Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
1 年多 前同步成功

通知 8
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel
切换分支/标签
  1. 16 10月, 2018 3 次提交
  3. 11 10月, 2018 1 次提交
  5. 09 10月, 2018 3 次提交
  7. 25 9月, 2018 1 次提交
    • S
      mpls: allow routes on ip6gre devices · d8e2262a
      由 Saif Hasan 提交于 
      Summary:

This appears to be necessary and sufficient change to enable `MPLS` on
`ip6gre` tunnels (RFC4023).

This diff allows IP6GRE devices to be recognized by MPLS kernel module
and hence user can configure interface to accept packets with mpls
headers as well setup mpls routes on them.

Test Plan:

Test plan consists of multiple containers connected via GRE-V6 tunnel.
Then carrying out testing steps as below.

- Carry out necessary sysctl settings on all containers

```
sysctl -w net.mpls.platform_labels=65536
sysctl -w net.mpls.ip_ttl_propagate=1
sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.lo.input=1
```

- Establish IP6GRE tunnels

```
ip -6 tunnel add name if_1_2_1 mode ip6gre \
  local 2401:db00:21:6048:feed:0::1 \
  remote 2401:db00:21:6048:feed:0::2 key 1
ip link set dev if_1_2_1 up
sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.if_1_2_1.input=1
ip -4 addr add 169.254.0.2/31 dev if_1_2_1 scope link

ip -6 tunnel add name if_1_3_1 mode ip6gre \
  local 2401:db00:21:6048:feed:0::1 \
  remote 2401:db00:21:6048:feed:0::3 key 1
ip link set dev if_1_3_1 up
sysctl -w net.mpls.conf.if_1_3_1.input=1
ip -4 addr add 169.254.0.4/31 dev if_1_3_1 scope link
```

- Install MPLS encap rules on node-1 towards node-2

```
ip route add 192.168.0.11/32 nexthop encap mpls 32/64 \
  via inet 169.254.0.3 dev if_1_2_1
```

- Install MPLS forwarding rules on node-2 and node-3
```
// node2
ip -f mpls route add 32 via inet 169.254.0.7 dev if_2_4_1

// node3
ip -f mpls route add 64 via inet 169.254.0.12 dev if_4_3_1
```

- Ping 192.168.0.11 (node4) from 192.168.0.1 (node1) (where routing
  towards 192.168.0.1 is via IP route directly towards node1 from node4)
```
ping 192.168.0.11
```

- tcpdump on interface to capture ping packets wrapped within MPLS
  header which inturn wrapped within IP6GRE header

```
16:43:41.121073 IP6
  2401:db00:21:6048:feed::1 > 2401:db00:21:6048:feed::2:
  DSTOPT GREv0, key=0x1, length 100:
  MPLS (label 32, exp 0, ttl 255) (label 64, exp 0, [S], ttl 255)
  IP 192.168.0.1 > 192.168.0.11:
  ICMP echo request, id 1208, seq 45, length 64

0x0000:  6000 2cdb 006c 3c3f 2401 db00 0021 6048  `.,..l<?$....!`H
0x0010:  feed 0000 0000 0001 2401 db00 0021 6048  ........$....!`H
0x0020:  feed 0000 0000 0002 2f00 0401 0401 0100  ......../.......
0x0030:  2000 8847 0000 0001 0002 00ff 0004 01ff  ...G............
0x0040:  4500 0054 3280 4000 ff01 c7cb c0a8 0001  E..T2.@.........
0x0050:  c0a8 000b 0800 a8d7 04b8 002d 2d3c a05b  ...........--<.[
0x0060:  0000 0000 bcd8 0100 0000 0000 1011 1213  ................
0x0070:  1415 1617 1819 1a1b 1c1d 1e1f 2021 2223  .............!"#
0x0080:  2425 2627 2829 2a2b 2c2d 2e2f 3031 3233  $%&'()*+,-./0123
0x0090:  3435 3637                                4567
```
Signed-off-by: NSaif Hasan <has@fb.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      d8e2262a
  9. 28 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  11. 18 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  13. 05 3月, 2018 1 次提交
  15. 09 2月, 2018 1 次提交
    • D
      mpls, nospec: Sanitize array index in mpls_label_ok() · 3968523f
      由 Dan Williams 提交于 
      mpls_label_ok() validates that the 'platform_label' array index from a
userspace netlink message payload is valid. Under speculation the
mpls_label_ok() result may not resolve in the CPU pipeline until after
the index is used to access an array element. Sanitize the index to zero
to prevent userspace-controlled arbitrary out-of-bounds speculation, a
precursor for a speculative execution side channel vulnerability.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: NDan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      3968523f
  17. 05 12月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 12 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  21. 08 10月, 2017 1 次提交
  23. 10 8月, 2017 1 次提交
  25. 08 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  27. 05 7月, 2017 1 次提交
  29. 04 7月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      mpls: route get support · 397fc9e5
      由 Roopa Prabhu 提交于 
      This patch adds RTM_GETROUTE doit handler for mpls routes.

