- 09 6月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
These aren't required at all, remove them. Reviewed-by: NKrzysztof Kozlowski <k.kozlowski@samsung.com> Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 03 6月, 2016 9 次提交
-
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
All cpufreq drivers with a freq-table are migrated to use cpufreq_table_validate_and_show() long back and the routine cpufreq_frequency_table_cpuinfo() isn't used outside of cpufreq core now. Unexport it and update Documentation as well. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The modularity of cpufreq_stats is quite problematic. First off, the usage of policy notifiers for the initialization and cleanup in the cpufreq_stats module is inherently racy with respect to CPU offline/online and the initialization and cleanup of the cpufreq driver. Second, fast frequency switching (used by the schedutil governor) cannot be enabled if any transition notifiers are registered, so if the cpufreq_stats module (that registers a transition notifier for updating transition statistics) is loaded, the schedutil governor cannot use fast frequency switching. On the other hand, allowing cpufreq_stats to be built as a module doesn't really add much value. Arguably, there's not much reason for that code to be modular at all. For the above reasons, make the cpufreq stats code non-modular, modify the core to invoke functions provided by that code directly and drop the notifiers from it. Make the stats sysfs attributes appear empty if fast frequency switching is enabled as the statistics will not be updated in that case anyway (and returning -EBUSY from those attributes breaks powertop). While at it, clean up Kconfig help for the CPU_FREQ_STAT and CPU_FREQ_STAT_DETAILS options. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Use clamp_val() instead of open coding it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
The sequence got a bit wrong as we are sending CPUFREQ_START notifications even before we have sent CPUFREQ_CREATE_POLICY. Fix it. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The 'initialized' field in struct cpufreq_governor is only used by the conservative governor (as a usage counter) and the way that happens is far from straightforward and arguably incorrect. Namely, the value of 'initialized' is checked by cpufreq_dbs_governor_init() and cpufreq_dbs_governor_exit() and the results of those checks are passed (as the second argument) to the ->init() and ->exit() callbacks in struct dbs_governor. Those callbacks are only implemented by the ondemand and conservative governors and ondemand doesn't use their second argument at all. In turn, the conservative governor uses it to decide whether or not to either register or unregister a transition notifier. That whole mechanism is not only unnecessarily convoluted, but also racy, because the 'initialized' field of struct cpufreq_governor is updated in cpufreq_init_governor() and cpufreq_exit_governor() under policy->rwsem which doesn't help if one of these functions is run twice in parallel for different policies (which isn't impossible in principle), for example. Instead of it, add a proper usage counter to the conservative governor and update it from cs_init() and cs_exit() which is guaranteed to be non-racy, as those functions are only called under gov_dbs_data_mutex which is global. With that in place, drop the 'initialized' field from struct cpufreq_governor as it is not used any more. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
Create a new helper to avoid code duplication across governors. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
pr_*() helpers already prefix the print messages with "cpufreq_governor:" and similar details aren't required in the actual message. For example, the print message getting fixed looks like this before this patch: cpufreq_governor: cpufreq: Governor initialization failed (dbs_data kobject init error 0) Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Viresh Kumar 提交于
These aren't required anymore as the allocation core already prints such messages. Remove the redundant ones. Signed-off-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The design of the cpufreq governor API is not very straightforward, as struct cpufreq_governor provides only one callback to be invoked from different code paths for different purposes. The purpose it is invoked for is determined by its second "event" argument, causing it to act as a "callback multiplexer" of sorts. Unfortunately, that leads to extra complexity in governors, some of which implement the ->governor() callback as a switch statement that simply checks the event argument and invokes a separate function to handle that specific event. That extra complexity can be eliminated by replacing the all-purpose ->governor() callback with a family of callbacks to carry out specific governor operations: initialization and exit, start and stop and policy limits updates. That also turns out to reduce the code size too, so do it. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 30 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The cpufreq_governor() routine is used by the cpufreq core to invoke the current governor's ->governor() callback with appropriate arguments and do some housekeeping related to that. Unfortunately, the way it mixes different governor events in one code path makes it rather hard to follow the code. For this reason, split cpufreq_governor() into five simpler functions that each will handle just one specific governor event and put all of the code related to the given event into its own function. This change is a prerequisite for a redesign of the cpufreq governor API that will be done subsequently. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The performance and powersave cpufreq governors handle the CPUFREQ_GOV_START event in the same way as CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS. However, the cpufreq core always invokes cpufreq_governor() with the event argument equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS right after invoking it with event equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_START. As a result, for both the governors in question, __cpufreq_driver_target() is executed twice in a row with the same arguments which is not useful. For this reason, simplify the performance and powersave governors to handle the CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS event only as that's going to be sufficient for the governor start too. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
It is not necessary to check the governor's max_transition_latency attribute every time cpufreq_governor() runs, so check it only if the event argument is CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_INIT. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS (unless invoked with incorrect arguments which doesn't matter anyway) and had it ever failed, the result of it wouldn't have been very clean. For this reason, rearrange the code in the core to ignore the return value of cpufreq_governor() when called with event equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_LIMITS. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 28 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
Most users of IS_ERR_VALUE() in the kernel are wrong, as they pass an 'int' into a function that takes an 'unsigned long' argument. This happens to work because the type is sign-extended on 64-bit architectures before it gets converted into an unsigned type. However, anything that passes an 'unsigned short' or 'unsigned int' argument into IS_ERR_VALUE() is guaranteed to be broken, as are 8-bit integers and types that are wider than 'unsigned long'. Andrzej Hajda has already fixed a lot of the worst abusers that were causing actual bugs, but it would be nice to prevent any users that are not passing 'unsigned long' arguments. This patch changes all users of IS_ERR_VALUE() that I could find on 32-bit ARM randconfig builds and x86 allmodconfig. For the moment, this doesn't change the definition of IS_ERR_VALUE() because there are probably still architecture specific users elsewhere. Almost all the warnings I got are for files that are better off using 'if (err)' or 'if (err < 0)'. The only legitimate user I could find that we get a warning for is the (32-bit only) freescale fman driver, so I did not remove the IS_ERR_VALUE() there but changed the type to 'unsigned long'. For 9pfs, I just worked around one user whose calling conventions are so obscure that I did not dare change the behavior. I was using this definition for testing: #define IS_ERR_VALUE(x) ((unsigned long*)NULL == (typeof (x)*)NULL && \ unlikely((unsigned long long)(x) >= (unsigned long long)(typeof(x))-MAX_ERRNO)) which ends up making all 16-bit or wider types work correctly with the most plausible interpretation of what IS_ERR_VALUE() was supposed to return according to its users, but also causes a compile-time warning for any users that do not pass an 'unsigned long' argument. I suggested this approach earlier this year, but back then we ended up deciding to just fix the users that are obviously broken. After the initial warning that caused me to get involved in the discussion (fs/gfs2/dir.c) showed up again in the mainline kernel, Linus asked me to send the whole thing again. [ Updated the 9p parts as per Al Viro - Linus ] Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@samsung.com> Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/1/7/363 Link: https://lkml.org/lkml/2016/5/27/486 Acked-by: Srinivas Kandagatla <srinivas.kandagatla@linaro.org> # For nvmem part Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
