPF_REG_AX instead of BPF_REG_TMP for the temporary register, as suggested by Martin. v2: refined Eddie Hao patch to address Alexei feedback. Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com> Cc: Eddie Hao <eddieh@google.com> Cc: Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Acked-by: NMartin KaFai Lau <kafai@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
Add tests for newly added dead code elimination. Both verifier and BTF tests are added. BTF test infrastructure has to be extended to be able to account for line info which is eliminated during dead code removal. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 06 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Add couple of test_verifier tests to check sanitation of alu op insn with pointer and scalar type coming from different paths. This also includes BPF insns of the test reproducer provided by Jann Horn. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 03 1月, 2019 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Add various map value pointer related test cases to test_verifier kselftest to reflect recent changes and improve test coverage. The tests include basic masking functionality, unprivileged behavior on pointer arithmetic which goes oob, mixed bounds tests, negative unknown scalar but resulting positive offset for access and helper range, handling of arithmetic from multiple maps, various masking scenarios with subsequent map value access and others including two test cases from Jann Horn for prior fixes. Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 22 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Daniel Borkmann 提交于
Minor fallout from merge resolution, test_verifier was segfaulting because the REJECT result was correct, but errstr was NULL. Properly fix it as in 339bbff2. Fixes: 339bbff2 ("Merge git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/bpf/bpf-next") Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
-
- 21 12月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 John Fastabend 提交于
Currently, the test to ensure reads past the end of the sk_msg_md data structure fail is incorrectly expecting success. Fix this typo and use correct expected error. Fixes: 945a47d8 ("bpf: sk_msg, add tests for size field") Reported-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
Validate that the verifier reasons correctly about the bounds and removes dead code based on results of JSET instruction. Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
We seem to have no JSET instruction test, and LLVM does not generate it at all, so let's add a simple hand-coded test to make sure JIT implementations are correct. v2: - extend test_verifier to handle multiple inputs and add the sample there (Daniel) - add a sign extension case Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 19 12月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 John Fastabend 提交于
This adds tests to read the size field to test_verifier. Signed-off-by: NJohn Fastabend <john.fastabend@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jiong Wang 提交于
Verifier is supposed to support sharing stack slot allocated to ptr with SCALAR_VALUE for privileged program. However this doesn't happen for some cases. The reason is verifier is not clearing slot_type STACK_SPILL for all bytes, it only clears part of them, while verifier is using: slot_type[0] == STACK_SPILL as a convention to check one slot is ptr type. So, the consequence of partial clearing slot_type is verifier could treat a partially overridden ptr slot, which should now be a SCALAR_VALUE slot, still as ptr slot, and rejects some valid programs. Before this patch, test_xdp_noinline.o under bpf selftests, bpf_lxc.o and bpf_netdev.o under Cilium bpf repo, when built with -mattr=+alu32 are rejected due to this issue. After this patch, they all accepted. There is no processed insn number change before and after this patch on Cilium bpf programs. Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 15 12月, 2018 2 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
"if (old->allocated_stack > cur->allocated_stack)" check is too conservative. In some cases explored stack could have allocated more space, but that stack space was not live. The test case improves from 19 to 15 processed insns and improvement on real programs is significant as well: before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 1940 1831 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3089 3029 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1065 1064 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 28052 26309 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 35487 33517 bpf_netdev.o 10864 9713 bpf_overlay.o 6643 6184 bpf_lcx_jit.o 38437 37335 Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
Teach test_verifier to parse verifier output for insn processed and compare with expected number. Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Acked-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 14 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jakub Kicinski 提交于
