Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 29 6月, 2016 2 次提交
  3. 28 6月, 2016 4 次提交
  5. 27 6月, 2016 4 次提交
  7. 26 6月, 2016 3 次提交
    • E
      net_sched: generalize bulk dequeue · 4d202a0d
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      When qdisc bulk dequeue was added in linux-3.18 (commit
5772e9a3 "qdisc: bulk dequeue support for qdiscs
with TCQ_F_ONETXQUEUE"), it was constrained to some
specific qdiscs.

With some extra care, we can extend this to all qdiscs,
so that typical traffic shaping solutions can benefit from
small batches (8 packets in this patch).

For example, HTB is often used on some multi queue device.
And bonding/team are multi queue devices...

Idea is to bulk-dequeue packets mapping to the same transmit queue.

This brings between 35 and 80 % performance increase in HTB setup
under pressure on a bonding setup :

1) NUMA node contention :   610,000 pps -> 1,110,000 pps
2) No node contention   : 1,380,000 pps -> 1,930,000 pps

Now we should work to add batches on the enqueue() side ;)
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Cc: John Fastabend <john.r.fastabend@intel.com>
Cc: Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Cc: Hannes Frederic Sowa <hannes@stressinduktion.org>
Cc: Florian Westphal <fw@strlen.de>
Cc: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      4d202a0d
    • E
      net_sched: fq_codel: cache skb->truesize into skb->cb · 008830bc
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      Now we defer skb drops, it makes sense to keep a copy
of skb->truesize in struct codel_skb_cb to avoid one
cache line miss per dropped skb in fq_codel_drop(),
to reduce latencies a bit further.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      008830bc
    • E
      net_sched: drop packets after root qdisc lock is released · 520ac30f
      由 Eric Dumazet 提交于 
      Qdisc performance suffers when packets are dropped at enqueue()
time because drops (kfree_skb()) are done while qdisc lock is held,
delaying a dequeue() draining the queue.

Nominal throughput can be reduced by 50 % when this happens,
at a time we would like the dequeue() to proceed as fast as possible.

Even FQ is vulnerable to this problem, while one of FQ goals was
to provide some flow isolation.

This patch adds a 'struct sk_buff **to_free' parameter to all
qdisc->enqueue(), and in qdisc_drop() helper.

I measured a performance increase of up to 12 %, but this patch
is a prereq so that future batches in enqueue() can fly.
Signed-off-by: NEric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Acked-by: NJesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      520ac30f
  9. 25 6月, 2016 4 次提交
    • K
      Revert "mm: make faultaround produce old ptes" · 315d09bf
      由 Kirill A. Shutemov 提交于 
      This reverts commit 5c0a85fa.

The commit causes ~6% regression in unixbench.

Let's revert it for now and consider other solution for reclaim problem
later.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1465893750-44080-2-git-send-email-kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NKirill A. Shutemov <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: N"Huang, Ying" <ying.huang@intel.com>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Rik van Riel <riel@redhat.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Minchan Kim <minchan@kernel.org>
Cc: Vinayak Menon <vinmenon@codeaurora.org>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      315d09bf
    • A
      mm: mempool: kasan: don't poot mempool objects in quarantine · 9b75a867
      由 Andrey Ryabinin 提交于 
      Currently we may put reserved by mempool elements into quarantine via
kasan_kfree().  This is totally wrong since quarantine may really free
these objects.  So when mempool will try to use such element,
use-after-free will happen.  Or mempool may decide that it no longer
need that element and double-free it.

So don't put object into quarantine in kasan_kfree(), just poison it.
Rename kasan_kfree() to kasan_poison_kfree() to respect that.

Also, we shouldn't use kasan_slab_alloc()/kasan_krealloc() in
kasan_unpoison_element() because those functions may update allocation
stacktrace.  This would be wrong for the most of the remove_element call
sites.

(The only call site where we may want to update alloc stacktrace is
 in mempool_alloc(). Kmemleak solves this by calling
 kmemleak_update_trace(), so we could make something like that too.
 But this is out of scope of this patch).