Input:
RTA_DST - input label
RTA_NEWDST - labels in packet for multipath selection

By default the getroute handler returns matched
nexthop label, via and oif

With RTM_F_FIB_MATCH flag, full matched route is
returned.

example (with patched iproute2):
$ip -f mpls route show
101
        nexthop as to 102/103 via inet 172.16.2.2 dev virt1-2
        nexthop as to 302/303 via inet 172.16.12.2 dev virt1-12
201
        nexthop as to 202/203 via inet6 2001:db8:2::2 dev virt1-2
        nexthop as to 402/403 via inet6 2001:db8:12::2 dev virt1-12

$ip -f mpls route get 103
RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable

$ip -f mpls route get 101
101 as to 102/103 via inet 172.16.2.2 dev virt1-2

$ip -f mpls route get as to 302/303 101
101 as to 302/303 via inet 172.16.12.2 dev virt1-12

$ip -f mpls route get fibmatch 103
RTNETLINK answers: Network is unreachable

$ip -f mpls route get fibmatch 101
101
        nexthop as to 102/103 via inet 172.16.2.2 dev virt1-2
        nexthop as to 302/303 via inet 172.16.12.2 dev virt1-12
Signed-off-by: NRoopa Prabhu <roopa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      397fc9e5
  31. 01 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  33. 30 5月, 2017 5 次提交
  35. 09 5月, 2017 1 次提交
    • M
      treewide: use kv[mz]alloc* rather than opencoded variants · 752ade68
      由 Michal Hocko 提交于 
      There are many code paths opencoding kvmalloc.  Let's use the helper
instead.  The main difference to kvmalloc is that those users are
usually not considering all the aspects of the memory allocator.  E.g.
allocation requests <= 32kB (with 4kB pages) are basically never failing
and invoke OOM killer to satisfy the allocation.  This sounds too
disruptive for something that has a reasonable fallback - the vmalloc.
On the other hand those requests might fallback to vmalloc even when the
memory allocator would succeed after several more reclaim/compaction
attempts previously.  There is no guarantee something like that happens
though.

This patch converts many of those places to kv[mz]alloc* helpers because
they are more conservative.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170306103327.2766-2-mhocko@kernel.orgSigned-off-by: NMichal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com> # Xen bits
Acked-by: NKees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
Acked-by: NVlastimil Babka <vbabka@suse.cz>
Acked-by: Andreas Dilger <andreas.dilger@intel.com> # Lustre
Acked-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@de.ibm.com> # KVM/s390
Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> # nvdim
Acked-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> # btrfs
Acked-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> # Ceph
Acked-by: Tariq Toukan <tariqt@mellanox.com> # mlx4
Acked-by: Leon Romanovsky <leonro@mellanox.com> # mlx5
Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: Anton Vorontsov <anton@enomsg.org>
Cc: Colin Cross <ccross@android.com>
Cc: Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>
Cc: Ben Skeggs <bskeggs@redhat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@gmail.com>
Cc: Santosh Raspatur <santosh@chelsio.com>
Cc: Hariprasad S <hariprasad@chelsio.com>
Cc: Yishai Hadas <yishaih@mellanox.com>
Cc: Oleg Drokin <oleg.drokin@intel.com>
Cc: "Yan, Zheng" <zyan@redhat.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Cc: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      752ade68
  37. 18 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  39. 14 4月, 2017 1 次提交
  41. 02 4月, 2017 6 次提交
    • D
      net: mpls: Increase max number of labels for lwt encap · 1511009c
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      Alow users to push down more labels per MPLS encap. Similar to LSR case,
move label array to the end of mpls_iptunnel_encap and allocate based on
the number of labels for the route.

For consistency with the LSR case, re-use the same maximum number of
labels.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      1511009c
    • D
      net: mpls: bump maximum number of labels · a4ac8c98
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      Allow users to push down more labels per MPLS route. With the previous
patches, no memory allocations are based on MAX_NEW_LABELS; the limit
is only used to keep userspace in check.

