Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
接近 2 年 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 09 10月, 2019 7 次提交
  3. 08 10月, 2019 2 次提交
  5. 07 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  7. 06 10月, 2019 3 次提交
  9. 05 10月, 2019 1 次提交
  11. 03 10月, 2019 2 次提交
    • I
      selftests/bpf: Correct path to include msg + path · c5881463
      由 Ivan Khoronzhuk 提交于 
      The "path" buf is supposed to contain path + printf msg up to 24 bytes.
It will be cut anyway, but compiler generates truncation warns like:

"
samples/bpf/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c: In
function ‘setup_cgroup_environment’:
samples/bpf/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c:52:34:
warning: ‘/cgroup.controllers’ directive output may be truncated
writing 19 bytes into a region of size between 1 and 4097
[-Wformat-truncation=]
snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/cgroup.controllers", cgroup_path);
				  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
samples/bpf/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c:52:2:
note: ‘snprintf’ output between 20 and 4116 bytes into a destination
of size 4097
snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/cgroup.controllers", cgroup_path);
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
samples/bpf/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c:72:34:
warning: ‘/cgroup.subtree_control’ directive output may be truncated
writing 23 bytes into a region of size between 1 and 4097
[-Wformat-truncation=]
snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/cgroup.subtree_control",
				  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
cgroup_path);
samples/bpf/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c:72:2:
note: ‘snprintf’ output between 24 and 4120 bytes into a destination
of size 4097
snprintf(path, sizeof(path), "%s/cgroup.subtree_control",
cgroup_path);
"

In order to avoid warns, lets decrease buf size for cgroup workdir on
24 bytes with assumption to include also "/cgroup.subtree_control" to
the address. The cut will never happen anyway.
Signed-off-by: NIvan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191002120404.26962-3-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org
      c5881463
    • I
      selftests/bpf: Add static to enable_all_controllers() · fb27dcd2
      由 Ivan Khoronzhuk 提交于 
      Add static to enable_all_controllers() to get rid from annoying warning
during samples/bpf build:

samples/bpf/../../tools/testing/selftests/bpf/cgroup_helpers.c:44:5:
warning: no previous prototype for ‘enable_all_controllers’
[-Wmissing-prototypes]
 int enable_all_controllers(char *cgroup_path)
Signed-off-by: NIvan Khoronzhuk <ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20191002120404.26962-2-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org
      fb27dcd2
  13. 26 9月, 2019 3 次提交
  15. 16 9月, 2019 2 次提交
    • I
      bpf: fix accessing bpf_sysctl.file_pos on s390 · d895a0f1
      由 Ilya Leoshkevich 提交于 
      "ctx:file_pos sysctl:read write ok" fails on s390 with "Read value  !=
nux". This is because verifier rewrites a complete 32-bit
bpf_sysctl.file_pos update to a partial update of the first 32 bits of
64-bit *bpf_sysctl_kern.ppos, which is not correct on big-endian
systems.

Fix by using an offset on big-endian systems.

Ditto for bpf_sysctl.file_pos reads. Currently the test does not detect
a problem there, since it expects to see 0, which it gets with high
probability in error cases, so change it to seek to offset 3 and expect
3 in bpf_sysctl.file_pos.

Fixes: e1550bfe ("bpf: Add file_pos field to bpf_sysctl ctx")
Signed-off-by: NIlya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Acked-by: NYonghong Song <yhs@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20190816105300.49035-1-iii@linux.ibm.com/
      d895a0f1
    • I
      selftests/bpf: add bpf-gcc support · 4ce150b6
      由 Ilya Leoshkevich 提交于 
      Now that binutils and gcc support for BPF is upstream, make use of it in
BPF selftests using alu32-like approach. Share as much as possible of
CFLAGS calculation with clang.

Fixes only obvious issues, leaving more complex ones for later:
- Use gcc-provided bpf-helpers.h instead of manually defining the
  helpers, change bpf_helpers.h include guard to avoid conflict.
- Include <linux/stddef.h> for __always_inline.
- Add $(OUTPUT)/../usr/include to include path in order to use local
  kernel headers instead of system kernel headers when building with O=.

