1. 16 12月, 2009 1 次提交
  2. 17 6月, 2009 1 次提交
  3. 18 2月, 2009 1 次提交
  4. 07 1月, 2009 2 次提交
    • H
      mm: try_to_free_swap replaces remove_exclusive_swap_page · a2c43eed
      Hugh Dickins 提交于
      remove_exclusive_swap_page(): its problem is in living up to its name.
      
      It doesn't matter if someone else has a reference to the page (raised
      page_count); it doesn't matter if the page is mapped into userspace
      (raised page_mapcount - though that hints it may be worth keeping the
      swap): all that matters is that there be no more references to the swap
      (and no writeback in progress).
      
      swapoff (try_to_unuse) has been removing pages from swapcache for years,
      with no concern for page count or page mapcount, and we used to have a
      comment in lookup_swap_cache() recognizing that: if you go for a page of
      swapcache, you'll get the right page, but it could have been removed from
      swapcache by the time you get page lock.
      
      So, give up asking for exclusivity: get rid of
      remove_exclusive_swap_page(), and remove_exclusive_swap_page_ref() and
      remove_exclusive_swap_page_count() which were spawned for the recent LRU
      work: replace them by the simpler try_to_free_swap() which just checks
      page_swapcount().
      
      Similarly, remove the page_count limitation from free_swap_and_count(),
      but assume that it's worth holding on to the swap if page is mapped and
      swap nowhere near full.  Add a vm_swap_full() test in free_swap_cache()?
      It would be consistent, but I think we probably have enough for now.
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Cc: Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@hp.com>
      Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
      Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
      Cc: KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@jp.fujitsu.com>
      Cc: Robin Holt <holt@sgi.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      a2c43eed
    • H
      mm: replace some BUG_ONs by VM_BUG_ONs · 51726b12
      Hugh Dickins 提交于
      The swap code is over-provisioned with BUG_ONs on assorted page flags,
      mostly dating back to 2.3.  They're good documentation, and guard against
      developer error, but a waste of space on most systems: change them to
      VM_BUG_ONs, conditional on CONFIG_DEBUG_VM.  Just delete the PagePrivate
      ones: they're later, from 2.5.69, but even less interesting now.
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Reviewed-by: NChristoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org>
      Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
      Cc: Mel Gorman <mel@csn.ul.ie>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      51726b12
  5. 06 2月, 2008 1 次提交
    • N
      mm: fix PageUptodate data race · 0ed361de
      Nick Piggin 提交于
      After running SetPageUptodate, preceeding stores to the page contents to
      actually bring it uptodate may not be ordered with the store to set the
      page uptodate.
      
      Therefore, another CPU which checks PageUptodate is true, then reads the
      page contents can get stale data.
      
      Fix this by having an smp_wmb before SetPageUptodate, and smp_rmb after
      PageUptodate.
      
      Many places that test PageUptodate, do so with the page locked, and this
      would be enough to ensure memory ordering in those places if
      SetPageUptodate were only called while the page is locked.  Unfortunately
      that is not always the case for some filesystems, but it could be an idea
      for the future.
      
      Also bring the handling of anonymous page uptodateness in line with that of
      file backed page management, by marking anon pages as uptodate when they
      _are_ uptodate, rather than when our implementation requires that they be
      marked as such.  Doing allows us to get rid of the smp_wmb's in the page
      copying functions, which were especially added for anonymous pages for an
      analogous memory ordering problem.  Both file and anonymous pages are
      handled with the same barriers.
      
      FAQ:
      Q. Why not do this in flush_dcache_page?
      A. Firstly, flush_dcache_page handles only one side (the smb side) of the
      ordering protocol; we'd still need smp_rmb somewhere. Secondly, hiding away
      memory barriers in a completely unrelated function is nasty; at least in the
      PageUptodate macros, they are located together with (half) the operations
      involved in the ordering. Thirdly, the smp_wmb is only required when first
      bringing the page uptodate, wheras flush_dcache_page should be called each time
      it is written to through the kernel mapping. It is logically the wrong place to
      put it.
      
      Q. Why does this increase my text size / reduce my performance / etc.
      A. Because it is adding the necessary instructions to eliminate the data-race.
      
