We use "list" to denote the list and "link" to denote an element on that
list. Rename request->list to match this idiom.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-14-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Tidy up the for loops that handle waiting for read/write vs read-only
access.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-13-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The future annotations will track the locking used for access to ensure
that it is always sufficient. We make the preparations now to present
the API ahead and to make sure that GCC can eliminate the unused
parameter.

Before:	6298417 3619610  696320 10614347         a1f64b vmlinux
After:	6298417 3619610  696320 10614347         a1f64b vmlinux
(with i915 builtin)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-12-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In the future, we will want to add annotations to the i915_gem_active
struct. The API is thus expanded to hide direct access to the contents
of i915_gem_active and mediated instead through a number of helpers.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-11-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In the next patch, request tracking is made more generic and for that we
need a new expanded struct and to separate out the logic changes from
the mechanical churn, we split out the structure renaming into this
patch.

v2: Writer's block. Add some spiel about why we track requests.
v3: Now i915_gem_active.
v4: Now with i915_gem_active_set() for attaching to the active request.
v5: Use i915_gem_active_set() from inside the retirement handlers
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-10-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The drop_pages() function is a dangerous trap in that it can release the
passed in object pointer and so unless the caller is aware, it can
easily trick us into using the stale object afterwards. Move it into its
solitary callsite where we know it is safe.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

When we call i915_vma_unbind(), we will wait upon outstanding rendering.
This will also trigger a retirement phase, which may update the object
lists. If, we extend request tracking to the VMA itself (rather than
keep it at the encompassing object), then there is a potential that the
obj->vma_list be modified for other elements upon i915_vma_unbind(). As
a result, if we walk over the object list and call i915_vma_unbind(), we
need to be prepared for that list to change.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-8-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we may have VMA allocated for an object, but we interrupted their
binding, there is a disparity between have elements on the obj->vma_list
and being bound. i915_gem_obj_bound_any() does this check, but this is
not rigorously observed - add an explicit count to make it easier.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NTvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

For the global GTT (and aliasing GTT), the address space is owned by the
device (it is a global resource) and so the per-file owner field is
NULL. For per-process GTT (where we create an address space per
context), each is owned by the opening file. We can use this ownership
information to both distinguish GGTT and ppGTT address spaces, as well
as occasionally inspect the owner.

v2: Whitespace, tells us who owns i915_address_space
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since we have a static if-else-chain for device probing of the global
GTT, we do not need to use a function pointer, let alone store it when
we never use it again. So use the if-else-chain to call down into the
device specific probe.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Initialising the global GTT is tricky as we wish to use the drm_mm range
manager during the modesetting initialisation (to capture stolen
allocations from the BIOS) before we actually enable GEM. To overcome
this, we currently setup the drm_mm first and then carefully rebind
them.

v2: Fixup after rebasing
v3: GGTT initialisation needs to be split around kicking out conflicts
v4: Restore an old UMS BUG_ON(mappable > total) as a DRM_ERROR plus
fixup of probe results.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since these are internal functions they operate on drm_i915_private and
not the drm_device being passed in. So pass in the drm_i915_private
instead, and remove one layer of dancing. No space wins here, just
conforming to the norm in function parameters.

v2: Include all the probe functions
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

In order to handle conflicting drivers (i.e. vgacon) having a different
setup of hardware, we have to remove those other drivers before we try
to setup our own mappings. This requires us to split GGTT initialisation
between probing for the hardware location (part of the PCI BAR) and
later establishing the kernel resources for it.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As we can now have multiple VMA inside the global GTT (with partial
mappings, rotations, etc), it is no longer true that there may just be a
single GGTT entry and so we should walk the full vma_list to count up
the actual usage. In addition to unifying the two walkers, switch from
multiplying the object size for each vma to summing the bound vma sizes.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470293567-10811-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Remove the CHV early bail out from intel_cleanup_gt_powersave() so that
we'll clean up the extra RPM reference held due to i915.enable_rc6=0.

