1. 29 6月, 2007 1 次提交
    • D
      Introduce fixed sys_sync_file_range2() syscall, implement on PowerPC and ARM · edd5cd4a
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      Not all the world is an i386.  Many architectures need 64-bit arguments to be
      aligned in suitable pairs of registers, and the original
      sys_sync_file_range(int, loff_t, loff_t, int) was therefore wasting an
      argument register for padding after the first integer.  Since we don't
      normally have more than 6 arguments for system calls, that left no room for
      the final argument on some architectures.
      
      Fix this by introducing sys_sync_file_range2(int, int, loff_t, loff_t) which
      all fits nicely.  In fact, ARM already had that, but called it
      sys_arm_sync_file_range.  Move it to fs/sync.c and rename it, then implement
      the needed compatibility routine.  And stop the missing syscall check from
      bitching about the absence of sys_sync_file_range() if we've implemented
      sys_sync_file_range2() instead.
      
      Tested on PPC32 and with 32-bit and 64-bit userspace on PPC64.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      edd5cd4a
  2. 17 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 10 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  4. 18 4月, 2007 1 次提交
  5. 12 3月, 2007 2 次提交
  6. 13 2月, 2007 1 次提交
  7. 16 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  8. 04 11月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 21 6月, 2006 1 次提交