      Q. Can it be improved?
      A. Yes, eg. if you were to create a rule that all SetPageUptodate operations
      run under the page lock, we could avoid the smp_rmb places where PageUptodate
      is queried under the page lock. Requires audit of all filesystems and at least
      some would need reworking. That's great you're interested, I'm eagerly awaiting
      your patches.
      Signed-off-by: NNick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      0ed361de
  6. 10 10月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 08 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 26 9月, 2006 3 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] swsusp: read speedup · 546e0d27
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      Implement async reads for swsusp resuming.
      
      Crufty old PIII testbox:
      	15.7 MB/s -> 20.3 MB/s
      
      Sony Vaio:
      	14.6 MB/s -> 33.3 MB/s
      
      I didn't implement the post-resume bio_set_pages_dirty().  I don't really
      understand why resume needs to run set_page_dirty() against these pages.
      
      It might be a worry that this code modifies PG_Uptodate, PG_Error and
      PG_Locked against the image pages.  Can this possibly affect the resumed-into
      kernel?  Hopefully not, if we're atomically restoring its mem_map?
      
      Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
      Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Cc: Jens Axboe <axboe@suse.de>
      Cc: Laurent Riffard <laurent.riffard@free.fr>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      546e0d27
    • A
      [PATCH] swsusp: write speedup · ab954160
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      Switch the swsusp writeout code from 4k-at-a-time to 4MB-at-a-time.
      
      Crufty old PIII testbox:
      	12.9 MB/s -> 20.9 MB/s
      
      Sony Vaio:
      	14.7 MB/s -> 26.5 MB/s
      
      The implementation is crude.  A better one would use larger BIOs, but wouldn't
      gain any performance.
      
      The memcpys will be mostly pipelined with the IO and basically come for free.
      
      The ENOMEM path has not been tested.  It should be.
      
      Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>
      Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@sisk.pl>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      ab954160
    • P
      [PATCH] mm: swap write failure fixup · 6ddab3b9
      Peter Zijlstra 提交于
      Currently we can silently drop data if the write to swap failed.  It
      usually doesn't result in data-corruption because on page-in the process
      will receive SIGBUS (assuming write-failure implies read-failure).
      
      This assumption might or might not be valid.
      
      This patch will avoid the page being discarded after a failed write.  But
      will print a warning the sysadmin _should_ take to heart, if a lot of swap
      space becomes un-writeable, OOM is not far off.
      
      Tested by making the write fail 'randomly' once every 50 writes or so.
      
      [akpm@osdl.org: printk warning fix]
      Signed-off-by: NPeter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>
      Cc: Hugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      6ddab3b9
  9. 01 7月, 2006 1 次提交
  10. 30 10月, 2005 1 次提交
    • H
      [PATCH] mm: split page table lock · 4c21e2f2
      Hugh Dickins 提交于
      Christoph Lameter demonstrated very poor scalability on the SGI 512-way, with
      a many-threaded application which concurrently initializes different parts of
      a large anonymous area.
      
      This patch corrects that, by using a separate spinlock per page table page, to
      guard the page table entries in that page, instead of using the mm's single
      page_table_lock.  (But even then, page_table_lock is still used to guard page
      table allocation, and anon_vma allocation.)
      
      In this implementation, the spinlock is tucked inside the struct page of the
      page table page: with a BUILD_BUG_ON in case it overflows - which it would in
      the case of 32-bit PA-RISC with spinlock debugging enabled.
      
      Splitting the lock is not quite for free: another cacheline access.  Ideally,
      I suppose we would use split ptlock only for multi-threaded processes on
      multi-cpu machines; but deciding that dynamically would have its own costs.
      So for now enable it by config, at some number of cpus - since the Kconfig
      language doesn't support inequalities, let preprocessor compare that with
      NR_CPUS.  But I don't think it's worth being user-configurable: for good
      testing of both split and unsplit configs, split now at 4 cpus, and perhaps
      change that to 8 later.
      
      There is a benefit even for singly threaded processes: kswapd can be attacking
      one part of the mm while another part is busy faulting.
      Signed-off-by: NHugh Dickins <hugh@veritas.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      4c21e2f2
  11. 09 10月, 2005 1 次提交
  12. 26 6月, 2005 1 次提交
  13. 17 4月, 2005 1 次提交
    • L
      Linux-2.6.12-rc2 · 1da177e4
      Linus Torvalds 提交于
      Initial git repository build. I'm not bothering with the full history,
      even though we have it. We can create a separate "historical" git
      archive of that later if we want to, and in the meantime it's about
      3.2GB when imported into git - space that would just make the early
      git days unnecessarily complicated, when we don't have a lot of good
      infrastructure for it.
      
      Let it rip!
      1da177e4