Cc: Imre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>
Fixes: b268c699 ("drm/i915: refactor RPM disabling due to RC6 being disabled")
Signed-off-by: NVille Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470136053-23276-1-git-send-email-ville.syrjala@linux.intel.comReviewed-by: NImre Deak <imre.deak@intel.com>

Now that we initialize the state to both legacy and execlists inside
intel_engine_cs, we should also clean up that state from the common
functions.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470226756-24401-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>

In order to be more consistent with the rest of the request construction
and ring emission, use the common names for the ring and request.

Rather than using signaler_req, waiter_req, and intel_ring *wait, we use
plain req and ring.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-32-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-23-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Since requests can no longer be generated as a side-effect of
intel_ring_begin(), we know that the seqno will be unchanged during
ring-emission. This predicatablity then means we do not have to check
for the seqno wrapping around whilst emitting the semaphore for
engine->sync_to().
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-31-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-22-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that emitting requests is identical between legacy and execlists, we
can use the same function to build up the ring for submitting to either
engine. (With the exception of i915_switch_contexts(), but in time that
will also be handled gracefully.)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-30-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-21-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

GCC was inlining the init and setup functions, but was getting itself
confused into thinking that variables could be used uninitialised. If we
do the inline for gcc, it is happy! As a bonus we shrink the code.

v2: A couple of minor tweaks from Joonas
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-29-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-20-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we use the same vfuncs for emitting the batch buffer in both
execlists and legacy, the golden render state initialisation is
identical between both.

v2: gcc wants so.ggtt_offset initialised (even though it is not used)
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-28-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-19-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As gen6_emit_request() only differs from i9xx_emit_request() when
semaphores are enabled, only use the specialised vfunc in that scenario.

v2: Reorder semaphore init so as to keep engine->emit_request default
vfunc selection compact.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-27-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-18-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

As GEN6+ is now a simple variant on the basic breadcrumbs + tail write,
reuse the common code.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-26-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-17-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Rather than pass in the num_dwords that the caller wishes to use after
the signal command packet, split the breadcrumb emission into two phases
and have both the signal and breadcrumb individiually acquire space on
the ring. This makes the interface simpler for the reader, and will
simplify for patches.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-25-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

With adding engine->submit_request, we now have a bunch of functions
with similar names used at different stages of the execlist submission.
Try a different coat of paint, to hopefully reduce confusion between the
requests, intel_engine_cs and the actual execlists submision process.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Tvrtko Ursulin <tvrtko.ursulin@intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-24-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Move request submission from emit_request into its own common vfunc
from i915_add_request().

v2: Convert I915_DISPATCH_flags to BIT(x) whilst passing
v3: Rename a few functions to match.
v4: Reenable execlists submission after disabling guc.
v5: Be aware that everyone calls i915_guc_submission_disable()!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-23-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-14-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Space reservation is already safe with respect to the ring->size
modulus, but hardware only expects to see values in the range
0...ring->size-1 (inclusive) and so requires the modulus to prevent us
writing the value ring->size instead of 0. As this is only required for
the register itself, we can defer the modulus to the register update and
not perform it after every command packet. We keep the
intel_ring_advance() around in the code to provide demarcation for the
end-of-packet (which then can be compared against intel_ring_begin() as
the number of dwords emitted must match the reserved space).

v2: Assert that the ring size is a power-of-two to match assumptions in
the code. Simplify the comment before writing the tail value to explain
why the modulus is necessary.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-13-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If we rewrite the I915_WRITE_TAIL specialisation for the legacy
ringbuffer as submitting the request onto the ringbuffer, we can unify
the vfunc with both execlists and GuC in the next patch.

v2: Drop the modulus from the I915_WRITE_TAIL as it is currently being
applied in intel_ring_advance() after every command packet, and add a
comment explaining why we need the modulus at all.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-22-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-12-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Joonas doesn't like the tiny function, especially if I go around making
it more complicated and using it elsewhere. To remove that temptation,
remove the function!
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-21-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-11-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Both the ->dispatch_execbuffer and ->emit_bb_start callbacks do exactly
the same thing, add MI_BATCHBUFFER_START to the request's ringbuffer -
we need only one vfunc.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-20-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-10-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

If is simpler and leads to more readable code through the callstack if
the allocation returns the allocated struct through the return value.

