Skip to content

K
Kernel

openeuler / Kernel
大约 1 年 前同步成功

通知 5
Star 0
Fork 0
K
Kernel

体验新版 GitCode，发现更多精彩内容 >>

切换分支/标签
  1. 20 6月, 2017 8 次提交
  3. 19 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  5. 11 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  7. 10 6月, 2017 10 次提交
  9. 09 6月, 2017 5 次提交
  11. 05 6月, 2017 11 次提交
  13. 04 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  15. 03 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • R
      dax: fix race between colliding PMD & PTE entries · e2093926
      由 Ross Zwisler 提交于 
      We currently have two related PMD vs PTE races in the DAX code.  These
can both be easily triggered by having two threads reading and writing
simultaneously to the same private mapping, with the key being that
private mapping reads can be handled with PMDs but private mapping
writes are always handled with PTEs so that we can COW.

Here is the first race:

  CPU 0					CPU 1

  (private mapping write)
  __handle_mm_fault()
    create_huge_pmd() - FALLBACK
    handle_pte_fault()
      passes check for pmd_devmap()

					(private mapping read)
					__handle_mm_fault()
					  create_huge_pmd()
					    dax_iomap_pmd_fault() inserts PMD

      dax_iomap_pte_fault() does a PTE fault, but we already have a DAX PMD
      			  installed in our page tables at this spot.

Here's the second race:

  CPU 0					CPU 1

  (private mapping read)
  __handle_mm_fault()
    passes check for pmd_none()
    create_huge_pmd()
      dax_iomap_pmd_fault() inserts PMD

  (private mapping write)
  __handle_mm_fault()
    create_huge_pmd() - FALLBACK
					(private mapping read)
					__handle_mm_fault()
					  passes check for pmd_none()
					  create_huge_pmd()

    handle_pte_fault()
      dax_iomap_pte_fault() inserts PTE
					    dax_iomap_pmd_fault() inserts PMD,
					       but we already have a PTE at
					       this spot.

The core of the issue is that while there is isolation between faults to
the same range in the DAX fault handlers via our DAX entry locking,
there is no isolation between faults in the code in mm/memory.c.  This
means for instance that this code in __handle_mm_fault() can run:

	if (pmd_none(*vmf.pmd) && transparent_hugepage_enabled(vma)) {
		ret = create_huge_pmd(&vmf);

But by the time we actually get to run the fault handler called by
create_huge_pmd(), the PMD is no longer pmd_none() because a racing PTE
fault has installed a normal PMD here as a parent.  This is the cause of
the 2nd race.  The first race is similar - there is the following check
in handle_pte_fault():

	} else {
		/* See comment in pte_alloc_one_map() */
		if (pmd_devmap(*vmf->pmd) || pmd_trans_unstable(vmf->pmd))
			return 0;

So if a pmd_devmap() PMD (a DAX PMD) has been installed at vmf->pmd, we
will bail and retry the fault.  This is correct, but there is nothing
preventing the PMD from being installed after this check but before we
actually get to the DAX PTE fault handlers.

In my testing these races result in the following types of errors:

  BUG: Bad rss-counter state mm:ffff8800a817d280 idx:1 val:1
  BUG: non-zero nr_ptes on freeing mm: 15

Fix this issue by having the DAX fault handlers verify that it is safe
to continue their fault after they have taken an entry lock to block
other racing faults.

[ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com: improve fix for colliding PMD & PTE entries]
  Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170526195932.32178-1-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170522215749.23516-2-ross.zwisler@linux.intel.comSigned-off-by: NRoss Zwisler <ross.zwisler@linux.intel.com>
Reported-by: NPawel Lebioda <pawel.lebioda@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: NJan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: "Darrick J. Wong" <darrick.wong@oracle.com>
Cc: Alexander Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@intel.com>
Cc: Matthew Wilcox <mawilcox@microsoft.com>
Cc: "Kirill A . Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Pawel Lebioda <pawel.lebioda@intel.com>
Cc: Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>
Cc: Xiong Zhou <xzhou@redhat.com>
Cc: Eryu Guan <eguan@redhat.com>
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      e2093926
  17. 02 6月, 2017 1 次提交
  19. 01 6月, 2017 1 次提交
    • J
      btrfs: fix race with relocation recovery and fs_root setup · a9b3311e
      由 Jeff Mahoney 提交于 
      If we have to recover relocation during mount, we'll ultimately have to
evict the orphan inode.  That goes through the reservation dance, where
priority_reclaim_metadata_space and flush_space expect fs_info->fs_root
to be valid.  That's the next thing to be set up during mount, so we
crash, almost always in flush_space trying to join the transaction
but priority_reclaim_metadata_space is possible as well.  This call
path has been problematic in the past WRT whether ->fs_root is valid
yet.  Commit 957780eb (Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc
infrastructure) added new users that are called in the direct path
instead of the async path that had already been worked around.

The thing is that we don't actually need the fs_root, specifically, for
anything.  We either use it to determine whether the root is the
chunk_root for use in choosing an allocation profile or as a root to pass
btrfs_join_transaction before immediately committing it.  Anything that
isn't the chunk root works in the former case and any root works in
the latter.

A simple fix is to use a root we know will always be there: the
extent_root.

Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> # v4.8+
Fixes: 957780eb (Btrfs: introduce ticketed enospc infrastructure)
Signed-off-by: NJeff Mahoney <jeffm@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: NLiu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: NDavid Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
      a9b3311e