- 04 8月, 2010 6 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no real reason to have RPC_ASSASSINATED() checks in the NFS code. As far as it is concerned, this is just an RPC error... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In RFC5661, an NFS4ERR_DELAY error on a SEQUENCE operation has the special meaning that the server is not finished processing the request. In this case we want to just retry the request without touching the slot. Also fix a bug whereby we would fail to update the sequence id if the server returned any error other than NFS_OK/NFS4ERR_DELAY. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
We don't really support nfs servers that invalidate the file handle after a rename, so precautions such as flushing out dirty data before renaming the file are superfluous. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no need to flush out writes before calling nfs_wb_all(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Christoph points out that the VFS will always flush out data before calling nfs_fsync(), so we can dispense with a full call to nfs_wb_all(), and replace that with a simpler call to nfs_commit_inode(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 31 7月, 2010 4 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
flock locks want to be labelled using the process pid, while posix locks want to be labelled using the fl_owner. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This is needed by NFSv4.0 servers in order to keep the number of locking stateids at a manageable level. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
This patch fixes bugzilla entry 14501: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14501Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 25 6月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
The 'so_delegations' list appears to be unused. Also eliminate so_client. If we already have so_server, we can get to the nfs_client structure. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 23 6月, 2010 19 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Set up a flag to ensure that is indeed the case. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no reason to change the nfs_client state every time we allocate a new session. Move that line into nfs4_init_client_minor_version. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Instead of testing if the nfs_client has a session, we should be testing if the struct nfs4_sequence_res was set up with one. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
In anticipation of the day when we have per-filesystem sessions, and also in order to allow the session to change in the event of a filesystem migration event. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Nobody uses the rpc_status parameter. It is not obvious why we need the struct nfs_client argument either, when we already have that information in the session. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Firstly, there is little point in first zeroing out the entire struct nfs4_sequence_res, and then initialising all fields save one. Just initialise the last field to zero... Secondly, nfs41_setup_sequence() has only 2 possible return values: 0, or -EAGAIN, so there is no 'terminate rpc task' case. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If the call to rpc_call_async() fails, then the arguments will not be freed, since there will be no call to nfs41_sequence_call_done Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Apparently, we have never been able to set the atime correctly from the NFSv4 client. Reported-by: N小倉一夫 <ka-ogura@bd6.so-net.ne.jp> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Currently, we do not display the minor version mount parameter in the /proc mount info. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Put the code that is common to both the referral and ordinary mount cases into a common helper routine. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Andy Adamson 提交于
S_ISDIR(fsinfo.fattr->mode) checks the file type rather than the mode bits, so we should be checking for the NFS_ATTR_FATTR_TYPE fattr property. Signed-off-by: NAndy Adamson <andros@netapp.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com> Cc: stable@kernel.org
-
- 28 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Christoph Hellwig 提交于
Signed-off-by: NChristoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de> Signed-off-by: NAl Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
-
- 26 5月, 2010 3 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
J.R. Okajima reports that the call to sync_inode() in nfs_wb_page() can deadlock with other writeback flush calls. It boils down to the fact that we cannot ever call writeback_single_inode() while holding a page lock (even if we do set nr_to_write to zero) since another process may already be waiting in the call to do_writepages(), and so will deny us the I_SYNC lock. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
If we exit from nfs_commit_inode() without ensuring that the COMMIT rpc call has been completed, we must re-mark the inode as dirty. Otherwise, future calls to sync_inode() with the WB_SYNC_ALL flag set will fail to ensure that the data is on the disk. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Commit 9c7e7e23 (NFS: Don't call iput() in nfs_access_cache_shrinker) unintentionally removed the spin unlock for the inode->i_lock. Reported-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
- 25 5月, 2010 1 次提交
-
-
由 Alexey Dobriyan 提交于
- C99 knows about USHRT_MAX/SHRT_MAX/SHRT_MIN, not USHORT_MAX/SHORT_MAX/SHORT_MIN. - Make SHRT_MIN of type s16, not int, for consistency. [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix drivers/dma/timb_dma.c] [akpm@linux-foundation.org: fix security/keys/keyring.c] Signed-off-by: NAlexey Dobriyan <adobriyan@gmail.com> Acked-by: NWANG Cong <xiyou.wangcong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 15 5月, 2010 5 次提交
-
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
iput() can potentially attempt to allocate memory, so we should avoid calling it in a memory shrinker. Instead, rely on the fact that iput() will call nfs_access_zap_cache(). Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
Both iput() and put_rpccred() might allocate memory under certain circumstances, so make sure that we don't recurse and deadlock... Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no danger of deadlock should the allocation trigger page writeback. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-
由 Trond Myklebust 提交于
There is no point in looping if we're out of memory. Signed-off-by: NTrond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
-