The importance of this is that it no longer looks like we accidentally
allocate requests as side-effect of calling certain functions.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-19-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-9-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Rather than passing a complete set of GPU cache domains for either
invalidation or for flushing, or even both, just pass a single parameter
to the engine->emit_flush to determine the required operations.

engine->emit_flush(GPU, 0) -> engine->emit_flush(EMIT_INVALIDATE)
engine->emit_flush(0, GPU) -> engine->emit_flush(EMIT_FLUSH)
engine->emit_flush(GPU, GPU) -> engine->emit_flush(EMIT_FLUSH | EMIT_INVALIDATE)

This allows us to extend the behaviour easily in future, for example if
we want just a command barrier without the overhead of flushing.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Cc: Dave Gordon <david.s.gordon@intel.com>
Cc: Joonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-8-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Space for flushing the GPU cache prior to completing the request is
preallocated and so cannot fail - the GPU caches will always be flushed
along with the completed request. This means we no longer have to track
whether the GPU cache is dirty between batches like we had to with the
outstanding_lazy_seqno.

With the removal of the duplication in the per-backend entry points for
emitting the obsolete lazy flush, we can then further unify the
engine->emit_flush.

v2: Expand a bit on the legacy of gpu_caches_dirty
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-18-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-7-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

For more consistent oop-naming, we would use intel_ring_verb, so pick
intel_ring_pin() and intel_ring_unpin().
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-17-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-6-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we have a clear ring/engine split and a struct intel_ring, we
no longer need the stopgap ringbuf names.
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-16-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.ukReviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-5-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

The state stored in this struct is not only the information about the
buffer object, but the ring used to communicate with the hardware. Using
buffer here is overly specific and, for me at least, conflates with the
notion of buffer objects themselves.

s/struct intel_ringbuffer/struct intel_ring/
s/enum intel_ring_hangcheck/enum intel_engine_hangcheck/
s/describe_ctx_ringbuf()/describe_ctx_ring()/
s/intel_ring_get_active_head()/intel_engine_get_active_head()/
s/intel_ring_sync_index()/intel_engine_sync_index()/
s/intel_ring_init_seqno()/intel_engine_init_seqno()/
s/ring_stuck()/engine_stuck()/
s/intel_cleanup_engine()/intel_engine_cleanup()/
s/intel_stop_engine()/intel_engine_stop()/
s/intel_pin_and_map_ringbuffer_obj()/intel_pin_and_map_ring()/
s/intel_unpin_ringbuffer()/intel_unpin_ring()/
s/intel_engine_create_ringbuffer()/intel_engine_create_ring()/
s/intel_ring_flush_all_caches()/intel_engine_flush_all_caches()/
s/intel_ring_invalidate_all_caches()/intel_engine_invalidate_all_caches()/
s/intel_ringbuffer_free()/intel_ring_free()/
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-15-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-4-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Perform s/ringbuf/ring/ on the context struct for consistency with the
ring/engine split.

v2: Kill an outdated error_ringbuf label
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-14-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-3-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Now that we have disambuigated ring and engine, we can use the clearer
and more consistent name for the intel_ringbuffer pointer in the
request.

@@
struct drm_i915_gem_request *r;
@@
- r->ringbuf
+ r->ring
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-12-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-2-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Both perform the same actions with more or less indirection, so just
unify the code.

v2: Add back a few intel_engine_cs locals
Signed-off-by: NChris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
Reviewed-by: NJoonas Lahtinen <joonas.lahtinen@linux.intel.com>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1469432687-22756-11-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1470174640-18242-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk

Updated the i915_drpc_info debugfs with coarse power gating & forcewake
info for Gen9.

v2: Change all IS_GEN9() by gen >= 9 (Damien)

v3: Rebase

Cc: Damien Lespiau <damien.lespiau@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NAkash Goel <akash.goel@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NSagar Arun Kamble <sagar.a.kamble@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: NDaniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467038401-8283-1-git-send-email-akash.goel@intel.com