-
- 18 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Pankaj Gupta 提交于
simplified goto out in cpufreq_register_driver for increasing code readability Signed-off-by: NPankaj Gupta <pankaj.gupta@spreadtrum.com> Signed-off-by: NSanjeev Yadav <sanjeev.yadav@spreadtrum.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_STOP (unless invoked with incorrect arguments which doesn't matter anyway) and it is rather difficult to imagine a valid reason for such a failure. Accordingly, rearrange the code in the core to make it clear that this call never fails. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
None of the cpufreq governors currently in the tree will ever fail an invocation of the ->governor() callback with the event argument equal to CPUFREQ_GOV_POLICY_EXIT (unless invoked with incorrect arguments which doesn't matter anyway) and it wouldn't really make sense to fail it, because the caller won't be able to handle that failure in a meaningful way. Accordingly, rearrange the code in the core to make it clear that this call never fails. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
One of the if () statements in intel_pstate_set_policy() causes another if () to be evaluated if the condition is true and it doesn't do anything else, so merge the two if () statements into one. No functional changes. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
-
- 17 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Dawei Chien 提交于
MT8173 cpufreq driver select of_cpufreq_power_cooling_register registering cooling devices with dynamic power coefficient. Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NDawei Chien <dawei.chien@mediatek.com> Signed-off-by: NEduardo Valentin <edubezval@gmail.com>
-
- 13 5月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Kelvin Cheung 提交于
This patch replaces goto out with return in ls1x_cpufreq_probe(). Signed-off-by: NKelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13056/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
由 Kelvin Cheung 提交于
This patch uses devm_kzalloc() instead of global structure. Signed-off-by: NKelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13055/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
由 Kelvin Cheung 提交于
This patch uses dev_get_platdata() to get the platform_data instead of referencing it directly. Signed-off-by: NKelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13054/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
由 Kelvin Cheung 提交于
This patch replaces kzalloc() with kcalloc() when allocating frequency table, and remove unnecessary 'out of memory' message. Signed-off-by: NKelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13053/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
由 Kelvin Cheung 提交于
This patch renames the file to loongson1-cpufreq.c, and also includes some minor updates. Signed-off-by: NKelvin Cheung <keguang.zhang@gmail.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@rjwysocki.net> Cc: linux-pm@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mips@linux-mips.org Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Patchwork: https://patchwork.linux-mips.org/patch/13052/Signed-off-by: NRalf Baechle <ralf@linux-mips.org>
-
- 12 5月, 2016 5 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The comments and the core_busy variable name in get_target_pstate_use_performance() are totally confusing, so modify them to reflect what's going on. The results of the computations should be the same as before. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Notice that get_avg_pstate() can use sample.core_avg_perf instead of carrying the same division again, so make it do that. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
The core_pct_busy field of struct sample actually contains the average performace during the last sampling period (in percent) and not the utilization of the core as suggested by its name which is confusing. For this reason, change the name of that field to core_avg_perf and rename the function that computes its value accordingly. Also notice that storing this value as percentage requires a costly integer multiplication to be carried out in a hot path, so instead store it as an "extended fixed point" value with more fraction bits and update the code using it accordingly (it is better to change the name of the field along with its meaning in one go than to make those two changes separately, as that would likely lead to more confusion). Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Chen Yu 提交于