Fixes: 55834c59 ("mm: kasan: initial memory quarantine implementation")
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/575977C3.1010905@virtuozzo.comSigned-off-by: NAndrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@virtuozzo.com>
Reported-by: NKuthonuzo Luruo <kuthonuzo.luruo@hpe.com>
Acked-by: NAlexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>
Cc: Dmitriy Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>
Cc: Kostya Serebryany <kcc@google.com>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      9b75a867
    • L
      fix up initial thread stack pointer vs thread_info confusion · 7f1a00b6
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      The INIT_TASK() initializer was similarly confused about the stack vs
thread_info allocation that the allocators had, and that were fixed in
commit b235beea ("Clarify naming of thread info/stack allocators").

The task ->stack pointer only incidentally ends up having the same value
as the thread_info, and in fact that will change.

So fix the initial task struct initializer to point to 'init_stack'
instead of 'init_thread_info', and make sure the ia64 definition for
that exists.

This actually makes the ia64 tsk->stack pointer be sensible for the
initial task, but not for any other task.  As mentioned in commit
b235beea, that whole pointer isn't actually used on ia64, since
task_stack_page() there just points to the (single) allocation.

All the other architectures seem to have copied the 'init_stack'
definition, even if it tended to be generally unusued.
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      7f1a00b6
    • L
      Clarify naming of thread info/stack allocators · b235beea
      由 Linus Torvalds 提交于 
      We've had the thread info allocated together with the thread stack for
most architectures for a long time (since the thread_info was split off
from the task struct), but that is about to change.

But the patches that move the thread info to be off-stack (and a part of
the task struct instead) made it clear how confused the allocator and
freeing functions are.

Because the common case was that we share an allocation with the thread
stack and the thread_info, the two pointers were identical.  That
identity then meant that we would have things like

	ti = alloc_thread_info_node(tsk, node);
	...
	tsk->stack = ti;

which certainly _worked_ (since stack and thread_info have the same
value), but is rather confusing: why are we assigning a thread_info to
the stack? And if we move the thread_info away, the "confusing" code
just gets to be entirely bogus.

So remove all this confusion, and make it clear that we are doing the
stack allocation by renaming and clarifying the function names to be
about the stack.  The fact that the thread_info then shares the
allocation is an implementation detail, and not really about the
allocation itself.

This is a pure renaming and type fix: we pass in the same pointer, it's
just that we clarify what the pointer means.

The ia64 code that actually only has one single allocation (for all of
task_struct, thread_info and kernel thread stack) now looks a bit odd,
but since "tsk->stack" is actually not even used there, that oddity
doesn't matter.  It would be a separate thing to clean that up, I
intentionally left the ia64 changes as a pure brute-force renaming and
type change.
Acked-by: NAndy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      b235beea
  11. 24 6月, 2016 5 次提交
  13. 23 6月, 2016 4 次提交
  15. 22 6月, 2016 1 次提交
    • D
      rxrpc: Fix exclusive connection handling · cc8feb8e
      由 David Howells 提交于 
      "Exclusive connections" are meant to be used for a single client call and
then scrapped.  The idea is to limit the use of the negotiated security
context.  The current code, however, isn't doing this: it is instead
restricting the socket to a single virtual connection and doing all the
calls over that.

This is changed such that the socket no longer maintains a special virtual
connection over which it will do all the calls, but rather gets a new one
each time a new exclusive call is made.

Further, using a socket option for this is a poor choice.  It should be
done on sendmsg with a control message marker instead so that calls can be
marked exclusive individually.  To that end, add RXRPC_EXCLUSIVE_CALL
which, if passed to sendmsg() as a control message element, will cause the
call to be done on an single-use connection.

The socket option (RXRPC_EXCLUSIVE_CONNECTION) still exists and, if set,
will override any lack of RXRPC_EXCLUSIVE_CALL being specified so that
programs using the setsockopt() will appear to work the same.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      cc8feb8e
  17. 20 6月, 2016 1 次提交
  19. 19 6月, 2016 7 次提交
  21. 18 6月, 2016 5 次提交