In order to activate the bpf-gcc support, one needs to configure
binutils and gcc with --target=bpf and make them available in $PATH. In
particular, gcc must be installed as `bpf-gcc`, which is the default.

Right now with binutils 25a2915e8dba and gcc r275589 only a handful of
tests work:

	# ./test_progs_bpf_gcc
	# Summary: 7/39 PASSED, 1 SKIPPED, 98 FAILED

The reason for those failures are as follows:

- Build errors:
  - `error: too many function arguments for eBPF` for __always_inline
    functions read_str_var and read_map_var - must be inlining issue,
    and for process_l3_headers_v6, which relies on optimizing away
    function arguments.
  - `error: indirect call in function, which are not supported by eBPF`
    where there are no obvious indirect calls in the source calls, e.g.
    in __encap_ipip_none.
  - `error: field 'lock' has incomplete type` for fields of `struct
    bpf_spin_lock` type - bpf_spin_lock is re#defined by bpf-helpers.h,
    so its usage is sensitive to order of #includes.
  - `error: eBPF stack limit exceeded` in sysctl_tcp_mem.
- Load errors:
  - Missing object files due to above build errors.
  - `libbpf: failed to create map (name: 'test_ver.bss')`.
  - `libbpf: object file doesn't contain bpf program`.
  - `libbpf: Program '.text' contains unrecognized relo data pointing to
    section 0`.
  - `libbpf: BTF is required, but is missing or corrupted` - no BTF
    support in gcc yet.
Signed-off-by: NIlya Leoshkevich <iii@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Jose E. Marchesi <jose.marchesi@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      4ce150b6
  17. 07 9月, 2019 6 次提交
  19. 05 9月, 2019 1 次提交
  21. 04 9月, 2019 4 次提交
  23. 03 9月, 2019 2 次提交
  25. 31 8月, 2019 2 次提交
    • M
      selftests/bpf: Fix a typo in test_offload.py · 1c6d6e02
      由 Masanari Iida 提交于 
      This patch fix a spelling typo in test_offload.py
Signed-off-by: NMasanari Iida <standby24x7@gmail.com>
Acked-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Acked-by: NSong Liu <songliubraving@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      1c6d6e02
    • Q
      tools: bpftool: improve and check builds for different make invocations · 45c5589d
      由 Quentin Monnet 提交于 
      There are a number of alternative "make" invocations that can be used to
compile bpftool. The following invocations are expected to work:

  - through the kbuild system, from the top of the repository
    (make tools/bpf)
  - by telling make to change to the bpftool directory
    (make -C tools/bpf/bpftool)
  - by building the BPF tools from tools/
    (cd tools && make bpf)
  - by running make from bpftool directory
    (cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make)

Additionally, setting the O or OUTPUT variables should tell the build
system to use a custom output path, for each of these alternatives.

The following patch fixes the following invocations:

  $ make tools/bpf
  $ make tools/bpf O=<dir>
  $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool OUTPUT=<dir>
  $ make -C tools/bpf/bpftool O=<dir>
  $ cd tools/ && make bpf O=<dir>
  $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make OUTPUT=<dir>
  $ cd tools/bpf/bpftool && make O=<dir>

After this commit, the build still fails for two variants when passing
the OUTPUT variable:

  $ make tools/bpf OUTPUT=<dir>
  $ cd tools/ && make bpf OUTPUT=<dir>

In order to remember and check what make invocations are supposed to
work, and to document the ones which do not, a new script is added to
the BPF selftests. Note that some invocations require the kernel to be
configured, so the script skips them if no .config file is found.

v2:
- In make_and_clean(), set $ERROR to 1 when "make" returns non-zero,
  even if the binary was produced.
- Run "make clean" from the correct directory (bpf/ instead of bpftool/,
  when relevant).
Reported-by: NLorenz Bauer <lmb@cloudflare.com>
Signed-off-by: NQuentin Monnet <quentin.monnet@netronome.com>
Reviewed-by: NJakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net>
      45c5589d
  27. 28 8月, 2019 4 次提交