At this point MAX_NEW_LABELS is only used for mpls_route_config (copying
route data from userspace) and processing nexthops looking for the max
number of labels across the route spec.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      a4ac8c98
    • D
      net: mpls: Limit memory allocation for mpls_route · df1c6316
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      Limit memory allocation size for mpls_route to 4096.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      df1c6316
    • D
      net: mpls: change mpls_route layout · 59b20966
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      Move labels to the end of mpls_nh as a 0-sized array and within mpls_route
move the via for a nexthop after the mpls_nh. The new layout becomes:

   +----------------------+
   | mpls_route           |
   +----------------------+
   | mpls_nh 0            |
   +----------------------+
   | alignment padding    |   4 bytes for odd number of labels; 0 for even
   +----------------------+
   | via[rt_max_alen] 0   |
   +----------------------+
   | alignment padding    |   via's aligned on sizeof(unsigned long)
   +----------------------+
   | ...                  |
   +----------------------+
   | mpls_nh n-1          |
   +----------------------+
   | via[rt_max_alen] n-1 |
   +----------------------+

Memory allocated for nexthop + via is constant across all nexthops and
their via. It is based on the maximum number of labels across all nexthops
and the maximum via length. The size is saved in the mpls_route as
rt_nh_size. Accessing a nexthop becomes rt->rt_nh + index * rt->rt_nh_size.

The offset of the via address from a nexthop is saved as rt_via_offset
so that given an mpls_nh pointer the via for that hop is simply
nh + rt->rt_via_offset.

With prior code, memory allocated per mpls_route with 1 nexthop:
     via is an ethernet address - 64 bytes
     via is an ipv4 address     - 64
     via is an ipv6 address     - 72

With this patch set, memory allocated per mpls_route with 1 nexthop and
1 or 2 labels:
     via is an ethernet address - 56 bytes
     via is an ipv4 address     - 56
     via is an ipv6 address     - 64

The 8-byte reduction is due to the previous patch; the change introduced
by this patch has no impact on the size of allocations for 1 or 2 labels.

Performance impact of this change was examined using network namespaces
with veth pairs connecting namespaces. ns0 inserts the packet to the
label-switched path using an lwt route with encap mpls. ns1 adds 1 or 2
labels depending on test, ns2 (and ns3 for 2-label test) pops the label
and forwards. ns3 (or ns4) for a 2-label is the destination. Similar
series of namespaces used for 2-nexthop test.

Intent is to measure changes to latency (overhead in manipulating the
packet) in the forwarding path. Tests used netperf with UDP_RR.

IPv4:                     current   patches
   1 label, 1 nexthop      29908     30115
   2 label, 1 nexthop      29071     29612
   1 label, 2 nexthop      29582     29776
   2 label, 2 nexthop      29086     29149

IPv6:                     current   patches
   1 label, 1 nexthop      24502     24960
   2 label, 1 nexthop      24041     24407
   1 label, 2 nexthop      23795     23899
   2 label, 2 nexthop      23074     22959

In short, the change has no effect to a modest increase in performance.
This is expected since this patch does not really have an impact on routes
with 1 or 2 labels (the current limit) and 1 or 2 nexthops.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      59b20966
    • D
      net: mpls: Convert number of nexthops to u8 · 77ef013a
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      Number of nexthops and number of alive nexthops are tracked using an
unsigned int. A route should never have more than 255 nexthops so
convert both to u8. Update all references and intermediate variables
to consistently use u8 as well.

Shrinks the size of mpls_route from 32 bytes to 24 bytes with a 2-byte
hole before the nexthops.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      77ef013a
    • D
      net: mpls: rt_nhn_alive and nh_flags should be accessed using READ_ONCE · 39eb8cd1
      由 David Ahern 提交于 
      The number of alive nexthops for a route (rt->rt_nhn_alive) and the
flags for a next hop (nh->nh_flags) are modified by netdev event
handlers. The event handlers run with rtnl_lock held so updates are
always done with the lock held. The packet path accesses the fields
under the rcu lock. Since those fields can change at any moment in
the packet path, both fields should be accessed using READ_ONCE. Updates
to both fields should use WRITE_ONCE.

Update mpls_select_multipath (packet path) and mpls_ifdown and mpls_ifup
(event handlers) accordingly.
Signed-off-by: NDavid Ahern <dsa@cumulusnetworks.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
      39eb8cd1
  43. 30 3月, 2017 1 次提交
  45. 29 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  47. 28 3月, 2017 2 次提交
  49. 25 3月, 2017 1 次提交