Currently for liveness and state pruning the register parentage chains don't include states of the callee. This makes some sense as the callee can't access those registers. However, this means that READs done after the callee returns will not propagate into the states of the callee. Callee will then perform pruning disregarding differences in caller state. Example: 0: (85) call bpf_user_rnd_u32 1: (b7) r8 = 0 2: (55) if r0 != 0x0 goto pc+1 3: (b7) r8 = 1 4: (bf) r1 = r8 5: (85) call pc+4 6: (15) if r8 == 0x1 goto pc+1 7: (05) *(u64 *)(r9 - 8) = r3 8: (b7) r0 = 0 9: (95) exit 10: (15) if r1 == 0x0 goto pc+0 11: (95) exit Here we acquire unknown state with call to get_random() [1]. Then we store this random state in r8 (either 0 or 1) [1 - 3], and make a call on line 5. Callee does nothing but a trivial conditional jump (to create a pruning point). Upon return caller checks the state of r8 and either performs an unsafe read or not. Verifier will first explore the path with r8 == 1, creating a pruning point at [11]. The parentage chain for r8 will include only callers states so once verifier reaches [6] it will mark liveness only on states in the caller, and not [11]. Now when verifier walks the paths with r8 == 0 it will reach [11] and since REG_LIVE_READ on r8 was not propagated there it will prune the walk entirely (stop walking the entire program, not just the callee). Since [6] was never walked with r8 == 0, [7] will be considered dead and replaced with "goto -1" causing hang at runtime. This patch weaves the callee's explored states onto the callers parentage chain. Rough parentage for r8 would have looked like this before: [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [10] [11] [6] [7] | | ,---|----. | | | sl0: sl0: / sl0: \ sl0: sl0: sl0: fr0: r8 <-- fr0: r8<+--fr0: r8 `fr0: r8 ,fr0: r8<-fr0: r8 \ fr1: r8 <- fr1: r8 / \__________________/ after: [0] [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [10] [11] [6] [7] | | | | | | sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: sl0: fr0: r8 <-- fr0: r8 <- fr0: r8 <- fr0: r8 <-fr0: r8<-fr0: r8 fr1: r8 <- fr1: r8 Now the mark from instruction 6 will travel through callees states. Note that we don't have to connect r0 because its overwritten by callees state on return and r1 - r5 because those are not alive any more once a call is made. v2: - don't connect the callees registers twice (Alexei: suggestion & code) - add more details to the comment (Ed & Alexei) v1: don't unnecessarily link caller saved regs (Jiong) Fixes: f4d7e40a ("bpf: introduce function calls (verification)") Reported-by: NDavid Beckett <david.beckett@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Reviewed-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 11 12月, 2018 3 次提交
-
-
由 Stanislav Fomichev 提交于
Use bpf_prog_type instead of bpf_map_type when passing prog_type. -Wenum-conversion might be unhappy about it: error: implicit conversion from enumeration type 'enum bpf_map_type' to different enumeration type 'enum bpf_prog_type' Signed-off-by: NStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Stanislav Fomichev 提交于
I get a segfault without it, other fixups always do dereference, and without dereference I don't understand how it can ever work. Fixes: 7c85c448 ("selftests/bpf: test_verifier, check bpf_map_lookup_elem access in bpf prog") Signed-off-by: NStanislav Fomichev <sdf@google.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
由 Jiong Wang 提交于
Currently, the destination register is marked as unknown for 32-bit sub-register move (BPF_MOV | BPF_ALU) whenever the source register type is SCALAR_VALUE. This is too conservative that some valid cases will be rejected. Especially, this may turn a constant scalar value into unknown value that could break some assumptions of verifier. For example, test_l4lb_noinline.c has the following C code: struct real_definition *dst 1: if (!get_packet_dst(&dst, &pckt, vip_info, is_ipv6)) 2: return TC_ACT_SHOT; 3: 4: if (dst->flags & F_IPV6) { get_packet_dst is responsible for initializing "dst" into valid pointer and return true (1), otherwise return false (0). The compiled instruction sequence using alu32 will be: 412: (54) (u32) r7 &= (u32) 1 413: (bc) (u32) r0 = (u32) r7 414: (95) exit insn 413, a BPF_MOV | BPF_ALU, however will turn r0 into unknown value even r7 contains SCALAR_VALUE 1. This causes trouble when verifier is walking the code path that hasn't initialized "dst" inside get_packet_dst, for which case 0 is returned and we would then expect verifier concluding line 1 in the above C code pass the "if" check, therefore would skip fall through path starting at line 4. Now, because r0 returned from callee has became unknown value, so verifier won't skip analyzing path starting at line 4 and "dst->flags" requires dereferencing the pointer "dst" which actually hasn't be initialized for this path. This patch relaxed the code marking sub-register move destination. For a SCALAR_VALUE, it is safe to just copy the value from source then truncate it into 32-bit. A unit test also included to demonstrate this issue. This test will fail before this patch. This relaxation could let verifier skipping more paths for conditional comparison against immediate. It also let verifier recording a more accurate/strict value for one register at one state, if this state end up with going through exit without rejection and it is used for state comparison later, then it is possible an inaccurate/permissive value is better. So the real impact on verifier processed insn number is complex. But in all, without this fix, valid program could be rejected. >From real benchmarking on kernel selftests and Cilium bpf tests, there is no impact on processed instruction number when tests ares compiled with default compilation options. There is slightly improvements when they are compiled with -mattr=+alu32 after this patch. Also, test_xdp_noinline/-mattr=+alu32 now passed verification. It is rejected before this fix. Insn processed before/after this patch: default -mattr=+alu32 Kernel selftest === test_xdp.o 371/371 369/369 test_l4lb.o 6345/6345 5623/5623 test_xdp_noinline.o 2971/2971 rejected/2727 test_tcp_estates.o 429/429 430/430 Cilium bpf === bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o: 2085/2085 1685/1687 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o: 2287/2287 1986/1982 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o: 690/690 622/622 bpf_lxc.o: 95033/95033 N/A bpf_netdev.o: 7245/7245 N/A bpf_overlay.o: 2898/2898 3085/2947 NOTE: - bpf_lxc.o and bpf_netdev.o compiled by -mattr=+alu32 are rejected by verifier due to another issue inside verifier on supporting alu32 binary. - Each cilium bpf program could generate several processed insn number, above number is sum of them. v1->v2: - Restrict the change on SCALAR_VALUE. - Update benchmark numbers on Cilium bpf tests. Signed-off-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 08 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Jiong Wang 提交于