Currently, in intel_pstate_clear_update_util_hook(), after clearing the utilization update hook, we leverage synchronize_sched() to deal with synchronization, which is a little bit time-costly because synchronize_sched() has to wait for all the CPUs to go through a grace period. Actually, the synchronize_sched() is not necessary if the utilization update hook has not been set for the given CPU yet, so make the driver check if that's the case and avoid the synchronize_sched() call then. Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=116371Tested-by: NTian Ye <yex.tian@intel.com> Signed-off-by: NChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> [ rjw : Rebase ] Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Arnd Bergmann 提交于
CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL gained a dependency on SMP, so now we get a warning if it gets selected by CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHEDUTIL without SMP: warning: (CPU_FREQ_DEFAULT_GOV_SCHEDUTIL) selects CPU_FREQ_GOV_SCHEDUTIL which has unmet direct dependencies (CPU_FREQ && SMP) This adds another dependency to avoid the problem. Signed-off-by: NArnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de> Fixes: bf7cdff1 (cpufreq: schedutil: Make it depend on CONFIG_SMP) Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 11 5月, 2016 2 次提交
-
-
由 Akshay Adiga 提交于
When global and local pstate are equal in a powernv_target_index() call, we don't queue a timer. But we may have timer already queued for future. This could cause the timer to fire one additional time for no use. Signed-off-by: NAkshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Akshay Adiga 提交于
Fix a WARN_ON caused by smp_call_function_any() when irq is disabled, because of changes made in the patch ('cpufreq: powernv: Ramp-down global pstate slower than local-pstate') https://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/612058/ WARNING: CPU: 0 PID: 4 at kernel/smp.c:291 smp_call_function_single+0x170/0x180 Call Trace: [c0000007f648f9f0] [c0000007f648fa90] 0xc0000007f648fa90 (unreliable) [c0000007f648fa30] [c0000000001430e0] smp_call_function_any+0x170/0x1c0 [c0000007f648fa90] [c0000000007b4b00] powernv_cpufreq_target_index+0xe0/0x250 [c0000007f648fb00] [c0000000007ac9dc] __cpufreq_driver_target+0x20c/0x3d0 [c0000007f648fbc0] [c0000000007b1b4c] od_dbs_timer+0xcc/0x260 [c0000007f648fc10] [c0000000007b3024] dbs_work_handler+0x54/0xa0 [c0000007f648fc50] [c0000000000c49a8] process_one_work+0x1d8/0x590 [c0000007f648fce0] [c0000000000c4e08] worker_thread+0xa8/0x660 [c0000007f648fd80] [c0000000000cca88] kthread+0x108/0x130 [c0000007f648fe30] [c0000000000095e8] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x5c/0x74 - Calling smp_call_function_any() with interrupt disabled (through spin_lock_irqsave) could cause a deadlock, as smp_call_function_any() relies on the IPI to complete. This is detected in the smp_call_function_any() call and hence the WARN_ON. - As the spinlock (gpstates->lock) is only used to synchronize access of global_pstate_info between timer irq handler and target_index calls. And the timer irq handler just try_locks() hence it would not cause a deadlock. Hence could do without making spinlocks irq safe. - As the smp_call_function_any() is a blocking call and does not access global_pstates_info, it could reduce the critcal section by moving smp_call_function_any() after giving up the lock. Reported-by: NAbdul Haleem <abdhalee@linux.vnet.linux.com> Signed-off-by: NAkshay Adiga <akshay.adiga@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 10 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
intel_pstate_get() contains a local variable that's initialized but never used and it can be written in fewer lines of code, so clean it up. Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com>
-
- 07 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
Make the schedutil cpufreq governor depend on CONFIG_SMP, because the scheduler-provided utilization numbers used by it are only available with CONFIG_SMP set. Fixes: 9bdcb44e (cpufreq: schedutil: New governor based on scheduler utilization data) Reported-by: NSteve Muckle <steve.muckle@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 06 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
As reported in KBZ 69821: "With CONFIG_HZ_PERIODIC=y cpu stays at the lowest frequcency 800MHz even if usage goes to 100%, frequency does not scale up, the governor in use is ondemand. Neither works conservative. Performance and userspace governors work as expected. With CONFIG_NO_HZ_IDLE or CONFIG_NO_HZ_FULL cpu scales up with ondemand as expected." Analysis carried out by Chen Yu leads to the conclusion that the observed issue is due to idle_time in dbs_update() representing a negative number in which case the function will return 0 as the load (unless load is greater than 0 for another CPU sharing the policy), although that need not be the right choice. Indeed, idle_time representing a negative number means that during the last sampling interval the CPU was almost 100% busy on the rough average, so 100 should be returned as the load in that case. Modify the code accordingly and rearrange it to clarify the handling of all of the special cases in it. While at it, also avoid returning zero as the load if time_elapsed is 0 (it doesn't really make sense to return 0 then). Link: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=69821Tested-by: NChen Yu <yu.c.chen@intel.com> Tested-by: NTimo Valtoaho <timo.valtoaho@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
