1. 29 6月, 2007 1 次提交
    • D
      Introduce fixed sys_sync_file_range2() syscall, implement on PowerPC and ARM · edd5cd4a
      David Woodhouse 提交于
      Not all the world is an i386.  Many architectures need 64-bit arguments to be
      aligned in suitable pairs of registers, and the original
      sys_sync_file_range(int, loff_t, loff_t, int) was therefore wasting an
      argument register for padding after the first integer.  Since we don't
      normally have more than 6 arguments for system calls, that left no room for
      the final argument on some architectures.
      
      Fix this by introducing sys_sync_file_range2(int, int, loff_t, loff_t) which
      all fits nicely.  In fact, ARM already had that, but called it
      sys_arm_sync_file_range.  Move it to fs/sync.c and rename it, then implement
      the needed compatibility routine.  And stop the missing syscall check from
      bitching about the absence of sys_sync_file_range() if we've implemented
      sys_sync_file_range2() instead.
      
      Tested on PPC32 and with 32-bit and 64-bit userspace on PPC64.
      Signed-off-by: NDavid Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
      Acked-by: NRussell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
      Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
      Cc: Paul Mackerras <paulus@samba.org>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
      edd5cd4a
  2. 09 5月, 2007 1 次提交
  3. 27 4月, 2007 1 次提交
    • M
      [PATCH] Turn do_sync_file_range() into do_sync_mapping_range() · 5b04aa3a
      Mark Fasheh 提交于
      do_sync_file_range() accepts a file * from which it takes an address_space to
      sync.  Abstract out the bulk of the function into do_sync_mapping_range()
      which takes the address_space directly.  This way callers who want to sync an
      address_space directly can take advantage of the functionality provided.
      
      do_sync_file_range() is preserved as a small wrapper around
      do_sync_mapping_range().
      
      Ocfs2 in particular would like to use this to initiate a sync of a specific
      inode range during truncate, where a file * may not be available.
      Signed-off-by: NMark Fasheh <mark.fasheh@oracle.com>
      Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
      5b04aa3a
  4. 09 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  5. 04 12月, 2006 1 次提交
  6. 01 10月, 2006 1 次提交
    • D
      [PATCH] BLOCK: Move functions out of buffer code [try #6] · cf9a2ae8
      David Howells 提交于
      Move some functions out of the buffering code that aren't strictly buffering
      specific.  This is a precursor to being able to disable the block layer.
      
       (*) Moved some stuff out of fs/buffer.c:
      
           (*) The file sync and general sync stuff moved to fs/sync.c.
      
           (*) The superblock sync stuff moved to fs/super.c.
      
           (*) do_invalidatepage() moved to mm/truncate.c.
      
           (*) try_to_release_page() moved to mm/filemap.c.
      
       (*) Moved some related declarations between header files:
      
           (*) declarations for do_invalidatepage() and try_to_release_page() moved
           	 to linux/mm.h.
      
           (*) __set_page_dirty_buffers() moved to linux/buffer_head.h.
      Signed-Off-By: NDavid Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>
      Signed-off-by: NJens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
      cf9a2ae8
  7. 23 6月, 2006 1 次提交
    • O
      [PATCH] writeback: fix range handling · 111ebb6e
      OGAWA Hirofumi 提交于
      When a writeback_control's `start' and `end' fields are used to
      indicate a one-byte-range starting at file offset zero, the required
      values of .start=0,.end=0 mean that the ->writepages() implementation
      has no way of telling that it is being asked to perform a range
      request.  Because we're currently overloading (start == 0 && end == 0)
      to mean "this is not a write-a-range request".
      
      To make all this sane, the patch changes range of writeback_control.
      
      So caller does: If it is calling ->writepages() to write pages, it
      sets range (range_start/end or range_cyclic) always.
      
      And if range_cyclic is true, ->writepages() thinks the range is
      cyclic, otherwise it just uses range_start and range_end.
      
      This patch does,
      
          - Add LLONG_MAX, LLONG_MIN, ULLONG_MAX to include/linux/kernel.h
            -1 is usually ok for range_end (type is long long). But, if someone did,
      
      		range_end += val;		range_end is "val - 1"
      		u64val = range_end >> bits;	u64val is "~(0ULL)"
      
            or something, they are wrong. So, this adds LLONG_MAX to avoid nasty
            things, and uses LLONG_MAX for range_end.
      
          - All callers of ->writepages() sets range_start/end or range_cyclic.
      
          - Fix updates of ->writeback_index. It seems already bit strange.
            If it starts at 0 and ended by check of nr_to_write, this last
            index may reduce chance to scan end of file.  So, this updates
            ->writeback_index only if range_cyclic is true or whole-file is
            scanned.
      Signed-off-by: NOGAWA Hirofumi <hirofumi@mail.parknet.co.jp>
      Cc: Nathan Scott <nathans@sgi.com>
      Cc: Anton Altaparmakov <aia21@cantab.net>
      Cc: Steven French <sfrench@us.ibm.com>
      Cc: "Vladimir V. Saveliev" <vs@namesys.com>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      111ebb6e
  8. 11 4月, 2006 1 次提交
  9. 01 4月, 2006 1 次提交
    • A
      [PATCH] sys_sync_file_range() · f79e2abb
      Andrew Morton 提交于
      Remove the recently-added LINUX_FADV_ASYNC_WRITE and LINUX_FADV_WRITE_WAIT
      fadvise() additions, do it in a new sys_sync_file_range() syscall instead.
      Reasons:
      
      - It's more flexible.  Things which would require two or three syscalls with
        fadvise() can be done in a single syscall.
      
      - Using fadvise() in this manner is something not covered by POSIX.
      
      The patch wires up the syscall for x86.
      
      The sycall is implemented in the new fs/sync.c.  The intention is that we can
      move sys_fsync(), sys_fdatasync() and perhaps sys_sync() into there later.
      
      Documentation for the syscall is in fs/sync.c.
      
      A test app (sync_file_range.c) is in
      http://www.zip.com.au/~akpm/linux/patches/stuff/ext3-tools.tar.gz.
      
      The available-to-GPL-modules do_sync_file_range() is for knfsd: "A COMMIT can
      say NFS_DATA_SYNC or NFS_FILE_SYNC.  I can skip the ->fsync call for
      NFS_DATA_SYNC which is hopefully the more common."
      
      Note: the `async' writeout mode SYNC_FILE_RANGE_WRITE will turn synchronous if
      the queue is congested.  This is trivial to fix: add a new flag bit, set
      wbc->nonblocking.  But I'm not sure that we want to expose implementation
      details down to that level.
      
      Note: it's notable that we can sync an fd which wasn't opened for writing.
      Same with fsync() and fdatasync()).
      
      Note: the code takes some care to handle attempts to sync file contents
      outside the 16TB offset on 32-bit machines.  It makes such attempts appear to
      succeed, for best 32-bit/64-bit compatibility.  Perhaps it should make such
      requests fail...
      
      Cc: Nick Piggin <nickpiggin@yahoo.com.au>
      Cc: Michael Kerrisk <mtk-manpages@gmx.net>
      Cc: Ulrich Drepper <drepper@redhat.com>
      Cc: Neil Brown <neilb@cse.unsw.edu.au>
      Signed-off-by: NAndrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org>
      Signed-off-by: NLinus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
      f79e2abb