"arsh32 on imm" and "arsh32 on reg" now are accepted. Also added two new testcases to make sure arsh32 won't be treated as arsh64 during interpretation or JIT code-gen for which case the high bits will be moved into low halve that the testcases could catch them. Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NJiong Wang <jiong.wang@netronome.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
- 05 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexei Starovoitov 提交于
pathological bpf programs may try to force verifier to explode in the number of branch states: 20: (d5) if r1 s<= 0x24000028 goto pc+0 21: (b5) if r0 <= 0xe1fa20 goto pc+2 22: (d5) if r1 s<= 0x7e goto pc+0 23: (b5) if r0 <= 0xe880e000 goto pc+0 24: (c5) if r0 s< 0x2100ecf4 goto pc+0 25: (d5) if r1 s<= 0xe880e000 goto pc+1 26: (c5) if r0 s< 0xf4041810 goto pc+0 27: (d5) if r1 s<= 0x1e007e goto pc+0 28: (b5) if r0 <= 0xe86be000 goto pc+0 29: (07) r0 += 16614 30: (c5) if r0 s< 0x6d0020da goto pc+0 31: (35) if r0 >= 0x2100ecf4 goto pc+0 Teach verifier to recognize always taken and always not taken branches. This analysis is already done for == and != comparison. Expand it to all other branches. It also helps real bpf programs to be verified faster: before after bpf_lb-DLB_L3.o 2003 1940 bpf_lb-DLB_L4.o 3173 3089 bpf_lb-DUNKNOWN.o 1080 1065 bpf_lxc-DDROP_ALL.o 29584 28052 bpf_lxc-DUNKNOWN.o 36916 35487 bpf_netdev.o 11188 10864 bpf_overlay.o 6679 6643 bpf_lcx_jit.o 39555 38437 Reported-by: NAnatoly Trosinenko <anatoly.trosinenko@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Acked-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: NEdward Cree <ecree@solarflare.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 04 12月, 2018 1 次提交
-
-
由 Petar Penkov 提交于
The pkt_len field in qdisc_skb_cb stores the skb length as it will appear on the wire after segmentation. For byte accounting, this value is more accurate than skb->len. It is computed on entry to the TC layer, so only valid there. Allow read access to this field from BPF tc classifier and action programs. The implementation is analogous to tc_classid, aside from restricting to read access. To distinguish it from skb->len and self-describe export as wire_len. Changes v1->v2 - Rename pkt_len to wire_len Signed-off-by: NPetar Penkov <ppenkov@google.com> Signed-off-by: NVlad Dumitrescu <vladum@google.com> Signed-off-by: NWillem de Bruijn <willemb@google.com> Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com> Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
-
- 01 12月, 2018 6 次提交
-
-
由 David Miller 提交于
If a testcase has alignment problems but is expected to be ACCEPT, verify it using F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS too. Maybe in the future if we add some architecture specific code to elide the unaligned memory access warnings during the test, we can execute these as well. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
Use F_NEEDS_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS in more tests where the expected result is REJECT. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
Make it set the flag argument to bpf_verify_program() which will relax the alignment restrictions. Now all such test cases will go properly through the verifier even on inefficient unaligned access architectures. On inefficient unaligned access architectures do not try to run such programs, instead mark the test case as passing but annotate the result similarly to how it is done now in the presence of this flag. So, we get complete full coverage for all REJECT test cases, and at least verifier level coverage for ACCEPT test cases. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
Often we want to write tests cases that check things like bad context offset accesses. And one way to do this is to use an odd offset on, for example, a 32-bit load. This unfortunately triggers the alignment checks first on platforms that do not set CONFIG_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS. So the test case see the alignment failure rather than what it was testing for. It is often not completely possible to respect the original intention of the test, or even test the same exact thing, while solving the alignment issue. Another option could have been to check the alignment after the context and other validations are performed by the verifier, but that is a non-trivial change to the verifier. Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
The message got changed a lot time ago. This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64. Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-
由 David Miller 提交于
The message got changed a lot time ago. This was responsible for 36 test case failures on sparc64. Fixes: f1174f77 ("bpf/verifier: rework value tracking") Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net> Signed-off-by: NAlexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
-