-
- 05 5月, 2016 4 次提交
-
-
由 Srinivas Pandruvada 提交于
When HWP (hardware P states) feature is active, the ACPI _PSS and _PPC is not used. So ignore processing for _PPC limits. Signed-off-by: NSrinivas Pandruvada <srinivas.pandruvada@linux.intel.com> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sudeep Holla 提交于
Currently when performing random CPU hot-plugs and suspend-to-ram(S2R) on systems using arm_big_little cpufreq driver, we get warnings similar to something like below: cpu cpu1: _opp_add: duplicate OPPs detected. Existing: freq: 600000000, volt: 800000, enabled: 1. New: freq: 600000000, volt: 800000, enabled: 1 This is mainly because the OPPs for the shared cpus are not set. We can just use dev_pm_opp_of_cpumask_add_table in case the OPPs are obtained from DT(arm_big_little_dt.c) or use dev_pm_opp_set_sharing_cpus if the OPPs are obtained by other means like firmware(e.g. scpi-cpufreq.c) Also now that the generic dev_pm_opp{,_of}_cpumask_remove_table can handle removal of opp table and entries for all associated CPUs, we can re-use dev_pm_opp{,_of}_cpumask_remove_table as free_opp_table in cpufreq_arm_bL_ops. This patch makes necessary changes to reuse the generic OPP functions for {init,free}_opp_table and thereby eliminating the warnings. Signed-off-by: NSudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Marc Gonzalez 提交于
Add tango4 compatible string to the list. Signed-off-by: NMarc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
由 Sai Gurrappadi 提交于
Currently, the userspace governor only updates frequency on GOV_LIMITS if policy->cur falls outside policy->{min/max}. However, it is also necessary to update current frequency on GOV_LIMITS to match the user requested value if it can be achieved within the new policy->{max/min}. This was previously the behaviour in the governor until commit d1922f02 ("cpufreq: Simplify userspace governor") which incorrectly assumed that policy->cur == user requested frequency via scaling_setspeed. This won't be true if the user requested frequency falls outside policy->{min/max}. Ex: a temporary thermal cap throttled the user requested frequency. Fix this by storing the user requested frequency in a seperate variable. The governor will then try to achieve this request on every GOV_LIMITS change. Fixes: d1922f02 (cpufreq: Simplify userspace governor) Signed-off-by: NSai Gurrappadi <sgurrappadi@nvidia.com> Acked-by: NViresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org> Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-
- 04 5月, 2016 1 次提交
-
-
由 Rafael J. Wysocki 提交于
After commit 8fa520af "intel_pstate: Remove freq calculation from intel_pstate_calc_busy()" intel_pstate_get() calls get_avg_frequency() to compute the average frequency, which is problematic for two reasons. First, intel_pstate_get() may be invoked before the driver reads the CPU feedback registers for the first time and if that happens, get_avg_frequency() will attempt to divide by zero. Second, the get_avg_frequency() call in intel_pstate_get() is racy with respect to intel_pstate_sample() and it may end up returning completely meaningless values for this reason. Moreover, after commit 7349ec04 "intel_pstate: Move intel_pstate_calc_busy() into get_target_pstate_use_performance()" sample.core_pct_busy is never computed on Atom, but it is used in intel_pstate_adjust_busy_pstate() in that case too. To address those problems notice that if sample.core_pct_busy was used in the average frequency computation carried out by get_avg_frequency(), both the divide by zero problem and the race with respect to intel_pstate_sample() would be avoided. Accordingly, move the invocation of intel_pstate_calc_busy() from get_target_pstate_use_performance() to intel_pstate_update_util(), which also will take care of the uninitialized sample.core_pct_busy on Atom, and modify get_avg_frequency() to use sample.core_pct_busy as per the above. Reported-by: Nkernel test robot <ying.huang@linux.intel.com> Link: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=146226437623173&w=4 Fixes: 8fa520af "intel_pstate: Remove freq calculation from intel_pstate_calc_busy()" Fixes: 7349ec04 "intel_pstate: Move intel_pstate_calc_busy() into get_target_pstate_use_performance()" Signed-off-by: NRafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
-